Early years · Early years inspection (EIF)
Sallykidscare
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection date verified
2 Aug 2024
- Inspectors verified
Kyrstie Gennoe
- Behaviour and attitudes verified
Inadequate
- Leadership and management verified
Inadequate
- Overall effectiveness verified
Inadequate
- Personal development verified
Inadequate
- Quality of education verified
Inadequate
- Postcode verified
SW2 1NR
- Name on report verified
Sallykidscare
- URN verified
2768901
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Each judgement on its scale, weakest to strongest.
- OverallInadequate
- Behaviour and attitudesInadequate
- Leadership and managementInadequate
- Personal developmentInadequate
- Quality of educationInadequate
5% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Inadequate (17,905 inspections).
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
Reads more critically than most reports of this type graded Inadequate.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No standout praise found.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- The provider has failed to meet several requirements of the early years foundation stage (EYFS), which puts children at risk of harm. p.2
- Due to the lack of available resources and poor organisation of daily routines, children become boisterous and run around. p.2
- For example, furniture is placed below an open window, which puts children at risk of falling from a height and smoke alarms are not working correctly. p.2
- Although staff have completed safeguarding training, they do not know how to report any child protection concerns. p.2
- As a result, hazards are not identified or reduced, which puts children at risk. p.2
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Teaching & assessment4
“Risk assessment and safety arrangements are not robust.” p.2Wellbeing & mental health3
“At times, the strategies used impact on children's emotional well-being.” p.2
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 8
- Words of findings
- 1,102
- about usual (typical 972)
- Reading level
- Fairly hard
- Flesch 50, typical 51
- Average sentence
- 16 words
- Next steps
- 1
- typical 1
- Hedged sentences
- 7%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Inspection of Sallykidscare Brixton Hill United Reformed Church, 235 Brixton Hill, London SW2 1NR
p.1
Overall effectiveness Inadequate
The quality of education Inadequate Behaviour and attitudes Inadequate Personal development Inadequate Leadership and management Inadequate Overall effectiveness at previous inspection Not applicable
p.1
The provision is inadequate
Children's safety is not assured at the setting. The provider has failed to meet several requirements of the early years foundation stage (EYFS), which puts children at risk of harm. Risk assessment and safety arrangements are not robust. The provider has failed to ensure staff have a good understanding of their responsibility to keep children safe. As a result, hazards are not identified or reduced, which puts children at risk. For example, furniture is placed below an open window, which puts children at risk of falling from a height and smoke alarms are not working correctly. Furthermore, the provider has failed to ensure there are suitable first-aid arrangements in place, which impacts on the treatment children receive in an emergency.
p.2
The provision is inadequate
Children's learning is not supported to a good level. Staff do not set out enough resources and learning opportunities to engage children in meaningful play. As a result, children quickly become bored and lose control of their behaviour. Staff have a poor understanding of how to manage children's behaviour. At times, the strategies used impact on children's emotional well-being. The curriculum is poorly designed and does not meet the learning needs of babies and young children. The provider has failed to ensure staff understand what they want children to learn and how best to support them. This impacts on the progress that children make.
p.2
need to do better?
n The provider has failed to implement effective procedures to safeguard children. The designated safeguarding lead (DSL) is not always on the premises and there are no written policies or procedures in place to provide guidance. Although staff have completed safeguarding training, they do not know how to report any child protection concerns. This places children at risk of harm. n Records about staff and children were not easily accessible and available for inspection as required. As a result, it was not possible to ascertain that the provider has taken steps to assure the suitability of staff, such as completing enhanced Disclosure and Barring Service (DBS) checks and ensuring staff are suitably qualified and trained for their roles. This compromises children's safety as it is not known if staff are suitable. n During the inspection, there was no manager or deputy manager present. This impacted on the safety and well-being of children. Although staff did their best
p.2
need to do better?
to care for children, they did not have the knowledge or experience to ensure the requirements of the EYFS are met. n Leaders and managers have not identified weaknesses in staff practice, which impacts on their teaching and interactions with children. For example, staff do not engage children in conversation to support their communication and language development and have a poor understanding of how children learn.
p.2
need to do better?
2 August 2024 n There are significant weaknesses in the key-person arrangements. Staff gather information about children's individual needs, however, this is not effectively shared to ensure children's individual needs are met. For example, daily routines are not flexible enough, which means some children are put to bed when they are not ready, this impacts on their well-being. n Staff do not consistently apply safety rules, such as how many children use the trampoline at one time. This is confusing for children and does not help them learn to keep themselves safe. n Children are poorly behaved. Due to the lack of available resources and poor organisation of daily routines, children become boisterous and run around. Staff do not consistently remind children about how to behave, such as not running indoors. As a result, children do not learn to control their behaviour. n Staff make some observations and assessments of children's learning and
p.2
need to do better?
development. However, they do not use this information to plan opportunities to extend children's learning. As a result, planning does not reflect children's developmental needs and interests. n Weaknesses in planning means children only have a passing interest in the activities that staff have set out. This means children do not have opportunities to develop their curiosity and become deeply engaged in their play. As a result, children do not develop positive attitudes to learning. n Children learn some skills to be independent. For example, children feed themselves at mealtimes and take off their shoes. However, older children are not challenged to do things for themselves and staff often do things for them, such as pulling up trousers after nappy changes. This impacts on how well children are prepared for the next stage in their learning. n The provider failed to provide evidence that they have valid public liability
p.3
need to do better?
insurance in place. In addition, the registration certificate is not displayed. This is a breach of requirements.
p.3
Safeguarding
The arrangements for safeguarding are not effective.
p.3
Safeguarding
There is not an open and positive culture around safeguarding that puts children's interests first.
p.3
Due date
2 August 2024 implement a safeguarding policy that sets out the action to be taken when there are safeguarding concerns about a child, or an allegation is made against a member of staff, and ensure all staff, including the DSL, have a good understanding of this 16/08/2024
p.3
Due date
ensure there is a named Designated Safeguarding Lead to take responsibility for safeguarding children 16/08/2024
p.4
Due date
ensure all staff obtain an enhanced Disclosure and Baring Service (DBS) check and that records are available for inspection as required 16/08/2024
p.4
Due date
improve supervision arrangements so staff receive support, coaching and training to help them meet the needs of children. 16/08/2024
p.4
Due date
ensure there is at least one person who has a current paediatric first-aid certificate on the premises and available at all times when children are present 16/08/2024
p.4
Due date
improve the key-person arrangements so that every child's care is tailored to their individual needs 16/08/2024
p.4
Due date
ensure there is a suitable, qualified and experienced manager and/or deputy manager on site at all times 16/08/2024
p.4
Due date
support and manage children's behaviour and ensure staff implement suitable behaviour management strategies 16/08/2024
p.4
Due date
take action to ensure the premises are safe and fit for providing childcare 16/08/2024
p.4
Due date
ensure that fire safety equipment is in good working order and that fire exits can be easily opened in an emergency 16/08/2024
p.4
Due date
obtain valid public liability insurance 16/08/2024
p.4
Due date
2 August 2024 implement effective risk assessments to ensure all hazards are identified and reduced/removed and ensure staff understand their responsibility to keep children safe 16/08/2024
p.4
Due date
take steps to make records and information available to be shared with relevant professionals, including Ofsted inspectors 16/08/2024
p.5
Due date
display the setting's Ofsted certificate of registration as required. 16/08/2024
p.5
Due date
implement a curriculum that is ambitious and designed to give children the knowledge and skills they need to prepare them for the next stage in their learning 30/08/2024
p.5
Due date
improve planning so each child's individual learning needs, interests, and development are considered and met. 30/08/2024
p.5
Setting details
Unique reference number 2768901 Local authority Lambeth Inspection number 10360562 Type of provision Childcare on non-domestic premises
p.6
Registers
Early Years Register, Compulsory Childcare Register, Voluntary Childcare Register Day care type Full day care
p.6
inspection
Total number of places 36 Number of children on roll 66 Name of registered person SALLYKIDSCARE Ltd
p.6
reference number
Telephone number 07951109446 Date of previous inspection Not applicable
p.6
Information about this early years setting
Sallykidscare registered in December 2023. The nursery employs eight members of childcare staff. Of these, five hold appropriate early years qualifications at level 3 and two at level 2. The nursery is open Monday to Friday from 7.30am to 6pm for 51 weeks of the year.
p.6
Inspection activities
n We carried out this inspection as a result of a risk assessment, following information we received about the provider. n This was the first routine inspection the provider received since the COVID-19 pandemic began. n The inspector viewed the provision and discussed the safety and suitability of the premises. n The inspector talked to staff at appropriate times during the inspection and took account of their views. n The inspector observed the quality of education being provided, indoors and outdoors, and assessed the impact that this was having on children's learning. n The inspector spoke to one parent during the inspection and took account of their views. n The inspector spoke to the nominated individual on the phone during the inspection.
p.7
Inspection activities
We carried out this inspection under sections 49 and 50 of the Childcare Act 2006 on the quality and standards of provision that is registered on the Early Years Register. The registered person must ensure that this provision complies with the statutory framework for children's learning, development and care, known as the early years foundation stage.
p.7
Inspection activities
2 August 2024 regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children's services, and inspects services for looked after children, safeguarding and child protection.
p.7
Inspection activities
If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .
p.8
Inspection activities
You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk
p.8
Inspection activities
Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .
p.8
Inspection activities
T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted
p.8
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion