Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Early years · Early years inspection (EIF)

Manifold Pre-School

Inspected 19 Jul 2024 · published 5 Nov 2024 · URN 218188

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

Inadequate

Remi Stennett

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Group verified

    Manifold Pre-School Committee

  • Group reference verified

    RP907712

  • Inspection date verified

    19 Jul 2024

  • Inspectors verified

    Remi Stennett

  • Behaviour and attitudes verified

    Inadequate

  • Leadership and management verified

    Inadequate

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Inadequate

  • Personal development verified

    Inadequate

  • Previous overall verified

    Good

  • Quality of education verified

    Inadequate

  • Postcode verified

    SK17 0JP

  • Name on report verified

    Manifold Pre-School

  • URN verified

    218188

Page 1 of 7
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2015.

  • OverallInadequate
  • Behaviour and attitudesInadequate
  • Leadership and managementInadequate
  • Personal developmentInadequate
  • Quality of educationInadequate

5% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Inadequate (17,905 inspections).

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

−53Criticalmore positive than 25% of reports of this type graded Inadequate
OutstandingGoodRIInadequate

In line with other reports of this type graded Inadequate.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praisehappywell-sequencedconfidentenjoytimelyeffectiveeffectivelysettled
Criticismconcernsat riskweaknessesfailedlacksnot consistentlydo not knownot effective

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsSafeguardingAbout the inspection positive critical
  • Findings699w−69
  • Safeguarding227w+15

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No next steps set out.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
7
Words of findings
893
about usual (typical 972)
Reading level
Fairly hard
Flesch 52, typical 51
Average sentence
16 words
Next steps
0
typical 1
Hedged sentences
7%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 48%Safeguarding 16%About the inspection 36%

Full report text

Inspection of Manifold Pre-School Leek Road, Warslow, Buxton, Derbyshire SK17 0JP

p.1

Overall effectiveness Inadequate

The quality of education Inadequate Behaviour and attitudes Inadequate Personal development Inadequate Leadership and management Inadequate Overall effectiveness at previous inspection Good

p.1

The provision is inadequate

Significant weaknesses in safeguarding processes mean that children's safety and well-being are at risk. Leaders and staff do not have a secure knowledge of safeguarding procedures. Leaders do not know when to escalate concerns. Additionally, staff do not understand the importance of reporting child protection concerns to leaders as they arise. This does not create a positive culture of safeguarding children and leaves them at risk. Furthermore, leaders have failed to inform Ofsted of changes to the individuals responsible for managing the setting to comply with legal requirements. This compromises children's safety.

p.2

The provision is inadequate

That said, children are settled and show an interest in playing with the activities and resources to support their play ideas. Some staff know children well enough to plan activities that engage them for periods of time. However, the curriculum lacks ambition for children and does not consistently build on what they know and can do. Although staff identify when children need extra support, they do not implement strategies to ensure that these children make good enough progress. Children are mostly happy and play with their peers. However, staff do not always support children to behave appropriately. At times, children do not share and take turns. This does not promote children's social skills and help them to learn mutual respect and tolerance.

p.2

need to do better?

n The quality of the provision has deteriorated since the last inspection. Leaders and staff do not have adequate knowledge to enable them to recognise concerns of a safeguarding nature. In addition, they do not know when to follow the correct procedures to ensure that they report concerns to the people with responsibility for safeguarding or to the local safeguarding board. This compromises children's safety and welfare, leaving them at risk of harm. n Those with overall governance of the setting do not have stringent procedures in place to monitor the overall quality. They do not ensure that leaders and staff are confident in their roles and understand how to raise the quality. This has a negative impact on all areas of the setting. Furthermore, they have failed to notify Ofsted of changes to the committee to ensure that those with overall responsibility are deemed suitable. n Children's behaviour is not managed consistently. During times of spontaneous

p.2

need to do better?

play, children snatch toys from each other, hit their friends and knock them over with their bikes. Staff do not respond to this in an appropriate way to teach children to respect others and to share and take turns. This does not support children to learn age-appropriate boundaries. n Staff provide children with opportunities to visit local wildlife parks and farms. Children remember these experiences and enjoy discussing them with their

p.2

need to do better?

19 July 2024 peers. For example, activities based around this experience provide children with opportunities to recall the events and promote group discussions. However, the curriculum lacks ambition and is not well sequenced to build on children's prior knowledge and move them forward in their learning. Staff do not ask open- ended questions to promote children's independent thinking. n Staff have attended mandatory training, such as food hygiene and safeguarding. However, they are not confident to put what they have learned into practice. Furthermore, staff have not been provided with any further training opportunities to improve the quality of education. This has resulted in staff not having the required knowledge and skills to fulfil their roles to a satisfactory level. n Parents of children who attend the setting are happy overall. They receive daily updates through communication books. This helps to keep them updated about

p.2

need to do better?

key information happening throughout the children's day. n Despite weaknesses in the quality of education, some children develop knowledge through incidental teaching. Staff converse with children during their play and discuss topics relevant to their lives. For example, children talk about the male sheep that they look after on their farms, and staff teach children that these are called a 'tup'. This helps children to learn about farming and agriculture, which is relevant for the place where they live.

p.3

Safeguarding

The arrangements for safeguarding are not effective.

p.3

Safeguarding

There is not an open and positive culture of safeguarding that puts children's interest first.

p.3

Due date

ensure that leaders and staff have a secure understanding of the local safeguarding procedures to report concerns about the welfare of a child and if an allegation is made against a member of staff 30/09/2024

p.3

Due date

19 July 2024 ensure leaders and staff improve their knowledge of safeguarding issues to enable them to identify signs of possible abuse and to respond in a timely and appropriate way 30/09/2024

p.3

Due date

ensure the committee has effective systems in place to support leaders and staff 30/09/2024

p.4

Due date

make sure that the committee has a clear oversight of the setting and provides support to leaders and staff to enable them to carry out their roles effectively 30/09/2024

p.4

Due date

ensure that any changes to committee members, including changes to the nominated individual, are notified to Ofsted in a timely manner 30/09/2024

p.4

Due date

develop more consistent strategies in the approach to managing children's behaviour, which are in line with their level of development. 30/09/2024

p.4

Due date

provide appropriate support for staff to ensure that they design and implement a well-sequenced curriculum that meets the needs of all children 30/09/2024

p.4

Due date

provide staff with appropriate support, guidance and training to ensure they develop the skills and understanding to raise the quality of teaching to at least a good level. 30/09/2024

p.4

Setting details

Unique reference number 218188 Local authority Staffordshire Inspection number 10354516 Type of provision Childcare on non-domestic premises Registers Early Years Register Day care type Sessional day care

p.5

inspection

Total number of places 20 Number of children on roll 22 Name of registered person Manifold Pre-School Committee

p.5

reference number

Telephone number 01298 84320 Date of previous inspection 15 November 2018

p.5

Information about this early years setting

Manifold Pre-School registered in 1992. It employs five members of childcare staff. Of these, two hold an appropriate early years qualification at level 6, and three hold an appropriate early years qualification at level 3. The pre-school opens from Monday to Friday, during term time only. Sessions are from 9am until 3pm. The pre-school provides funded early education for two-, three- and four-year-old children.

p.5

Inspection activities

n This was the first routine inspection the provider received since the COVID-19 pandemic began. The inspector discussed the impact of the pandemic with the provider and has taken that into account in their evaluation of the provider. n The manager joined the inspector on a learning walk and talked to the inspector about their curriculum and what they want their children to learn. n Children told the inspector about their friends and what they like to do when they are at pre-school. n Staff spoke to the inspector during the inspection. n The inspector observed the quality of education being provided, indoors and outdoors, and assessed the impact that this was having on children's learning. n The inspector carried out a joint observation of a group activity with the manager. n The inspector spoke to parents during the inspection and took account of their views. n The manager showed the inspector documentation to demonstrate the suitability

p.6

Inspection activities

We carried out this inspection under sections 49 and 50 of the Childcare Act 2006 on the quality and standards of provision that is registered on the Early Years Register. The registered person must ensure that this provision complies with the statutory framework for children's learning, development and care, known as the early years foundation stage.

p.6

Inspection activities

19 July 2024 regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children's services, and inspects services for looked after children, safeguarding and child protection.

p.6

Inspection activities

If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.7

Inspection activities

You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk

p.7

Inspection activities

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .

p.7

Inspection activities

T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.7

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion