Social care · Children's home inspection (SCCIF)
Children's Home run by Compass Children‟s Homes Limited in Wiltshire
Summary
Tara Webb (lead), Nicola Lownds
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Group verified
Compass Children’s Homes Limited
- Inspection date verified
19 Sept 2024
- Inspectors verified
Nicola Lownds, Tara Webb
- Helped and protected verified
Good
- Leadership and management verified
Good
- Overall effectiveness verified
Good
- Name on report verified
2740402
- URN verified
2740402
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2024.
- OverallGood
- Helped and protectedGood
- Leadership and managementGood
70% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Good (12,716 inspections).
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
Reads more critically than most reports of this type graded Good.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No standout praise found.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- The manager has raised concerns with social workers when family and friendship ties are putting children at risk of harm. p.3
- Inspection report for children’s home: 2740402 4 Some serious incidents have occurred in the home and outcomes have not always aligned with the home’s therapeutic approach. p.3
- Staff take appropriate steps to minimise the risk of children harming each other or encouraging each other to participate in unsafe behaviours, for example intervening to reduce the likelihood of children spending unsupervised time together. p.3
- There has been an isolated incident where the manager’s response to safeguarding concerns was insufficient. p.4
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- if the registered person considers, or staff consider, a placing authority’s or a relevant person’s performance or response to be inadequate in relation to their role, challenge the placing authority or the relevant person to seek to ensure that each child’s needs are met in accordance with the child’s relevant plans. p.5
- In particular, the registered person must direct challenge to other agencies when their actions fall short of what is required. 25 October 2024 p.5
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Leadership & governance2
“The effectiveness of leaders and managers good” p.1
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 7
- Words of findings
- 1,000
- shorter than usual (typical 1319)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 44, typical 51
- Average sentence
- 16 words
- Next steps
- 2
- typical 4
- Hedged sentences
- 7%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Inspection report for children’s home: 2740402 1 Registered provider: Compass Children’s Homes Limited
p.1
Full inspection Inspected under the social care common inspection framework
p.1
Information about this children’s home
The home provides care for up to six children who have experienced childhood trauma and display emotional and behavioural difficulties.
p.1
Information about this children’s home
The registered manager resigned in June 2024 and a new manager was appointed. The new manager left their post earlier than anticipated. The previous registered manager maintained oversight throughout this period and was present during the inspection.
p.1
Information about this children’s home
At the time of the inspection, three children were living at the home.
p.1
Overall experiences and progress of
children and young people, taking into account
p.1
good
How well children and young people are helped and protected good
p.1
good
The effectiveness of leaders and managers good
p.1
good
The children’s home provides effective services that meet the requirements for good.
p.1
good
Date of last inspection: 23 January 2024
p.1
good
Overall judgement at last inspection: good
p.1
good
Enforcement action since last inspection: none Inspection report for children’s home: 2740402 2
p.1
Inspection date Inspection type Inspection judgement
23/01/2024 Full Good Inspection report for children’s home: 2740402 3
p.2
Overall experiences and progress of children and young people: good
There were three children present during the inspection. The inspector saw all of the children and spent time playing and speaking with two of them.
p.3
Overall experiences and progress of children and young people: good
Children have developed good relationships with adults. Children are confident and relaxed in the presence of adults and they talk to them about their needs, wishes and aspirations. Children have the confidence to voice when they need support from adults, for example asking for help to manage their relationships with peers, friends and family. One child said that they liked living in the home because adults were kind.
p.3
Overall experiences and progress of children and young people: good
Adults have supported children to create individual communication tools to help them express themselves when they feel overwhelmed. One child uses one-word codes and coloured wrist bands. This creative approach is mirrored by the programme psychologist, who supports children to process their feelings using play and music.
p.3
Overall experiences and progress of children and young people: good
Education has been a top priority for managers. They are mindful of children’s individual needs and strengths when considering the suitability of schools. One child has been supported to acquire qualifications that enable them to participate in an apprenticeship. Another child is making good progress at mainstream school. When children experience exclusions, adults work with schools to achieve favourable outcomes for them.
p.3
Overall experiences and progress of children and young people: good
Adults implement age-appropriate boundaries and expectations for children. They support children to understand the rationale for rules: to keep them safe and aid their healthy development. One child struggled to adjust to these expectations. After a few months, managers realised they were unable to meet the child’s needs and the child moved to a new home.
p.3
Overall experiences and progress of children and young people: good
Children are supported to spend time with their friends and family, providing experiences are positive and safe. The manager has raised concerns with social workers when family and friendship ties are putting children at risk of harm.
p.3
How well children and young people are helped and protected: good
Adults have a good understanding of children’s lived experiences and how this impacts their emotional well-being and behaviours. They are alert to children’s individual vulnerabilities. They use this knowledge to inform their practice and to help children, for example through reflective conversations about their behaviour and associated risks.
p.3
How well children and young people are helped and protected: good
Children’s relationships are carefully monitored, and this enables staff to promote healthy boundaries between them. Staff take appropriate steps to minimise the risk of children harming each other or encouraging each other to participate in unsafe behaviours, for example intervening to reduce the likelihood of children spending unsupervised time together. Staff respond with care when children go missing from home or self-harm. Inspection report for children’s home: 2740402 4 Some serious incidents have occurred in the home and outcomes have not always aligned with the home’s therapeutic approach. However, managers and staff have engaged in reflective discussions and appropriate actions have followed, for example liaising with the police, challenging them and making agreements about how any future interactions should be managed.
p.3
How well children and young people are helped and protected: good
In most instances, managers respond appropriately when children raise concerns about adults, demonstrating that they listen to children. Managers follow established safeguarding procedures and consult with children’s social workers and other local authority professionals. They conduct internal investigations and share the outcomes with external professionals.
p.4
The effectiveness of leaders and managers: good
The manager monitors children’s progress effectively and ensures that adults are aware of their ongoing or emerging needs. Adults share updates and ideas during team meetings, which include input from the programme psychologist. This has resulted in adults using some creative strategies to support children and to overcome barriers to their engagement. When the new manager briefly joined the home, the former registered manager continued to be present, ensuring consistency for the children.
p.4
The effectiveness of leaders and managers: good
The manager has a good understanding of the strengths and weaknesses within the team. Many adults are working towards their level 3 qualification, but they receive a thorough induction, and they are supported through regular supervision sessions and team meetings. They also benefit from working alongside the programme psychologist, who reinforces the home’s trauma-informed approach.
p.4
The effectiveness of leaders and managers: good
When the manager identifies shortfalls in practice, he explores them with adults during supervision and reminds them of the home’s ethos and expectations. The manager holds the children in mind throughout these conversations and challenges adults’ suitability for the role, if this need becomes apparent.
p.4
The effectiveness of leaders and managers: good
There has been an isolated incident where the manager’s response to safeguarding concerns was insufficient. While he correctly followed safeguarding procedures immediately, there was a lack of challenge directed towards the local authority to ensure the child’s needs were met and to promote the child’s rights. Inspection report for children’s home: 2740402 5
p.4
Statutory requirements
This section sets out the actions that the registered person(s) must take to meet the Care Standards Act 2000, The Children’s Homes (England) Regulations 2015 and the ‘Guide to the Children’s Homes Regulations, including the quality standards’. The registered person(s) must comply within the given timescales.
p.5
Requirement Due date
In meeting the quality standards, the registered person must, and must ensure that staff—
p.5
Requirement Due date
seek to involve each child’s placing authority effectively in the child’s care, in accordance with the child’s relevant plans;
p.5
Requirement Due date
seek to secure the input and services required to meet each child’s needs;
p.5
Requirement Due date
if the registered person considers, or staff consider, a placing authority’s or a relevant person’s performance or response to be inadequate in relation to their role, challenge the placing authority or the relevant person to seek to ensure that each child’s needs are met in accordance with the child’s relevant plans. (Regulation 5 (a)(b)(c))
p.5
Requirement Due date
In particular, the registered person must direct challenge to other agencies when their actions fall short of what is required. 25 October 2024
p.5
Information about this inspection
Inspectors have looked closely at the experiences and progress of children and young people, using the social care common inspection framework. This inspection was carried out under the Care Standards Act 2000 to assess the effectiveness of the service, how it meets the core functions of the service as set out in legislation, and to consider how well it complies with The Children’s Homes (England) Regulations 2015 and the ‘Guide to the Children’s Homes Regulations, including the quality standards’. Inspection report for children’s home: 2740402 6
p.5
Children’s home details
Registered provider: Compass Children’s Homes Limited
p.6
Children’s home details
Registered provider address: Chalford House, 114 Warminster Road, Westbury BA13 3PR
p.6
Inspectors:
Tara Webb, Social Care Regulatory Inspector Nicola Lownds, Social Care Regulatory Inspector Inspection report for children’s home: 2740402 7 achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for looked after children, safeguarding and child protection.
p.6
Inspectors:
If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk.
p.7
Inspectors:
You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence, write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk.
p.7
Inspectors:
Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn.
p.7
Inspectors:
T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted
p.7
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion