Schools & FE · School inspection (EIF)
Lift Sir Herbert Leon
Summary
Phillip Blagg (lead), Andrew Hanlon, Ian Cooksey, Marieke Forster
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection date verified
9 Oct 2024
- Inspectors verified
Andrew Hanlon, Ian Cooksey, Marieke Forster, Phillip Blagg
- Behaviour and attitudes verified
Good
- Leadership and management verified
Good
- Personal development verified
Good
- Quality of education verified
Good
- Postcode verified
MK2 3HQ
- Name on report verified
Sir Herbert Leon Academy
- URN verified
138439
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2022.
- Behaviour and attitudesGood
- Leadership and managementGood
- Personal developmentGood
- Quality of educationGood
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Personal development3
“Pupils benefit from wider opportunities, including clubs and trips.” p.2Reading & phonics2
“The school promotes a love of reading.” p.2
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 7
- Words of findings
- 1,056
- about usual (typical 1153)
- Reading level
- Fairly hard
- Flesch 54, typical 55
- Average sentence
- 13 words
- Next steps
- 2
- typical 4
- Hedged sentences
- 9%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Inspection of Sir Herbert Leon Academy Fern Grove, Bletchley, Milton Keynes, Buckinghamshire MK2 3HQ
p.1
The quality of education Good Behaviour and attitudes Good Personal development Good Leadership and management Good Previous inspection grade Inadequate
p.1
The principal of this school is Emma Jordan. This school is part of LIFT Schools Multi- Academy Trust, which means other people in the trust also have responsibility for running the school. The trust is run by the chief executive officer, Rebecca Boomer-Clark, and overseen by a board of trustees, chaired by David Hall. There is also an executive principal, Nabila Jiwa, who is responsible for this school and one other. 8 and 9 October 2024
p.1
What is it like to attend this school?
Pupils rightly recognise how much the school has improved. They explain how the culture has completely changed to one where they are expected to achieve the best they can. The school’s values of determination, respect, ambition and kindness are evident in pupils’ conduct. Pupils appreciate the higher standards of behaviour across the school. They enjoy learning and work with focus and purpose. This helps them to achieve well. Improvements to the curriculum mean that current pupils are achieving stronger outcomes than previous cohorts.
p.2
What is it like to attend this school?
The school promotes a strong and close community. Pupils feel they are known well by their tutors and wider staff. This gives them confidence to share any worries and know they will be supported. They learn about the different cultures in the school through events like ‘culture week’. This builds their understanding of others, and pupils view differences as a strength. Around the school, this helps friendships to flourish, regardless of background.
p.2
What is it like to attend this school?
Pupils contribute positively to the school community. Through different leadership roles and the school council, pupils put forward their ideas for changes in the school. Pupils benefit from wider opportunities, including clubs and trips. Many regularly represent the school in sporting fixtures and are proud of their successes.
p.2
What does the school do well and what does it need to do better?
There has been considerable work to improve the school’s curriculum since the previous inspection. These changes mean that most pupils are now learning well. They are achieving better than the 2023 published examination data suggests. The curriculum is broad and ambitious. Across the curriculum, important knowledge is arranged so that it builds pupils’ knowledge and understanding. This includes the regular revisiting of earlier learning to help pupils recall important knowledge. This is not routinely the case in a few subjects. As a result, some pupils struggle to remember the key knowledge they have learned before. The number of pupils achieving the English Baccalaureate qualification is low. The school is aiming to increase the number of pupils studying a modern foreign language. It is taking appropriate action to address this.
p.2
What does the school do well and what does it need to do better?
Teachers have secure subject knowledge. They draw on this to explain new ideas clearly. Most teachers check and correct errors in pupils’ understanding well. They know the needs of pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND). Teachers use specific strategies to support the learning of pupils with SEND effectively.
p.2
What does the school do well and what does it need to do better?
The school promotes a love of reading. Across the curriculum, pupils read regularly. They encounter a diverse range of texts in lessons and during tutor times. The school checks how well all pupils can read. Any pupils who struggle with reading have extra sessions so that they catch up quickly.
p.2
What does the school do well and what does it need to do better?
Behaviour around the school is calm and orderly. Pupils know the rules and are clear about the boundaries. Staff uphold the school’s high expectations. They consistently apply 8 and 9 October 2024
p.2
3
the school’s behaviour routines. These support pupils to learn well. In cases where pupils’ behaviour is not meeting expectations, prompt action is taken. This includes supporting pupils in learning how they can manage their behaviour better in future.
p.3
3
The school takes prompt and robust action to address absences from school. However, there remains a significant number of pupils who miss too much school. These pupils do not benefit fully from the school’s high expectations so they do not make the progress they could through the planned curriculum. The school’s approach to ensuring that pupils close the gaps in their knowledge is not yet consistently followed. This affects how well some pupils achieve.
p.3
3
The personal, social and health education curriculum is comprehensive. Pupils learn how to keep themselves safe, including online. Through this curriculum, pupils explore different issues, attitudes and emerging risks in society. This helps pupils develop informed opinions. Pupils value the careers programme. This develops their understanding of different study options and employment opportunities. It helps them to be ready for life beyond school.
p.3
3
The school has achieved and sustained considerable improvement. It scrutinises the impact of changes and acts robustly to identify further ways to improve pupils’ achievement. The trust and standards board provide challenge and, where needed, targeted support. Staff appreciate efforts to keep their work manageable. This helps them to focus their efforts on helping pupils to learn.
p.3
Safeguarding
The arrangements for safeguarding are effective.
p.3
(Information for the school and appropriate authority)
In a few subjects, teachers do not always carefully check how well pupils understand new knowledge or remember important earlier learning. This means some pupils can continue to have gaps in their understanding. The school needs to ensure that across all subjects, teachers routinely identify and re-explain knowledge so that pupils develop a strong understanding over time. A significant number of pupils are absent too often. This means that they miss out on key learning and personal development opportunities. They do not achieve as well as their peers. The school should ensure that the strategy to help these pupils catch up on any missed learning is followed consistently well.
p.3
How can I feed back my views?
find out what other parents and carers think. We use information from Ofsted Parent View 8 and 9 October 2024
p.3
4
when deciding which schools to inspect, when to inspect them and as part of their inspection.
p.4
4
The Department for Education has further guidance on how to complain about a school.
p.4
Further information
You can search for published performance information about the school.
p.4
Further information
In the report, ‘disadvantaged pupils’ is used to mean pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND); pupils who meet the definition of children in need of help and protection ; pupils receiving statutory local authority support from a social worker; and pupils who otherwise meet the criteria used for deciding the school’s pupil premium funding (this includes pupils claiming free school meals at any point in the last six years, looked after children (children in local authority care) and/or children who left care through adoption or another formal route). 8 and 9 October 2024
p.4
School details
Principal Nabila Jiwa (Executive Principal) Emma Jordan (Principal). Website www.shlacademy.org
p.5
School details
Dates of previous inspection 8 and 9 November 2023, under section 8 of the Education Act 2005.
p.5
Information about this school
The school is part of the LIFT Schools Multi-Academy Trust. The school currently uses one registered and one unregistered alternative provision. A daily breakfast club is overseen by the school. The school meets the requirements of the provider access legislation, which requires schools to provide pupils in Years 8 to 13 with information and engagement about approved technical education qualifications and apprenticeships.
p.5
Information about this inspection
The inspectors carried out this graded inspection under section 5 of the Education Act 2005. During a graded inspection, we grade the school for each of our key judgements (quality of education; behaviour and attitudes; personal development; and leadership and management) and for any relevant provision judgement (early years and/or sixth form provision). Schools receiving a graded inspection from September 2024 will not be given 8 and 9 October 2024
p.5
6
In accordance with section 13(4) of the Education Act 2005, His Majesty’s Chief Inspector is of the opinion that the school no longer requires special measures.
p.6
6
Inspections are a point-in-time evaluation about the quality of a school’s education provision. Inspectors discussed any continued impact of the pandemic with the school and have taken that into account in their evaluation of the school. The inspectors met with the executive headteacher, the acting principal, the vice- principal, the assistant principals, the inclusion lead, curriculum leaders and teachers. The lead inspector met with representatives from the interim standards board and multi-academy trust, including the chief executive officer. The inspectors carried out deep dives in these subjects: English, mathematics, science, computing, history and physical education. For each deep dive, inspectors held discussions about the curriculum, visited a sample of lessons, spoke to teachers, spoke to some pupils about their learning and looked at samples of pupils’ work. The inspectors also looked at the curriculum, met with pupils and looked at their work
p.6
6
in business studies and geography. The inspectors observed breaktime and lunchtime activities. To evaluate the effectiveness of safeguarding, the inspectors reviewed the single central record; took account of the views of leaders, staff and pupils; and considered the extent to which the school has created an open and positive culture around safeguarding that puts pupils’ interests first. The inspectors considered the responses to the staff survey and spoke to a range of staff about their views of the school. The inspectors took account of the responses to the Ofsted Parent View survey and the additional free-text responses. Inspectors also spoke to parents at the school gate.
p.6
Inspection team
Phillip Blagg, lead inspector His Majesty’s Inspector
p.6
Inspection team
Marieke Forster Ofsted Inspector 8 and 9 October 2024
p.6
7
achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.
p.7
7
If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .
p.7
7
You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open- government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .
p.7
7
Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .
p.7
7
T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted
p.7
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion