Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School inspection (EIF)

St Edward's Church of England Primary School

Inspected 23 Oct 2024 · published 28 Nov 2024 · URN 105802

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Thomas Fay (lead), Keith Wright, Kevan Naughton

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    23 Oct 2024

  • Inspectors verified

    Keith Wright, Kevan Naughton, Thomas Fay

  • Behaviour and attitudes verified

    Good

  • Early years verified

    Good

  • Leadership and management verified

    Requires improvement

  • Personal development verified

    Requires improvement

  • Quality of education verified

    Requires improvement

  • Postcode verified

    OL11 3AR

  • Name on report verified

    St Edward’s Church of England Primary School

  • URN verified

    105802

Page 1 of 7
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Each judgement on its scale, weakest to strongest.

  • Behaviour and attitudesGood
  • Early yearsGood
  • Leadership and managementRequires improvement
  • Personal developmentRequires improvement
  • Quality of educationRequires improvement

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+22Mostly positivemore positive than 18% of reports of this type
OutstandingGoodRIInadequate

In line with other reports of this type.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praisehappypositiveconfidenthigh expectationseffectiveenjoyconsistentlysafe
Criticismweaknessesgapsstrugglenot well preparedinconsistentlacksnot high-qualityvariable

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsSafeguardingAbout the inspection positive critical
  • Findings1326w+20
  • Safeguarding6w+33

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
7
Words of findings
1,292
about usual (typical 1153)
Reading level
Fairly hard
Flesch 56, typical 55
Average sentence
16 words
Next steps
6
typical 4
Hedged sentences
15%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 68%Safeguarding 0%About the inspection 31%

Full report text

Inspection of St Edward’s Church of England Primary School Hanover Street, Castleton, St. Edward’s Church of England Primary School, Rochdale, Lancashire OL11 3AR

p.1

Inspection dates: 22 and 23 October 2024

p.1

The quality of education Requires Improvement Behaviour and attitudes Good Personal development Requires Improvement Leadership and management Requires Improvement Early years provision Good Previous inspection grade Good 22 and 23 October 2024

p.1

What is it like to attend this school?

The school aspires for all pupils, including those with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND), to achieve well. However, the school’s ambition for pupils is not fully realised. The school has recently revised much of the curriculum. The effectiveness of the delivery of this new curriculum is variable across the different subjects. Pupils are not as well prepared for the next stage of their education as they should be.

p.2

What is it like to attend this school?

Pupils are happy at school. They have positive relationships with staff, which helps them to feel valued. Pupils know who to speak to if they are concerned or worried. They are confident that trusted adults will keep them safe. The school has high expectations of pupils’ behaviour. Pupils behave well and work hard in lessons. Where teaching is most effective, pupils enjoy their learning.

p.2

What is it like to attend this school?

The school has not thought carefully enough about its approach to promoting pupils’ personal development. Pupils do not benefit from high-quality opportunities to learn about heathy lifestyles or fundamental British values. They are not as well prepared for life in modern Britain as they should be. However, pupils talk proudly about their leadership roles as mental health leaders or eco commute members. Pupils develop their talents and interests as they access clubs such as cross-stitch, choir and American football.

p.2

What does the school do well and what does it need to do better?

Since the COVID-19 pandemic, the school has acted to improve the quality of education that it provides. However, its analysis of the impact of this work is inconsistent, and at times lacks urgency. This means that there are missed opportunities for the school to swiftly address any ongoing weaknesses, including in relation to the delivery of the curriculum. This hinders how well pupils achieve.

p.2

What does the school do well and what does it need to do better?

The school has recently improved the curriculum so that it is coherently sequenced and ambitious. However, it has not ensured that staff are fully equipped to deliver this new curriculum consistently well. Sometimes, teachers do not implement the curriculum as intended or devise lesson activities that help pupils learn the important knowledge needed.

p.2

What does the school do well and what does it need to do better?

Teachers check how well pupils learn and remember the curriculum. However, the school does not ensure that this information is used effectively in order to identify and address any gaps or misconceptions in pupils’ knowledge. This means that sometimes pupils move on to new concepts before they are ready. This makes it difficult for these pupils to build new learning securely on what they already know and can do.

p.2

What does the school do well and what does it need to do better?

The early years is a happy and safe environment. Children engage enthusiastically in the well-considered activities that deepen their understanding of the world around them. Children benefit from the high-quality interactions that they have with adults. The curriculum in the early years prepares children well for Year 1. 22 and 23 October 2024

p.2

3

Pupils with SEND are identified quickly by skilled staff. Staff work well with other professionals as well as parents and carers to provide appropriate support for these pupils. Most pupils with SEND are fully included in all aspects of school life, including sports clubs and the school choir. However, as with their classmates, these pupils’ learning is hampered by the weaknesses in the delivery of the curriculum. Some pupils with SEND do not achieve as well as they could, especially in reading and writing.

p.3

3

The school has not ensured that pupils at the early stages of learning to read, especially in key stage 1, receive the help and support that they need. This hinders how quickly these pupils gain the phonics knowledge that they need to become confident and fluent readers. The school has recently introduced a new phonics programme for younger pupils and a new reading curriculum for key stage 2. It is early days. Children in the early years and pupils in key stage 1 are benefiting from the new phonics programme and enjoy listening to stories. However, older pupils do not learn to read as well as they should nor enjoy reading for information or pleasure.

p.3

3

Pupils behave well when moving around the school and at breaktimes. They are polite and kind to staff and each other. The school supports those pupils who find it difficult to manage their behaviour well. The school places high importance on pupils’ attendance. It identifies and supports those pupils who struggle to get into school on time every day. This has made a positive difference. Most pupils attend well.

p.3

3

The programme to promote pupils’ personal development does not ensure that pupils are fully prepared for life in modern Britain. Pupils struggle to recall their learning about other faiths or about people who are different to themselves. In addition, they do not have a secure knowledge of healthy eating. Pupils do understand important concepts such as tolerance and respect. They learn how to keep themselves safe, including online, and have a secure understanding of a range of issues, including consent and healthy relationships.

p.3

3

Governors provide appropriate challenge and support to the school. They are committed to increase the school’s capacity to improve the quality of education. However, much of this work is at an early stage of development. As it brings in changes, the school pays due regard to staff’s well-being and workload.

p.3

Safeguarding

The arrangements for safeguarding are effective.

p.3

(Information for the school and appropriate authority)

 The school has not ensured that pupils who are at the early stages of learning to read, especially in key stage 1, receive appropriate support to improve their reading. As a result, some pupils do not have the knowledge and skills that they need to read with fluency and confidence. This hinders them from accessing the full curriculum. The 22 and 23 October 2024

p.3

4

school should ensure that pupils receive the support that they need to overcome gaps in their phonics knowledge so that they can catch up quickly with their peers.  In some subjects, teachers do not deliver the curriculum as intended. This hampers the learning of some pupils, including pupils with SEND. The school should ensure that staff deliver the curriculum consistently well so that pupils build secure subject knowledge.  The school’s assessment strategies are not used effectively in order to check on pupils’ learning. This means that some pupils do not learn the curriculum as well as they should. The school should ensure that staff identify and address gaps in pupils’ learning so that pupils build a secure body of knowledge over time in each subject.  The school has not ensured that pupils learn the important concepts that they need to be prepared for life in modern Britain. Some pupils do not have a secure understanding

p.4

4

about aspects of a responsible life in modern Britain, such as healthy eating and understanding people in society who are different to themselves. The school should ensure that pupils have the knowledge that they need to be well prepared for life beyond the school.

p.4

How can I feed back my views?

find out what other parents and carers think. We use information from Ofsted Parent View when deciding which schools to inspect, when to inspect them and as part of their inspection.

p.4

How can I feed back my views?

The Department for Education has further guidance on how to complain about a school.

p.4

Further information

You can search for published performance information about the school.

p.4

Further information

In the report, ‘disadvantaged pupils’ is used to mean pupils with SEND; pupils who meet the definition of children in need of help and protection ; pupils receiving statutory local authority support from a social worker; and pupils who otherwise meet the criteria used for deciding the school’s pupil premium funding (this includes pupils claiming free school meals at any point in the last six years, looked after children (children in local authority care) and/or children who left care through adoption or another formal route). 22 and 23 October 2024

p.4

School details

Appropriate authority The governing body

p.5

School details

Date of previous inspection 26 March 2019, under section 8 of the Education Act 2005

p.5

Information about this school

 The headteacher has been in post since September 2022.  The school currently uses one alternative provider, Tree of Life Educational and Holistic services, who are registered with the Department for Education.  The school offers wraparound care through a breakfast club and an after-school club.

p.5

Information about this inspection

The inspectors carried out this graded inspection under section 5 of the Education Act 2005. During a graded inspection, we grade the school for each of our key judgements (quality of education; behaviour and attitudes; personal development; and leadership and management) and for any relevant provision judgement (early years). Schools receiving a graded inspection from September 2024, will not be given an overall effectiveness grade.

p.5

Information about this inspection

 Inspections are a point-in-time evaluation about a school’s education provision. 22 and 23 October 2024

p.5

6

 This was the first routine inspection the school received since the COVID-19 pandemic began. Inspectors discussed the impact of the pandemic with the school and have taken that into account in their evaluation of the school.  To evaluate the effectiveness of safeguarding, the inspectors: reviewed the single central record; took account of the views of leaders, staff and pupils; and considered the extent to which the school has created an open and positive culture around safeguarding that puts pupils’ interests first.  Inspectors carried out deep dives in these subjects: early reading, mathematics, history and music. For each deep dive, the inspectors held discussions about the curriculum, visited a sample of lessons, spoke to teachers, spoke to some pupils about their learning and looked at samples of pupils’ work. Inspectors also spoke to subject leaders about other subjects.  Inspectors listened to a sample of pupils in Year 1 to Year 3 read to a familiar adult.

p.6

6

 Inspectors met with groups of pupils to discuss their views of the school.  The inspectors held meetings with the headteacher, senior leaders, curriculum leaders and teachers.  The lead inspector met with members of the governing body, including the chair of governors.  Inspectors observed behaviour in classrooms and social times. They spoke to teachers and pupils throughout the inspection about behaviour in school.  The lead inspector considered the responses to Ofsted Parent View, including the free- text comments. He also spoke with groups of staff and considered the responses from staff and pupils to Ofsted’s online surveys.

p.6

Inspection team

Thomas Fay, lead inspector Ofsted Inspector

p.6

Inspection team

Keith Wright Ofsted Inspector 22 and 23 October 2024

p.6

7

achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for looked after children, safeguarding and child protection.

p.7

7

If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.7

7

You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open- government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .

p.7

7

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .

p.7

7

T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.7

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion