Schools & FE · School inspection (EIF)
Weald of Kent Grammar School
Summary
Daniel Botting (lead), Christie Ransom, Debbie Brake, Helen Middleton, Lee Selby
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection date verified
2 Oct 2024
- Inspectorssingle source
Christie Ransom, Daniel Botting, Debbie Brake, Helen Middleton, Lee Selby
- Behaviour and attitudes verified
Good
- Leadership and management verified
Good
- Personal development verified
Good
- Quality of education verified
Good
- Postcode verified
TN9 2JP
- Name on report verified
Weald of Kent Grammar School
- URN verified
136455
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2022.
- Behaviour and attitudesGood
- Leadership and managementGood
- Personal developmentGood
- Quality of educationGood
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No strong criticism found.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
SEND & inclusion5
“In sixth form, students with SEND achieve exceptionally well.” p.2Teaching & assessment5
“Teachers have a detailed knowledge and enthusiasm for their subjects.” p.2Progress & outcomes4
“In sixth form, students with SEND achieve exceptionally well.” p.2
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 7
- Words of findings
- 1,115
- about usual (typical 1153)
- Reading level
- Fairly hard
- Flesch 54, typical 55
- Average sentence
- 16 words
- Next steps
- 2
- typical 4
- Hedged sentences
- 8%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Inspection of Weald of Kent Grammar School Tudeley Lane, Tonbridge, Kent TN9 2JP
p.1
The quality of education Good Behaviour and attitudes Good Personal development Good Leadership and management Good Sixth-form provision Good Previous inspection grade Requires improvement
p.1
The headteacher of this school is Richard Booth. The school is a single-academy trust, Weald of Kent Grammar School Academy Trust, which means other people in the trust also have responsibility for running the school. The trust is overseen by a board of trustees, chaired by Chris Eades. 1 and 2 October 2024
p.1
What is it like to attend this school?
Pupils value the school’s caring and nurturing ethos. They are enthusiastic about the changes the school has undergone in the last two years. At the heart of these has been a shift in the school’s culture. The school has put in place a clear system of rewards and consequences, so pupils know what to expect. Behaviour is calm and settled as a result. There is a strong emphasis on pupil welfare and helping to develop confident young people. Pupils and staff interact positively with one another. This helps pupils to trust that staff will help them if they are worried, including about bullying. Pupils feel confident to alert staff to any concerns, for example by using special post boxes situated around the school.
p.2
What is it like to attend this school?
Pupils achieve very well, as do students in the sixth form. As with all aspects of the school’s provision, staff make sure that standards are consistent across the two sites. At both campuses, pupils enjoy a broad variety of extra-curricular activities. Clubs for trampolining, robotics and cooking are among the highlights of this programme. The new house system helps pupils to feel a sense of shared identity and community in the school.
p.2
What does the school do well and what does it need to do better?
Teachers have a detailed knowledge and enthusiasm for their subjects. This enables them to provide clear and insightful explanations for pupils. The work they set challenges pupils to develop ‘scholarship’ by thinking deeply about their learning. This extends into the sixth form, where students are confident in deliberating complex ideas such as the causes of the mid-Tudor crisis. Teachers are adept at checking what pupils know and understand. This goes beyond simply accepting accurate responses. For example, in mathematics, pupils explain how they can prove their answers. As well as studying ambitious texts in English lessons, pupils are encouraged to read widely. The school promotes reading for pleasure, and pupils who speak English as an additional language develop their formal language strongly. Students in the sixth form benefit from high-quality suggested reading lists, which deepen their understanding.
p.2
What does the school do well and what does it need to do better?
The school makes sure that teachers know how to meet the needs of pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND). Therefore, these pupils benefit from supportive strategies to access the full breadth of learning. The performance of disadvantaged pupils, including pupils with SEND, is analysed carefully by the school. Differences in attainment between disadvantaged pupils and their peers are closing. In sixth form, students with SEND achieve exceptionally well. The school continues to refine its curriculum. Programmes of study set out a clear sequence for learning, and teachers are working to close relative gaps in pupils’ understanding.
p.2
What does the school do well and what does it need to do better?
Pupils’ behaviour is focused and purposeful. This contributes to effective learning in classrooms. Pupils understand the ‘three Cs’ behaviour system well. Consequently, there is no low-level disruption to learning. Attendance has been on an upward trend since the previous inspection. Staff work sensitively with the parents and carers of pupils who are persistently absent. This helps to remove potential barriers to good attendance. However, this work does not always bring together a full picture of the attendance issues faced by 1 and 2 October 2024
p.2
3
pupils with SEND. As a result, these pupils miss out on more of the learning and support on offer in school.
p.3
3
The school has transformed its provision for personal, social and health education (PSHE). Lessons and assemblies address vital themes that affect pupils both online and in real life. This helps pupils to understand issues such as peer pressure and friendship dynamics. In the mixed-gender sixth form, PSHE learning builds further to explore perspectives for young men and women on issues such as coercive relationships. Pupils have extensive opportunities to discuss the moral and societal implications of these topics. The school has mapped out a new approach to careers education. Pupils find the ‘career of the week’ helpful and thought-provoking. However, some pupils feel that they would benefit from further guidance in making decisions about their next steps in education.
p.3
3
Leaders and trustees have acted strategically to move the school forward. Staff feel that changes have been made supportively, and with consideration for their workload. Improvements have been underpinned by a change in the school’s ethos and culture. Staff are fully invested in this and make sure that this applies equally across both campuses. By engaging openly with pupils’ and students’ experiences, leaders have brought them along with this culture shift. Pupils and parents feel that they have a voice in their education and that the school listens to them.
p.3
Safeguarding
The arrangements for safeguarding are effective.
p.3
(Information for the school and appropriate authority)
Despite the school’s actions, the attendance of some groups of pupils, including pupils with SEND, remains lower than their peers. Consequently, these pupils miss out on some aspects of the learning and opportunities that the school provides, and they do not achieve as highly as they could. The school should continue to develop its strategic approach to monitoring and improving the attendance of all groups of pupils. Some elements of the school’s programme for careers information, education advice and guidance are still in the process of being embedded. As a result, some pupils do not yet feel fully confident about making the transition to the next stage of their education. The school should ensure that pupils clearly understand all aspects of careers provision.
p.3
How can I feed back my views?
find out what other parents and carers think. We use information from Ofsted Parent View when deciding which schools to inspect, when to inspect them and as part of their inspection. 1 and 2 October 2024
p.3
4
The Department for Education has further guidance on how to complain about a school.
p.4
Further information
You can search for published performance information about the school.
p.4
Further information
In the report, ‘disadvantaged pupils’ is used to mean pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND); pupils who meet the definition of children in need of help and protection ; pupils receiving statutory local authority support from a social worker; and pupils who otherwise meet the criteria used for deciding the school’s pupil premium funding (this includes pupils claiming free school meals at any point in the last six years, looked after children (children in local authority care) and/or children who left care through adoption or another formal route). 1 and 2 October 2024
p.4
provision
Number of pupils on the school roll 1,900
p.5
form
Date of previous inspection 9 November 2022, under section 8 of the Education Act 2005
p.5
Information about this school
The school is a single-academy trust, Weald of Kent Grammar School Academy Trust. The school operates across two sites; one in Tonbridge (Tudeley Lane, TN9 2JP), and the other in Sevenoaks (Seal Hollow Road, TN13 3SN). The majority of sixth-form students attend the Tonbridge site. The school currently uses two registered alternative providers and one unregistered alternative provider. The school meets the requirements of the provider access legislation, which requires schools to provide pupils in Years 8 to 13 with information and engagement about approved technical education qualifications and apprenticeships. 1 and 2 October 2024
p.5
Information about this inspection
The inspectors carried out this graded inspection under section 5 of the Education Act 2005. During a graded inspection, we grade the school for each of our key judgements (quality of education; behaviour and attitudes; personal development; and leadership and management) and for any relevant provision judgement (early years and/or sixth form provision). Schools receiving a graded inspection from September 2024 will not be given an overall effectiveness grade.
p.6
Information about this inspection
Inspections are a point-in-time evaluation about the quality of a school’s education provision. Inspectors discussed any continued impact of the pandemic with the school and have taken that into account in their evaluation of the school. The inspectors met with school leaders, including the headteacher and deputy headteachers. The inspectors also met representatives from the board of trustees. The inspectors carried out deep dives in these subjects: English, mathematics, science, history, modern foreign languages and physical education. For each deep dive, the inspectors held discussions about the curriculum, visited a sample of lessons across both of the school’s sites, spoke to teachers, spoke to some pupils about their learning and looked at samples of pupils’ work. The inspectors also discussed the curriculum and provision for pupils with SEND, and sampled work from other areas of the curriculum.
p.6
Information about this inspection
To evaluate the effectiveness of safeguarding, the inspectors: reviewed the single central record; took account of the views of leaders, trustees, staff, parents and pupils; and considered the extent to which the school has created an open and positive culture around safeguarding that puts the pupils’ interests first. As part of the inspection evidence, inspectors also considered parents’ responses to Ofsted Parent View, and the responses to the online surveys for school pupils and staff.
p.6
Information about this inspection
Daniel Botting, lead inspector His Majesty’s Inspector
p.6
Information about this inspection
Lee Selby His Majesty’s Inspector 1 and 2 October 2024
p.6
7
achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.
p.7
7
If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .
p.7
7
You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open- government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .
p.7
7
Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .
p.7
7
T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted
p.7
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion