Schools & FE · School inspection (EIF)
Old Trafford Community Academy
Summary
Kathy Nichol (lead), Alison Lawson, Katherine Muncaster
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection date verified
2 Oct 2024
- Inspectors verified
Alison Lawson, Katherine Muncaster, Kathy Nichol
- Behaviour and attitudes verified
Good
- Early years verified
Good
- Leadership and management verified
Good
- Personal development verified
Good
- Quality of education verified
Requires improvement
- Postcode verified
M15 4FL
- Name on report verified
Old Trafford Community Academy
- URN verified
140738
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2022.
- Behaviour and attitudesGood
- Early yearsGood
- Leadership and managementGood
- Personal developmentGood
- Quality of educationRequires improvement
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- However, they do not consistently identify and address the gaps in learning that older pupils have as a result of the previous weaker curriculum. p.3
- This means they are not always developing the positive reading habits 1 and 2 October 2024 p.2
- However, the quality of education in essential areas such as reading, writing and mathematics requires improvement as reflected in the published low outcomes for pupils. p.2
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- It has identified the important knowledge that all pupils need to learn. p.2
- Pupils have not learned the important knowledge that they need to prepare them for their future learning. p.3
- The school should ensure that its checks focus on the consistency and precision of pedagogy and its impact on pupils’ learning. p.4
- The school should implement and embed the intended reading curriculum so that all pupils read widely and foster a love of reading p.4
- The school should work with teachers to ensure that these subject curriculums are implemented effectively and enable pupils to achieve well across these subjects. p.3
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 7
- Words of findings
- 1,216
- about usual (typical 1153)
- Reading level
- Fairly hard
- Flesch 55, typical 55
- Average sentence
- 16 words
- Next steps
- 5
- typical 4
- Hedged sentences
- 8%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Inspection of Old Trafford Community Academy Malvern Street, Old Trafford, Manchester M15 4FL
p.1
The quality of education Requires improvement Behaviour and attitudes Good Personal development Good Leadership and management Good Early years provision Good Previous inspection grade Requires improvement
p.1
The headteacher of this school is Nicole Davenport. This school is part of Focus Academy Trust, which means other people in the trust also have responsibility for running the school. The trust is run by the chief executive officer (CEO), Helen Rowland, and overseen by a board of trustees, chaired by Paul Spencer. 1 and 2 October 2024
p.1
What is it like to attend this school?
The rules of ‘be ready, respectful and safe’ are at the heart of this welcoming school. They are woven through the curriculum and school life. Pupils learn about differences and being respectful to others. This contributes to the sense of unity and partnership that is felt throughout the school. Pupils are happy in school. They are ready to learn and learning is rarely disrupted.
p.2
What is it like to attend this school?
The school has high expectations for all pupils. Pupils achieve with increasing success at this improving school. Recent work to improve the curriculum, supported by the trust, is having a positive impact. However, the quality of education in essential areas such as reading, writing and mathematics requires improvement as reflected in the published low outcomes for pupils.
p.2
What is it like to attend this school?
Positive relationships between pupils and staff mean that pupils trust adults to help keep them safe. They know that they can talk to adults if they are ever worried. Pupils feel they are listened to. They know that their views and ideas will be taken seriously and that they can make a difference to their school. For example, the pupil parliament has secured new basketball equipment for playtimes. Pupils value the roles of responsibility available to them, such as being a class ambassador.
p.2
What does the school do well and what does it need to do better?
The school has taken decisive action to improve the curriculum. It has identified the important knowledge that all pupils need to learn. The carefully sequenced curriculum is suitably broad and ambitious for all pupils, including pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND).
p.2
What does the school do well and what does it need to do better?
The school has focused on ensuring that learning in the key areas of reading, writing and mathematics is secure. Teachers follow an agreed lesson structure that supports pupils in revisiting prior learning before learning the next step. Teachers provide meaningful adaptations to support pupils with SEND. This enables pupils with SEND to access learning alongside their peers in class. Teachers use questioning skilfully to check and challenge pupils’ learning before they move on. This is having a positive impact on the progress that pupils are now making through the English and mathematics curriculums, although they are still not achieving as well as they could. This is reflected in the published outcomes of 2023 national tests.
p.2
What does the school do well and what does it need to do better?
The teaching of early reading follows clear and consistent routines from the moment children enter the early years. Staff deliver the well-ordered phonics programme confidently. They select books for pupils to read in school, and to take home, which are carefully matched to the sounds they are learning. Pupils who do not keep up with the pace of the programme are quickly identified and are supported to catch up.
p.2
What does the school do well and what does it need to do better?
The reading curriculum, beyond the phonics curriculum, is less well developed. Some pupils do not show a love of reading or talk confidently about stories that they enjoy or would recommend. This means they are not always developing the positive reading habits 1 and 2 October 2024
p.2
3
that they will need for the next stage of learning. Leaders and the trust already have plans in place to further promote reading for pleasure.
p.3
3
In some subjects other than English and mathematics, the curriculum is in its early stages of implementation. Staff present subject content clearly in lessons. However, they do not consistently identify and address the gaps in learning that older pupils have as a result of the previous weaker curriculum. This means that these pupils struggle to make connections in their learning to remember and build knowledge over time.
p.3
3
In a small number of subjects, the school has not refined its systems for checking on the implementation and impact of the curriculum across the school. As a result, it does not precisely identify weaknesses and address these swiftly enough.
p.3
3
Routines are well established from the Nursery Year and throughout the school. This results in a calm and orderly environment in classrooms where pupils can concentrate and learn. The school works hard to encourage regular attendance. It has rigorous processes in place that are driving improvement. Staff work diligently with families to strengthen attendance and reduce persistent absence.
p.3
3
The school has carefully considered how it promotes pupils’ personal development. Pupils learn how to stay safe in school, online and in their local community. The school understands its context and how to drive improvements. There is a shared vision of there being no ceiling to what pupils can do. Instead, the school teaches pupils about the doors that education can open for them. To this end, the school is doing much to raise aspirations.
p.3
3
Trustees and members of the local governing body provide effective challenge and support to the school. While they are determined to drive the improvements that this school needs, they are mindful of staff’s well-being. Staff appreciate the training that they receive and the resources that the school has purchased to help to reduce their workload.
p.3
Safeguarding
The arrangements for safeguarding are effective.
p.3
(Information for the school and appropriate authority)
Some subjects in the wider curriculum are at an early stage of implementation. Pupils have not learned the important knowledge that they need to prepare them for their future learning. This means that they have gaps in their knowledge. The school should work with teachers to ensure that these subject curriculums are implemented effectively and enable pupils to achieve well across these subjects. In some subjects, the checks that the school makes on teaching and learning are not sharply focused. As a result, learning is not consistent. This affects how well pupils 1 and 2 October 2024
p.3
4
build their knowledge over time. The school should ensure that its checks focus on the consistency and precision of pedagogy and its impact on pupils’ learning. The school has not ensured that there is a rigorous and consistent approach to the development of pupils’ reading, beyond phonics, across the school. This means that some pupils do not show a love of reading or talk confidently about stories they enjoy or would recommend. The school should implement and embed the intended reading curriculum so that all pupils read widely and foster a love of reading
p.4
How can I feed back my views?
find out what other parents and carers think. We use information from Ofsted Parent View when deciding which schools to inspect, when to inspect them and as part of their inspection.
p.4
How can I feed back my views?
The Department for Education has further guidance on how to complain about a school.
p.4
Further information
You can search for published performance information about the school.
p.4
Further information
In the report, ‘disadvantaged pupils’ is used to mean pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND); pupils who meet the definition of children in need of help and protection ; pupils receiving statutory local authority support from a social worker; and pupils who otherwise meet the criteria used for deciding the school’s pupil premium funding (this includes pupils claiming free school meals at any point in the last six years, looked after children (children in local authority care) and/or children who left care through adoption or another formal route). 1 and 2 October 2024
p.4
School details
Website www.oldtraffordcommunityacademy.co.uk
p.5
School details
Dates of previous inspection 6 and 7 December 2022, under section 5 of the Education Act 2005
p.5
Information about this school
The school is part of the Focus Academy Trust. The trust is known as Focus-Trust. The school has introduced a new leadership structure since the last inspection. The school does not make use of any alternative provision.
p.5
Information about this inspection
The inspectors carried out this graded inspection under section 5 of the Education Act 2005. During a graded inspection, we grade the school for each of our key judgements (quality of education; behaviour and attitudes; personal development; and leadership and management) and for any relevant provision judgement (early years and/or sixth form provision). Schools receiving a graded inspection from September 2024 will not be given an overall effectiveness grade.
p.5
Information about this inspection
Inspections are a point-in-time evaluation about the quality of a school’s education provision. 1 and 2 October 2024
p.5
6
In spectors discussed any continued impact of the pandemic with the school and have taken that into account in their evaluation of the school. Inspectors held meetings with the headteacher and other senior leaders. Inspectors also held meetings with other staff, including those responsible for attendance and pupils’ behaviour, welfare and personal development. The inspectors held meetings with the leaders responsible for SEND and the provision for children in the early years. An inspector met with members of the local governing body, including the chair. She also met with the chair and a member of the board of trustees. An inspector spoke with a representative of the local authority. An inspector met with the CEO of Focus-Trust. Inspectors carried out deep dives in these subjects: early reading, mathematics, science, geography, and art and design. For each deep dive, inspectors discussed the
p.6
6
curriculum with subject leaders, visited a sample of lessons, spoke with teachers, spoke with some pupils about their learning and looked at samples of pupils’ work. The lead inspector listened to pupils from Years 1 to 3 read to a familiar adult. Inspectors looked at samples of pupils’ work and met with pupils to discuss their learning in some other subjects. Inspectors observed pupils’ behaviour as they arrived at school and during lessons and breaktimes. They also spoke with pupils about their views of school life. Inspectors spoke with staff about their workload and well-being. They took account of the responses to Ofsted’s online staff survey. Inspectors met with parents and carers and reviewed the responses to Ofsted Parent View, including the free-text comments. Inspectors considered the views of pupils who responded to Ofsted’s survey. To evaluate the effectiveness of safeguarding, inspectors: reviewed the single central
p.6
6
record; took account of the views of leaders, staff and pupils; and considered the extent to which the school has created an open and positive culture around safeguarding that puts pupils’ interests first.
p.6
Inspection team
Kathy Nichol, lead inspector Ofsted Inspector
p.6
Inspection team
Alison Lawson Ofsted Inspector 1 and 2 October 2024
p.6
7
achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.
p.7
7
If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .
p.7
7
You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open- government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .
p.7
7
Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .
p.7
7
T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted
p.7
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion