Whitmore Park Primary School

Inspection of Whitmore Park Primary School Halford Lane, Coventry, West Midlands CV6 2HG

p.1

Inspection dates: 24 and 25 September 2024

p.1

The quality of education Requires improvement Behaviour and attitudes Requires improvement Personal development Good Leadership and management Requires improvement Early years provision Good Previous inspection grade Good 24 and 25 September 2024

p.1

What is it like to attend this school?

Pupils speak positively about Whitmore Park Primary. This is because the school is nurturing and ensures all pupils are welcome and valued. Adults know the pupils well, and place value on supporting them to succeed and be happy. This means, as one pupil said, ‘we learn lots and have fun’. Pupils speak highly of the junior leadership positions in the school. They also enjoy the many clubs and trips which the school offers.

p.2

What is it like to attend this school?

The school is ambitious for the pupils and has reviewed the curriculum to ensure a more consistent approach for all pupils. This has had some success, but there remain inconsistencies. Pupils speak highly of the books that teachers read to them in class and the opportunities they have to select high-quality books to take home.

p.2

What is it like to attend this school?

Although pupils’ attendance is not as high as it should be, they generally behave very well at Whitmore Park. This is because pupils understand the school’s expectations about how they should treat each other. They know that adults will listen to them if they have concerns. At social times, pupils enjoy the activities on offer to them as well as the new benches the school has installed. Some pupils do find it harder to meet the school’s expectations for them.

p.2

What does the school do well and what does it need to do better?

The school was aware that published outcomes had dipped and so reviewed the curriculum to ensure it was ambitious for all pupils. The key knowledge that pupils need is more clearly identified, although some subjects are still in development. There is significant variation in how well teachers check that pupils have understood the key knowledge they need. This means that pupils have difficulties with more challenging work, for example in mathematics, as the key learning they need is not secure.

p.2

What does the school do well and what does it need to do better?

The school has prioritised early reading but there are inconsistencies with the delivery of the phonics programme. Some pupils who are at risk of falling behind have gaps in their reading knowledge which are not systematically addressed. The school has ensured there is a wider love of reading with a considered reading book list and exposure to high-quality texts.

p.2

What does the school do well and what does it need to do better?

Provision for special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND) is improving. Teachers now receive information about how to adapt the curriculum for these pupils. However, this information is not used systematically, meaning pupils with SEND do not achieve as well as they should.

p.2

What does the school do well and what does it need to do better?

The school ensures all children have a strong start in the early years. They establish starting points promptly and use these to match the learning to the children’s needs. This builds a secure foundation for later learning. The children’s learning is enriched with stories, songs and rhymes to ensure a strong start to their language development.

p.2

What does the school do well and what does it need to do better?

The school is aware that pupils’ attendance has been too low for too long. It has recently established a clearer overview of attendance patterns and additional staff are now 24 and 25 September 2024

p.2

3

allocated to attendance. This is being used to drive improvements. There remains work to sustain recent increases in attendance, especially for more vulnerable pupils. Although most pupils generally behave very well at Whitmore Park there are groups of pupils who are more likely to struggle to meet leaders’ expectations. There is a lack of clarity among some staff about school’s approach to managing pupils’ behaviour, which leads to inconsistencies. The school does not always have clear oversight on how it manages the few cases of unkind behaviour between pupils.

p.3

3

The school’s work for the pupils’ personal development is a strength. The curriculum gives pupils a clear understanding of healthy relationships, fundamental British values, other cultures or religions, and how to keep themselves safe and healthy. There is an impressive range of extra-curricular opportunities covering sport, creative and social opportunities. Leaders carefully monitor the uptake of these. There are also a wide range of trips and visits, including residentials.

p.3

3

The school has had a period of transition in leadership. There are a number of staff who are new in their roles. In addition, the school was supporting another local school. This has impacted on leaders’ capacity to be able to review and renew provision. Many leaders are new in post and have had limited time to have an impact in their roles, despite training. That said, the school’s evaluation of its work lacks precision. This means that senior leaders and governors are often unclear about the impact and consistency of changes made. Governors are committed to the school and discharge their statutory duties. Staff report that leaders are mindful of workload. Parents are broadly positive about the school. A number expressed concerns about historical provision for pupils with SEND and some aspects of behaviour.

p.3

Safeguarding

The arrangements for safeguarding are effective.

p.3

(Information for the school and appropriate authority)

 There remain too many pupils who are absent from school too often, especially more vulnerable pupils. This means these pupils miss too much school and learning. The school should continue to implement its strategic approach, working closely with parents and external agencies, so pupils’ attendance improves.  The school has not ensured that pupils with SEND receive effective support to achieve well. Teachers do not use the information provided to them to make appropriate adaptations to the curriculum, meaning these pupils do not achieve as well as they should. The school should ensure that staff make effective adaptations to their delivery of the curriculum so that pupils with SEND make good progress.  There is inconsistency in the teaching of early reading, including for the pupils who need extra support. This results in some pupils, especially weaker readers, not reading as well as they should. The school should ensure that there is a consistent approach to

p.3

4

the teaching of early reading, particularly for those pupils who need extra support to become confident, fluent readers.  Teachers do not check pupils’ understanding consistently well. This means that misconceptions are not spotted and addressed. The school should ensure that teachers identify gaps in pupils’ knowledge and then adapt the tasks selected to ensure key knowledge is secure.  The school is not accurately evaluating the impact of its work in various aspects of its provision, including some curriculum areas, SEND and behaviour. This means that inconsistencies persist, and leaders and governors do not have clear oversight. The school should ensure that there is clarity around expectations, and the impact of its work is systematically evaluated.

p.4

How can I feed back my views?

find out what other parents and carers think. We use information from Ofsted Parent View when deciding which schools to inspect, when to inspect them and as part of their inspection.

p.4

How can I feed back my views?

The Department for Education has further guidance on how to complain about a school.

p.4

Further information

You can search for published performance information about the school.

p.4

Further information

In the report, ‘disadvantaged pupils’ is used to mean pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND); pupils who meet the definition of children in need of help and protection ; pupils receiving statutory local authority support from a social worker; and pupils who otherwise meet the criteria used for deciding the school’s pupil premium funding (this includes pupils claiming free school meals at any point in the last six years, looked after children (children in local authority care) and/or children who left care through adoption or another formal route). 24 and 25 September 2024

p.4

School details

Appropriate authority The governing body

p.5

School details

Chair of governing body Karl Miles and Rosella Brennan (Co-Chairs)

p.5

School details

Date of previous inspection 27 February 2019, under section 8 of the Education Act 2005

p.5

Information about this school

 The school is one of two schools in The Affinity Federation.  The school uses one registered alternative provider.  The school runs its own nursery and a breakfast club.

p.5

Information about this inspection

The inspectors carried out this graded inspection under section 5 of the Education Act 2005. During a graded inspection, we grade the school for each of our key judgements (quality of education; behaviour and attitudes; personal development; and leadership and management) and for any relevant provision judgement (early years and/or sixth form provision). Schools receiving a graded inspection from September 2024 will not be given an overall effectiveness grade.

p.5

Information about this inspection

 Inspections are a point-in-time evaluation about the quality of a school’s education provision. 24 and 25 September 2024

p.5

6

 This was the first routine inspection the school received since the COVID-19 pandemic began. Inspectors discussed the impact of the pandemic with the school and have taken that into account in their evaluation of the school.  To evaluate the effectiveness of safeguarding, the inspectors: reviewed the single central record; took account of the views of leaders, staff and pupils; and considered the extent to which the school has created an open and positive culture around safeguarding that puts pupils’ interests first.  As part of this inspection, the inspectors met with the co-chairs of the governing body and governors. They met with senior leaders, subject leaders, teaching staff and other employees in the school. Inspectors also talked informally to pupils to gather general information about school life. The lead inspector also spoke with a representative of the local authority by telephone. He scrutinised records of external visits to the school.

p.6

6

Governing body minutes were reviewed.  The inspectors carried out deep dives in these subjects: early reading, mathematics, geography, music, English and science. For each deep dive, the inspectors held discussions about the curriculum, visited a sample of lessons, spoke to teachers, spoke to some pupils about their learning and looked at samples of pupils’ work in these subjects and others.  The inspectors reviewed the school’s extra-curricular activities, enrichment programme and their careers and personal development programmes with leaders and pupils.  The inspectors reviewed the school’s behaviour and attendance records with school leaders.  A range of documentation was scrutinised, including plans to improve the school.  The inspectors met with members of staff and spoke to pupils, both formally and informally, at various points in the inspection. They took account of responses to Ofsted surveys for staff and pupils, Ofsted Parent View and the free-text responses as

p.6

6

well as other communication from parents.

p.6

Inspection team

Andrew Madden, lead inspector His Majesty’s Inspector

p.6

Inspection team

Helen Lowe Ofsted Inspector 24 and 25 September 2024

p.6

7

achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.

p.7

7

If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.7

7

You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open- government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .

p.7

7

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .

p.7

7

T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.7