Schools & FE · School inspection (EIF)
St Gregory's Catholic School
Summary
James Stuart (lead), Ann Fearon, Ben Greene, Peter Fry, Zoe Harris
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection date verified
16 Oct 2024
- Inspectors AI-checked
Ann Fearon, Ben Greene, James Stuart, Peter Fry, Zoe Harris
- Behaviour and attitudes verified
Good
- Leadership and management verified
Good
- Personal development verified
Good
- Quality of education verified
Good
- Postcode verified
TN4 9XL
- Name on report verified
St Gregory's Catholic School
- URN verified
140640
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Each judgement on its scale, weakest to strongest.
- Behaviour and attitudesGood
- Leadership and managementGood
- Personal developmentGood
- Quality of educationGood
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Teachers use the school’s behaviour systems effectively and have created a culture where positive relationships are important. p.2
- The rich and broad curriculum effectively prepares pupils for life beyond school. p.2
- However, the school is still developing its wider approach, to ensure all pupils are supported to become confident, and fluent readers, and develop a love for reading. p.2
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No strong criticism found.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- The school has identified the key content and concepts that pupils should learn, and the curriculum is carefully sequenced to ensure that knowledge builds in a logical order over time. p.2
- The school ensures that pupils, and students in the sixth form, receive the impartial guidance they need to make informed choices about their future. p.3
- For some disadvantaged pupils, and sixth-form students studying vocational subjects, the school is working to further develop how it helps them to ensure that they receive the support they need to achieve as well as their peers. p.2
- The trust is alert to this and must now pursue consistently high standards of teaching to ensure that all pupils benefit from the quality of education that is intended. p.3
- The trust should ensure that it monitors and evaluates the impact of actions to ensure that it is clear about the school's strengths and what needs further strengthening. p.4
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Personal development3
“The school has a strong personal development curriculum.” p.3Progress & outcomes3
“As a result, pupils are happy and achieve well.” p.2
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 8
- Words of findings
- 1,190
- about usual (typical 1153)
- Reading level
- Fairly hard
- Flesch 53, typical 55
- Average sentence
- 17 words
- Next steps
- 5
- typical 4
- Hedged sentences
- 12%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Inspection of St Gregory's Catholic School Reynolds Lane, Tunbridge Wells, Kent TN4 9XL
p.1
Inspection dates: 15 and 16 October 2024
p.1
The quality of education Good Behaviour and attitudes Good Personal development Good Leadership and management Good Sixth-form provision Good Previous inspection grade Outstanding
p.1
The headteacher of this school is Michael Wilson. This school is part of Kent Catholic Schools’ Partnership, which means other people in the trust also have responsibility for running the school. The trust is run by the chief executive officer, Annemarie Whittle and overseen by a board of trustees, chaired by Michael Powis. 15 and 16 October 2024
p.1
What is it like to attend this school?
The school, in its mission to ensure that ‘every pupil is known and loved’, has created a warm and welcoming environment for pupils. Teachers get to know pupils well, and they have high ambitions for their success. Pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND), and those who attend the St Francis de Sales Centre for the Deaf, are well supported. As a result, pupils are happy and achieve well.
p.2
What is it like to attend this school?
The trust has a clear vision for school improvement and has taken decisive action to bring stability to the school, including significantly raising expectations for behaviour and attendance. This has had a transformational impact on the school. Pupils behave well in classrooms and corridors. Teachers use the school’s behaviour systems effectively and have created a culture where positive relationships are important. As a result, pupils are courteous and respectful. They feel safe, and their learning is rarely interrupted.
p.2
What is it like to attend this school?
The rich and broad curriculum effectively prepares pupils for life beyond school. Pupils learn about healthy relationships and online safety. They demonstrate inclusive attitudes towards each other, including those who are different from themselves. They have many opportunities to develop their character. Students in the sixth form embrace a well- considered programme of volunteering that enables them to contribute to the school community.
p.2
What does the school do well and what does it need to do better?
The school’s curriculum is broad and ambitious for all pupils. The school has identified the key content and concepts that pupils should learn, and the curriculum is carefully sequenced to ensure that knowledge builds in a logical order over time. As a result, most pupils, and students in the sixth form, achieve well and gain the skills, knowledge, and qualifications needed for their next steps. For some disadvantaged pupils, and sixth-form students studying vocational subjects, the school is working to further develop how it helps them to ensure that they receive the support they need to achieve as well as their peers.
p.2
What does the school do well and what does it need to do better?
The school knows that reading is a barrier to learning for many pupils. Assessments are used to identify pupils at the earlier stages of learning to read who need help. These pupils benefit from expert support to catch up. However, the school is still developing its wider approach, to ensure all pupils are supported to become confident, and fluent readers, and develop a love for reading.
p.2
What does the school do well and what does it need to do better?
Teachers have strong subject knowledge. They present new concepts and ideas clearly. Teachers often draw upon a range of well-selected resources. They revisit prior knowledge at the start of lessons to help pupils remember what they have learned over time. However, from time to time, in a small number of subjects, some teachers’ choice of learning activities does not always enable pupils to grasp subject content securely. Additionally, while assessment is used well by most teachers, in some subjects, pupils are unsure how to act upon the feedback they are given, and staff do not always check to 15 and 16 October 2024
p.2
3
ensure pupils apply the advice they receive. This prevents a small number of pupils from achieving as well as they could.
p.3
3
The school has responded well to the increased number of pupils that have joined the school with SEND. Effective systems ensure the additional needs of pupils are identified swiftly, and that they receive the support they need. Provision in the St Francis de Sales Centre for the Deaf is impressive. Additionally, a small number of pupils access alternative provisions. With continued support from the school, these pupils benefit from specialist support, which enables them to succeed.
p.3
3
Effective systems are in place to track and analyse attendance. A team of dedicated staff work positively with families to support pupils to attend regularly. Despite these efforts, too many disadvantaged pupils still do not attend regularly enough. The school is alert to this and is relentless in its work to ensure attendance is a priority. However, this same rigorous approach is yet to be replicated with equal vigour in the sixth form, where student attendance is too low.
p.3
3
The school has a strong personal development curriculum. Personal, social and health education (PSHE) lessons ensure pupils learn about important topics, such as the responsible use of social media and online safety. The school ensures that pupils, and students in the sixth form, receive the impartial guidance they need to make informed choices about their future.
p.3
3
The trust, and those responsible for local governance, systematically scrutinise the school’s work and provide effective support. They are mindful of the pressures on staff and have made considered changes to policies and practices. As a result, morale is high, staff feel well cared for and are highly supportive of the school.
p.3
Safeguarding
The arrangements for safeguarding are effective.
p.3
(Information for the school and appropriate authority)
The quality of curriculum implementation is variable. A small number of subjects are not being delivered as well as others. This includes inconsistencies in the use of assessment, the support offered to some disadvantaged pupils and the quality of provision for some students studying vocational courses in the school’s sixth form. This means some pupils are not learning as well as they could. The trust is alert to this and must now pursue consistently high standards of teaching to ensure that all pupils benefit from the quality of education that is intended.
p.3
(Information for the school and appropriate authority)
The school does not always have clarity about the impact of its work. This means that some pupils, including those who are disadvantaged, at the earlier stages of learning to read, and some students in the sixth form, are not supported well enough in terms of 15 and 16 October 2024
p.3
4
their attendance and education. The trust should ensure that it monitors and evaluates the impact of actions to ensure that it is clear about the school's strengths and what needs further strengthening.
p.4
How can I feed back my views?
find out what other parents and carers think. We use information from Ofsted Parent View when deciding which schools to inspect, when to inspect them and as part of their inspection.
p.4
How can I feed back my views?
The Department for Education has further guidance on how to complain about a school.
p.4
Further information
You can search for published performance information about the school.
p.4
Further information
In the report, 'disadvantaged pupils' is used to mean pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND); pupils who meet the definition of children in need of help and protection ; pupils receiving statutory local authority support from a social worker; and pupils who otherwise meet the criteria used for deciding the school's pupil premium funding (this includes pupils claiming free school meals at any point in the last six years, looked after children (children in local authority care) and/or children who left care through adoption or another formal route). 15 and 16 October 2024
p.4
provision
Number of pupils on the school roll 1184
p.5
form
Date of previous inspection 15 October 2013
p.5
Information about this school
This school is a Catholic comprehensive school within the Archdiocese of Southwark. In June 2024, it underwent a Catholic Schools Inspection under section 48 of the Education Act. At the time of inspection, the school was using three registered alternative provisions. The school meets the requirements of the provider access legislation, which requires schools to provide pupils in Years 8 to 13 with information and engagement about approved technical education qualifications and apprenticeships. The school is part of Kent Catholic Schools’ Partnership academy trust. 15 and 16 October 2024
p.5
6
The school has a specially resourced provision: The St Francis de Sales Centre for the Deaf. This caters to hearing-impaired pupils with an education, health and care (EHC) plan. Places are commissioned by the local authority.
p.6
Information about this inspection
The inspectors carried out this graded inspection under section 5 of the Education Act 2005. During a graded inspection, we grade the school for each of our key judgements (quality of education; behaviour and attitudes; personal development; and leadership and management) and for any relevant provision judgement (early years and/or sixth form provision). Schools receiving a graded inspection from September 2024, will not be given an overall effectiveness grade.
p.6
Information about this inspection
This was the first routine inspection the school received since the COVID-19 pandemic began. Inspectors discussed the impact of the pandemic with the school and have considered that in their evaluation of the school. Inspections are a point-in-time evaluation about the quality of a school's education provision. Inspectors met and spoke with leaders, staff, pupils, parents, governors, the chair of trustees, the chief executive officer from the trust and members of the trusts’ executive leadership team. Inspectors carried out deep dives in these subjects: English, mathematics, science, modern foreign languages, art and history. For each deep dive, inspectors held discussions about the curriculum, visited a sample of lessons, spoke to teachers, spoke to some pupils about their learning and looked at samples of pupils’ work. Inspectors also discussed the curriculum in some other subjects. Inspectors considered the responses to the Ofsted Parent View questionnaire. They
p.6
Information about this inspection
also considered the responses to the confidential Ofsted staff survey and the views of pupils gathered throughout the inspection. To evaluate the effectiveness of safeguarding, the inspectors: reviewed the single central record; considered the views of leaders, staff, and pupils; and considered the extent to which the school has created an open and positive culture around safeguarding that puts pupils’ interests first. Inspectors considered information about pupils’ attendance, behaviour and wider learning. They also met with the school special educational needs and/or disabilities coordinator.
p.6
Inspection team
James Stuart, lead inspector His Majesty's Inspector
p.6
Inspection team
Zoe Harris Ofsted Inspector 15 and 16 October 2024
p.6
7
Ann Fearon Ofsted Inspector 15 and 16 October 2024
p.7
8
achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children's services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.
p.8
8
If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .
p.8
8
You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open- government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .
p.8
8
Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .
p.8
8
T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted
p.8
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion