Schools & FE · School inspection (EIF)
Kingswood Primary School
Summary
Matea Marcinko (lead), Andrew Rigby, Lando Du Plooy
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection date verified
2 Oct 2024
- Inspectors verified
Andrew Rigby, Lando Du Plooy, Matea Marcinko
- Behaviour and attitudes verified
Good
- Early years verified
Good
- Leadership and management verified
Good
- Personal development verified
Good
- Quality of education verified
Good
- Postcode verified
SE27 9RD
- Name on report verified
Kingswood Primary School
- URN verified
100574
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2019.
- Behaviour and attitudesGood
- Early yearsGood
- Leadership and managementGood
- Personal developmentGood
- Quality of educationGood
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
Reads more critically than most reports of this type.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No standout praise found.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Leaders have planned a broad and balanced curriculum in line with what pupils need to learn nationally. p.2
- The school should continue to review the consistency and coherence of p.3
- The school should ensure that all staff receive appropriate training to teach the required content most effectively. p.3
- They should also ensure that the curriculum is consistently adapted where needed to meet the needs of pupils with SEND. p.3
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Progress & outcomes5
“Pupils are proud of their achievements.” p.2
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 7
- Words of findings
- 1,025
- about usual (typical 1153)
- Reading level
- Fairly hard
- Flesch 52, typical 55
- Average sentence
- 15 words
- Next steps
- 4
- typical 4
- Hedged sentences
- 21%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Inspection of Kingswood Primary School Gipsy Road, London SE27 9RD
p.1
The quality of education Good Behaviour and attitudes Good Personal development Good Leadership and management Good Early years provision Good Previous inspection grade Good 1 and 2 October 2024
p.1
What is it like to attend this school?
Pupils are kept safe and know who their trusted adults are. They enjoy coming to school and learning with their friends. There is a sense of shared pride throughout the school. Pupils act with consideration and show courtesy to others.
p.2
What is it like to attend this school?
Pupils benefit from the varied extra-curricular offer. They can take their interests further through a range of clubs, including gymnastics, gardening and art. Pupils develop their leadership skills through a range of roles, such as play ambassadors, peer mediators and school council representatives. Pupils enjoy the outdoor space and having quiet zones to read as well as inviting areas to play ball games.
p.2
What is it like to attend this school?
The school has high ambitions for pupils. Leaders have planned a broad and balanced curriculum in line with what pupils need to learn nationally. Pupils are proud of their achievements. They achieve well in national assessments. In a few subjects, the teaching of the curriculum is at an earlier stage of development. This means that key ideas are not consistently taught, including for some pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND).
p.2
What does the school do well and what does it need to do better?
In most subjects, the school has set out precisely what it wants pupils to learn and when. This is sequenced so that pupils build on their knowledge securely over time. For example, in history, pupils are introduced to key ideas across the curriculum. Children in early years begin learning about the achievements of humans. Then in Year 1, they can begin to learn about the significant achievements of women in history. This means that older pupils can then consider the lunar landings as achievements and evaluate whether their impact was worth the cost of space exploration.
p.2
What does the school do well and what does it need to do better?
In a few subjects, however, teaching does not consistently ensure that all pupils, including pupils with SEND, are securing the key concepts needed for future learning effectively. Occasionally, adaptations are not supporting pupils to access the curriculum. This means that some pupils are not building on previous learning and that misconceptions are not tackled quickly enough.
p.2
What does the school do well and what does it need to do better?
Pupils with SEND are appropriately identified. Teachers are trained to support pupils as part of an inclusive environment. The school works with parents and external agencies to understand pupils’ needs so that they can succeed in all aspects of school life.
p.2
What does the school do well and what does it need to do better?
Pupils begin learning to read as soon as they start school. Staff receive training in the teaching of phonics. Pupils, including pupils with SEND, have opportunities to practise their reading with books matched to the sounds they are learning. Pupils who struggle with reading are given effective support to become more fluent and confident. The school promotes a love of stories. Reading is carefully planned across the curriculum so that pupils encounter key ideas across topics. For example, pupils read fiction and non-fiction texts in English to deepen their learning about Pompeii in geography. 1 and 2 October 2024
p.2
3
Pupils behave well and lessons are rarely disrupted. Pupils demonstrate positive attitudes towards each other and adults. They are awarded house points for demonstrating the Kingswood values. Bullying is rare, and pupils trust adults to deal with any concerns. Typically, pupils are focused on their learning in lessons. Some of the policies for behaviour and attendance are at the early stages of implementation. This means that, at times, pupils and staff are not clear on the agreed expectations and consequences. The school is working with families to increase attendance and decrease persistent absence sustainably.
p.3
3
Pupils’ wider development is well considered. The curriculum is carefully designed to support pupils’ understanding of important concepts. For example, pupils in Year 2 learn about posting information online and how to stay safe. This means that pupils in Year 6 can learn about building a positive online reputation for their future careers. Pupils are taught about how to appreciate different faiths and cultures. This is extended through cultural events, such as the school’s annual carnival and Windrush celebrations.
p.3
3
Staff feel supported by leaders in the school community. Teachers, including those at the early stages of their career, feel that their workload and well-being are carefully considered. Governors fulfil their statutory duties. Leaders and those responsible for governance have worked effectively to maintain high standards for all pupils during a period of transition.
p.3
Safeguarding
The arrangements for safeguarding are effective.
p.3
(Information for the school and appropriate authority)
In a few subjects, teaching does not consistently focus on the most important knowledge and skills. As a result, the foundations that pupils need for future learning are not always secure and misconceptions are not addressed as swiftly as they could be. The school should ensure that all staff receive appropriate training to teach the required content most effectively. They should also ensure that the curriculum is consistently adapted where needed to meet the needs of pupils with SEND. The school’s implementation of behaviour and attendance policies is in the early stages. As a result, there are some inconsistencies with how these are used. This makes it difficult to review any patterns and check which groups of pupils need most support. This includes the rates of absence and persistence absence, which remain an area of focus. The school should continue to review the consistency and coherence of
p.3
(Information for the school and appropriate authority)
policies to identify any patterns and target support where it is most needed. 1 and 2 October 2024
p.3
How can I feed back my views?
find out what other parents and carers think. We use information from Ofsted Parent View when deciding which schools to inspect, when to inspect them and as part of their inspection.
p.4
How can I feed back my views?
The Department for Education has further guidance on how to complain about a school.
p.4
Further information
You can search for published performance information about the school.
p.4
Further information
In the report, ‘disadvantaged pupils’ is used to mean pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND); pupils who meet the definition of children in need of help and protection ; pupils receiving statutory local authority support from a social worker; and pupils who otherwise meet the criteria used for deciding the school’s pupil premium funding (this includes pupils claiming free school meals at any point in the last six years, looked after children (children in local authority care) and/or children who left care through adoption or another formal route). 1 and 2 October 2024
p.4
School details
Appropriate authority The governing body
p.5
School details
Chair of governing body Christopher Toye
p.5
School details
Dates of previous inspection 13 and 14 March 2019, under section 5 of the Education Act 2005
p.5
Information about this school
Kingswood Primary School is part of the Gipsy Hill Federation. There has recently been a change in the leadership of the local governing body. The local advisory board has not met during a period of transition. The school has also moved all pupils to one site. The headteacher has continued in post since the school’s last inspection. The school currently does not use any alternative providers. The school runs its own breakfast and after-school clubs.
p.5
Information about this inspection
The inspectors carried out this graded inspection under section 5 of the Education Act 2005. During a graded inspection, we grade the school for each of our key judgements (quality of education; behaviour and attitudes; personal development; and leadership and management) and for any relevant provision judgement (early years provision). Schools receiving a graded inspection from September 2024 will not be given an overall effectiveness grade. 1 and 2 October 2024
p.5
6
Inspections are a point-in-time evaluation about the quality of a school’s education provision. This was the first routine inspection the school received since the COVID-19 pandemic began. Inspectors discussed the impact of the pandemic with the school and have taken that into account in their evaluation of the school. The inspectors held meetings with the headteacher, senior leaders, teachers and support staff. The lead inspector spoke with the chair of the governing body and members of the local advisory board. She also spoke with the local authority director of education and the school improvement partner. The inspectors carried out deep dives in these subjects: reading, history, art and mathematics. For each deep dive, the inspectors discussed the curriculum with subject leaders, visited a sample of lessons, spoke with teachers, spoke with some pupils about their learning and looked at samples of their work. The inspectors also considered the
p.6
6
curriculum in other subjects. To evaluate the effectiveness of safeguarding, inspectors: reviewed the single central record of pre-employment checks; took account of the views of leaders, staff and pupils; and considered the extent to which the school has created an open and positive culture around safeguarding that puts pupils’ interests first. The inspectors scrutinised a range of documents provided by leaders, including their priorities for improvement. The inspectors considered the views of parents, pupils and staff through discussions and their responses to Ofsted’s online surveys.
p.6
Inspection team
Matea Marcinko, lead inspector His Majesty’s Inspector
p.6
Inspection team
Andrew Rigby Ofsted Inspector 1 and 2 October 2024
p.6
7
achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.
p.7
7
If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .
p.7
7
You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open- government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .
p.7
7
Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .
p.7
7
T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted
p.7
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion