Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School inspection (EIF)

Two Waters Primary School

Inspected 25 Sept 2024 · published 13 Nov 2024 · URN 117108

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

James Chester (lead), Emma Breckenridge

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    25 Sept 2024

  • Inspectors verified

    Emma Breckenridge, James Chester

  • Behaviour and attitudes verified

    Good

  • Early years verified

    Good

  • Leadership and management verified

    Good

  • Personal development verified

    Outstanding

  • Quality of education verified

    Good

  • Postcode verified

    HP3 0AU

  • Name on report verified

    Two Waters Primary School

  • URN verified

    117108

Page 1 of 7
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Each judgement on its scale, weakest to strongest.

  • Behaviour and attitudesGood
  • Early yearsGood
  • Leadership and managementGood
  • Personal developmentOutstanding
  • Quality of educationGood

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+68Positivemore positive than 75% of reports of this type
OutstandingGoodRIInadequate

In line with other reports of this type.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praisevery welleffectivelyloveambitiouseffectiveoutstandingthriveenjoy
Criticismnot alwaysnot consistentlydisruptionnot effectivelowernot clear

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsSafeguardingAbout the inspection positive critical
  • Findings1139w+67
  • Safeguarding6w+33

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
7
Words of findings
1,115
about usual (typical 1153)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 47, typical 55
Average sentence
16 words
Next steps
5
typical 4
Hedged sentences
13%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 66%Safeguarding 0%About the inspection 34%

Full report text

Inspection of Two Waters Primary School High Ridge Close, Apsley, High Ridge Close, Hemel Hempstead, Hertfordshire HP3 0AU

p.1

Inspection dates: 24 and 25 September 2024

p.1

The quality of education Good Behaviour and attitudes Good Personal development Outstanding Leadership and management Good Early years provision Good Previous inspection grade Outstanding

p.1

Until November 2020, the school was exempt from routine inspection because it was judged as outstanding for overall effectiveness at its previous inspection under section 5 of the Education Act 2005. The school has not been inspected under section 5 of the Act since December 2011. 24 and 25 September 2024

p.1

What is it like to attend this school?

Being a pupil at Two Waters means being part of a caring and inclusive community. Everyone is encouraged to thrive and reach their potential. Pupils feel safe and valued. This is because there is a supportive environment, where everyone’s differences are celebrated. For example, the school recently put on a ‘paralympic roadshow’, which enabled pupils with special educational needs and/or physical disabilities (SEND) to shine.

p.2

What is it like to attend this school?

Pupils benefit from a broad and ambitious curriculum. This includes a strong focus on developing their love of reading. Older pupils take great pride in their roles as reading ambassadors. They help inspire younger pupils to develop a love of books. While pupils achieve very well in reading and mathematics, they do not always get the support needed to develop their handwriting skills effectively. Pupils behave well. This is because they understand the school’s expectations and look forward to getting house points for positive behaviour. They are confident that any issues, including perceived bullying, are addressed promptly and effectively. Children in early years enjoy a stimulating and nurturing environment. There are many interesting activities to explore. However, they do not always have enough suitable opportunities to develop their writing skills.

p.2

What does the school do well and what does it need to do better?

The school’s curriculum is broad and covers the full national curriculum. Leaders have carefully planned the important knowledge that pupils should learn across the main school. However, this is less well developed in early years, as knowledge intended for children to learn has not always been thought through carefully enough. Experienced teachers are more ambitious in taking planned knowledge and exploring it with pupils in more depth. Where this is the case, pupils develop deeper and more complex understanding and achieve very well. The school recognises this and has plans to address it.

p.2

What does the school do well and what does it need to do better?

Teachers actively foster a love for reading among pupils. This starts with effective phonics teaching in the early years, where children are well supported in decoding and blending words. This provides the secure foundation they need to read fluently and access increasingly challenging books.

p.2

What does the school do well and what does it need to do better?

The school provides a wealth of opportunities to explore and enjoy books. Books are everywhere, from classrooms, to the school library, to pupils reading them in playgrounds. Pupils are passionate about reading and have developed a clear love for it.

p.2

What does the school do well and what does it need to do better?

Although the school has taken effective steps to develop writing, the quality of pupils’ handwriting is not consistently high. This is because in the lower school, including early years, the approach to developing early letter formation and simple sentence construction has not been as effective as intended. Some pupils do not consolidate these basic elements strongly, before moving on to more complex writing. 24 and 25 September 2024

p.2

3

The school excels in supporting pupils with SEND. Staff skilfully tailor learning and carefully consider education, health, and care plans to remove any barriers to participation. This ensures that all pupils with SEND are fully included and achieve as well as possible. Pupils attend and behave very well as they know and follow the school values, such as respect. Most pupils find lessons engaging and want to learn. Any instances of low-level disruption are addressed quickly. In early years, children share and take turns and include each other. However, there are occasions when teachers expect pupils to concentrate for longer periods than they are able to. This impacts on some younger children’s motivation for learning.

p.3

3

Personal development is richly promoted. Pupils take pride in their leadership roles. These include house captains, which create cohesion between year groups. There are highly meaningful opportunities for pupils to learn about fundamental British values, such as democracy and citizenship. These include standing for election, raising money for charity and working with the elderly. The school also offers an extensive range of extracurricular activities, trips, and clubs that are carefully planned to ensure everyone benefits. Over time, these build a rich tapestry of wider experiences. For example, pupils have been to the theatre to develop their understanding of Shakespeare and participated in high ropes courses to build their confidence and teamwork skills.

p.3

3

The school proactively involve parents in pupils’ education. This is reflected in the number of parents running clubs. Governors know the school well. For example, they carefully planned for the recent period of transition, during which a few experienced teachers moved on to promotions. This ensured that new teachers have the support they need. The school engages effectively with staff regarding well-being but recognise that further work is needed to refine workload in line with new assessment systems.

p.3

Safeguarding

The arrangements for safeguarding are effective.

p.3

(Information for the school and appropriate authority)

 The school has not ensured that its programme for developing pupils’ handwriting is effectively structured from the early years. As a result, some pupils advance to more complex writing without fully consolidating essential transcription skills, such as letter formation, word spacing, and alignment. The school needs to establish a clear approach to handwriting development that strengthens transcription skills from the early years, ensuring pupils have a solid foundation for more advanced writing.  The school is redeveloping the early years curriculum. As such, in some areas of learning it is not fully clear what children should learn. Certain activities in early years do not develop children’s knowledge and skills effectively, particularly in writing and 24 and 25 September 2024

p.3

4

transcription. The school needs to ensure that the intended knowledge is carefully planned and sequenced, with activities consistently supporting the development of these skills.

p.4

How can I feed back my views?

find out what other parents and carers think. We use information from Ofsted Parent View when deciding which schools to inspect, when to inspect them and as part of their inspection.

p.4

How can I feed back my views?

The Department for Education has further guidance on how to complain about a school.

p.4

Further information

You can search for published performance information about the school.

p.4

Further information

In the report, ‘disadvantaged pupils’ is used to mean pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND); pupils who meet the definition of children in need of help and protection ; pupils receiving statutory local authority support from a social worker; and pupils who otherwise meet the criteria used for deciding the school’s pupil premium funding (this includes pupils claiming free school meals at any point in the last six years, looked after children (children in local authority care) and/or children who left care through adoption or another formal route). 24 and 25 September 2024

p.4

School details

Appropriate authority The governing body

p.5

School details

Date of previous inspection 1 and 2 December 2011, under section 5 of the Education Act 2005

p.5

Information about this school

 The headteacher took up post in December 2015.  The school does not use any alternative providers.

p.5

Information about this inspection

The inspectors carried out this graded inspection under section 5 of the Education Act 2005. During a graded inspection, we grade the school for each of our key judgements (quality of education; behaviour and attitudes; personal development; and leadership and management) and for any relevant provision judgement (early years and/or sixth form provision). Schools receiving a graded inspection from September 2024, will not be given an overall effectiveness grade.

p.5

Information about this inspection

 Inspections are a point-in-time evaluation about the quality of a school’s education provision. 24 and 25 September 2024

p.5

6

 This was the first routine inspection the school received since the COVID-19 pandemic began. Inspectors discussed the impact of the pandemic with the school and have taken that into account in their evaluation of the school.

p.6

6

 Inspectors met with the headteacher, deputy headteacher, local authority standards and excellence officer, special education needs coordinator, middle leaders and class teachers.

p.6

6

 Inspectors carried out deep dives in English (including early reading), mathematics and religious education. For each deep dive, inspectors held discussions about the curriculum, visited a sample of lessons, spoke to teachers, spoke to some pupils about their learning and looked at samples of pupils’ work.

p.6

6

 Inspectors also discussed the curriculum in some other subjects, which included science, history and geography. Inspectors also spent time in early years and met with early years staff.

p.6

6

 To evaluate the effectiveness of safeguarding, inspectors: reviewed the single central record; took account of the views of leaders, staff and pupils; and considered the extent to which the school has created an open and positive culture around safeguarding that puts pupils’ interests first.

p.6

6

 Inspectors met with the governing body regarding governance.

p.6

6

 Inspectors met with pupils and visited break and lunch times.

p.6

6

 Inspectors reviewed staff, pupil and parent surveys and free text comments.

p.6

6

 Inspectors conducted further meetings on behaviour and attendance, personal development and SEND.

p.6

6

 Inspectors considered responses to Ofsted’s pupil survey and Ofsted’s staff survey. They considered responses to the parent survey, Ofsted Parent View, including free- text messages.

p.6

Inspection team

James Chester, lead inspector His Majesty’s Inspector

p.6

Inspection team

Emma Breckenridge Ofsted Inspector 24 and 25 September 2024

p.6

7

achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.

p.7

7

If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.7

7

You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open- government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .

p.7

7

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .

p.7

7

T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.7

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion