Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School inspection (EIF)

Haven High Academy

Inspected 10 Jul 2024 · published 11 Nov 2024 · URN 138754

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    10 Jul 2024

  • Inspectors verified

    Damian Painton, Julie McBrearty, Paul Sweeney, Rakesh Patel, Roxanne Fearns-Davies, Sean Kelly

  • Behaviour and attitudes verified

    Inadequate

  • Leadership and management verified

    Inadequate

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Inadequate

  • Personal development verified

    Requires improvement

  • Quality of education verified

    Inadequate

  • Postcode verified

    PE21 9HB

  • Name on report verified

    Haven High Academy

  • URN verified

    138754

Page 1 of 8
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2022.

  • OverallInadequate
  • Behaviour and attitudesInadequate
  • Leadership and managementInadequate
  • Personal developmentRequires improvement
  • Quality of educationInadequate

3% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Inadequate (5,043 inspections).

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

−43Criticalmore positive than 28% of reports of this type graded Inadequate
OutstandingGoodRIInadequate

In line with other reports of this type graded Inadequate.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praiseconsistentlyeffectivethriveskilledpositivepositivelysuccessfullyconfidently
Criticismweaknessesmissedtoo manynot consistentlytoo slowlypoorlypoorstruggle

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsSafeguardingAbout the inspection positive critical
  • Findings1429w−45
  • Safeguarding6w+33

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
8
Words of findings
1,405
about usual (typical 1552)
Reading level
Fairly hard
Flesch 51, typical 53
Average sentence
15 words
Next steps
6
typical 6
Hedged sentences
13%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 67%Safeguarding 0%About the inspection 33%

Full report text

Inspection of Haven High Academy Marian Road, Boston, Lincolnshire PE21 9HB

p.1

Overall effectiveness Inadequate

The quality of education Inadequate Behaviour and attitudes Inadequate Personal development Requires improvement Leadership and management Inadequate Previous inspection grade Requires improvement

p.1

Overall effectiveness Inadequate

The executive headteacher of this school is Austin Sheppard. This school is part of Voyage Education Partnership, which means other people in the trust also have responsibility for running the school. The trust is run by the chief executive officer (CEO), Emma Hadley, and overseen by a board of trustees, chaired by Christopher Penney. 9 and 10 July 2024

p.1

What is it like to attend this school?

Although the pupils at Haven High say, ‘Things are getting better recently’, they do not benefit from an acceptable quality of education. Teaching that does not routinely take into account pupils’ needs, fill their knowledge gaps and help them to develop a secure understanding has led to pupils achieving poorly. There is little sign that achievement is improving.

p.2

What is it like to attend this school?

Many pupils experience a fragmented education. Attendance is low and suspensions are high. Pupils miss too much learning due to being absent, disengaged or suspended. When pupils do attend lessons, there is not a clear or coherent strategy to help them catch up on missed learning.

p.2

What is it like to attend this school?

The school has begun to tackle poor behaviour. Pupils say that the school is calmer recently. However, some pupils and staff think rewards and sanctions are not applied fairly across the school. Most pupils say that there are trusted adults they know they can speak to if they have a problem. However, some pupils’ behaviour makes other pupils feel uneasy and worried. Not all pupils are confident that staff tackle this consistently, so they do not always report concerns.

p.2

What is it like to attend this school?

Parents and carers have lost faith in the school. They do not feel the school has communicated well enough about the number of significant changes that impact their children daily.

p.2

better?

Significant variability in how well the curriculum is taught has led to pupils underachieving. Not all teachers are sufficiently skilled in teaching the curriculum. They do not consistently adapt how they teach to help pupils learn, including pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND). Teachers do not routinely address gaps in pupils’ knowledge. Teachers do not ensure that pupils’ work is of a high enough quality. Work undertaken to redesign the curriculum in some subjects has not led to an improvement in how these curriculums are taught.

p.2

better?

The school has identified, but not addressed effectively, the barriers to academic success for disadvantaged pupils. These pupils underachieve.

p.2

better?

Strategies to support pupils who struggle to read have been implemented too slowly. This work is only having a positive impact on the reading ability of pupils in Year 7. This work has not yet started for older pupils. Those older pupils who require it do not get the necessary support to become fluent readers.

p.2

better?

Not all pupils consistently commit to their learning. Teachers do not routinely support these pupils to help them to engage positively with their learning.

p.2

better?

The school promotes pupils’ wider development. Pupils learn about careers and future next steps. Year 10 pupils can undertake work experience. Pupils learn how to 9 and 10 July 2024

p.2

3

stay safe, including online. They have some understanding about protected characteristics. Pupils learn about respect and tolerance. However, some do not apply this well to how they treat others. Pupils do not learn how to be independent and resilient to support them to engage routinely with learning.

p.3

3

Attendance has been historically low and shows little sign of sustained improvement. Absence is further compounded by the high number of suspensions. Too many pupils, including disadvantaged pupils, are regularly absent. They do not receive sufficient support to help them to catch up on missed learning.

p.3

3

Insufficient work has been undertaken to address the weaknesses in the school’s provision. The school has not secured the necessary improvements, including to the teaching of the curriculum, achievement, the support for disadvantaged pupils and those with SEND, and attendance. The school has acted too slowly on advice from external support. Very recent work that the school has undertaken to begin to address the provision’s weaknesses is at an early stage. This work is yet to bring about the necessary, sustained improvement.

p.3

3

Trust leaders and trustees do not have an accurate understanding of the quality of all aspects of the provision. This limits their ability to provide the school with effective challenge and support to address the provision’s weaknesses successfully. Trust leaders and trustees have not brought about the necessary improvement. This includes in relation to attendance and curriculum, both of which were identified as weaknesses at the previous inspection. Trust leaders and trustees do not demonstrate the capacity to bring about the required improvement.

p.3

3

Trustees have not ensured that the school consistently implements agreed policies, particularly in relation to the use of alternative provision.

p.3

3

Staff are much happier at this school than in previous years. However, a significant minority of staff are still concerned about pupils’ behaviour.

p.3

Safeguarding

The arrangements for safeguarding are effective.

p.3

(Information for the school and appropriate authority)

 There is variation across the different subjects in how well the curriculum is taught. Teachers do not consistently use the most effective strategies to help pupils, including those with SEND, to learn and achieve well. In some subjects, the curriculum is not sufficiently ambitious or well planned to promote effective learning. Many pupils, including disadvantaged pupils and those with SEND, underachieve as a result. The school must ensure that there is clarity about what 9 and 10 July 2024

p.3

4

should be taught and when in all subjects, and that all teachers know how best to teach their subjects so that all pupils can learn and achieve well.  Older pupils who struggle to read do not receive support to help them to read confidently. This can limit how well they access the curriculum and achieve. The school must ensure that all pupils who need it receive support to help them to read fluently.  The school’s strategy to support disadvantaged pupils is not securing these pupils better outcomes. Disadvantaged pupils underachieve. The school must ensure that its support for these pupils helps them to access their learning and achieve well.  Too many pupils are absent too often. There is no consistent support to help these pupils catch up on missed learning. This leads to them falling further behind. The school should ensure that frequently absent pupils receive the right support to attend regularly and to catch up on missed learning, so that they can

p.4

4

engage in lessons and achieve well.  Too many pupils do not commit to learning well enough in lessons. This further limits pupils’ ability to learn well. The school should ensure that pupils receive the necessary support and guidance, from their teachers and through the personal development offer, to develop the necessary resilience, independence and focus to be able to engage consistently with their learning.  While the school is now addressing behaviour, some pupils feel that the rewards and sanctions are inconsistently applied. Some pupils report that the behaviour of other pupils leaves them feeling uneasy and worried. Some staff are concerned at some pupils’ behaviour. The school should ensure that the behaviour policy is applied consistently, so that all pupils behave well, feel safe and thrive at the school.  There is an inaccurate understanding of how well the school is performing. The necessary improvements have not been brought about. As a result, too many

p.4

4

pupils continue to underachieve. The school must ensure that there is an accurate understanding of the quality of provision and an appropriate focus on rapidly securing the necessary improvements.  Having considered the evidence, we strongly recommend that the school does not seek to appoint early careers teachers.

p.4

How can I feed back my views?

or to find out what other parents and carers think. We use information from Ofsted Parent View when deciding which schools to inspect, when to inspect them and as part of their inspection.

p.4

How can I feed back my views?

The Department for Education has further guidance on how to complain about a school. 9 and 10 July 2024

p.4

Further information

You can search for published performance information about the school.

p.5

Further information

In the report, ‘disadvantaged pupils’ is used to mean pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND); pupils who meet the definition of children in need of help and protection; pupils receiving statutory local authority support from a social worker; and pupils who otherwise meet the criteria used for deciding the school’s pupil premium funding (this includes pupils claiming free school meals at any point in the last six years, looked after children (children in local authority care) and/or children who left care through adoption or another formal route). 9 and 10 July 2024

p.5

School details

Number of pupils on the school roll 1315

p.6

School details

Dates of previous inspection 2 and 3 November 2022, under section 5 of the Education Act 2005

p.6

Information about this school

 There have been significant changes to the school’s leadership since the previous inspection. An executive headteacher joined the school in June 2024. Several new senior leaders have been appointed since the last inspection.  The school is located on two sites. Pupils in Years 9 to 11 attend the site where the school is registered. Pupils in Year 7 and 8 attend a separate site, located at Tollfield Road, Boston PE21 9PN.  The school uses one registered and one unregistered alternative provision.  The school meets the requirements of the provider access legislation, which requires schools to provide pupils in Years 8 to 13 with information and engagement about approved technical education qualifications and apprenticeships.

p.6

Information about this inspection

The inspectors carried out this graded inspection under section 5 of the Education Act 2005. 9 and 10 July 2024

p.6

7

In accordance with section 44(1) of the Education Act 2005, His Majesty’s Chief Inspector is of the opinion that this school requires special measures because it is failing to give its pupils an acceptable standard of education and the persons responsible for leading, managing or governing the school are not demonstrating the capacity to secure the necessary improvement in the school.

p.7

7

 Inspections are a point-in-time judgment about the quality of a school’s education.  Inspectors discussed any continued impact of the pandemic with the school and have taken that into account in their evaluation of the school.  Inspectors met with the executive headteacher, and other school leaders, including those responsible for attendance, behaviour, the reading strategy, the provision for pupils with SEND, and the school’s pupil premium strategy.  The lead inspector met with the CEO of the trust and the director of education. He met with trustees, including the chair.  Inspectors carried out deep dives in English, mathematics, science, geography, and design and technology. For each deep dive, inspectors held discussions about the curriculum, visited a sample of lessons, spoke to teachers, spoke to some pupils about their learning, and looked at samples of pupils’ work. The lead inspector listened to some pupils read to their teacher.

p.7

7

 Inspectors also discussed the curriculum, looked at samples of pupils’ work, visited lessons and spoke to pupils about their learning in some other subjects.  To evaluate the effectiveness of safeguarding, the inspectors: reviewed the single central record; took account of the views of leaders, staff, and pupils; and considered the extent to which the school has created an open and positive culture around safeguarding that puts pupils’ interests first.  Inspectors met with pupils from across the school. Inspectors also considered the responses to the online pupil survey.  Inspectors considered responses to Ofsted Parent View.  Inspectors met with staff and considered responses to the online staff survey.

p.7

Inspection team

Rakesh Patel, lead inspector His Majesty’s Inspector

p.7

Inspection team

Roxanne Fearns-Davies His Majesty’s Inspector

p.7

Inspection team

Damian Painton Ofsted Inspector 9 and 10 July 2024

p.7

8

regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.

p.8

8

If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.8

8

You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .

p.8

8

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .

p.8

8

T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.8

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion