Social care · Social care inspection (SCCIF)
Phoenix Family Care Limited
Summary
Sally Griffiths (lead), Leanne Carr
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection datesingle source
7 Oct 2024
- Inspectors verified
Leanne Carr, Sally Griffiths
- Leadership and management verified
Inadequate
- Overall effectivenesssingle source
Inadequate
- Name on report verified
Phoenix Family Care Limited
- URN verified
2483425
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2023.
- OverallInadequate
- Leadership and managementInadequate
5% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Inadequate (12,716 inspections).
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
Reads more critically than most reports of this type graded Inadequate.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No standout praise found.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- There are serious and widespread failures that mean children and parents are not protected or their welfare is not promoted or safeguarded and the care and experiences of children and parents are poor. p.1
- There are serious failures that mean children are not protected. p.2
- The effectiveness of leaders and managers inadequate p.1
- This has meant that unsafe practice has not been challenged and has been allowed to continue. p.2
- For example, Inspection report for residential family centre: Phoenix Family Care Ltd 3 managers did not investigate a complaint when it was reported a staff member had placed a child at risk of harm. p.2
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- The registered person must comply within the given timescales. p.5
- The registered manager shall undertake from time to time such training as is appropriate to ensure that he has the skills necessary for managing the residential family centre. p.5
- The registered person must review the referral process. p.5
- This should consider the skills and knowledge of the staff team before residents are offered a place at the centre. p.5
- The registered person must ensure there are sufficient suitably trained staff always working in the centre. p.5
- The registered person must ensure that staff complete training and development in line with the statement of purpose. p.5
- The registered person must use monitoring and review systems to understand the experiences of residents and children living in the centre. p.5
- When shortfalls are identified in staff practice, the registered person must ensure that these are acted on. p.5
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Records & policies20
“Records are not always made available to families in an accessible format.” p.2Leadership & governance7
“The effectiveness of leaders and managers inadequate” p.1
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 12
- Words of findings
- 2,661
- about usual (typical 2452)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 44, typical 42
- Average sentence
- 18 words
- Next steps
- 8
- typical 8
- Hedged sentences
- 13%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Inspection report for residential family centre: Phoenix Family Care Ltd 1 Phoenix Family Care Limited
p.1
Inspected under the social care common inspection framework
p.1
Information about this residential family centre
This residential family centre is owned and managed by a private provider and is registered to accommodate up to six families.
p.1
Information about this residential family centre
At the time of the inspection, there were four families in residence.
p.1
Overall experiences and progress of
children and parents, taking into account
p.1
inadequate
How well children and parents are helped and protected inadequate
p.1
inadequate
The effectiveness of leaders and managers inadequate
p.1
inadequate
There are serious and widespread failures that mean children and parents are not protected or their welfare is not promoted or safeguarded and the care and experiences of children and parents are poor.
p.1
inadequate
Overall judgement at last inspection: good
p.1
Enforcement action since last inspection:
On 11 March 2024, Ofsted inspected the residential family centre in response to information received about the physical condition of the centre and inconsistencies in staff practice. A compliance notice was issued under regulation 20, the complaints standard.
p.1
Enforcement action since last inspection:
A monitoring visit was carried out on 25 April 2024, when the provider demonstrated that they had taken the necessary steps to meet the compliance notice issued under regulation 20. Inspection report for residential family centre: Phoenix Family Care Ltd 2
p.1
Overall experiences and progress of children and parents: inadequate
There are disparities in the experiences of families and children living in this centre. Families experience inconsistency in the levels of support that they receive from staff. Managers do not always ensure that staff receive clear guidance on the best way to support families. This undermines the effectiveness of the plans in place to protect children and promote their welfare. As a result, families are unclear on what is expected of them.
p.2
Overall experiences and progress of children and parents: inadequate
Families share their views with managers. However, they raised concerns that managers do not take their views seriously or act on them. Families say that they do not understand why generic rules are in place. Families feel unable to raise complaints about the support they receive because they believe that this will negatively impact on their assessment. Some families say that they had felt ‘threatened’ by managers in the centre. Complaints made by families or others acting on their behalf are not always acknowledged, investigated, or responded to. Consequently, families do not always understand how their views are listened to and acted on. Some staff said that assessment outcomes are determined by whether the management team likes a family.
p.2
Overall experiences and progress of children and parents: inadequate
Managers and staff do not always treat children and families with dignity and respect. There is a lack of understanding of their cultural and identity needs. Managers have not assessed how the cultural and identity needs of some families will be met. For example, managers did not ensure that there were suitable arrangements in place for one family to maintain their religious practices or access cooking facilities in line with their cultural needs.
p.2
Overall experiences and progress of children and parents: inadequate
Managers do not ensure that assessments, plans and reports for individual families and children are accurate. The language used in some records does not clearly distinguish between opinion and fact. Records are not always made available to families in an accessible format. This prevents families from contributing to their records or challenging them. This undermines the reliability of the assessments completed.
p.2
Overall experiences and progress of children and parents: inadequate
Staff provide families and children with planned direct work and activities which align with their individual plans. This helps families to build their confidence. Families who move out of the centre in a planned way say they have received appropriate support.
p.2
How well children and parents are helped and protected: inadequate
There are serious failures that mean children are not protected. Managers do not always act on safeguarding incidents or information. This has meant that unsafe practice has not been challenged and has been allowed to continue. For example, Inspection report for residential family centre: Phoenix Family Care Ltd 3 managers did not investigate a complaint when it was reported a staff member had placed a child at risk of harm.
p.2
How well children and parents are helped and protected: inadequate
Managers have not ensured that staff have the skills, experience, and knowledge to meet the needs of children and their families before they move into the centre. This has left children at risk of immediate harm. For example, staff have not had training to meet one child’s complex health needs. As a result, some staff said they were unable to keep this child safe.
p.3
How well children and parents are helped and protected: inadequate
Medication is not administered to children as prescribed. Medical advice is not sought when children have not received their prescribed medication. Managers have not ensured that all medication is labelled with the name of the child and the administration instructions. This does not ensure that staff have the necessary information to supervise families or administer medication. Records of medication that has been administered are not accurate. Some medication records are missing or have been altered retrospectively by managers.
p.3
How well children and parents are helped and protected: inadequate
Some staff do not understand their safeguarding roles and responsibilities. For example, staff did not seek immediate medical advice when a child who is reliant on oxygen went without it for an undetermined length of time. Some staff say that managers do not address staff conduct matters.
p.3
How well children and parents are helped and protected: inadequate
Managers have not notified the regulator, placing local authorities or relevant professionals of safeguarding incidents, allegations against staff or complaints. This prevents relevant agencies from assessing risk and taking steps to safeguard children. This has meant that risks are not fully understood.
p.3
How well children and parents are helped and protected: inadequate
Managers do not ensure that the physical environment is safe for children. One baby’s bedroom was found to be above the recommended temperature for safe sleep and the bedroom window had been sealed shut. This was a significant risk to the baby.
p.3
How well children and parents are helped and protected: inadequate
Managers do not ensure that safer recruitment checks are completed before staff start working in the centre. For example, references are not consistently obtained. This does not ensure that only suitable people work with families and children in this centre.
p.3
The effectiveness of leaders and managers: inadequate
Since the last inspection, there have been changes to the management arrangements for the centre. The centre is now managed by the responsible individual. An interim manager is working in the centre alongside a deputy manager.
p.3
The effectiveness of leaders and managers: inadequate
Management review and monitoring systems are ineffective. As a result, managers do not understand how staff practice influences the experiences of families and children. Managers do not always take decisive action to address shortfalls in staff practice. This has allowed unsafe practice to continue and does not support staff to understand what is expected of them. Inspection report for residential family centre: Phoenix Family Care Ltd 4 Staff experiences of working in the centre are variable. Some staff enjoy working in the centre and say they receive support from managers. In contrast, some staff describe a closed culture, and say that when they have raised concerns with managers their views are dismissed. Some staff do not feel able to share their views about the running of the centre or use the whistle-blowing procedures to raise concerns about staff practice.
p.3
The effectiveness of leaders and managers: inadequate
Managers do not ensure that there are sufficient suitably trained staff working in the centre. Managers have not always identified when staff have required additional training to meet the specific needs of individual children and families. This has contributed to families experiencing an inconsistent quality of care and support.
p.4
The effectiveness of leaders and managers: inadequate
Staff have supervision and team meetings. Managers have introduced new senior staff responsibilities and made changes to the recording systems in place.
p.4
The effectiveness of leaders and managers: inadequate
Following this inspection, a case review was held by Ofsted, and the decision was made to suspend the centre’s registration. Ofsted also issued compliance notices in respect of regulations 8, 12 and 20. Inspection report for residential family centre: Phoenix Family Care Ltd 5
p.4
Statutory requirements
This section sets out the actions that the registered person must take to meet the Care Standards Act 2000, The Residential Family Centre Regulations 2002 and the national minimum standards. The registered person must comply within the given timescales.
p.5
Requirement Due date
* The registered provider and the registered manager shall, having regard to the size of the residential family centre, the statement of purpose, and the number and needs of the residents, carry on or manage the centre (as the case may be) with sufficient care, competence, and skill.
p.5
Requirement Due date
an organisation, it shall ensure that the responsible individual undertakes;
p.5
Requirement Due date
from time to time such training as is appropriate to ensure that he has the skills necessary for carrying on the residential family centre.
p.5
Requirement Due date
The registered manager shall undertake from time to time such training as is appropriate to ensure that he has the skills necessary for managing the residential family centre. (Regulation 8 (1) (2)(b) (3))
p.5
Requirement Due date
The registered person must review the referral process. This should consider the skills and knowledge of the staff team before residents are offered a place at the centre.
p.5
Requirement Due date
The registered person must ensure there are sufficient suitably trained staff always working in the centre. The registered person must ensure that staff complete training and development in line with the statement of purpose.
p.5
Requirement Due date
The registered person must use monitoring and review systems to understand the experiences of residents and children living in the centre. When shortfalls are identified in staff practice, the registered person must ensure that these are acted on.
p.5
Requirement Due date
The registered person must ensure that there are processes in place that staff can use to share their views about the running of the centre. The registered person must ensure 17 November Inspection report for residential family centre: Phoenix Family Care Ltd 6 that all staff understand their safeguarding responsibilities to escalate any concerns they have about the welfare of children.
p.5
Requirement Due date
The registered person must ensure that staff understand their safeguarding roles and responsibilities. The registered person must ensure that staff understand what is expected of them. This should include understanding the individual needs of residents and children.
p.6
Requirement Due date
* The registered person shall prepare and implement a written child protection policy which—
p.6
Requirement Due date
is intended to safeguard children accommodated in the residential family centre from abuse or neglect; and
p.6
Requirement Due date
sets out the procedure to be followed in the event of any allegation of abuse or neglect.
p.6
Requirement Due date
The procedure under paragraph (1)(b) must in particular provide for—
p.6
Requirement Due date
liaison and co-operation with any local authority which is making child protection enquiries in relation to any child accommodated in the residential family centre;
p.6
Requirement Due date
the prompt referral to the local authority in whose area the residential family centre is situated, of any allegations of abuse or neglect affecting any child accommodated in the residential family centre. (Regulation 12 (1)(a)(b) (2)(a)(b))
p.6
Requirement Due date
The registered person must ensure that staff administer medication as prescribed. The registered person must ensure that all staff have had relevant training in this area to ensure they understand their roles in monitoring medication processes.
p.6
Requirement Due date
The registered person must also ensure that staff understand the steps to take when children have not been administered medication as prescribed.
p.6
Requirement Due date
The registered person must ensure that the administration of medication policy is reviewed. This should include management oversight of medication records.
p.6
Requirement Due date
The registered person must ensure that there is an accurate record of medications which have been administered. 17 November Inspection report for residential family centre: Phoenix Family Care Ltd 7 The registered person must ensure that all medication is labelled with the child's details and administration instructions.
p.6
Requirement Due date
The registered person must ensure that safeguarding incidents are reviewed by a manager and steps are taken to address shortfalls identified in staff practice.
p.7
Requirement Due date
The registered person must review the safeguarding policy. This should include the steps that will be taken to inform the placing local authority and other relevant professionals of all safeguarding incidents.
p.7
Requirement Due date
The registered person must ensure that the physical environment is a safe environment for the residents and children who live there.
p.7
Requirement Due date
* The registered person shall establish a procedure (“the complaints procedure”) for considering complaints made to the registered person by a resident or a person acting on behalf of a resident.
p.7
Requirement Due date
The registered person shall ensure that any complaint made under the complaints procedure is fully investigated.
p.7
Requirement Due date
The registered person shall, as far as reasonably practicable, within 28 days after the date on which the complaint is made, or such shorter period as may be reasonable in the circumstances, inform the person who made the complaint of the action (if any) that is to be taken.
p.7
Requirement Due date
The registered person must ensure that a written record is made of any complaint or representation, the action taken in response, and the outcome of the investigation. (Regulation 20 (1) (2) (5) (6))
p.7
Requirement Due date
The registered person must ensure that the procedure for considering complaints or a person acting on behalf of a resident is reviewed.
p.7
Requirement Due date
This procedure should include complaints that are made verbally. This procedure should also include steps that residents or persons acting on their behalf can take if they feel unable to raise a complaint internally.
p.7
Requirement Due date
The registered person must ensure that all complaints received are fully investigated. Where shortfalls are identified, ensure that action is taken to resolve these. 17 November Inspection report for residential family centre: Phoenix Family Care Ltd 8 The registered person must ensure that within 28 days of the complaint being received, the person who made the complaint is given an outcome in an accessible format. The registered person must also ensure that the person who made the complaint is given the steps that they can take if they are dissatisfied with the outcome of the complaint.
p.7
Requirement Due date
The registered person must ensure a written record is made of any complaint or representation, the action taken in response, and the outcome of the investigation.
p.8
Requirement Due date
The registered person shall use reasonable endeavours to ensure that the residential family centre is conducted so as to—
p.8
Requirement Due date
promote and make proper provision for the health (including physical, mental, and emotional health) and welfare of residents;
p.8
Requirement Due date
make such provision for the care, treatment, education, and supervision of residents as is appropriate to their age and needs.
p.8
Requirement Due date
The registered person shall make suitable arrangements to ensure that the residential family centre is conducted—
p.8
Requirement Due date
in a manner which respects the privacy and dignity of residents; and
p.8
Requirement Due date
with due regard to the sex, religious persuasion, racial origin, and cultural and linguistic background and any disability of residents. (Regulation 10 (1)(a)(b) (3)(a)(b))
p.8
Requirement Due date
This specifically relates to the registered person ensuring that staff are suitably trained to meet the health needs of families and children in line with their individual placement plans.
p.8
Requirement Due date
Also, to the registered person ensuring that suitable arrangements are in place to ensure that families are treated with dignity in regard to their cultural and linguistic background. 17 November
p.8
Requirement Due date
This paragraph applies to any person who is employed by a person other than the registered person in a position in which he may in the course of his duties have regular contact with residents. 17 November Inspection report for residential family centre: Phoenix Family Care Ltd 9 For the purposes of paragraph (1), a person is not fit to work at a residential family centre unless— full and satisfactory information is available in relation to him in respect of each of the matters specified in Schedule 2. (Regulation 16 (2) (3)(d))
p.8
Requirement Due date
This specifically relates to the registered person ensuring that safer recruitment checks are completed before staff start working in the centre.
p.9
Requirement Due date
The registered person shall maintain in respect of each family accommodated in the residential family centre a record which—
p.9
Requirement Due date
is kept up to date. (Regulation 19 (1)(b))
p.9
Requirement Due date
This specifically relates to ensuring that children’s records contain current information and identify children’s known needs.
p.9
Requirement Due date
Also, to the registered person ensuring that all families have access to their records in a format which is accessible to them. 17 November
p.9
Requirement Due date
If, in relation to a residential family centre, any of the events listed in column 1 of the table in Schedule 5 takes place, the registered person shall without delay notify the persons indicated in respect of the event in column 2 of the table.
p.9
Requirement Due date
The registered person shall without delay notify the parent accommodated in the residential family centre with a child of any significant incident affecting the child’s welfare unless to do so is not reasonably practicable or would place the child’s welfare at risk. (Regulation 26 (1) (2))
p.9
Requirement Due date
This specifically relates to ensuring notifications are made to all relevant parties, including placing local authorities and Ofsted, within 24 hours of a significant incident. 17 November
p.9
Requirement Due date
*These requirements are subject to a compliance notice. Inspection report for residential family centre: Phoenix Family Care Ltd 1
p.9
Information about this inspection
Inspectors have looked closely at the experiences and progress of children and parents using the social care common inspection framework. This inspection was carried out under the Care Standards Act 2000 to assess the effectiveness of the service, how it meets the core functions of the service as set out in legislation, and to consider how well it complies with The Residential Family Centre Regulations 2002 and the national minimum standards. Inspection report for residential family centre: Phoenix Family Care Ltd 1
p.10
Inspectors
Sally Griffiths, Social Care Inspector Leanne Carr, Social Care Inspector Inspection report for residential family centre: Phoenix Family Care Ltd 1 to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children who are looked after, safeguarding and child protection.
p.11
Inspectors
If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk . You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .
p.12
Inspectors
Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .
p.12
Inspectors
T: 0300 123 4234 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted
p.12
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion