Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School inspection (EIF)

St Marys Church of England Primary Academy

Inspected 25 Sept 2024 · published 23 Oct 2024 · URN 147633

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Ian Rawstorne (lead), Jane Wilson

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    25 Sept 2024

  • Inspectors verified

    Ian Rawstorne, Jane Wilson

  • Behaviour and attitudes verified

    Good

  • Early years verified

    Good

  • Leadership and management verified

    Requires improvement

  • Personal development verified

    Good

  • Quality of education verified

    Requires improvement

  • Postcode verified

    LS10 2QY

  • Name on report verified

    St Marys Church of England Primary Academy

  • URN verified

    147633

Page 1 of 7
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Each judgement on its scale, weakest to strongest.

  • Behaviour and attitudesGood
  • Early yearsGood
  • Leadership and managementRequires improvement
  • Personal developmentGood
  • Quality of educationRequires improvement

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+43Positivemore positive than 40% of reports of this type
OutstandingGoodRIInadequate

In line with other reports of this type.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praisepositiveambitiousenjoyeffectivehigh expectationsstrongtrusting relationshipspolite
Criticismpersistent absencetoo fewinconsistentnot yetgapslownot precisely

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsSafeguardingAbout the inspection positive critical
  • Findings1314w+42
  • Safeguarding6w+33

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
7
Words of findings
1,291
about usual (typical 1153)
Reading level
Fairly hard
Flesch 53, typical 55
Average sentence
14 words
Next steps
6
typical 4
Hedged sentences
16%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 67%Safeguarding 0%About the inspection 33%

Full report text

Inspection of St Marys Church of England Primary Academy Church Street, Hunslet, Leeds, West Yorkshire LS10 2QY

p.1

Inspection dates: 24 and 25 September 2024

p.1

The quality of education Requires improvement Behaviour and attitudes Good Personal development Good Leadership and management Requires improvement Early years provision Good

p.1

Previous inspection grade Not previously inspected under section 5 of the Education Act 2005

p.1

The headteacher of this school is Elizabeth McDonagh. This school is part of the Collaborative Learning Trust, which means other people in the trust also have responsibility for running the school. The trust is run by the chief executive officer, Janet Sheriff OBE, and overseen by a board of trustees, chaired by Ian Bond. 24 and 25 September 2024

p.1

What is it like to attend this school?

The school is welcoming and inclusive to all. It has a genuine spirit of community. Pupils enjoy school life and form strong friendships with their peers. Staff provide pupils with the social and emotional support they need. The school has developed trusting relationships with parents and carers. It works with them in the best interests of pupils.

p.2

What is it like to attend this school?

The school has high aspirations for what pupils can achieve. A new ambitious curriculum reflects this. However, too few pupils meet those high aspirations. There is still much work to do, to improve both the quality of teaching and pupils’ attendance.

p.2

What is it like to attend this school?

Pupils behave well. They are polite, friendly and inquisitive. From Reception, the school has established a clear set of routines that promote positive behaviour. Pupils show kindness and respect to each other. They form positive relationships with staff and feel safe. This is a calm and orderly school, but also a school where pupils can play and have fun.

p.2

What is it like to attend this school?

Pupils enjoy a wide range of opportunities to develop their talents and interests. They participate in clubs including football, dodge ball and dance. There is a school choir and a school council. Pupils take on roles as buddies to younger children, worship leaders and house captains.

p.2

What does the school do well and what does it need to do better?

The school has developed a broad and ambitious curriculum. It has identified the essential knowledge and skills it wants pupils to know and remember. In Reception, the curriculum prepares children well for Year 1 and beyond. There is a central focus on children’s language and communication. The curriculum also prioritises children’s physical development and social and emotional development. However, in some subjects at key stage 1 and 2, the school has not adapted the curriculum well enough. The curriculum does not build on what pupils have learned before in a clear and logical manner. Sometimes, pupils do not have the foundational knowledge they need to understand new learning.

p.2

What does the school do well and what does it need to do better?

In Reception, there is a purposeful learning environment. Adults use appropriate activities to consolidate children’s phonic and mathematical knowledge. They support children’s language development well through songs, rhymes and conversation. This helps to build children’s vocabulary and communication skills.

p.2

What does the school do well and what does it need to do better?

At key stage 1 and 2, the quality of teaching is inconsistent. Sometimes, teachers select activities that do not support pupils’ learning well. Sometimes, they do not adapt learning to meet pupils’ needs. Some pupils, including pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND), do not gain a coherent body of knowledge. However, there are strengths in the school’s provision for SEND. The school identifies pupils’ needs well. It also provides effective support for pupils with social, emotional and mental health needs. 24 and 25 September 2024

p.2

3

From the start of Reception, pupils learn to read using phonics. Teachers teach phonics well. Most pupils in Year 1 are reading at an age-appropriate level. The school is quick to identify those pupils who need extra help with their reading. This includes older pupils who need help in building their reading fluency. However, sometimes, adults do not provide the expert help that pupils need. They do not focus with enough precision on pupils’ needs. Some pupils do not catch up with their peers quickly enough.

p.3

3

The school has high expectations of pupils’ behaviour. Pupils respond well to these expectations and show positive attitudes to their learning. The school is quick to identify barriers to pupils’ attendance and works with pupils and their families to remove those barriers. There has been recent improvement in pupils’ attendance. However, levels of persistent absence remain high, particularly for disadvantaged pupils.

p.3

3

Pupils benefit from a comprehensive and age-appropriate personal development programme. They are taught how to keep themselves safe, including online. They learn about important issues such as relationships and equality and diversity. The school promotes pupils’ physical and mental health through sport and outdoor activities. The school prepares pupils well for life in modern Britain.

p.3

3

The school is working in a context that provides significant challenge. It is experiencing the ongoing impact of the pandemic. Also, there has been instability in school leadership and staffing. The trust has supported the school well. It has provided additional leadership capacity and significant support with school improvement. Trustees, supported by governors, perform their statutory responsibilities with appropriate rigour.

p.3

3

The school has improved pupils’ behaviour and attendance. It has established positive relationships with parents. It engages well with staff on matters of workload and well- being. However, professional development has not yet had the desired impact on the quality of teaching. The attainment of many pupils at key stage 2 remains low.

p.3

Safeguarding

The arrangements for safeguarding are effective.

p.3

(Information for the school and appropriate authority)

 In some subjects, the school has not adapted the curriculum to ensure that it builds coherently on pupils’ prior knowledge. This means that, sometimes, pupils move on to new learning without the foundational knowledge they need to secure that learning. The school should ensure that it adapts the curriculum in these subjects, so that the curriculum builds on pupils’ prior knowledge and provides pupils with a coherent body of knowledge as they progress through the school.  Sometimes, teachers do not select activities that are well-matched to pupils’ needs, including pupils with SEND. This means that some pupils find it difficult to access 24 and 25 September 2024

p.3

4

learning, while other pupils do not move on to new learning quickly enough. The school should ensure that it provides teachers with the training and development in pedagogy and pedagogical content knowledge that they require to adapt learning to meet the needs of all pupils.  Sometimes, the extra help pupils at an early stage of reading get is not focused precisely enough on their specific reading needs. This means that some pupils do not catch up with their peers quickly enough. The school should ensure that it gives teachers and other adults, who provide extra support to pupils at an early stage of reading, the training and development they need. In particular, this training and development should focus on how best to build and secure pupils’ reading fluency.  Levels of persistent absence are high, particularly for disadvantaged pupils. This means that some pupils miss out on too much of their education, have gaps in their

p.4

4

knowledge and do not achieve well. The school should continue to reduce levels of persistent absence so that more pupils benefit from the school’s recent curriculum changes.

p.4

How can I feed back my views?

find out what other parents and carers think. We use information from Ofsted Parent View when deciding which schools to inspect, when to inspect them and as part of their inspection.

p.4

How can I feed back my views?

The Department for Education has further guidance on how to complain about a school.

p.4

Further information

You can search for published performance information about the school.

p.4

Further information

In the report, ‘disadvantaged pupils’ is used to mean pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND); pupils who meet the definition of children in need of help and protection ; pupils receiving statutory local authority support from a social worker; and pupils who otherwise meet the criteria used for deciding the school’s pupil premium funding (this includes pupils claiming free school meals at any point in the last six years, looked after children (children in local authority care) and/or children who left care through adoption or another formal route). 24 and 25 September 2024

p.4

School details

Date of previous inspection Not previously inspected

p.5

Information about this school

 The school opened on 1 February 2020.  The school is part of the Collaborative Learning Trust.  St Marys Church of England Primary Academy converted to become an academy in January 2020. When its predecessor school, Hunslet St Mary’s Church of England Primary School, was last inspected by Ofsted, it was judged to be inadequate for overall effectiveness.  The current headteacher has been in post since May 2024.  The school uses one unregistered alternative provider.  The school is a Church of England school in the Diocese of Leeds. It is due to have its first section 48 inspection during this school year.

p.5

Information about this inspection

The inspectors carried out this graded inspection under section 5 of the Education Act 2005. During a graded inspection, we grade the school for each of our key judgements 24 and 25 September 2024

p.5

6

(quality of education; behaviour and attitudes; personal development; and leadership and management) and for any relevant provision judgement (early years and/or sixth form provision). Schools receiving a graded inspection from September 2024 will not be given an overall effectiveness grade.

p.6

6

 This was the first routine inspection the school received since the COVID-19 pandemic began. Inspectors discussed the impact of the pandemic with the school and have taken that into account in their evaluation of the school.  Inspections are a point-in-time evaluation about the quality of a school’s education provision.  The inspectors met with the headteacher, deputy headteacher, the chief executive officer of the trust and other trust leaders, including the director of school improvement (primary). They also met with the chair of the board of trustees, members of both the board of trustees and the local governing body, and with a diocesan representative.  The inspectors carried out deep dives in these subjects: early reading, mathematics, physical education, and geography. For each deep dive, the inspectors held discussions about the curriculum, visited a sample of lessons, spoke to teachers, spoke to some

p.6

6

pupils about their learning and looked at samples of pupils’ work.  The inspectors also discussed the curriculum in English and science. They looked at samples of pupils’ work in these subjects.  To evaluate the effectiveness of safeguarding, the inspectors: reviewed the single central record; took account of the views of leaders, staff and pupils; and considered the extent to which the school has created an open and positive culture around safeguarding that puts pupils’ interests first.  The inspectors considered the responses to Ofsted’s surveys for pupils and staff, and to the online survey for parents, Ofsted Parent View.

p.6

Inspection team

Ian Rawstorne, lead inspector His Majesty’s Inspector

p.6

Inspection team

Jane Wilson Ofsted Inspector 24 and 25 September 2024

p.6

7

achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.

p.7

7

If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.7

7

You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open- government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .

p.7

7

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .

p.7

7

T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.7

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion