Early years · Early years complaint outcome
Sticky Mits Childcare Centre
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection datesingle source
15 Oct 2024
- URN verified
EY336961
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No standout praise found.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No strong criticism found.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 2
- Words of findings
- 330
- about usual (typical 281)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 32, typical 42
- Average sentence
- 17 words
- Next steps
- 1
- typical 1
- Hedged sentences
- 5%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Summary of outcome
All early years providers must meet the legal requirements in the Statutory framework for the early years foundation stage, which you can find at www.gov.uk/government/publications/early-years-foundation-stage-framework--2. If we find that a provider is not meeting the requirements, we can take action to ensure they put matters right.
p.1
Summary of outcome
On 8 October 2024, we received concerns that the provider was not meeting requirements relating to safeguarding policies and procedures; staff: child ratios; health; supporting and understanding children's behaviour; and safety and suitability of premises, environment and equipment.
p.1
Summary of outcome
On 11 October 2024, we carried out a regulatory visit. We found the provider was not meeting some of the requirements. We have issued actions for the provider to take. The provider will be able to give parents further information about this.
p.1
Summary of outcome
n ensure child protection procedures are consistently implemented and monitored, with specific regard to maintaining clear information about children's pre-existing injuries
p.1
Summary of outcome
n ensure staff fully understand the correct procedures to follow if safeguarding concerns are identified about a child.
p.1
Summary of outcome
On 21 October 2024, the provider responded to the actions set. We found that the provider had improved their records relating to recording and monitoring existing injuries to children. Safeguarding training is continuing to be rolled out to all staff, to ensure they are fully aware of their roles and responsibilities. Leaders and managers now have procedures in place to monitor staff safeguarding knowledge and implementation of their policies and procedures.
p.1
Summary of outcome
The information gathered suggests that the provider is now meeting the requirements of their registration. We are satisfied the provider has met the safeguarding and welfare actions raised. The provider is still registered with Ofsted.
p.1
Publication of complaints
We publish details of complaints made against childminders, home childcarers and childcare providers where we or the provider have taken action in order to meet legal requirements.
p.2
Publication of complaints
We publish details of complaints on our website for a period of five years.
p.2
Publication of complaints
For further information about the complaints process please view the Concerns and complaints about childminders and childcare providers leaflet .
p.2
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion