Early years · Early years complaint outcome
Bridge End House Nursery Ltd
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection datesingle source
19 Nov 2024
- URN verified
EY367827
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
Reads more warmly than most reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No standout praise found.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No strong criticism found.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 2
- Words of findings
- 304
- about usual (typical 281)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 41, typical 42
- Average sentence
- 19 words
- Next steps
- 1
- typical 1
- Hedged sentences
- 6%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Summary of outcome
All early years providers must meet the legal requirements in the Statutory framework for the early years foundation stage, which you can find at www.gov.uk/government/publications/early-years-foundation-stage-framework--2. If we find that a provider is not meeting the requirements, we can take action to ensure they put matters right.
p.1
Summary of outcome
On 24 and 25 October 2024, we received concerns that the provider was not meeting requirements relating to safety and suitability of the premises, environment and equipment and safeguarding policies and procedures.
p.1
Summary of outcome
On 31 October 2024, we carried out a regulatory telephone call. We found the provider was not meeting some of the requirements and had taken action to put this right.
p.1
Summary of outcome
We found that the provider took prompt action to reassess staff's supervision of children and has assessed the potential risks to ensure children are safe. We found that more robust procedures have been introduced to ensure children's safety, in particular at collection time. This includes extra staffing, CCTV and a new lock on the double entry gates. A new, high, security perimeter fence is also on order. A review, followed by refresher training of safeguarding and risk assessment policies and procedures have been shared with all staff to ensure they understand their roles and responsibilities to keep children safe. The provider has also put in place procedures to ensure this knowledge is consistently maintained by staff.
p.1
Summary of outcome
The provider will be able to give parents further information about this.
p.1
Summary of outcome
The provider is still registered with Ofsted.
p.1
Publication of complaints
We publish details of complaints made against childminders, home childcarers and childcare providers where we or the provider have taken action in order to meet legal requirements.
p.1
Publication of complaints
We publish details of complaints on our website for a period of five years.
p.1
Publication of complaints
For further information about the complaints process please view the Concerns and complaints about childminders and childcare providers leaflet .
p.1
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion