Schools & FE · School inspection (EIF)
Hemington Primary School
Summary
Chris Davies (lead), Cleo Redmond
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection date verified
6 Nov 2024
- Inspectors verified
Chris Davies, Cleo Redmond
- Behaviour and attitudes verified
Good
- Leadership and management verified
Good
- Personal development verified
Good
- Quality of education verified
Good
- Postcode verified
DE74 2RB
- Name on report verified
Hemington Primary School
- URN verified
119934
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Each judgement on its scale, weakest to strongest.
- Behaviour and attitudesGood
- Leadership and managementGood
- Personal developmentGood
- Quality of educationGood
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- They are respectful, polite and welcoming. p.2
- The school has high expectations of pupils’ learning across the curriculum. p.2
- Typically, a parent commented, ‘My children are happy to go to school every morning and they are eager to share what they have learned.’ p.2
- The school has high expectations of pupils’ behaviour. p.3
- They promote children’s personal, social and emotional development very well. p.3
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No strong criticism found.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Some subject curriculums are not as ambitious and well implemented as they should be. p.3
- A minority of subject curriculums do not identify the knowledge and skills that pupils should learn and when. p.2
- Occasionally, adults’ subject knowledge and choice of teaching activities do not provide pupils with the opportunities to learn as well as they should. p.2
- Pupils who need to keep up are given additional and effective support when needed. p.3
- The school should develop more effective approaches to developing staff expertise in their use of assessment. p.4
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Reading & phonics8
“They teach phonics consistently well.” p.3Leadership & governance4
“Leaders lead with a strong moral purpose.” p.2
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 7
- Words of findings
- 1,040
- about usual (typical 1153)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 49, typical 55
- Average sentence
- 13 words
- Next steps
- 5
- typical 4
- Hedged sentences
- 6%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Inspection of Hemington Primary School Main Street, Hemington, Derby, Derbyshire DE74 2RB
p.1
The quality of education Good Behaviour and attitudes Good Personal development Good Leadership and management Good Previous inspection grade Good 5 and 6 November 2024
p.1
What is it like to attend this school?
Pupils are rightfully proud of their school. The school’s values, the 3Rs of ‘respect, responsibility and readiness’, are lived out daily by pupils and staff. Pupils are happy, safe and cared for well. They are respectful, polite and welcoming.
p.2
What is it like to attend this school?
The school has high expectations of pupils’ learning across the curriculum. Pupils learn well in a range of subjects, including English and mathematics.
p.2
What is it like to attend this school?
Pupils appreciate that their attitudes, effort, work and positive behaviour are rewarded. They understand how the new behaviour ladder is helping to improve their behaviour and conduct. Pupils get on well with each other. Older pupils take care of younger peers, including children in the early years.
p.2
What is it like to attend this school?
The school provides lots of positive opportunities to promote pupils’ personal development. Pastoral care is strong. The school develops pupils’ character and resilience well. Pupils recall many memorable events, including positive experiences of residential and theatre visits. They relish taking on responsibility. The pupil leadership team is well respected and pupils enjoy their role in helping to make decisions about the school’s work.
p.2
What is it like to attend this school?
Parents and carers have very positive views about the school. Typically, a parent commented, ‘My children are happy to go to school every morning and they are eager to share what they have learned.’
p.2
What does the school do well and what does it need to do better?
The school has worked with a clear vision and determination. Leaders lead with a strong moral purpose. They have improved the school’s provision since the previous inspection.
p.2
What does the school do well and what does it need to do better?
The school has ensured that the curriculum is broad in its scope, from Reception to the end of Year 6. In a few subjects, including English and mathematics, the subject curriculums are particularly well-developed. In mathematics for example, pupils confidently build their knowledge over time. They gain fluency in number and deepen their understanding of concepts.
p.2
What does the school do well and what does it need to do better?
When subject curriculums are well-thought-through, they are taught well. Pupils learn and embed their learning over time. For example, in history, pupils build their knowledge and understanding of chronology. In science, pupils gain key knowledge and deepen their understanding of scientific concepts. However, not all subject curriculums are equally as ambitious. A minority of subject curriculums do not identify the knowledge and skills that pupils should learn and when. These subject curriculums are taught less consistently well. Occasionally, adults’ subject knowledge and choice of teaching activities do not provide pupils with the opportunities to learn as well as they should. The school’s approaches to checking pupils’ learning are not consistently embedded in some subjects. 5 and 6 November 2024
p.2
3
The school has prioritised reading. Pupils enjoy their regular reading sessions. Staff are trained in the school’s chosen phonics scheme. They teach phonics consistently well. Pupils gain confidence and become fluent readers. They use their phonics knowledge to deepen comprehension and develop writing skills. The school assesses pupils’ reading regularly. Pupils who need to keep up are given additional and effective support when needed. Children get off to a quick start with learning to read in the early years. Staff nurture a love of reading and books.
p.3
3
The school identifies and supports pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND) very effectively. Teachers successfully adapt their activities to enable these pupils to access the same curriculum as their peers. Leaders work with external professionals to make sure these pupils get additional help. Many parents recognise the positive provision for pupils with SEND.
p.3
3
The school has high expectations of pupils’ behaviour. These expectations are met. Behaviour and conduct have improved in recent terms. For example, pupils interact well with each other at breaktimes and lunchtimes.
p.3
3
Children in the early years get off to a great start in their learning. They are cared for well. The school focuses on developing children’s speech and communication. Adult interactions are purposeful and meaningful. They promote children’s personal, social and emotional development very well. Children learn, explore and play creatively. They are prepared well for their next stage of education.
p.3
3
The school promotes pupils’ personal development well. Pupils benefit from a well- developed personal, social, health and economic (PSHE) education curriculum. Pupils have opportunities to learn about right and wrong. They gain a strong appreciation of British values, including democracy and the rule of law. They have well-planned opportunities to learn about healthy relationships and age-appropriate sex education. They learn about potential risks and how to be safe, for example, when they are out in the community or when online.
p.3
3
Leaders, including governors, know the school’s strengths and priorities for improvement. Overwhelmingly, staff are positive about the school. They recognise that the school is mindful of their workload and well-being. Staff are proud to be part of, and enjoy working at, the school.
p.3
Safeguarding
The arrangements for safeguarding are effective.
p.3
(Information for the school and appropriate authority)
Some subject curriculums are not as ambitious and well implemented as they should be. As a result, pupils do not consistently gain and build key knowledge and skills in 5 and 6 November 2024
p.3
4
these subjects over time. The school must ensure that all subject curriculums are suitably ambitious and are implemented effectively, thus enabling pupils to know, remember and do more across the curriculum. In some subjects, the school has not established secure approaches to assessing pupils’ learning. Consequently, errors and misconceptions in learning are not identified and addressed quickly. The school should develop more effective approaches to developing staff expertise in their use of assessment.
p.4
How can I feed back my views?
find out what other parents and carers think. We use information from Ofsted Parent View when deciding which schools to inspect, when to inspect them and as part of their inspection.
p.4
How can I feed back my views?
The Department for Education has further guidance on how to complain about a school.
p.4
Further information
You can search for published performance information about the school.
p.4
Further information
In the report, 'disadvantaged pupils' is used to mean pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND); pupils who meet the definition of children in need of help and protection ; pupils receiving statutory local authority support from a social worker; and pupils who otherwise meet the criteria used for deciding the school's pupil premium funding (this includes pupils claiming free school meals at any point in the last six years, looked after children (children in local authority care) and/or children who left care through adoption or another formal route). 5 and 6 November 2024
p.4
School details
Appropriate authority The governing body
p.5
School details
Chair of governing body Liz Cordon and Craig Witton (co-chairs)
p.5
School details
Headteacher Andrea Reay and Lucy Timbrell (co- headteachers) Website www.hemington.leics.sch.uk
p.5
School details
Date of previous inspection 4 May 2023, under section 8 of the Education Act 2005
p.5
Information about this school
The two co-headteachers took up post in August 2023. The two co-chairs of governors took up their shared responsibilities in September 2024. The school has a small early years provision. The school does not use any alternative provision.
p.5
Information about this inspection
The inspectors carried out this graded inspection under section 5 of the Education Act 2005. During a graded inspection, we grade the school for each of our key judgements (quality of education; behaviour and attitudes; personal development; and leadership and management) and for any relevant provision judgement (early years and/or sixth form provision). Schools receiving a graded inspection from September 2024 will not be given an overall effectiveness grade. 5 and 6 November 2024
p.5
6
Inspections are a point-in-time evaluation about the quality of a school’s education provision. Inspectors discussed any continued impact of the pandemic with the school and have taken that into account in their evaluation of the school. Inspectors met with the co-headteachers. The lead inspector met with some governors, including the two co-chairs of governors. They also spoke with a local authority officer, remotely. Inspectors carried out deep dives in these subjects: reading, mathematics and religious education. For each deep dive, inspectors held discussions about the curriculum, visited sample lessons, spoke with teachers, spoke with some pupils about their learning and looked at samples of their work. Inspectors considered the curriculum, visited lessons and reviewed pupils’ work in a range of other subjects, including science, art and design, English, geography and PSHE. Due to the small size of the early years provision, a separate judgement on the quality
p.6
6
of provision has not been made. To review the effectiveness of safeguarding, inspectors: reviewed the single central record; took account of the views of leaders, staff and pupils; considered the extent to which the school has created an open and positive culture around safeguarding that puts pupils’ interests first. Inspectors considered the views of parents who they met at the school gate as well as those who completed Ofsted Parent View. Inspectors reviewed the responses to Ofsted’s survey for school staff.
p.6
Inspection team
Chris Davies, lead inspector His Majesty's Inspector
p.6
Inspection team
Cleo Redmond Ofsted Inspector 5 and 6 November 2024
p.6
7
achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children's services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.
p.7
7
If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .
p.7
7
You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open- government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .
p.7
7
Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .
p.7
7
T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted
p.7
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion