Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School inspection (EIF)

Lift Wishmore

Inspected 25 Sept 2024 · published 14 Nov 2024 · URN 138766

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Chris Ellison

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    25 Sept 2024

  • Inspectors verified

    Chris Ellison

  • Behaviour and attitudes verified

    Good

  • Leadership and management verified

    Good

  • Personal development verified

    Good

  • Quality of education verified

    Good

  • Postcode verified

    GU24 8NE

  • Name on report verified

    Wishmore Cross Academy

  • URN verified

    138766

Page 1 of 7
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2022.

  • Behaviour and attitudesGood
  • Leadership and managementGood
  • Personal developmentGood
  • Quality of educationGood

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+15Mostly positivemore positive than 14% of reports of this type
OutstandingGoodRIInadequate

Reads more critically than most reports of this type.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praisepositivehigh expectationseffectivefeel safepositivelyconsistentlykeenimproving
Criticismstrugglepoornot alwaysseriouslylacknot skillednot consistentabsence

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsSafeguardingAbout the inspection positive critical
  • Findings1042w+11
  • Safeguarding6w+33

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
7
Words of findings
1,025
about usual (typical 1153)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 48, typical 55
Average sentence
17 words
Next steps
3
typical 4
Hedged sentences
21%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 61%Safeguarding 0%About the inspection 39%

Full report text

Inspection of Wishmore Cross Academy Alpha Road, Chobham, Woking, Surrey GU24 8NE

p.1

Inspection dates: 24 and 25 September 2024

p.1

The quality of education Good Behaviour and attitudes Good Personal development Good Leadership and management Good Previous inspection grade Requires improvement

p.1

The principal of this school is Abedah Karim. This school is part of LIFT Schools multi- academy trust, which means other people in the trust also have responsibility for running the school. The trust is run by the chief executive officer (CEO), Rebecca Boomer Clark, and overseen by a board of trustees, chaired by David Hall. There is also an executive principal, Andrea George-Samuels, who is responsible for this and one other school. 24 and 25 September 2024

p.1

What is it like to attend this school?

Pupils are mostly positive about their school. Those who have attended for longer acknowledge the improvements made since the last inspection. Pupils have a favourable view of their school. They particularly appreciate the patience of staff.

p.2

What is it like to attend this school?

This is an all-boys school for pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND). They are sometimes off-task or disengaged from learning, but staff deal with this well. Pupils readily acknowledge behaviour is not always perfect. However, those who talked to inspectors said they feel safe here, not least because staff understand them and give them space when needed. One older pupil was blunt when he told an inspector, ‘It’s a small school for boys with SEND, so obviously there are complications with relationships at times’. Others agreed but were also keen to point out that the school has helped them to become more aware and understanding of the impact of their actions on others.

p.2

What is it like to attend this school?

Staff have appropriately high expectations of what pupils can achieve. They know pupils well, despite the challenges presented by relatively high levels of pupil mobility and the different pathways some follow. Nevertheless, due to the bespoke nature of the curriculum, pupils are now achieving increasingly well by the time they leave the school.

p.2

What does the school do well and what does it need to do better?

Much has been achieved since the school’s last inspection. Leaders at all levels are effective in their work to improve the quality of provision. The support and strategic oversight of the multi-academy trust has been central in moving the school forward. Staff appreciate the professional development opportunities available to them. They are overwhelmingly positive, indicating a growing pride in the school and confidence in the direction it is travelling.

p.2

What does the school do well and what does it need to do better?

The school’s curriculum offer has appropriate breadth and is meeting the needs of pupils who all have SEND increasingly well. Vulnerable pupils from disadvantaged backgrounds benefit from targeted support that meets their needs. A significant minority of pupils also access the school’s online curriculum offer that is supporting them to re-engage with education. Others are following tailored curriculums that support pupils with additional complex needs well, including those who struggle to attend school.

p.2

What does the school do well and what does it need to do better?

Central pillars of the curriculum such, as English, mathematics and science, are well established. Pupils who join the school who struggle to read benefit from early identification and targeted support. Pupils generally engage well in learning. However, some staff are not as skilled as others in planning activities that either support or challenge pupils well enough. Occasionally, this is due to the complex needs of pupils. Sometimes it is because of a simple training need, such as delivering the school’s reading programme with complete fidelity. The school is aware of this. Crucially, current priorities for improvement focus on the right things.

p.2

What does the school do well and what does it need to do better?

Pupils’ personal development is a high priority here. Improving their self-esteem and sense of self-worth is very much a central part of the school’s curriculum offer. Staff 24 and 25 September 2024

p.2

3

understand that pupils need to be ready to learn before they make meaningful progress in the classroom. Integral to their work is supporting pupils’ social and emotional needs, a task that all staff treat seriously and with growing success. A positive consequence is the impact on reducing pupil absence. However, sometimes the delicate balance between supporting vulnerable pupils and directly addressing the varying challenges they present, is not consistent. For example, staff lack consistency in addressing some pupils’ use of offensive language.

p.3

3

The school’s personal, social and health education (PSHE) programme has been revised. There are a growing range of enrichment opportunities that make pupils’ learning more interesting and meaningful. These include learning about different cultures and religions as well as aspects such as celebrating neurodiversity and difference. As a result, pupils recall their learning in PSHE well. A new careers programme is also impacting positively on the school’s work to ensure that pupils are better prepared for their next steps on leaving school.

p.3

Safeguarding

The arrangements for safeguarding are effective.

p.3

(Information for the school and appropriate authority)

 There is some variability in the way that the curriculum is adapted to meet the needs of individual pupils, including with the teaching of reading. Sometimes this prevents pupils from learning as much as they could because tasks do not build securely enough on what they already know and can do. The school should ensure that all teachers understand how to design and adapt tasks for the pupils they teach, so that this is happening consistently well.  Sometimes poor language is used by pupils, and staff are not consistent in how they address this. As a result, derogatory language is sometimes allowed to continue. The school should ensure the recent training for staff is routinely put into practice across all phases of the school.

p.3

How can I feed back my views?

find out what other parents and carers think. We use information from Ofsted Parent View when deciding which schools to inspect, when to inspect them and as part of their inspection.

p.3

How can I feed back my views?

The Department for Education has further guidance on how to complain about a school. 24 and 25 September 2024

p.3

Further information

You can search for published performance information about the school.

p.4

Further information

In the report, 'disadvantaged pupils' is used to mean pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND); pupils who meet the definition of children in need of help and protection ; pupils receiving statutory local authority support from a social worker; and pupils who otherwise meet the criteria used for deciding the school's pupil premium funding (this includes pupils claiming free school meals at any point in the last six years, looked after children (children in local authority care) and/or children who left care through adoption or another formal route). 24 and 25 September 2024

p.4

School details

School category Academy special converter

p.5

School details

Principal Andrea George-Samuels (executive principal), Abedah Karim (principal) Website www.wishmorecrossacademy.org

p.5

School details

Dates of previous inspection 4 and 5 May 2022, under section 5 of the Education Act 2005

p.5

Information about this school

 Wishmore Cross Academy caters for boys aged from seven to 16 who have social, emotional, mental health and associated needs. All have education, health and care plans.  The school is part of Lift Schools multi-academy trust, formally known as Academies Enterprise Trust (AET). A board of trustees and officers employed by the trust are responsible for governance.  A new executive principal and a new principal have joined the school since the last inspection in May 2022.  The school meets the requirements of the provider access legislation, which requires schools to provide pupils in Years 8 to 13 with information and engagement about approved technical education qualifications and apprenticeships.  The school uses four unregistered providers. 24 and 25 September 2024

p.5

Information about this inspection

The inspectors carried out this graded inspection under section 5 of the Education Act 2005. During a graded inspection, we grade the school for each of our key judgements (quality of education; behaviour and attitudes; personal development; and leadership and management) and for any relevant provision judgement (early years and/or sixth form provision). Schools receiving a graded inspection from September 2024, will not be given an overall effectiveness grade

p.6

Information about this inspection

 Inspections are a point-in-time evaluation about the quality of a school's education provision.  Inspectors discussed any continued impact of the pandemic with the school and have taken that into account in their evaluation of the school.  Inspectors held a wide range of meetings with leaders at all levels, as well as teaching and support staff. The lead inspector met with a representative of the multi-academy trust.  Inspectors carried out deep dives in these subjects: reading, mathematics, science and physical education. For each deep dive, inspectors held discussions about the curriculum, visited a sample of lessons, spoke to teachers, spoke to some pupils about their learning and looked at samples of pupils’ work. Inspectors also discussed the curriculum in some other subjects with leaders.  To evaluate the effectiveness of safeguarding, inspectors: reviewed the single central record; took account of the views of parents, leaders, staff and pupils; and considered

p.6

Information about this inspection

the extent to which the school has created an open and positive culture around safeguarding that puts pupils’ interests first.  Pupils were talked to throughout the inspection to gain their views about the school. An inspector also talked formally to two representative groups of pupils.  Inspectors considered the views of parents and carers submitted through Ofsted Parent View. An inspector talked to parents on the telephone. The views of staff were also considered through Ofsted’s staff survey.

p.6

Inspection team

Clive Close, lead inspector His Majesty's Inspector

p.6

Inspection team

Chris Ellison His Majesty's Inspector 24 and 25 September 2024

p.6

7

achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children's services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.

p.7

7

If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.7

7

You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open- government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .

p.7

7

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .

p.7

7

T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.7

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion