Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School inspection (EIF)

Manor School

Inspected 17 Jul 2024 · published 2 Oct 2024 · URN 137613

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    17 Jul 2024

  • Inspectors AI-checked

    Damian Painton, Dick Vasey, Jayne Ashman, John Spragg

  • Behaviour and attitudes verified

    Requires improvement

  • Leadership and management verified

    Inadequate

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Inadequate

  • Personal development verified

    Requires improvement

  • Quality of education verified

    Inadequate

  • Postcode verified

    NN9 6PA

  • Name on report verified

    Manor School

  • URN verified

    137613

Page 1 of 9
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2012.

  • OverallInadequate
  • Behaviour and attitudesRequires improvement
  • Leadership and managementInadequate
  • Personal developmentRequires improvement
  • Quality of educationInadequate

3% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Inadequate (5,043 inspections).

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

−22Mixedmore positive than 56% of reports of this type graded Inadequate
OutstandingGoodRIInadequate

In line with other reports of this type graded Inadequate.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praisepositiverespectfulsecurewell-plannedpoliteimprovingimprovedeffective
Criticismpoortoo lowgapsnot alwaysnot high-qualityweakshortcomingsnot robust

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsSafeguardingAbout the inspection positive critical
  • Findings1453w−24
  • Safeguarding11w+33

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
9
Words of findings
1,427
about usual (typical 1552)
Reading level
Fairly hard
Flesch 51, typical 53
Average sentence
16 words
Next steps
6
typical 6
Hedged sentences
9%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 70%Safeguarding 1%About the inspection 29%

Full report text

Inspection of Manor School Mountbatten Way, Raunds, Wellingborough, Northamptonshire NN9 6PA

p.1

Overall effectiveness Inadequate

The quality of education Inadequate Behaviour and attitudes Requires improvement Personal development Requires improvement Leadership and management Inadequate Sixth-form provision Requires improvement Previous inspection grade Good

p.1

Overall effectiveness Inadequate

The interim principal of this school is Adam Crawte. The school is part of Nene Education Trust, which means other people in the trust also have responsibility for running the school. The trust is run by the chief executive officer (CEO), Chris Hill, and overseen by a board of trustees, chaired by Jenna Weedon. 16 and 17 July 2024

p.1

What is it like to attend this school?

The curriculum at Manor School does not provide pupils with the knowledge and skills that they need to achieve well. Expectations are too low. The quality of teaching is inconsistent. Lessons are not well matched to pupils’ stage of learning. This is having a negative impact on pupils’ achievement, which is reflected in published outcomes. The curriculum in the sixth form is better, particularly in vocational courses.

p.2

What is it like to attend this school?

Pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND) do not get the support they need. Many pupils with SEND become disengaged in their lessons or do not attend school regularly. This creates further gaps in their learning.

p.2

What is it like to attend this school?

The majority of pupils are polite and respectful. Most behave well. Pupils say that bullying is infrequent. Pupils told inspectors that occasionally their learning can be disrupted by a small minority of pupils. Also, that sometimes school routines are not implemented consistently and fairly. Some pupils told inspectors that the behaviour of others can leave them feeling uneasy at times.

p.2

What is it like to attend this school?

A small number of pupils attend alternative provision. The school does not make robust checks to ensure this provision is suitable for these pupils. This includes checks to ensure pupils attend and achieve well.

p.2

better?

Over recent years, the school’s development journey has been unsettled by changes to staffing and leadership. This has affected the consistency of the implementation of the curriculum, school routines and policies. This has been a factor in pupils not achieving as well as they should, resulting in dissatisfaction from some parents and carers.

p.2

better?

The delivery of the curriculum is weak. Staff do not routinely check that pupils are secure in what they have learned. They often present new learning before pupils have applied or practised sufficiently what they have been taught. There are few opportunities for pupils, including those with SEND, to revisit prior learning to help them to strengthen their recall of important knowledge. Pupils receive work that does not always challenge them to think deeply.

p.2

better?

The school does not identify or assess the needs of pupils with SEND well enough. Information about these pupils is not shared effectively or followed up with staff. This is resulting in teaching not being adapted to meet pupils’ needs. Leaders have started to put in place systems to address these shortcomings.

p.2

better?

The school does not have an assessment system to identify gaps in pupils’ knowledge and skills in reading. Therefore, staff are unable to provide suitable support across the curriculum. This is limiting pupils’ ability to read at an age- appropriate level and apply their skills to learning in all subjects. 16 and 17 July 2024

p.2

3

The school has designed a suitably broad curriculum offer. Pupils have access to a variety of academic and vocational courses. Nevertheless, in some subjects, the curriculum is less well developed. This can affect pupils’ ability to connect learning within and across all subjects so they do not always secure the breadth and depth of knowledge that they could.

p.3

3

With support from the multi-academy trust, new leaders have quickly identified and acted on the areas in need of rapid improvement. While at an early stage, the new policies and procedures are beginning to have a positive impact on improving provision. In English and in the sixth-form provision, the quality of teaching is more consistent and pupils’ learning more secure.

p.3

3

The school has introduced a new strategy for promoting and checking on pupils’ attendance. It has started to address the barriers that pupils, particularly those with SEND and disadvantaged, may face. This approach is having a positive impact on securing improved attendance rates, which are now not dissimilar to those found nationally. The school has also revised systems for improving pupils’ behaviour. The spike in suspensions that was evident in the first half of the academic year have reduced dramatically. The number of pupils who are removed from lessons has also decreased.

p.3

3

The school has planned a ‘work, world, and wellness’ curriculum to support pupils’ wider personal development. This is designed to give pupils the knowledge they need to keep themselves safe, and physically and mentally healthy. Pupils learn about fundamental British values, equality and diversity as well as different faiths and cultures. Pupils have access to lots of information about future education and career choices.

p.3

3

In the sixth form, the delivery of the curriculum for personal development is more established. It supports students to become responsible, respectful and active citizens. Students benefit from opportunities to take on leadership and mentoring responsibilities in the school.

p.3

3

Staff told inspectors that leaders are considerate of their well-being. They appreciate the opportunities that the school provides to support them to develop their expertise.

p.3

Safeguarding

The arrangements for safeguarding are effective. 16 and 17 July 2024

p.3

(Information for the school and appropriate authority)

 The school’s delivery of the intended curriculum is of poor quality. It does not support pupils to gain knowledge and skills securely. This is reflected in pupils’ work and their performance in external examinations at key stages 4 and 5. The school needs to ensure that pupils benefit from a well-planned and well- implemented curriculum and that they gain the knowledge and qualifications to be successful in their next stages of education and future careers.  Pupils with SEND do not benefit from a high-quality education because expectations for these pupils are too low. Staff do not receive accurate information, or have the expertise, to effectively adapt the curriculum to meet the needs of pupils with SEND. Therefore, these pupils are not reaching their potential. The school needs to ensure that expectations are raised, and that staff adapt teaching approaches so that pupils with SEND benefit from the curriculum

p.4

(Information for the school and appropriate authority)

and achieve well.  The school does not have systems in place to identify gaps in pupils’ reading knowledge. As a result, pupils who need more help with reading, including those with SEND, do not receive the support they need to access the curriculum. The school should ensure that it has an accurate understanding of pupils’ reading needs. It should ensure that all pupils can access reading material across the curriculum through appropriate adaptations.  The school has not made appropriate and robust checks on the alternative provision used to support the needs of a small number of pupils. Routines are not in place to measure the impact of the provision or monitor the attendance of these pupils. As a result, these pupils do not benefit from a high-quality education. The school needs to ensure that secure systems are in place to ensure any alternative provision used meets the needs of pupils. It should ensure pupils

p.4

(Information for the school and appropriate authority)

attend well and benefit from an appropriate curriculum.  The school has introduced new systems to improve attendance, behaviour and the number of pupil suspensions. Although these new systems are starting to have some positive impact, they are still in their infancy. This results in these pupils missing too much of their learning. Pupils with SEND and those that are disadvantaged are disproportionately represented in these figures. The school must fully implement its systems to improve behaviour and reduce the rates of poor attendance and suspensions so that all pupils benefit from the school’s curriculum.

p.4

How can I feed back my views?

or to find out what other parents and carers think. We use information from Ofsted Parent View when deciding which schools to inspect, when to inspect them and as part of their inspection. 16 and 17 July 2024

p.4

5

The Department for Education has further guidance on how to complain about a school.

p.5

Further information

You can search for published performance information about the school.

p.5

Further information

In the report, ‘disadvantaged pupils’ is used to mean pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND); pupils who meet the definition of children in need of help and protection; pupils receiving statutory local authority support from a social worker; and pupils who otherwise meet the criteria used for deciding the school’s pupil premium funding (this includes pupils claiming free school meals at any point in the last six years, looked after children (children in local authority care) and/or children who left care through adoption or another formal route). 16 and 17 July 2024

p.5

provision

Number of pupils on the school roll 1003

p.6

sixth form

Principal Adam Crawte (interim principal)

p.6

sixth form

Dates of previous inspection 4 and 5 March 2020, under section 8 of the Education Act 2005

p.6

Information about this school

 The school is part of the Nene Education Trust.  The interim principal was appointed in June 2024.  The school makes use of one registered and two unregistered alternative provisions.  The school meets the requirements of the provider access legislation, which requires schools to provide pupils in Years 8 to 13 with information and engagement about approved technical education qualifications and apprenticeships. 16 and 17 July 2024

p.6

Information about this inspection

The inspectors carried out this graded inspection under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.

p.7

Information about this inspection

In accordance with section 44(2) of the Education Act 2005, His Majesty’s Chief Inspector is of the opinion that this school requires significant improvement, because it is performing significantly less well than it might in all the circumstances reasonably be expected to perform.

p.7

Information about this inspection

 Inspections are a point-in-time judgement about the quality of a school’s education provision.  This was the first routine inspection the school received since the COVID-19 pandemic began. Inspectors discussed the impact of the pandemic with the school and have taken that into account in their evaluation of the school.  Inspectors met with the interim principal, the senior vice-principal and other school leaders, including the special educational needs and disabilities coordinator and the designated safeguarding lead.  The lead inspector met with the CEO, the deputy CEO, and the school improvement partner from the multi-academy trust. The lead inspector also met with representatives of the board of trustees and the interim action board.  Inspectors carried out deep dives in these subjects: English, science, modern foreign languages and computing. For each deep dive, inspectors held discussions about the curriculum, visited a sample of lessons, spoke to teachers, spoke to

p.7

Information about this inspection

some pupils about their learning and looked at samples of pupils’ work.  Inspectors also visited lessons and spoke to pupils in a number of other subjects.  To evaluate the effectiveness of safeguarding, the inspectors: reviewed the single central record; took account of the views of leaders, staff and pupils; and considered the extent to which the school has created an open and positive culture around safeguarding that puts pupils’ interests first.  Inspectors held meetings with leaders and scrutinised records relating to attendance, behaviour and personal development.  An inspector held telephone conversations with two unregistered alternative provisions.  Inspectors considered the views of staff, pupils, parents through discussions and Ofsted’s online surveys.

p.7

Inspection team

John Spragg, lead inspector His Majesty’s Inspector

p.7

Inspection team

Dick Vasey Ofsted Inspector 16 and 17 July 2024

p.7

8

Jayne Ashman His Majesty’s Inspector 16 and 17 July 2024

p.8

9

regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.

p.9

9

If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.9

9

You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .

p.9

9

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .

p.9

9

T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.9

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion