Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · Ungraded school inspection

St Matthew's CofE Primary School

Inspected 23 Oct 2024 · published 26 Nov 2024 · URN 102592

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Ray Lau

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    23 Oct 2024

  • Inspectors verified

    Ray Lau

  • Postcode verified

    KT6 6LW

  • Name on report verified

    St Matthew’s CofE Primary School

  • URN verified

    102592

Page 1 of 7
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+70Positivemore positive than 71% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praiseeffectivevery wellexceptionalenjoyhigh expectationsthriveeffectivelyimproved
Criticismseriousdisruptionconcernsnot strong

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsSafeguardingAbout the inspection positive critical
  • Findings1255w+69
  • Safeguarding6w+33

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
7
Words of findings
1,260
about usual (typical 1282)
Reading level
Fairly hard
Flesch 51, typical 51
Average sentence
16 words
Next steps
2
typical 3
Hedged sentences
5%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 72%Safeguarding 0%About the inspection 27%

Full report text

Inspection of a school judged good for overall effectiveness before September 2024: St Matthew’s CofE Primary School Langley Road, Surbiton, Surrey KT6 6LW

p.1

Inspection dates: 22 and 23 October 2024

p.1

Outcome

St Matthew’s CofE Primary School has taken effective action to maintain the standards identified at the previous inspection.

p.1

What is it like to attend this school?

Pupils are proud to attend St Matthew’s CofE Primary School. Pupils attend very well, feel safe and enjoy their learning. They behave very well in lessons and around the school.

p.1

What is it like to attend this school?

The school has high expectations of pupils’ achievement. Leaders and staff fully realise the school’s vision and values and demonstrate commitment to pupils’ success. Pupils rise to the challenges presented. As a result, pupils achieve well.

p.1

What is it like to attend this school?

The school has placed great emphasis on developing pupils’ character. Pupils develop their resilience and independence. Staff help pupils to enhance their social and communication skills. Pupils make good use of the carefully designed provision for outdoor play, which helps them to develop these skills. They thrive because the school has ensured that pupils can interact with one another purposefully and supportively. This includes through the school’s exceptional programme to develop pupils’ leadership skills. Year 6 pupils take on roles as ‘Owls’ and ‘Owlets’ and mentor younger pupils during social times and beyond. The school provides a meticulously planned programme of trips, residentials and visitors to broaden pupils’ horizons and enrich curriculum learning experiences.

p.1

What does the school do well and what does it need to do better?

The school has created an ambitious curriculum. The most important knowledge that pupils need to learn and remember has been prioritised and set out in a logical order. For example, in mathematics, children in the early years learn how to compare numbers using various approaches. In Year 2, pupils learn to add and subtract using apparatus, enabling them to build their knowledge of number facts and subsequently to solve problems. 22 and 23 October 2024

p.1

2

Teachers have strong subject knowledge. Pupils grasp knowledge quickly when teaching is closely linked to the content they are expected to learn. In Year 4 science, for example, pupils create a model of teeth and gums, recognising the different purposes of teeth and applying this knowledge to further their understanding. However, there are occasions when some pupils do not learn as much as they could. This is because sometimes the choice of teaching activities does not match pupils’ needs, and some teachers do not check pupils’ understanding quickly enough.

p.2

2

The school enhances the curriculum by making connections between subjects. In Year 6 science, pupils apply their prior experience of sprinting in physical education and the principles of exercise to their learning about the function of the circulatory system and how the heart is structured.

p.2

2

The school prioritises reading. Children in the early years learn phonics as soon as they start in Reception and quickly learn to recognise sounds and words. In Years 1 and 2, pupils become more confident and fluent in reading. The school has effective strategies in place to identify those pupils who may have fallen behind. These pupils are provided with support and catch up rapidly. Older pupils value and enjoy reading a wide range of fiction and non-fiction books. They recall important facts and communicate well.

p.2

2

Pupils with SEND achieve well. This is because the school begins to identify those with specific needs from the early years. The school ensures that staff are well trained, enabling them to support pupils appropriately. Staff adapt the curriculum effectively and allow pupils to learn at their own speed.

p.2

2

The school is calm and orderly. Low-level disruption in lessons is rare and around the school pupils conduct themselves well. Children in the early years learn to cooperate and socialise with each other.

p.2

2

The school ensures that pupils’ personal development is given high priority. This aspect of the school’s work is wide-ranging and of high quality. Pupils demonstrate an effective awareness of mental and physical health. They understand and appreciate the importance of having healthy relationships. The school has ensured that the curriculum includes texts and authors from a wide range of faiths, cultures and backgrounds, which helps to prepare pupils well for living in a multicultural and diverse society. A wide range of sporting and other extra-curricular activities exist, with high uptake from pupils.

p.2

2

There is a culture of mutual trust and support among the staff. Leaders have prioritised and improved important aspects of the school’s work. Staff value the importance of teamwork and appreciate the actions of the school to make this more cohesive. The governors ensure that the school fully realises its vision and hold leaders effectively to account.

p.2

2

The school works in conjunction with the community. For example, the school sells homegrown farm and eco-friendly products to the community, and funds are raised for good causes. Parents and carers are very supportive of the school. They report effective communication between the school and the home. 22 and 23 October 2024

p.2

Safeguarding

The arrangements for safeguarding are effective.

p.3

(Information for the school and appropriate authority)

 Sometimes teachers do not check pupils’ understanding closely. As a result, there are occasions when they provide pupils with work which has not been matched to their existing understanding. On these occasions, pupils do not learn as much as they could. The school should ensure that teachers check pupils’ understanding so that it can provide activities which enable pupils to know, remember and understand more.

p.3

Background

Until September 2024, on a graded (section 5) inspection we gave schools an overall effectiveness grade, in addition to the key and provision judgements. Overall effectiveness grades given before September 2024 will continue to be visible on school inspection reports and on Ofsted’s website. From September 2024 graded inspections will not include an overall effectiveness grade. This school was, before September 2024, judged to be good for its overall effectiveness.

p.3

Background

We have now inspected the school to determine whether it has taken effective action to maintain the standards identified at that previous inspection. This is called an ungraded inspection, and it is carried out under section 8 of the Education Act 2005. We do not give graded judgements on an ungraded inspection. However, if we find evidence that a school’s work has improved significantly or that it may not be as strong as it was at the last inspection, then the next inspection will be a graded inspection. A graded inspection is carried out under section 5 of the Act. Usually this is within one to two years of the date of the ungraded inspection. If we have serious concerns about safeguarding, behaviour or the quality of education, we will deem the ungraded inspection a graded inspection immediately.

p.3

Background

This is the second ungraded inspection since we judged the school to be good for overall effectiveness in November 2015.

p.3

How can I feed back my views?

find out what other parents and carers think. We use information from Ofsted Parent View when deciding which schools to inspect, when to inspect them and as part of their inspection.

p.3

How can I feed back my views?

The Department for Education has further guidance on how to complain about a school. 22 and 23 October 2024

p.3

Further information

You can search for published performance information about the school.

p.4

Further information

In the report, ‘disadvantaged pupils’ is used to mean pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND); pupils who meet the definition of children in need of help and protection ; pupils receiving statutory local authority support from a social worker; and pupils who otherwise meet the criteria used for deciding the school’s pupil premium funding (this includes pupils claiming free school meals at any point in the last six years, looked after children (children in local authority care) and/or children who left care through adoption or another formal route). 22 and 23 October 2024

p.4

School details

Appropriate authority The governing body

p.5

School details

Chair Andrew Buckley and Tom Eaves (co-chairs)

p.5

School details

Date of previous inspection 3 July 2019, under section 8 of the Education Act 2005

p.5

Information about this school

 The school uses one unregistered alternative provision. The school uses the provision endorsed by the local authority.

p.5

Information about this inspection

 Inspections are a point-in-time evaluation about the quality of a school’s education provision.  This was the first routine inspection the school received since the COVID-19 pandemic began. The inspector discussed the impact of the pandemic with the school and has taken that into account in their evaluation of the school.  The inspector spoke to the headteacher, the deputy headteacher, the special educational needs and disabilities coordinator and the early years leader.  The inspector spoke to a range of staff, including curriculum subject leaders, teachers and support staff. The lead inspector spoke to members of the governing body, and representatives of the local authority and the Diocese of Southwark. 22 and 23 October 2024

p.5

6

 The inspector visited a sample of lessons, spoke to some pupils about their learning and looked at samples of pupils’ work.  To evaluate the effectiveness of safeguarding, the inspector reviewed the single central record, took account of the views of leaders, staff and pupils, and considered the extent to which the school has created an open and positive culture around safeguarding that puts pupils’ interests first.  The inspector took account of responses to Ofsted’s online survey, Ofsted Parent View. The inspector also considered the responses of staff to Ofsted’s online surveys and the school’s responses to the pupil survey conducted.  The inspector spoke with groups of pupils during lessons and social times.

p.6

Inspection team

Ray Lau, lead inspector Ofsted Inspector 22 and 23 October 2024

p.6

7

achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.

p.7

7

If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.7

7

You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open- government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .

p.7

7

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .

p.7

7

T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.7

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion