Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School monitoring visit

a school not in a category of concern of Guilsborough Academy

Inspected — · published 27 Nov 2024

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Anne Maingay

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Anne Maingay

  • Postcode verified

    NN6 8QE

  • Name on report verified

    a school not in a category of concern of Guilsborough Academy

Page 1 of 3
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+51Positivemore positive than 85% of reports of this type

Reads more warmly than most reports of this type.

Praisepositiveeffectivelyconsistentlyeffectiveimprovedrespectfulstrengthsswiftly
Criticismpoorweaknessesnot yetnot consistently

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

Findings positive critical

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
3
Words of findings
966
shorter than usual (typical 1570)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 47, typical 47
Average sentence
19 words
Next steps
3
typical 8
Hedged sentences
6%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 100%

Full report text

Store Street Manchester M1 2WD T 0300 123 1231 www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.1

Simon Frazer Principal Guilsborough Academy West Haddon Road Guilsborough Northampton Northamptonshire NN6 8QE

p.1

Academy

This letter sets out the findings from the monitoring inspection that took place on 23 October 2024 on behalf of His Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills. The monitoring inspection was carried out under section 8(2) of the Education Act 2005 and took place because the school meets the monitoring threshold as set out in the Monitoring Inspection Handbook .

p.1

Academy

The purpose of a monitoring inspection is not to grade the school’s key and (where applicable) provision judgements, but to identify and report on the school’s progress. It is to highlight to the school and parents any improvements that school leaders have made since the school’s previous graded inspection.

p.1

Academy

During the inspection, I discussed with you and other senior leaders, trustees and other staff the actions that have been taken to improve the school since the most recent graded inspection. We discussed the ongoing impact of the COVID-19 pandemic. I also held meetings with pupils, visited a range of lessons, looked at pupils’ work and scrutinised documentation relating to the school’s provision for pupils’ personal development, school improvement and safeguarding. Additionally, I spoke to pupils informally during social times and considered documentation in relation to the support provided for pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND). I also considered responses to Ofsted’s online survey, Ofsted Parent View. I have considered all this in coming to my judgement.

p.1

OFFICIAL-SENSITIVE

The school should take further action to:

p.2

OFFICIAL-SENSITIVE

 Ensure that staff share the same high standards for pupils’ behaviour and that the behaviour policy is applied consistently well.  Ensure that pupils with unmet SEND needs are identified more swiftly and that the provision for pupils with SEND is rigorously quality assured to ensure the provision is having a positive impact on pupils’ outcomes.  Embed the teaching and learning strategies outlined in the professional development provided to staff, including assessment strategies.

p.2

Main findings

Since the previous inspection, you have rightly identified the actions needed to address the next steps from the previous inspection report. You have ensured that all staff understand the rationale for these actions and have built a team around you that fully supports the school’s improvement journey. The staff share your commitment to providing the best possible education for all pupils.

p.2

Main findings

At the last inspection, it was identified that teachers were unsure how to use the information they get about the needs of pupils with SEND effectively. You have taken action to develop provision maps for pupils with SEND and provided professional development for staff on developing and using these provision maps. You recognise that there is more to do to ensure that the maps are more precisely aligned to pupils’ needs and that provision in the classroom is quality assured effectively.

p.2

Main findings

Since the last inspection, you have made improvements to the quality of education. Middle leaders have been supported well to build the skills and understanding they need to provide effective oversight of their subject curriculum and its implementation, including the new life skills curriculum.

p.2

Main findings

You have ensured staff have been provided with training, which draws on educational research, to develop how well the curriculum is implemented. As a result, staff now typically scaffold activities for pupils well. You recognise that this work is developing and practice is embedding. You know that there is more work to do. This includes embedding your new approaches to assessment so that the full impact of the professional development provided to staff is realised consistently well.

p.2

Main findings

At the last inspection, some poor behaviour was identified. You have rightly prioritised improving pupils’ behaviour as critical to the development of a positive school culture. The introduction of ‘The Guilsborough Way’ has been integral to this, alongside other strategies, such as staggered social times. The school is now a calmer place and pupils state behaviour has improved. Parents and carers share this view. However, you recognise

p.2

OFFICIAL-SENSITIVE

that the school’s behaviour policy is not yet applied consistently well by all staff and that more work is needed to ensure this happens.

p.3

OFFICIAL-SENSITIVE

You have restructured and significantly developed the school’s approach to pupils’ personal development. You have ensured that there is now time to deliver the full programme. This has contributed to the development of a positive school culture. You recognise there is more work to do to ensure pupils are fully respectful of each other.

p.3

OFFICIAL-SENSITIVE

You have worked hard to improve relationships with parents through increased communication and this work is continuing. Most recently, a forum for parents of pupils with SEND has been established to ensure that their voices are heard and they can contribute to school improvement in relation to provision for SEND.

p.3

OFFICIAL-SENSITIVE

Trustees know the school well. They have a clear understanding of the school’s strengths and weaknesses and are working effectively with you to continue to improve the school. Systems for checking the impact of the school’s work, including use of external quality assurance, help to assure trustees that the actions taken to improve provision are the right actions. You, your leaders and the trustees know that the journey towards receiving a judgement of good is ongoing. You clearly recognise that the pace of improvement needs to be swift. However, you have also been mindful of staff’s workload. You have introduced improvements in such a way that staff have not been overwhelmed. Staff appreciate the training you have provided to support them to do their job well.

p.3

OFFICIAL-SENSITIVE

I am copying this letter to the chair of the board of trustees and the CEO or equivalent of the Guilsborough Multi Academy Trust, the Department for Education’s regional director and the director of children’s services for West Northamptonshire. This letter will be published on the Ofsted reports website.

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion