Early years · Early years compliance action
Yetev Lev D'Satmar Nursery
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection datesingle source
7 Nov 2024
- URN verified
2747725
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- The provider has arranged support for staff, so that staff have improved their understanding of how to support children to display safe and positive behaviours. p.1
- The provider has improved the organisation of the childcare environment, so that it meets the learning, care and safety needs of children more effectively. p.1
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- The overall effectiveness of the provision was judged to be inadequate. p.1
- We found the provider has begun to take appropriate action to improve supervision and training for all staff, including leaders, so that weaknesses in practice are identified and addressed to develop the overall quality of the provision. p.1
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 1
- Words of findings
- 270
- about usual (typical 317)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 41, typical 35
- Average sentence
- 19 words
- Next steps
- 1
- typical 5
- Hedged sentences
- 7%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Summary of outcome
All early years providers must meet the legal requirements in the Statutory framework for the early years foundation stage, which you can find at www.gov.uk/government/publications/early-years-foundationstage-framework. If we find that a provider is not meeting the requirements, we can take action to ensure they put matters right.
p.1
Summary of outcome
On 25 September 2024, we carried out an inspection and found the provider was not meeting some of these requirements. The overall effectiveness of the provision was judged to be inadequate. The inspection report sets out the actions the provider was required to take to meet the requirements.
p.1
Summary of outcome
On 6 November 2024, we carried out a regulatory visit. The focus of the visit was to check whether the provider had met the safeguarding and welfare actions raised at their last inspection.
p.1
Summary of outcome
We found the provider has begun to take appropriate action to improve supervision and training for all staff, including leaders, so that weaknesses in practice are identified and addressed to develop the overall quality of the provision. Leaders have supported staff to develop their understanding of their role as a key person. The provider has begun to take steps to improve staffing arrangements so that these meet the needs of the children more effectively. The provider has arranged support for staff, so that staff have improved their understanding of how to support children to display safe and positive behaviours. The provider has improved the organisation of the childcare environment, so that it meets the learning, care and safety needs of children more effectively.
p.1
Summary of outcome
We are satisfied the provider has met the safeguarding and welfare actions raised. The provider is still registered with Ofsted.
p.1
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion