Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School inspection (EIF)

Endike Academy

Inspected 25 Sept 2024 · published 15 Nov 2024 · URN 140184

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Alison Stephenson (lead), Andrew Yeomans, Rhian Williams

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    25 Sept 2024

  • Inspectors verified

    Alison Stephenson, Andrew Yeomans, Rhian Williams

  • Behaviour and attitudes verified

    Requires improvement

  • Early years verified

    Good

  • Leadership and management verified

    Requires improvement

  • Personal development verified

    Requires improvement

  • Quality of education verified

    Requires improvement

  • Postcode verified

    HU6 7UR

  • Name on report verified

    Endike Academy

  • URN verified

    140184

Page 1 of 7
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Each judgement on its scale, weakest to strongest.

  • Behaviour and attitudesRequires improvement
  • Early yearsGood
  • Leadership and managementRequires improvement
  • Personal developmentRequires improvement
  • Quality of educationRequires improvement

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+23Mostly positivemore positive than 19% of reports of this type
OutstandingGoodRIInadequate

In line with other reports of this type.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praisehigh expectationsambitiousstrengthswell-designedenjoyfeel safesafeenthusiastic
Criticismnot consistentlyvariableweakerlackconcerninconsistenciesstrugglelimited

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsSafeguardingAbout the inspection positive critical
  • Findings1163w+21
  • Safeguarding6w+33

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
7
Words of findings
1,137
about usual (typical 1153)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 49, typical 55
Average sentence
14 words
Next steps
4
typical 4
Hedged sentences
11%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 66%Safeguarding 0%About the inspection 34%

Full report text

Inspection of Endike Academy Endike Lane, Hull HU6 7UR

p.1

Inspection dates: 24 and 25 September 2024

p.1

The quality of education Requires improvement Behaviour and attitudes Requires improvement Personal development Requires improvement Leadership and management Requires improvement Early years provision Good Previous inspection grade Good

p.1

The interim principal of this school is Kate Buyukyilmaz. This school is part of The David Ross Education Trust, which means other people in the trust also have responsibility for running the school. The trust is run by the chief executive officer, Stuart Burns, and overseen by a board of trustees, chaired by Tracey Maloney. There is also an executive principal, Caroline Broadhead, who is responsible for this school. 24 and 25 September 2024

p.1

What is it like to attend this school?

Pupils are experiencing an increasingly ambitious curriculum. The school and the trust have high expectations for what pupils can achieve in their learning. However, these expectations are not fully realised.

p.2

What is it like to attend this school?

The school has high expectations for pupils’ behaviour. Pupils understand the rewards and sanctions. They show respect and can articulate the things they like. The school ensures that in lessons, adults manage pupils’ behaviour well. However, behaviour routines are not fully established. Some pupils struggle to manage their behaviour when they think an adult is not watching.

p.2

What is it like to attend this school?

The school provides extra-curricular clubs that pupils enjoy. Pupils particularly appreciate participating in trust-wide sporting activities. The school supports pupils’ resilience, self- esteem and confidence. For example, staff offer personalised sessions to advise pupils how to stay mentally healthy. Pupils feel safe in the classroom. However, the view of some pupils is that they feel less safe at playtime.

p.2

What is it like to attend this school?

Pupils learn about important aspects of safety, such as how to stay safe on the roads as pedestrians or cyclists. However, some pupils have a limited understanding of staying safe online and cyber-bullying.

p.2

What does the school do well and what does it need to do better?

The school has adopted the trust’s purposeful and well-designed curriculum. The curriculum is sequenced and progressive from early years to Year 6. The curriculum is ambitious, including for pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND). However, the delivery of the curriculum is variable across subjects. As a result, pupils do not learn consistently well in all areas.

p.2

What does the school do well and what does it need to do better?

The school prioritises reading. It uses a phonics programme and a whole-school approach to reading comprehension. This programme is being used with greater consistency than in previous years when pupils’ achievement was much weaker, particularly at key stage 2. The school regularly checks pupils’ phonics knowledge. It uses this information to ensure that pupils who need support with their reading receive daily tutoring to keep up. Pupils’ reading books match the sounds they know. Pupils are enthusiastic about reading. They talk knowledgeably about their favourite books and authors.

p.2

What does the school do well and what does it need to do better?

Adults help pupils learn mathematical concepts with approaches such as breaking learning into smaller steps. Pupils can make links between their prior and current learning. For example, pupils use rhymes to help them recall their multiplication tables. Pupils’ mathematical fluency, where they use their skills to know the best way to solve a problem, is variable. Staff receive training from the trust, including a focus on developing pupils’ fluency. However, this training has not had sufficient impact to address gaps in knowledge for pupils in Years 5 and 6. 24 and 25 September 2024

p.2

3

Pupils with SEND are well supported. They access an ambitious curriculum. Adults adapt their teaching to suit individual needs. Pupils with SEND are carefully tracked and receive additional support to make progress and achieve success.

p.3

3

Since May 2024, the school has accelerated its focus on improving attendance. The school analyses attendance patterns weekly. It has introduced several incentives to encourage good attendance, such as rewards, certificates, competitions and quizzes. These strategies are at an early stage and their impact is not fully embedded.

p.3

3

In early years, the school has a broad and balanced curriculum for children from two- years-old. There is a sharp focus on developing children’s communication skills. Adults use symbols to help some children communicate. Children actively engage in their own play. They display sustained concentration in a calm and purposeful setting. Children share resources and are respectful to each other. The early years staff ensure that children understand the school’s rules and routines and are ready for Year 1.

p.3

3

There is variation in how well pupils learn about aspects of life in modern Britain. Pupils can name different faiths and cultures but lack a deeper understanding of the commonalities shared by religions. Although the school’s curriculum includes units about topics such as protected characteristics, pupils’ understanding of British values and diverse cultures is superficial.

p.3

3

The school has managed recent staffing and curriculum changes with sensitivity, taking into consideration staff workload and well-being. Many subject leaders new to their role are keen to develop their areas further.

p.3

3

The trust recognises that the school is underperforming. It has a clear oversight of the strengths and areas for improvement. Recent staffing instability has caused concern for some parents and carers. The school recognises the need to strengthen relationships with families.

p.3

Safeguarding

The arrangements for safeguarding are effective.

p.3

(Information for the school and appropriate authority)

 There are inconsistencies in the way the school implements the trust’s intended curriculum. This means the outcomes for pupils over time have been consistently below national expectations. The school should ensure that the curriculum is better implemented so that pupils know more and remember more.  The school’s behaviour expectations are not consistently followed by pupils. As a result, some pupils do not feel safe at unstructured times. The school should ensure that the high expectations for behaviour are followed in and out of the classroom. 24 and 25 September 2024

p.3

4

 Some aspects of pupils’ personal development are less developed than others. This means some pupils’ knowledge of topics such as British values, protected characteristics and world religions is not as deep as it could be. The school should ensure that it better develops pupils’ understanding in these areas.  Some subject leaders are new to role. They do not have a deep understanding of the strengths and areas for improvement in their subject. The school should ensure that new subject leaders receive support and guidance to lead and develop their curriculum responsibility effectively.

p.4

How can I feed back my views?

find out what other parents and carers think. We use information from Ofsted Parent View when deciding which schools to inspect, when to inspect them and as part of their inspection.

p.4

How can I feed back my views?

The Department for Education has further guidance on how to complain about a school.

p.4

Further information

You can search for published performance information about the school.

p.4

Further information

In the report, ‘disadvantaged pupils’ is used to mean pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND); pupils who meet the definition of children in need of help and protection ; pupils receiving statutory local authority support from a social worker; and pupils who otherwise meet the criteria used for deciding the school’s pupil premium funding (this includes pupils claiming free school meals at any point in the last six years, looked after children (children in local authority care) and/or children who left care through adoption or another formal route). 24 and 25 September 2024

p.4

School details

Local authority Kingston Upon Hull City Council

p.5

School details

Date of previous inspection 4 June 2019, under section 8 of the Education Act 2005

p.5

Information about this school

 The school joined The David Ross Education Trust in November 2013. There is an academy scrutiny committee that is accountable for the safeguarding and the school’s performance.  There have been significant staffing changes since the last inspection.  The interim principal and executive principal were appointed in May 2024.  The school does not use any alterative providers.  The school has nursery provision for two- and three-year-old children.

p.5

Information about this inspection

The inspectors carried out this graded inspection under section 5 of the Education Act 2005. During a graded inspection, we grade the school for each of our key judgements (quality of education; behaviour and attitudes; personal development; and leadership and management) and for any relevant provision judgement (early years and/or sixth form 24 and 25 September 2024

p.5

6

provision). Schools receiving a graded inspection from September 2024 will not be given an overall effectiveness grade.

p.6

6

 Inspections are a point-in-time evaluation about the quality of a school’s education provision.  This was the first routine inspection the school received since the COVID-19 pandemic began. Inspectors discussed the impact of the pandemic with the school and have taken that into account in their evaluation of the school.  Inspectors met with the executive principal, the interim principal, curriculum leaders, staff and pupils.  Meetings were also held with representatives of the academy scrutiny committee and the trust.  Inspectors carried out deep dives in these subjects: early reading, mathematics, physical education and history. For each deep dive, inspectors held discussions about the curriculum, visited a sample of lessons, spoke to teachers, spoke to some pupils about their learning and looked at samples of pupils’ work.  To evaluate pupils’ behaviour, inspectors visited lessons, analysed behaviour records,

p.6

6

met with groups of pupils, and observed their play at playtime and lunchtime.  To evaluate the effectiveness of safeguarding, inspectors: reviewed the single central record; took account of the views of leaders, staff and pupils; and considered the extent to which the school has created an open and positive culture around safeguarding that puts pupils’ interests first.  The views of parents, staff and pupils were considered from meeting with them and from the responses to Ofsted’s online questionnaires.

p.6

Inspection team

Alison Stephenson, lead inspector His Majesty’s Inspector

p.6

Inspection team

Andrew Yeomans Ofsted Inspector 24 and 25 September 2024

p.6

7

achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.

p.7

7

If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.7

7

You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open- government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .

p.7

7

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .

p.7

7

T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.7

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion