Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · Independent school inspection

School of Coding AEP Limited

Inspected 25 Sept 2024 · published 29 Oct 2024 · URN 151123

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Chris Pollitt

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    25 Sept 2024

  • Inspectors verified

    Chris Pollitt

  • Postcode verified

    WV9 5HB

  • Name on report verified

    School of Coding AEP Limited

  • URN verified

    151123

Page 1 of 12
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+55Positivemore positive than 67% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praiseclearstrongindependenthighly skilledconsistentlyhigh-qualitysafewell-planned
Criticismyet tolimitedat riskconcerns

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improveAbout the inspection positive critical
  • Findings2051w+54
  • What needs to improve1015w+43

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
12
Words of findings
2,989
longer than usual (typical 1813)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 46, typical 49
Average sentence
18 words
Next steps
8
typical 8
Hedged sentences
1%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 61%What needs to improve 30%About the inspection 9%

Full report text

School pre-registration inspection report

p.1

School of Coding AEP Limited Unit 8 Newton Court, Pendeford Business Park, Wolverhampton WV9 5HB

p.1

Main inspection findings

Part 1. Quality of education provided Paragraphs 2(1) to 3(i)  The proprietor and leaders have a clear vision for the proposed school. The school will aim to provide for pupils who are facing difficulties in mainstream schools and need enhanced support. This includes providing access to appropriate qualifications and accreditation. This vision is enriched by access to high-quality computing, programming and artificial intelligence courses.  The core academic curriculum comprises of subjects that meet the requirements of the independent school standards (the standards). These include English, mathematics, science, computer science, programming, creativity, work skills and humanities.  Since the last pre-registration inspection, the school has developed well-written schemes of work. An extensive range of curriculum plans were submitted with the application.  There is a clear and well-articulated vision for how the proposed school will meet the

p.1

Main inspection findings

needs of pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND). While the proprietor expects these will be primarily linked to social, emotional and mental health needs or autism, they also understand and plan for other potential needs. The SEND policy describes a range of provisions to meet the needs of pupils. The school has formed partnerships with external services, such as local authorities, to develop systems for how the school will identify, assess and meet the individual needs of pupils, including those with education, health and care plans (EHC plan). Paragraphs 2(2)(e) to 2(2)(e)(iii)  Through the personal, social, health and economic (PSHE) education curriculum, leaders have developed a suitable plan to ensure pupils receive impartial careers information, education, advice and guidance. For example, schemes of work provide opportunities to develop employability skills, write job applications and develop an

p.1

Main inspection findings

understanding of careers in science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM). The proprietor has already developed relationships with various careers services providing impartial advice.  The school intends to build on the proprietor’s strong links with European and South Asian industries to provide international work experience opportunities. The school currently offers courses for adults to provide access to the world of work and is keen to offer these opportunities to pupils at the proposed school. Paragraphs 3, 3(a) to 4  The school has already developed a highly skilled and experienced teaching workforce for those pupils attending the provision. This workforce has provided after-school clubs in primary schools across the West Midlands and holiday clubs focusing on computing and programming for some years. Recent recruitments have brought an added level of expertise in the form of a qualified and experienced teacher.

p.1

Main inspection findings

 The proprietor intends that English and mathematics teachers will be qualified teachers and experts in their respective subjects. The other staff will be unqualified teachers. Paragraphs 2A(1) to 2A(2)  The relationships and sex education (RSE) policy sits alongside the PSHE policy. This RSE policy and associated schemes and plans for learning are carefully considered. The issues facing young people in their personal lives and local communities are prioritised. For example, there is a heightened focus on managing conflict in relationships, avoiding toxic influences and staying safe from potential exploitation.  The proprietor has ensured that these standards are likely to be met.

p.2

Main inspection findings

Part 2. Spiritual, moral, social and cultural development of pupils Paragraphs 5, 5(a) to 5(d)(iii)  Careful consideration has been given to pupils’ spiritual, moral, social and cultural (SMSC) development. Carefully considered lessons for SMSC are planned alongside subjects such as mathematics or English to provide pupils with opportunities to reflect on social, moral, cultural and spiritual issues. For example, in mathematics, pupils will be encouraged to consider such matters as ‘How does the pursuit of mathematical knowledge connect to deeper questions about the nature of reality and existence?’.  A well-planned programme of mentoring and pastoral care threads through the intended curriculum, underpinned by various social and emotional development approaches.  There is no evidence in curriculum plans or wider documentation suggesting that fundamental British values will be undermined. Instead, leaders explain clearly how

p.2

Main inspection findings

these values will be promoted through the curriculum and other activities such as visiting different places of worship and places of interest, for example airfields. Leaders are keen to develop the pupils’ voices, even in day-to-day arrangements such as deciding how to develop the range of clubs and extracurricular activities.  The proprietor has ensured that these standards are likely to be met.

p.2

Main inspection findings

Part 3. Welfare, health and safety of pupils Paragraphs 7, 7(a), 7(b), 32(1)(c)  The proposed systems for safeguarding are well defined. Systems will match and fulfil the expectations of current national statutory guidance. Staff training is already ongoing. Staff at the current provision were knowledgeable about their safeguarding responsibilities and uncompromising in their tenacity to act when they even suspected a child might be at risk. Appointed leaders for safeguarding already have a strong knowledge of guidance from the Department for Education (DfE) and have created systems, processes and policies to embrace these expectations. Paragraphs 9 and 10  The school’s proposed behaviour policy is well written and shared with staff. The proprietor and leaders have a clear, caring vision for providing pupils with a ‘fresh start’, regardless of their difficulties. This ethos runs through the policy and the

p.2

Main inspection findings

observed interactions between existing staff and pupils who attend the current provision. Systems to record and analyse behaviour incidents are thorough. They will give leaders an understanding of patterns of behaviour and the necessary actions they need to take to address the behaviour. Paragraphs 11, 12, 13, and 16  The health and safety policy is detailed. The advice is comprehensive, and it is clear what expectations are in different areas. Staff induction reinforces these messages from the first day staff start at the school.  Health and safety checks are thorough. For example, they include fire extinguisher and emergency lighting checks. The headteacher is trained as a fire marshal, and fire safety is intended to be included in the staff induction process. A fire risk assessment has been recently completed, and leaders have acted on the points for action.  Risk assessments support efforts to raise awareness of the complexities of managing

p.3

Main inspection findings

the site, the pupils’ educational experiences, visits and trips and keeping pupils safe. Paragraphs 14 and 15  There are currently four pupils dual-rolled with other schools at the alternative provision. These pupils are appropriately recorded on the school’s admission register. The school’s information on the admissions register aligns with the DfE’s guidance.  The staff-to-pupil ratio suggests pupils are likely to be suitably supervised throughout the school day. It is intended that pupils work with different teachers, but each pupil will have a named staff member to support their welfare.  The proprietor has ensured that these standards are likely to be met.

p.3

Main inspection findings

Part 4. Suitability of staff, supply staff, and proprietors Paragraphs 18(3), 19(2), 19(3), 21(2), 21(3)(a)(i), 21(3)(a)(ii), 21(3)(a)(iv) to 21(3)(a)(viii), 21(4), 21(5), 21(6), 21(7)  The single central record (SCR) template is compliant and in line with ‘Keeping children safe in education (2024)’ statutory guidance. For the already appointed staff, the necessary checks, as advocated by the current guidance from the DfE, are prevalent on the SCR. Inspectors sampled four staff files, and the information in each file was triangulated precisely with the SCR.  The proprietor has ensured that these standards are likely to be met. Paragraphs 18(2), 20(6), 21(1), 21(3), 21(3)(a)(iii)  While the proprietor has ensured that many pre-appointment checks such as references, barred lists checks, enhanced Disclosure and Barring Service checks and health checks have been completed, prohibition from teaching checks still need to be

p.3

Main inspection findings

completed on all staff members involved in teaching at the proposed school. This was raised at the first pre-registration inspection. While there is evidence that prohibition checks have been completed on recently recruited staff, these checks have yet to be completed on other relevant staff members.  During this pre-registration inspection, leaders applied for these checks to be completed for all remaining teaching staff, including tutors and additional support staff.  The proprietor has not ensured that these standards are likely to be met.

p.4

Main inspection findings

Part 5. Premises of and accommodation at schools Paragraphs 23(1) to 29(1)(b)  Within the proposed school building, all rooms are well lit and have good acoustics. The premises have been refurbished and decorated to a high standard. The building has offices, toilets, a kitchen and medical facilities.  The two classrooms are on the ground floor of this building, and the upper floor is for administration and leadership offices. There is suitable space for the pupils to learn. However, this space is based around one large classroom and one room with computers. This provides appropriate space for up to 20 pupils, which could impact the provision for 30 pupils on site.  There is one unisex toilet for pupils and a separate toilet for staff. Both have hot and cold running water and handwashing facilities. The water temperature is suitably regulated. The medical room is spacious and contains a washbasin. It is close to a

p.4

Main inspection findings

toilet.  The proprietor has purchased a 17-seater minibus to transport pupils to a nearby community play area, a local nature walk or the local sports centre. All are located within a five-minute drive.  There is currently no shower in the proposed school. Leaders intend to use a local leisure centre in the physical education curriculum. The centre’s facilities include a swimming pool and a sports hall. Showers are available in the leisure centre if pupils need to use them. Staff will transport pupils to the centre in the school’s minibus.  The proprietor has ensured that these standards are likely to be met.

p.4

Main inspection findings

Part 6. Provision of information Paragraphs 32(1) to 32(3)(f)  All policies, documents and information required for the pre-registration inspection were provided promptly. Where relevant, policies reflect that the proposed school will cater for pupils with specific needs or who might need a specific form of support to be ready for further education, employment or training. Policies are clear, well presented and written in accessible language.  The school’s website contains the information required by the standards. This includes curriculum information, admission guidance and behaviour and safeguarding policies.  Annual reports will provide parents and carers with information about their child’s achievement in each subject and their child’s engagement in learning and school. The report will include comments from the headteacher.  Leaders have a comprehensive understanding of how relevant staff will contribute to

p.4

Main inspection findings

the annual review process for pupils with an EHC plan. In addition, parents and pupils are intended to play a key role in this process.  The proprietor has ensured that these standards are likely to be met.

p.5

Main inspection findings

Part 7. Manner in which complaints are handled Paragraph 33  The complaints policy is clear and precise. It outlines what needs to be done at each stage. The aim is to resolve complaints informally, but more formal steps are outlined, including a panel hearing. The policy sets out suitable timeframes for dealing with complaints. Leaders have articulated transparent systems and processes for learning from any complaints to reduce the chance of the complaint happening again. The complaints policy is on the website and accessible to parents should it be needed.  The proprietor has ensured that this standard is likely to be met.

p.5

Main inspection findings

Part 8. Quality of leadership in and management of schools Paragraphs 34(1)(a), 34(1)(b) 34 (1)(c)  At the first pre-registration inspection, the proposed school had yet to ensure that the standards for completing prohibition from teaching checks were completed. This meant that some staff were employed at the school without some necessary checks completed. At the time of this second pre-registration inspection, the proposed school had yet to ensure that these checks had been completed. This means that the standards relating to knowledge of the standards and the consistent meeting of these standards currently need to be met.  The proprietor has not ensured that these standards are likely to be met

p.5

Main inspection findings

Schedule 10 of the Equality Act 2010  Leaders have ensured that they have a suitable accessibility plan in place that meets the requirements of schedule 10 of the Equality Act 2010. The proposed school considers and plans for the needs of pupils with SEND.

p.5

Compliance with regulatory requirements

The school is unlikely to meet the requirements of the schedule to the Education (Independent School Standards) Regulations 2014 (‘the independent school standards’) and associated requirements, as set out in the annex of this report.

p.6

Proposed school details

This inspection was carried out under section 99 of the Education and Skills Act 2008, the purpose of which is to advise the Secretary of State for Education about the school’s likely compliance with the independent school standards that are required for registration as an independent school.

p.7

Proposed school details

Annual fees (day pupils) £37,050 to £56,050

p.7

Provider already operating

Number of pupils of compulsory school age 4 Number of pupils of compulsory school age who have an education, health and care plan, or who are looked after by a local authority Total hours operating as a school per week 25

p.7

Provider already operating

Total hours of teaching provided per week 20

p.7

recommendation

Age range of pupils 13 to 16 13 to 16 13 to 16 Number of pupils on the school roll 4 30 20 Reason for inspector’s recommendations  The school currently has only space for one unisex toilet on site, which would be appropriate for up to 20 pupils. Equally, at the moment, the space for learning is limited to one large space, with a current capacity of 14 and one smaller space that currently has a capacity for six pupils working at computer workstations. Leaders identify that they have further tables and chairs that could be available, but using additional tables and chairs would limit access and egress to different parts of the learning space.

p.7

School’s current position School’s proposal

Gender of pupils Mixed Mixed Number of full-time pupils of compulsory school age 0 30

p.8

School’s current position School’s proposal

Number of pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities 4 30

p.8

School’s current position School’s proposal

Of which, number of pupils with an education, health and care plan 0 30

p.8

School’s current position School’s proposal

Of which, number of pupils paid for by a local authority with an education, health and care plan 0 30

p.8

School’s current position School’s proposal

Number of full-time equivalent teaching staff 7 7

p.8

School’s current position School’s proposal

Number of staff in the welfare provision 1 1

p.8

Information about this proposed school

 The proposed school was previously a business unit containing offices in Pendeford Business Park, on the outskirts of Wolverhampton.  The proposed school intends to cater to boys and girls aged 13 to 16 years.  The proposed school will cater exclusively to pupils with additional needs needing alternative provision. The core function of the proposed school will be to teach employability in computing skills in the workplace. Local authorities will place the pupils in the school, mainly Walsall and Wolverhampton. The school will also take short-term dual-rolled placements from local secondary schools.  The proprietor currently runs an unregistered alternative provision for pupils at risk of exclusion or who require focused intervention to develop a range of computing skills.  The proposed school will not have a religious denomination.  The proposed school does not intend to use any alternative provision.

p.8

Information about this inspection

 The DfE commissioned this pre-registration inspection to determine whether the proposed school is likely to meet the independent school standards if permitted to open. This is the proposed school’s second pre-registration inspection.  The lead inspector reviewed a wide range of documentation, including the school’s single central record of pre-employment checks.  The inspector toured the proposed school’s premises and visited the local play area that the school intends to use for outdoor play.  The lead inspector met with the headteacher and staff members who currently work at their alternative provision. He also met with the staff members responsible for administering staff recruitment and the finance manager.

p.10

Inspection team

Chris Pollitt, lead inspector His Majesty’s Inspector

p.10

The school is unlikely to meet the following independent school standards

Part 4. Suitability of staff, supply staff, and proprietors

p.11

The school is unlikely to meet the following independent school standards

 18(2) The standard in this paragraph is met if- – 18(2)(b) no such person carries out work, or intends to carry out work, at the school in contravention of a prohibition order, an interim prohibition order, or any direction made under section 128 of the 2008 Act or section 142 of the 2002 Act, or any disqualification, prohibition or restriction which takes effect as if contained in either such direction.  20(6) The standard in this paragraph is met in relation to an individual ("MB"), not being the Chair of the school, who is a member of a body of persons corporate or unincorporate named as the proprietor of the school in the register or in an application to enter the school in the register, if- – 20(6)(a) MB- – 20(6)(a)(ii) does not carry out work, or intend to carry out work, at the school in contravention of a prohibition order, an interim prohibition order, or any direction made under section 128 of the 2008 Act or section 142 of the 2002 Act or any

p.11

The school is unlikely to meet the following independent school standards

disqualification, prohibition or restriction which takes effect as if contained in either such direction. – 21(1) The standard in this paragraph is met if the proprietor keeps a register which shows such of the information referred to in sub-paragraphs (3) to (7) as is applicable to the school in question. – 21(3) The information referred to in this sub-paragraph is- – 21(3)(a) in relation to each member of staff ("S") appointed on or after 1st May 2007, whether- – 21(3)(a)(iii) a check was made to establish whether S is subject to any direction made under section 128 of the 2008 Act or section 142 of the 2002 Act or any disqualification, prohibition or restriction which takes effect as if contained in such a direction; – 21(3)(b) in relation to each member of staff ("S"), whether a check was made to establish whether S is subject to a prohibition order or an interim prohibition order, including the date on which such check was completed.

p.11

The school is unlikely to meet the following independent school standards

Part 8. Quality of leadership in and management of schools

p.11

The school is unlikely to meet the following independent school standards

 34(1) The standard about the quality of leadership and management is met if the proprietor ensures that persons with leadership and management responsibilities at the school- – 34(1)(a) demonstrate good skills and knowledge appropriate to their role so that the independent school standards are met consistently; – 34(1)(b) fulfil their responsibilities effectively so that the independent school standards are met consistently; and – 34 (1)(c) actively promote the well-being of pupils. guidance ‘Raising concerns and making a complaint about Ofsted’, which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.gov.uk/government/publications/complaints-about-ofsted . If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.11

The school is unlikely to meet the following independent school standards

Parent View You can use Parent View to give Ofsted your opinion on your child’s school. Ofsted will use the information parents and carers provide when deciding which schools to inspect and when and as part of the inspection.

p.12

The school is unlikely to meet the following independent school standards

You can also use Parent View to find out what other parents and carers think about schools in England. You can visit www.parentview.ofsted.gov.uk , or look for the link on the main Ofsted website: www.gov.uk/ofsted .

p.12

The school is unlikely to meet the following independent school standards

achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.

p.12

The school is unlikely to meet the following independent school standards

If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk . You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open- government-licence , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .

p.12

The school is unlikely to meet the following independent school standards

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .

p.12

The school is unlikely to meet the following independent school standards

T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.12

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion