Schools & FE · School inspection (EIF)
St Thomas More Roman Catholic Primary School, Middleton, Rochdale
Summary
Alex Reed (lead), Katie Thornton, Kevan Naughton
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection date verified
2 Oct 2024
- Inspectors verified
Alex Reed, Katie Thornton, Kevan Naughton
- Behaviour and attitudes verified
Good
- Early years verified
Good
- Leadership and management verified
Good
- Personal development verified
Good
- Quality of education verified
Good
- Postcode verified
M24 1PY
- Name on report verified
St Thomas More Roman Catholic Primary School, Middleton, Rochdale
- URN verified
105820
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2019.
- Behaviour and attitudesGood
- Early yearsGood
- Leadership and managementGood
- Personal developmentGood
- Quality of educationGood
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- In the early years, children are well supported to engage and learn by excellent adult interactions. p.3
- This ensures that they can meet the high expectations set for all pupils. p.2
- Leaders have high expectations of what children will achieve, which is reflected in most of the school’s external outcomes. p.2
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- In a small number of curriculum subjects, the school has not explicitly identified the information that pupils must remember. p.3
- The school should ensure that assessment in these subjects more accurately identifies what pupils know, so that teachers can use this as a starting point for their teaching and address any gaps in learning. p.4
- In a small number of subjects, the checks are less helpful, as the school has not been clear on the precise knowledge that needs to be checked. p.3
- There are clear strategies in place to support pupils who need to catch up and keep up. p.2
- The school should ensure that teachers are always clear on what the core knowledge is for each topic, so that pupils more successfully remember it. p.4
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 7
- Words of findings
- 1,059
- about usual (typical 1153)
- Reading level
- Fairly hard
- Flesch 54, typical 55
- Average sentence
- 17 words
- Next steps
- 5
- typical 4
- Hedged sentences
- 15%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Inspection of St Thomas More Roman Catholic Primary School, Middleton, Rochdale Evesham Road, Alkrington, Middleton, Manchester M24 1PY
p.1
The quality of education Good Behaviour and attitudes Good Personal development Good Leadership and management Good Early years provision Good Previous inspection grade Good Rochdale 1 and 2 October 2024
p.1
What is it like to attend this school?
Pupils describe their school as friendly, happy and safe. They know that staff care for them and will resolve any issues between peers effectively.
p.2
What is it like to attend this school?
Pupils know that everyone is welcome at their school, they demonstrate this through the respect they show each other. Staff make sure that they support pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND) well. This ensures that they can meet the high expectations set for all pupils. As a result, pupils achieve well in most subjects.
p.2
What is it like to attend this school?
Most pupils behave well in lessons and at playtimes. They are polite and well mannered. Staff support pupils to engage in a range of activities at playtime, such as sports, games and den building, which pupils enjoy.
p.2
What is it like to attend this school?
Pupils have opportunities to apply for a range of leadership roles. They value the opportunities to contribute to school life through acting as school council members, leading worship, looking after the school environment and raising money for charity. Pupils understand how these roles help to prepare them for later life and take their responsibilities seriously.
p.2
What is it like to attend this school?
Pupils enjoy and benefit from a range of trips and visitors, which have been carefully planned to bring the curriculum to life and provide wider opportunities.
p.2
What does the school do well and what does it need to do better?
The school has made sure that the curriculum provides an appropriate level of challenge to all pupils. Leaders have high expectations of what children will achieve, which is reflected in most of the school’s external outcomes.
p.2
What does the school do well and what does it need to do better?
The school has effective systems for quickly identifying pupils with SEND and for providing the extra support that they need. As a result, pupils with SEND access the full curriculum and are supported to succeed.
p.2
What does the school do well and what does it need to do better?
In 2023, pupils in key stage 2 did not achieve as well as the national average in writing. Pupils in key stage 1 phonics also did not achieve as well as the national average. Since then, leaders have engaged with external support to bring about improvements to the curriculum and pupils’ achievement. As a result, the standards of writing and phonics in school are now much higher.
p.2
What does the school do well and what does it need to do better?
The school’s approach to teaching phonics enables pupils to succeed. Pupils quickly become confident and fluent readers. They are passionate about reading and enjoyed sharing some of the books which they have recently read with the inspectors. Teachers accurately identify the sounds which pupils know and identify if anyone is at risk of falling behind. There are clear strategies in place to support pupils who need to catch up and keep up. All staff are trained in the phonics approach and apply this training well to teach the programme as intended. Rochdale 1 and 2 October 2024
p.2
3
In a small number of curriculum subjects, pupils’ recall of what they have learned is not consistently secure. This is because the school has not explicitly identified the core knowledge which they need pupils to remember and practise.
p.3
3
Leaders have designed an approach to checking pupils’ learning which provides an accurate view of pupils’ performance, while balancing the workload of staff. In some curriculum subjects, the checks are well used to identify pupils who need more support and to ensure that this support has the desired impact. In a small number of subjects, the checks are less helpful, as the school has not been clear on the precise knowledge that needs to be checked.
p.3
3
In the early years, children are well supported to engage and learn by excellent adult interactions. Adults think carefully about the way that they talk to children, to promote the development of communication and language. Children play purposefully and with sustained attention. Recent changes to the structure of the early years means that reception and nursery are now taught in mixed-age classes. Leaders think carefully about how teaching will still meet the needs of mixed-age pupils, enabling all children to do well.
p.3
3
Pupils apply themselves well to their learning. They have positive attitudes and learn to be resilient to setbacks. Pupils do report that their learning can occasionally be disrupted by other pupils. They are, however, confident that this is always appropriately addressed by staff.
p.3
3
The school provides a range of trips and visits, which stick in the memories of pupils and help learning to come to life. For example, pupils recall with enthusiasm their trip to a Viking workshop and could share what they had learned.
p.3
3
Across the school, pupils know what it means to be ‘the best they can be’. Leaders have carefully thought about how the school’s curriculum and wider offer helps pupils to develop into positive citizens, who make contributions to wider society.
p.3
Safeguarding
The arrangements for safeguarding are effective.
p.3
(Information for the school and appropriate authority)
In a small number of curriculum subjects, the school has not explicitly identified the information that pupils must remember. This means that teaching is not always focused on making sure that this knowledge is consistently remembered and regularly recalled. Rochdale 1 and 2 October 2024
p.3
4
The school should ensure that teachers are always clear on what the core knowledge is for each topic, so that pupils more successfully remember it. Assessment in a few curriculum subjects does not clearly identify what pupils remember. This means that teaching does not always build on what pupils already know. The school should ensure that assessment in these subjects more accurately identifies what pupils know, so that teachers can use this as a starting point for their teaching and address any gaps in learning.
p.4
How can I feed back my views?
find out what other parents and carers think. We use information from Ofsted Parent View when deciding which schools to inspect, when to inspect them and as part of their inspection.
p.4
How can I feed back my views?
The Department for Education has further guidance on how to complain about a school.
p.4
Further information
You can search for published performance information about the school.
p.4
Further information
In the report, ‘disadvantaged pupils’ is used to mean pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND); pupils who meet the definition of children in need of help and protection ; pupils receiving statutory local authority support from a social worker; and pupils who otherwise meet the criteria used for deciding the school’s pupil premium funding (this includes pupils claiming free school meals at any point in the last six years, looked after children (children in local authority care) and/or children who left care through adoption or another formal route). Rochdale 1 and 2 October 2024
p.4
School details
Appropriate authority The governing body
p.5
School details
Dates of previous inspection 3 and 4 April 2019, under section 5 of the Education Act 2005
p.5
Information about this school
The school is a voluntary aided Roman Catholic school. It is within the diocese of Salford. The last section 48 inspection of the school took place in June 2017. The next inspection is due in the 2024/25 academic year. The school offers breakfast and after-school provision. The school does not make use of alternative provision.
p.5
Information about this inspection
The inspectors carried out this graded inspection under section 5 of the Education Act 2005. During a graded inspection, we grade the school for each of our key judgements (quality of education; behaviour and attitudes; personal development; and leadership and management) and for any relevant provision judgement (early years and/or sixth form provision). Schools receiving a graded inspection from September 2024, will not be given an overall effectiveness grade. Rochdale 1 and 2 October 2024
p.5
6
Inspections are a point-in-time evaluation about the quality of a school’s education provision. This was the first routine inspection the school received since the COVID-19 pandemic began. Inspectors discussed the impact of the pandemic with the school and have taken that into account in their evaluation of the school. The inspectors spoke with the headteacher, other leaders and staff. The lead inspector met with representatives of the local governing body, including the chair of governors. The lead inspector spoke with a representative of the local authority and the diocese. The lead inspector observed pupils read to a familiar adult. The inspectors considered the responses to Ofsted Parent View, including the free-text comments. They also considered the responses to Ofsted’s online surveys for pupils and for staff. To evaluate the effectiveness of safeguarding, the inspectors: reviewed the single
p.6
6
central record; took account of the views of leaders, staff and pupils; and considered the extent to which the school has created an open and positive culture around safeguarding that puts pupils’ interests first. The inspectors carried out deep dives in these subjects: mathematics, early reading, science, music and geography. For each deep dive, the inspector discussed the curriculum with subject leaders, visited a sample of lessons, spoke with teachers, spoke with some pupils about their learning and looked at samples of pupils’ work. The inspectors also spoke with leaders about the curriculum in some other subjects. The inspectors spoke with pupils about their experiences of school and their views on behaviour and bullying. They also observed pupils’ behaviour during lessons and at breaktimes. The inspectors reviewed a wide range of evidence, including the school’s self- evaluation documents and records relating to pupils’ behaviour and attendance.
p.6
Inspection team
Alex Reed, lead inspector Ofsted Inspector
p.6
Inspection team
Kevan Naughton Ofsted Inspector Rochdale 1 and 2 October 2024
p.6
7
achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.
p.7
7
If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .
p.7
7
You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open- government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .
p.7
7
Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .
p.7
7
T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted
p.7
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion