Schools & FE · School inspection (EIF)
John Kyrle High School and Sixth Form Centre Academy
Summary
Nicola Beech (lead), Huw Bishop, Jacqueline Newsome, Mark Fenton, Sarah Steer
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection date verified
25 Sept 2024
- Inspectors verified
Huw Bishop, Jacqueline Newsome, Mark Fenton, Nicola Beech, Sarah Steer
- Behaviour and attitudes verified
Good
- Leadership and management verified
Good
- Personal development verified
Good
- Quality of education verified
Good
- Postcode verified
HR9 7ET
- Name on report verified
John Kyrle High School and Sixth Form Centre Academy
- URN verified
136399
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2022.
- Behaviour and attitudesGood
- Leadership and managementGood
- Personal developmentGood
- Quality of educationGood
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Students achieve excellent outcomes in a number of key stage 5 subjects. p.3
- Sixth-form students visibly enjoy their learning and make the most of the many opportunities for high-quality discussion. p.2
- The vast majority meet the school’s high expectations of behaviour, moving around the site calmly and requiring minimal supervision at social times. p.2
- Pupils want to meet the school’s high expectations of their learning. p.2
- The school’s high expectations of behaviour and attendance are understood by all. p.3
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No strong criticism found.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- The key knowledge pupils need to learn is not always made explicitly clear to them. p.3
- The key knowledge pupils need to learn is not clear. p.2
- However, sometimes the level of detail in these plans means staff are not confident about the specific adaptations they need to make in lessons. p.2
- There are times, however, when the additional support or adaptation needed by some pupils at the point of learning is not as effective as it should be. p.3
- The school should ensure that the curriculum is implemented in a way that enables all pupils to better understand themselves as learners in each subject. p.3
- There is a clear understanding of what needs to improve. p.2
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Teaching & assessment6
“Pupils benefit from the strong subject expertise of teachers in all subjects.” p.3Progress & outcomes5
“Students achieve excellent outcomes in a number of key stage 5 subjects.” p.3Leadership & governance4
“The new leadership team have established an ambitious and inclusive vision for the school.” p.2
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 7
- Words of findings
- 1,197
- about usual (typical 1153)
- Reading level
- Fairly hard
- Flesch 53, typical 55
- Average sentence
- 16 words
- Next steps
- 6
- typical 4
- Hedged sentences
- 17%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Inspection of John Kyrle High School and Sixth Form Centre Academy Ledbury Road, Ross-on-Wye, Herefordshire HR9 7ET
p.1
Inspection dates: 24 and 25 September 2024
p.1
The quality of education Good Behaviour and attitudes Good Personal development Good Leadership and management Good Sixth-form provision Good Previous inspection grade Requires improvement
p.1
The headteacher of this school is Julian Morgan. The school is part of the Heart of Mercia trust, which means other people in the trust also have responsibility for running the school. The trust is run by the chief executive officer, Peter Cooper, and overseen by a board of trustees, chaired by Kenneth Hopkins. 24 and 25 September 2024
p.1
What is it like to attend this school?
Pupils and staff are justifiably proud of the welcoming and friendly culture at John Kyrle. Pupils get on well with each other and actively demonstrate the school’s value of respect in their interactions and conduct. The vast majority meet the school’s high expectations of behaviour, moving around the site calmly and requiring minimal supervision at social times. Those who make the wrong choices know that any consequences are fair.
p.2
What is it like to attend this school?
Pupils want to meet the school’s high expectations of their learning. They apply themselves well in lessons, especially on independent tasks and opportunities to improve their work. Most achieve well. Lessons are rarely disrupted by poor behaviour. Sixth-form students visibly enjoy their learning and make the most of the many opportunities for high-quality discussion.
p.2
What is it like to attend this school?
The school makes sure that pupils learn how to keep themselves safe and healthy at an age-appropriate level through the ‘respect’ curriculum. There are many opportunities for pupils to engage in extra-curricular activities. The curriculum is enhanced by visits and participation in competitions. Many pupils gain important life skills and experiences through their participation in the Duke of Edinburgh programme. Pupils are proud of their charitable activities, including the close links they have with a partner school in Uganda.
p.2
What does the school do well and what does it need to do better?
There have been significant changes and improvements since the previous inspection. The new leadership team have established an ambitious and inclusive vision for the school. There is a clear understanding of what needs to improve. Important changes have been made to improve the quality of education, as well as other areas. However, because these changes are relatively new, they are not yet embedded. Pockets of inconsistency still remain. Leaders at all levels know there is still work to be done before they can be confident the improvements are having an impact.
p.2
What does the school do well and what does it need to do better?
The school has broadened its curriculum offer at key stages 4 and 5. Pupils can choose from a range of subjects that match their career aspirations, including construction and criminology. The curriculum has been designed in a way to support pupils to build their knowledge over time. However, in some subjects in key stage 3, this sequencing is not as strong. The key knowledge pupils need to learn is not clear. Sometimes, pupils do not understand how they are learning and improving within each subject.
p.2
What does the school do well and what does it need to do better?
The school believes in inclusion. This is evident in the high-quality support pupils receive in the ‘hub’ and the ‘haven’. Pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND) have their needs identified and mapped in comprehensive plans. However, sometimes the level of detail in these plans means staff are not confident about the specific adaptations they need to make in lessons. There is work underway to ensure that adaptations are consistently made for all pupils who need them. The school has made sure that there is appropriate support in place for pupils who are at the early stages of learning to read. 24 and 25 September 2024
p.2
3
Pupils benefit from the strong subject expertise of teachers in all subjects. Teachers enthusiastically share their subject knowledge, especially in sixth-form lessons. New knowledge is explained clearly. Teachers check effectively that pupils have understood their learning. There are times, however, when the additional support or adaptation needed by some pupils at the point of learning is not as effective as it should be. Pupils do not always have the opportunity to discuss their learning and organise their thinking before they move on to written tasks.
p.3
3
Pupil outcomes are improving. Most pupils, including those with SEND, achieve well. However, this is not the case for some disadvantaged pupils, especially those who are persistently absent. Students achieve excellent outcomes in a number of key stage 5 subjects. Almost all pupils successfully move into the next stage of education, employment or training, including many who take up apprenticeships. This can be attributed to the strength of the careers guidance and support they receive.
p.3
3
The school’s high expectations of behaviour and attendance are understood by all. There has been a reduction in the number of incidents of poor behaviour and attendance has improved. The strength of pastoral support pupils receive is a strength.
p.3
3
Many parents and carers are happy with the care and education their children receive. They support the improvements that have taken place over the last two years. Trust leaders, trustees and local governors work well with school leaders. There is an accurate understanding of what the school does well and any areas that require further strengthening. There is an absolute commitment to seeing the school and its pupils thrive.
p.3
Safeguarding
The arrangements for safeguarding are effective.
p.3
(Information for the school and appropriate authority)
The key knowledge pupils need to learn is not always made explicitly clear to them. This means pupils do not always understand how their learning is building over time. The school should ensure that the curriculum is implemented in a way that enables all pupils to better understand themselves as learners in each subject. There are times when teaching is not adapted well enough to meet the needs of groups of pupils. This can include some disadvantaged pupils, pupils with SEND and those who are persistently absent. Consequently, some of these pupils develop gaps in their knowledge or do not learn and achieve as well as they could. The school should ensure that all staff are clear around their role and responsibilities in supporting these pupils to achieve the best possible outcomes. There is more to be done to strengthen the school’s work on literacy and oracy. Sometimes, pupils do not have opportunities to discuss their learning and practise
p.3
4
using new vocabulary before they move to written work. The school should ensure all staff are consistently following the school’s literacy and oracy strategies.
p.4
How can I feed back my views?
find out what other parents and carers think. We use information from Ofsted Parent View when deciding which schools to inspect, when to inspect them and as part of their inspection.
p.4
How can I feed back my views?
The Department for Education has further guidance on how to complain about a school.
p.4
Further information
You can search for published performance information about the school.
p.4
Further information
In the report, ‘disadvantaged pupils’ is used to mean pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND); pupils who meet the definition of children in need of help and protection ; pupils receiving statutory local authority support from a social worker; and pupils who otherwise meet the criteria used for deciding the school’s pupil premium funding (this includes pupils claiming free school meals at any point in the last six years, looked after children (children in local authority care) and/or children who left care through adoption or another formal route). 24 and 25 September 2024
p.4
provision
Number of pupils on the school roll 1298
p.5
form
Dates of previous inspection 22 and 23 March 2022, under section 5 of the Education Act 2005
p.5
Information about this school
The headteacher took up post in September 2022.
p.5
Information about this school
The school joined the Heart of Mercia multi-academy trust in September 2023. The trust comprises five academies.
p.5
Information about this school
The school does not use any alternative provision.
p.5
Information about this school
The school meets the requirements of the provider access legislation, which requires schools to provide pupils in Years 8 to 13 with information and engagement about approved technical education qualifications and apprenticeships. 24 and 25 September 2024
p.5
Information about this inspection
The inspectors carried out this graded inspection under section 5 of the Education Act 2005. During a graded inspection, we grade the school for each of our key judgements (quality of education; behaviour and attitudes; personal development; and leadership and management) and for any relevant provision judgement (early years and/or sixth form provision). Schools receiving a graded inspection from September 2024 will not be given an overall effectiveness grade.
p.6
Information about this inspection
Inspectors discussed any continued impact of the pandemic with the school and have taken that into account in their evaluation of the school.
p.6
Information about this inspection
Inspections are a point-in-time evaluation about the quality of a school’s education provision.
p.6
Information about this inspection
The inspectors met with the headteacher, other school leaders, trust leaders, including the chief executive officer, the chair of the trust board, and the chair and vice-chair of the local governing board.
p.6
Information about this inspection
The inspectors carried out deep dives in these subjects: mathematics, design technology, English, geography and science. For each deep dive, the inspectors held discussions about the curriculum, visited a sample of lessons, spoke to teachers, spoke to some pupils about their learning and looked at samples of pupils’ work. The inspectors also visited other lessons.
p.6
Information about this inspection
To evaluate the effectiveness of safeguarding, the inspectors: reviewed the single central record; took account of the views of leaders, staff and pupils; and considered the extent to which the school has created an open and positive culture around safeguarding that puts pupils’ interests first.
p.6
Information about this inspection
The inspectors considered the responses to Ofsted’s staff and pupil surveys. They considered the responses to Ofsted Parent View, including comments submitted via the free-text facility, and communications received by Ofsted during the inspection.
p.6
Inspection team
Nicola Beech, lead inspector His Majesty’s Inspector
p.6
7
achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.
p.7
7
If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .
p.7
7
You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open- government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .
p.7
7
Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .
p.7
7
T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted
p.7
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion