Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School inspection (EIF)

Cannington Church of England Primary School

Inspected 16 Oct 2024 · URN 123786

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Victoria Griffin (lead), Julie Fox

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    16 Oct 2024

  • Inspectors verified

    Julie Fox, Victoria Griffin

  • Behaviour and attitudes verified

    Good

  • Early years verified

    Good

  • Leadership and management verified

    Requires improvement

  • Personal development verified

    Good

  • Quality of education verified

    Requires improvement

  • Postcode verified

    TA5 2HP

  • Name on report verified

    Cannington Church of England Primary School

  • URN verified

    123786

Page 1 of 7
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Each judgement on its scale, weakest to strongest.

  • Behaviour and attitudesGood
  • Early yearsGood
  • Leadership and managementRequires improvement
  • Personal developmentGood
  • Quality of educationRequires improvement

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

−15Mixedmore positive than 7% of reports of this type
OutstandingGoodRIInadequate

Reads more critically than most reports of this type.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praiseenjoyhigh expectationspositiveimprovedeffectivestrongwell-plannedclear
Criticismnot alwaysgapsweaknessestoo manyharmlackconcernsnot robust

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsSafeguardingAbout the inspection positive critical
  • Findings1132w−8
  • Safeguarding133w−44

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
7
Words of findings
1,228
about usual (typical 1153)
Reading level
Fairly hard
Flesch 53, typical 55
Average sentence
15 words
Next steps
6
typical 4
Hedged sentences
19%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 60%Safeguarding 7%About the inspection 32%

Full report text

Inspection of Cannington Church of England Primary School Brook Street, Cannington, Bridgwater, Somerset TA5 2HP

p.1

Inspection dates: 15 and 16 October 2024

p.1

The quality of education Requires improvement Behaviour and attitudes Good Personal development Good Leadership and management Requires improvement Early years provision Good Previous inspection grade Good 15 and 16 October 2024

p.1

What is it like to attend this school?

Pupils at Cannington Church of England Primary School value being part of and contributing to, their local community and school community.

p.2

What is it like to attend this school?

Children in Reception get off to a strong start. Clear routines and high expectations mean that children enjoy their learning and feel safe. The environment in the early years provides many opportunities for learning and purposeful play. However, in contrast, pupils in Years 1 to 6 do not learn the curriculum as well. The school’s expectations about what these pupils can achieve has not been high enough.

p.2

What is it like to attend this school?

Pupils generally behave well and are keen to learn. However, occasionally they feel frustrated when a small number of pupils do not behave as well as they should.

p.2

What is it like to attend this school?

Pupils have many opportunities to develop their leadership, talents and interests. They enjoy taking part in sports competitions and trips. Older pupils value the responsibility of being buddies for children in Reception class, serving on the school council and being head pupils.

p.2

What does the school do well and what does it need to do better?

The school has developed the curriculum recently so that it now identifies what pupils should learn, and in which order. However, the school has not yet ensured that all staff have the expertise to deliver the curriculum as intended. This means that the work given to pupils does not ensure they build on prior learning and retain new knowledge. Pupils do not recall knowledge confidently in some subjects.

p.2

What does the school do well and what does it need to do better?

Activities do not always help pupils to remember important information, make links with previous learning, or deepen their understanding. This is stronger in the early years foundation stage (EYFS). In the EYFS, children benefit from clear explanations. They are shown clearly how to complete work. The school uses every opportunity within the day to develop children's knowledge of phonics, mathematics and social skills.

p.2

What does the school do well and what does it need to do better?

The school has strengthened the reading curriculum. The youngest children regularly read books matched to the sounds they know. They enjoy story time and talking about the books they have heard. The school ensures that pupils who need to catch up receive additional support. However, this is not always done effectively by well-trained staff. Older pupils read a range of texts that also contribute to their understanding of the world. As a result, most pupils have positive attitudes towards reading. Pupils’ achievements have improved in reading.

p.2

What does the school do well and what does it need to do better?

Weaknesses in the writing curriculum have now been rectified, but many pupils still have significant gaps in their writing knowledge. For example, younger pupils have not secured basic writing skills before they are asked to complete more advanced writing tasks. Written work is often not high quality. In the EYFS, there is a sharp focus on developing children's fine motor skills. Children regularly write and draw. This means they are well 15 and 16 October 2024

p.2

3

prepared for the next stage of their learning. In the EYFS, the school identifies issues early, so children receive additional support when needed.

p.3

3

The school has systems in place to check pupils’ learning. These systems are particularly effective for pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND). These checks on pupils’ learning ensure that pupils with SEND are accurately identified and well supported in school. The school works closely with parents and pupils to ensure they achieve well and enjoy wider opportunities. However, too many older pupils who do not have additional needs have gaps in their knowledge that require extra support.

p.3

3

Staff understand the behaviour policy and build positive relationships with pupils and their families. However, sometimes a small number of pupils do not meet the school’s expectations of behaviour in class and at play times. While most pupils behave well, the behaviour of a few affects the way some pupils feel towards their peers and towards school.

p.3

3

All pupils have access to additional outdoor education, alongside their physical education lessons. Most pupils understand how to keep themselves safe, including online. Children in the EYFS learn to share, recognise their emotions and take responsibility for their classroom.

p.3

3

The school has experienced significant challenges in recent times. There has been a lack of oversight in some areas of the school’s work. Governors now have the knowledge and expertise needed to support the school moving forward.

p.3

Safeguarding

The arrangements for safeguarding are effective.

p.3

Safeguarding

Pupils are safe and know they can discuss any worries they may have with any adult in the school.

p.3

Safeguarding

During the inspection, gaps were identified on the school’s single central record. However, the school does have appropriate assurances about the suitability of staff who work with their children.

p.3

Safeguarding

Staff know how to report safeguarding concerns in a timely manner. However, actions, decisions and outcomes of safeguarding referrals are not always recorded. While children have not been placed at immediate risk or harm, the school’s current system is not compliant with statutory guidance. Records are not routinely monitored with rigour. As a result, leaders cannot readily show when and how they have ensured that vulnerable pupils have been protected from harm and neglect. 15 and 16 October 2024

p.3

(Information for the school and appropriate authority)

 The implementation of the school’s curriculum is variable in quality, including in early reading. The work given does not always enable pupils to know and remember more. This means that, while the school now has a well-planned curriculum in place, the impact of this is not apparent in all subjects. The school must ensure that pedagogical choices enable pupils to build knowledge over time and deepen their understanding of individual subjects.  Historic weaknesses in the writing curriculum mean that too many pupils do not write well enough for their age. These pupils have gaps in their learning. The school should address these gaps in writing knowledge, so that pupils write well in all subjects and are well prepared for their next steps.  Sometimes a small number of pupils do not meet the school’s expectations of behaviour. The behaviour of a few affects the way others feel towards their peers and

p.4

(Information for the school and appropriate authority)

towards school. The school should ensure all pupils are supported to understand what is expected from them.  Some of the school’s record keeping is not robust. Most significantly, the actions, decisions and outcomes of safeguarding referrals are not always recorded. Governors do not currently have an accurate oversight of this. In addition, this information is not stored in an accessible and logical way. The school must urgently work with the local authority to ensure that systems and processes, including for safeguarding, are improved and in line with statutory guidance.

p.4

How can I feed back my views?

find out what other parents and carers think. We use information from Ofsted Parent View when deciding which schools to inspect, when to inspect them and as part of their inspection.

p.4

How can I feed back my views?

The Department for Education has further guidance on how to complain about a school.

p.4

Further information

You can search for published performance information about the school.

p.4

Further information

In the report, 'disadvantaged pupils' is used to mean pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND); pupils who meet the definition of children in need of help and protection ; pupils receiving statutory local authority support from a social worker; and pupils who otherwise meet the criteria used for deciding the school's pupil premium funding (this includes pupils claiming free school meals at any point in the last six years, looked after children (children in local authority care) and/or children who left care through adoption or another formal route). 15 and 16 October 2024

p.4

School details

Chair of governing body Carly Kew (co-chair) Reverand Alison Waters (co chair) Headteacher Claire Nurse

p.5

School details

Dates of previous inspection 13 and 14 September 2023, under section 8 of the Education Act 2005

p.5

Information about this school

 The school is a Church of England voluntary controlled school in Diocese of Bath and Wells. The most recent section 48 inspection of the school was in February 2024.  The school provides a breakfast and after-school club.  The school uses one unregistered alternative provision.

p.5

Information about this inspection

The inspectors carried out this graded inspection under section 5 of the Education Act 2005. During a graded inspection, we grade the school for each of our key judgements (quality of education; behaviour and attitudes; personal development; and leadership and management) and for any relevant provision judgement (early years and/or sixth form provision). Schools receiving a graded inspection from September 2024, will not be given an overall effectiveness grade.

p.5

Information about this inspection

 Inspections are a point-in-time evaluation about the quality of a school’s education 15 and 16 October 2024

p.5

6

provision.  This was the second routine inspection the school received since the COVID-19 pandemic began. Inspectors discussed the impact of the pandemic with the school and have taken that into account in their evaluation of the school.  Inspectors carried out deep dives in these subjects: early reading, mathematics and physical education. For each deep dive, inspectors held discussions about the curriculum, visited a sample of lessons, spoke to teachers, spoke to some pupils about their learning and looked at samples of pupils’ work.  An inspector also looked at the wider curriculum in history and writing.  Inspectors analysed 25 responses to Ofsted’s online survey, Ofsted Parent View. Inspectors also considered the responses of staff to Ofsted’s online survey.  Inspectors spoke with groups of pupils during lessons and social times. They met with staff who oversee the personal development and behaviour of pupils.

p.6

6

 To evaluate the effectiveness of safeguarding, the lead inspector: reviewed the single central record; took account of the views of leaders, staff and pupils; and considered the extent to which the school has created an open and positive culture around safeguarding that puts pupils’ interests first.  An inspector discussed how the school identifies and supports pupils with SEND.  The lead inspector met with the co-chair and one other member of the local governing body.  The lead inspector also spoke to the local authority’s school improvement partner and safeguarding advisor.

p.6

Inspection team

Victoria Griffin, lead inspector His Majesty's Inspector

p.6

Inspection team

Julie Fox Ofsted Inspector 15 and 16 October 2024

p.6

7

achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children's services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.

p.7

7

If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.7

7

You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open- government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .

p.7

7

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .

p.7

7

T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.7

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion