Social care · Children's home inspection (SCCIF)
Children's home run by Highfield North East Limited in Redcar and Cleveland
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Group verified
Highfield (North East) Limited
- Inspection date verified
9 Oct 2024
- Inspectors verified
Natalie Clark
- Helped and protected verified
Good
- Leadership and management verified
Good
- Overall effectiveness verified
Good
- Name on report verified
SC408656
- URN verified
SC408656
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2024.
- OverallGood
- Helped and protectedGood
- Leadership and managementGood
70% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Good (12,716 inspections).
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type graded Good.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No strong criticism found.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Wellbeing & mental health3
“Children’s health and emotional well-being are a priority for staff.” p.3
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 8
- Words of findings
- 1,210
- about usual (typical 1319)
- Reading level
- Fairly hard
- Flesch 56, typical 51
- Average sentence
- 15 words
- Next steps
- 2
- typical 4
- Hedged sentences
- 0%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Inspection report for children’s home: SC408656 1 SC408656
p.1
Registered provider: Highfield (North East) Limited
p.1
Full inspection Inspected under the social care common inspection framework
p.1
Information about this children’s home
The home is operated by a private provider. It provides short- and long-term care for up to four children who may experience social and emotional difficulties.
p.1
Information about this children’s home
The manager registered with Ofsted in June 2010.
p.1
Information about this children’s home
There were two children living at the home at the time of the inspection. Both were spoken to.
p.1
Overall experiences and progress of
children and young people, taking into account
p.1
good
How well children and young people are helped and protected good
p.1
good
The effectiveness of leaders and managers good
p.1
good
The children’s home provides effective services that meet the requirements for good.
p.1
good
Date of last inspection: 27 February 2024
p.1
good
Overall judgement at last inspection: outstanding
p.1
good
Enforcement action since last inspection: none Inspection report for children’s home: SC408656 2
p.1
Inspection date Inspection type Inspection judgement
27/02/2024 Full Outstanding 01/03/2023 Full Good 17/02/2022 Full Good 05/11/2019 Full Good Inspection report for children’s home: SC408656 3
p.2
Overall experiences and progress of children and young people: good
The home is warm and welcoming, and there are photos of the children throughout. Children have been involved in the ongoing redecoration of the home. Staff ensure that children’s bedrooms are maintained to a high standard, and they are personalised to their individual likes and interests.
p.3
Overall experiences and progress of children and young people: good
Children have built trusting relationships with those caring for them. Staff regularly complete key-work discussions with children about things that are important in their lives. Children say that they feel able to talk to the staff, with one child saying that the staff really care about them and show an interest in getting to know them. This has helped children to share their worries and experiences with staff.
p.3
Overall experiences and progress of children and young people: good
The children are able to participate in a variety of activities. Staff involve them in planning activities, and children have a choice in where they want to go on holiday. Children’s interests are considered, and staff actively encourage regular activities and hobbies. One child learned to swim when they came to live at the home. The opportunities provided by the home have helped children to explore their talents and enhance their positive experiences.
p.3
Overall experiences and progress of children and young people: good
When children move on from the home, staff always support them to have positive endings. Staff have gone above and beyond to develop and maintain relationships with family members. Staff worked closely with one child’s parents so that they understood the child’s routines and boundaries, enabling them to maintain continuity of care. This helped the child return to live in their family home. Another child said that it is the best home that they have lived in, and staff helped them to feel well prepared for moving into independence. When children move out of the home, they maintain relationships with the staff and continue to reach out for support.
p.3
Overall experiences and progress of children and young people: good
Staff support children to attend school, and they are making good progress. When one child has struggled with education, staff have worked with professionals to reduce the amount of time they spend in the classroom. The school provided the child with additional learning that staff support them with at home. Staff were proactive in working with professionals to explore an alternative provision. These actions mean that children are motivated to attend education.
p.3
Overall experiences and progress of children and young people: good
Children’s health and emotional well-being are a priority for staff. The children are registered with local dentists, doctors and opticians. When children have needed emotional support, staff have referred to external professional services. This has meant that children have received timely support tailored to their needs. Inspection report for children’s home: SC408656 4
p.3
How well children and young people are helped and protected: good
Staff understand children’s vulnerabilities and are proactive in working with them around a range of subjects relevant to their individual risks. When there are concerns about children, the staff escalate these to the necessary services in a timely manner. This has helped to safeguard children and help them understand their risks.
p.4
How well children and young people are helped and protected: good
Positive behaviour is consistently promoted in the home. Staff know the children well and use effective de-escalation techniques aligned with each child’s individual needs. Children respond well to staff and the approach has promoted positive behaviour, both at home and at school.
p.4
How well children and young people are helped and protected: good
Not all information is clearly recorded in children’s risk assessments. One child was being supported around appropriate relationships. Staff understand this risk, but the risk assessment does not provide guidance to staff on how to best support the child. This could lead to staff being inconsistent in how they respond when children are in need of support.
p.4
How well children and young people are helped and protected: good
Children rarely go missing from the home. When they do, staff are aware of the missing-from-home protocol and will actively search for children. Children are given a warm welcome by staff when they return home. However, on one occasion, there was a missed opportunity to explore a missing-from-home episode. This limits the staff’s understanding of the risks that children might face when they are missing from home. Furthermore, incidents do not have management oversight to support future learning of how staff can reduce risks.
p.4
The effectiveness of leaders and managers: good
The home is run by an experienced manager who knows the children well. The manager is committed to supporting children to achieve the best outcomes. The manager is ambitious for the future of the home and wants to continuously improve the care they offer to the children.
p.4
The effectiveness of leaders and managers: good
Leaders and managers regularly monitor the quality of care provided to children. The registered manager has a clear process in place for auditing and monitoring all aspects of the home. The manager has been able to use this to identify areas where improvement is needed and what changes are required to improve the children’s experiences.
p.4
The effectiveness of leaders and managers: good
The staff team is well established, and this provides consistency for the children. When new staff are recruited, there is a robust recruitment process in place. New staff shadow more-experienced staff so that children get to know them before they work independently in the home. New staff are provided with a robust induction programme where they complete mandatory training.
p.4
The effectiveness of leaders and managers: good
The manager and staff have developed strong working relationships with multi- agency professionals and parents. They have provided appropriate challenge and Inspection report for children’s home: SC408656 5 advocated for the children when this has been required, for example gaining the right support for children to improve their emotional well-being. This challenge has been effective in helping children to achieve better outcomes.
p.4
The effectiveness of leaders and managers: good
There are gaps in staff supervision. Staff report that they feel able to speak openly about issues that they have and feel supported by management. However, sessions do not include opportunities for staff to reflect on their practice and learn lessons from their mistakes and successes. This hinders their professional development and ability to analyse what works well for children. Inspection report for children’s home: SC408656 6
p.5
Statutory requirements
This section sets out the actions that the registered person must take to meet The Care Standards Act 2000, The Children’s Homes (England) Regulations 2015 and the ‘Guide to the Children’s Homes Regulations, including the quality standards’. The registered person must comply within the given timescales.
p.6
Requirement Due date
The protection of children standard is that children are protected from harm and enabled to keep themselves safe.
p.6
Requirement Due date
In particular, the standard in paragraph (1) requires the registered person to ensure—
p.6
Requirement Due date
assess whether each child is at risk of harm, taking into account information in the child’s relevant plans, and, if necessary, make arrangements to reduce the risk of any harm to the child;
p.6
Requirement Due date
take effective action whenever there is a serious concern about a child’s welfare. (Regulation 12 (1) (2)(a)(i)(vi)) 1 December
p.6
Recommendation
The registered person should have systems in place so that all staff, including the manager, receive supervision which allows them to reflect on their practice and the needs of the children assigned to their care. (‘Guide to the Children’s Homes Regulations, including the quality standards’, page 61, paragraph 13.2)
p.6
Information about this inspection
Inspectors have looked closely at the experiences and progress of children and young people, using the social care common inspection framework. This inspection was carried out under The Care Standards Act 2000 to assess the effectiveness of the service, how it meets the core functions of the service as set out in legislation, and to consider how well it complies with The Children’s Homes (England) Regulations 2015 and the ‘Guide to the Children’s Homes Regulations, including the quality standards’. Inspection report for children’s home: SC408656 7
p.6
Children’s home details
Registered provider: Highfield (North East) Limited
p.7
Children’s home details
Registered provider address: 37 Emerald Street, Saltburn-by-the-Sea, Cleveland TS12 1EE
p.7
Inspector
Natalie Clark, Social Care Inspector Inspection report for children’s home: SC408656 8 and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for looked after children, safeguarding and child protection.
p.7
Inspector
If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk . You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .
p.8
Inspector
Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .
p.8
Inspector
T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted
p.8
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion