Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School inspection (EIF)

Outwood Academy Haydock

Inspected 2 Oct 2024 · published 25 Oct 2024 · URN 148522

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Jenny Jones (lead), Barbara Dutton, Stephen Ruddy, Tim Long

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    2 Oct 2024

  • Inspectors verified

    Barbara Dutton, Jenny Jones, Stephen Ruddy, Tim Long

  • Behaviour and attitudes verified

    Good

  • Leadership and management verified

    Good

  • Personal development verified

    Good

  • Quality of education verified

    Good

  • Postcode verified

    WA11 0JG

  • Name on report verified

    Outwood Academy Haydock

  • URN verified

    148522

Page 1 of 7
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Each judgement on its scale, weakest to strongest.

  • Behaviour and attitudesGood
  • Leadership and managementGood
  • Personal developmentGood
  • Quality of educationGood

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+54Positivemore positive than 57% of reports of this type
OutstandingGoodRIInadequate

In line with other reports of this type.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praisestronghigh expectationssuccessfullyproudthriveflourisheffectivelyhigh-quality
Criticismweaknesseslacknot alwayslimitedstruggletoo manynot effectively

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsSafeguardingAbout the inspection positive critical
  • Findings1087w+53
  • Safeguarding6w+33

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
7
Words of findings
1,075
about usual (typical 1153)
Reading level
Fairly hard
Flesch 54, typical 55
Average sentence
14 words
Next steps
2
typical 4
Hedged sentences
12%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 62%Safeguarding 0%About the inspection 38%

Full report text

Inspection of Outwood Academy Haydock Clipsley Lane, Haydock, St. Helens, Merseyside WA11 0JG

p.1

The quality of education Good Behaviour and attitudes Good Personal development Good Leadership and management Good

p.1

Previous inspection grade Not previously inspected under section 5 of the Education Act 2005

p.1

The principal of this school is Philip Abram. This school is part of Outwood Grange Academies Trust, which means other people in the trust also have responsibility for running the school. The trust is run by the chief executive officer (CEO), Lee Wilson, and overseen by a board of trustees, chaired by David Earnshaw. There is also an executive principal, Cara Ackroyd, who is responsible for this school and 27 others. 1 and 2 October 2024

p.1

What is it like to attend this school?

This is a school that is built on a strong foundation of mutual respect. Pupils benefit from high-quality pastoral support. There are strong relationships between staff and pupils. For example, around the school, staff greet pupils warmly and offer words of encouragement. This helps pupils to understand that staff care for them.

p.2

What is it like to attend this school?

The school has high expectations of all pupils’ academic achievement. With a strengthened curriculum, pupils, including those with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND), are now learning more successfully, in most subjects, than they did in the past.

p.2

What is it like to attend this school?

Pupils’ wider development is carefully considered through a raft of exciting opportunities such as workshops with visiting poets, trips to outward bound centres and involvement in local community projects. Pupils spoke excitedly about the upcoming whole-school production.

p.2

What is it like to attend this school?

There is a consistent approach across the school to how behaviour is managed. Staff model the positive behaviour that they expect of pupils. Pupils behave politely and courteously. Most follow the school’s routines appropriately. There is a real culture of praise in this school. ‘Proud Thursday’ is just one of the ways that pupils’ work and effort is celebrated. Over time, pupils’ aspirations are rising. They are happy in school.

p.2

What does the school do well and what does it need to do better?

The school, trust and governors, share a strong moral purpose which guides them to make decisions in the best interests of pupils. Each decision that the school makes is well considered to ensure that all pupils, including those who are disadvantaged, have the same chances of success.

p.2

What does the school do well and what does it need to do better?

The curriculum is ambitious and logically ordered. It builds on what pupils have learned in primary school. Pupils study a broad range of subjects. Pupils in the specially resourced provision for pupils with SEND (specially resourced provision) have an appropriately adapted curriculum. This helps to ease their transition back into mainstream lessons.

p.2

What does the school do well and what does it need to do better?

Teachers know what to teach and when to teach it. They are experts in their subjects. The school has invested heavily in training for staff around the delivery of the curriculum. This has led to firmly embedded routines and a consistent approach across the school. Pupils with SEND have their needs identified and are well catered for. Learning is broken down and adapted for them so that they learn successfully.

p.2

What does the school do well and what does it need to do better?

While most pupils respond when asked a question in class, they lack confidence to share their reasoning. In lessons, there are limited opportunities for pupils to discuss their learning. This hinders them from deepening their understanding and connecting their ideas as well as they could. At times, staff do not check whether pupils have understood what has been taught before moving on to new learning. This results in some pupils developing misconceptions that are not addressed. 1 and 2 October 2024

p.2

3

The published outcomes for pupils at the end of Year 11 are lagging behind the strides that have been made in the quality of education that pupils receive. They do not reflect how well pupils are learning currently. This is due to legacy weaknesses in the curriculum. Pupils, including disadvantaged pupils and those with SEND, take pride in their work. They build a secure body of knowledge over time.

p.3

3

The school has prioritised reading. Pupils who struggle with reading are given support that helps them to become fluent and confident readers. Furthermore, pupils are encouraged to read regularly. Pupils are developing a love of reading.

p.3

3

Pupils behave well in lessons. Raising attendance remains one of the school’s priorities as too many pupils still do not attend school regularly. The school has approached this with vigour. There is increased capacity within the attendance team which has allowed more interactions with parents and carers. The school’s actions have led to some improvements in attendance rates.

p.3

3

The school is motivated by preparing pupils to thrive in modern Britain. This includes raising pupils’ aspirations through a carefully constructed careers programme. Pupils learn to appreciate difference and to understand different religions. They are proud of the ways in which they can serve the school community in roles such as ‘prime minister’ or as mental health ambassadors.

p.3

3

Under the guidance and support from the trust, staff flourish. They report how changes to the marking policy have reduced workload. Knowledgeable governors hold the school to account well.

p.3

Safeguarding

The arrangements for safeguarding are effective.

p.3

(Information for the school and appropriate authority)

 The curriculum does not provide enough opportunities for pupils to discuss their learning and express the reasoning behind their ideas. This means that pupils do not always get the chance to deepen their thinking as well as they could. The school should ensure that pupils develop their oracy skills effectively and are helped to deepen their learning across the curriculum.  In some subjects, teachers do not use assessment information effectively to check how well pupils have learned the curriculum. At times, some teachers move on to new learning before pupils are ready or pupils’ misconceptions go unaddressed. The school should ensure that teachers are supported to use assessment information to shape future learning effectively. 1 and 2 October 2024

p.3

How can I feed back my views?

find out what other parents and carers think. We use information from Ofsted Parent View when deciding which schools to inspect, when to inspect them and as part of their inspection.

p.4

How can I feed back my views?

The Department for Education has further guidance on how to complain about a school.

p.4

Further information

You can search for published performance information about the school.

p.4

Further information

In the report, 'disadvantaged pupils' is used to mean pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND); pupils who meet the definition of children in need of help and protection ; pupils receiving statutory local authority support from a social worker; and pupils who otherwise meet the criteria used for deciding the school's pupil premium funding (this includes pupils claiming free school meals at any point in the last six years, looked after children (children in local authority care) and/or children who left care through adoption or another formal route). 1 and 2 October 2024

p.4

School details

[For academy] CEO of the trust Lee Wilson

p.5

School details

Date of previous inspection Not previously inspected

p.5

Information about this school

 The school is part of the Outwood Grange Academies Trust.  The school has a specially resourced provision for 25 pupils with moderate learning difficulties.  The school does not make use of any alternative provision.  The school meets the requirements of the provider access legislation, which requires schools to provide pupils in Years 8 to 13 with information and engagement about approved technical education qualifications and apprenticeships.  Outwood Academy Haydock converted to become an academy in January 2022. When its predecessor school, Haydock High School, was last inspected by Ofsted, it was judged to be inadequate for overall effectiveness.

p.5

Information about this inspection

The inspectors carried out this graded inspection under section 5 of the Education Act 2005. During a graded inspection, we grade the school for each of our key judgements (quality of education; behaviour and attitudes; personal development; and leadership and 1 and 2 October 2024

p.5

6

management) and for any relevant provision judgement (early years and/or sixth form provision). Schools receiving a graded inspection from September 2024, will not be given an overall effectiveness grade.

p.6

6

 Inspections are a point-in-time evaluation about the quality of a school's education provision.  Inspectors discussed any continued impact of the pandemic with the school and have taken that into account in their evaluation of the school.  Inspectors spoke to the principal, the executive principal, the CEO, the chief executive principal, senior leaders and other staff.  The lead inspector had a telephone conversation with a representative of the local authority.  The lead inspector met with the vice chair of trustees, the acting chair and other members of the governing body.  Inspectors carried out deep dives in these subjects: English, mathematics, science, physical education, modern foreign languages and geography. For each deep dive, inspectors held discussions about the curriculum, visited a sample of lessons, spoke to teachers, spoke to some pupils about their learning and looked at samples of pupils’

p.6

6

work.  To evaluate the effectiveness of safeguarding, inspectors: reviewed the single central record; took account of the views of leaders, staff and pupils; and considered the extent to which the school has created an open and positive culture around safeguarding that puts pupils’ interests first.  Inspectors observed pupils’ behaviour in lessons and at social times and spoke to pupils about their views of the school.  Inspectors scrutinised a range of documentation including the school’s self-evaluation, minutes of trustee and local academy council meetings and the school’s improvement plan.  Inspectors considered the responses to Ofsted Parent View, including the free-text responses. They also considered the responses to Ofsted’s survey for staff. There were no responses to the pupil survey.

p.6

Inspection team

Jenny Jones, lead inspector His Majesty's Inspector

p.6

Inspection team

Barbara Dutton Ofsted Inspector 1 and 2 October 2024

p.6

7

achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children's services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.

p.7

7

If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.7

7

You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open- government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .

p.7

7

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .

p.7

7

T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.7

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion