Social care · Children's home inspection (SCCIF)
Children's home run by Norfolk County Council
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Group verified
Norfolk County Council
- Inspection date verified
29 Aug 2024
- Inspectors verified
Dan Williams
- Helped and protected verified
Good
- Leadership and management verified
Good
- Overall effectiveness verified
Good
- Name on report verified
2767797
- URN verified
2767797
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Each judgement on its scale, weakest to strongest.
- OverallGood
- Helped and protectedGood
- Leadership and managementGood
70% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Good (12,716 inspections).
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type graded Good.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No standout praise found.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No strong criticism found.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- The registered person should ensure that all incidents of control, discipline and restraint are subject to systems of regular scrutiny to ensure that their use is fair. p.5
- The registered person should ensure that supervision enables staff to reflect and act on how their own feelings and behaviour may be affected by the behaviour of the children they care for. p.5
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Staff development3
“Specific training is provided as the child’s needs change.” p.3Leadership & governance2
“The effectiveness of leaders and managers good” p.1Progress & outcomes2
“The child receives good care and is making progress.” p.2
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 7
- Words of findings
- 1,121
- about usual (typical 1319)
- Reading level
- Fairly hard
- Flesch 56, typical 51
- Average sentence
- 15 words
- Next steps
- 2
- typical 4
- Hedged sentences
- 3%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Inspection report for children’s home: 2767797 1 Registered provider: Norfolk County Council Full inspection Inspected under the social care common inspection framework
p.1
Information about this children’s home
This home registered with Ofsted in March 2024 and is run by a local authority. It provides care for up to two children who experience social and emotional difficulties. At the time of this inspection, one child was living at the home.
p.1
Information about this children’s home
The manager registered with Ofsted at the same time as the home.
p.1
Overall experiences and progress of
children and young people, taking into account
p.1
good
How well children and young people are helped and protected good
p.1
good
The effectiveness of leaders and managers good
p.1
good
The children’s home provides effective services that meet the requirements for good.
p.1
good
Date of last inspection: not previously inspected
p.1
good
Overall judgement at last inspection: not applicable
p.1
good
Enforcement action since last inspection: not applicable Inspection report for children’s home: 2767797 2
p.1
Overall experiences and progress of children and young people: good
Only one child has lived at the home since registration. They were present and were spoken with during this inspection.
p.2
Overall experiences and progress of children and young people: good
Before this inspection, details of an ongoing concern were shared with Ofsted. The inspector was aware during this inspection that this was being investigated. While Ofsted does not have the power to investigate complaints of this kind, actions taken by the home and the host local authority in response were considered alongside other evidence available at the time of the inspection to inform the inspector’s judgements.
p.2
Overall experiences and progress of children and young people: good
The child receives good care and is making progress. They have good relationships with the staff, who have taken time to get to know the child and how to communicate with them effectively. Staff use a therapeutic approach and are responsive to the child’s needs.
p.2
Overall experiences and progress of children and young people: good
Staff support the child’s understanding and development of their culture and identity, trying out different hairstyles and cultural meals. Staff encourage the child to stay active. The child has enjoyed the gym, long walks in the countryside, holidays with staff, pamper days and bowling.
p.2
Overall experiences and progress of children and young people: good
Staff seek the child’s wishes and views in all aspects of care planning. Staff arrange for the child to speak to external professionals to make sure that their voice is heard outside of the home.
p.2
Overall experiences and progress of children and young people: good
The child’s social worker said, ‘I think the relationships that staff have with the child are positive. The staff have been instrumental in showing [name of child] that they are valued and supporting them with moving forward with their independence.’
p.2
Overall experiences and progress of children and young people: good
Staff have a good understanding of the child’s health needs. The staff and the manager work closely with external professionals to support good healthcare. When there are health concerns, staff keep the child safe and healthy by taking effective and decisive action.
p.2
Overall experiences and progress of children and young people: good
Staff plan for the child’s education in accordance with the significant restrictions placed on the child’s liberty imposed by the courts. This is due to be reviewed in September 2024. Once an outcome has been reached, there are plans to support the child at their chosen college.
p.2
How well children and young people are helped and protected: good
Staff help the child to feel safe and supported. Staff know the child well. They build trusting relationships and know the child’s vulnerabilities. Staff are committed to working with the child to reduce the likelihood of harm. Inspection report for children’s home: 2767797 3 Staff help the child to adhere to the restrictions placed on their liberty. Staff and the manager are supporting the child to understand their responsibilities and vulnerabilities as they approach adulthood.
p.2
How well children and young people are helped and protected: good
The manager follows the relevant procedures when safeguarding concerns are raised and works closely with external agencies, sharing information as necessary.
p.3
How well children and young people are helped and protected: good
Staff manage behaviour well to prevent the need for physical intervention. There have been no incidents of restraint for over three months. Staff talk to the child, using trauma-informed practice, and show empathy towards them. However, when physical intervention is used, the duration of the holds is not always clear in records. This makes it difficult to monitor the effectiveness of the holds and whether their use was proportionate.
p.3
How well children and young people are helped and protected: good
The child’s social worker said, ‘The risks to the child and others were considered high. Through our meetings, it is clear that the staff are creative in using alternative methods to support the child; this has reduced incidents.’
p.3
How well children and young people are helped and protected: good
The child rarely goes missing from the home. When the child has left the home without permission, staff have followed appropriate protocols to find them and bring them home safely.
p.3
How well children and young people are helped and protected: good
The child is helped to reflect on incidents. They are always consulted when an incident occurs. Staff use effective restorative practice and involve other professionals who can support the child to understand the differences in responses in the judicial system. This is carried out sensitively, with good relationship building with the youth justice team.
p.3
How well children and young people are helped and protected: good
The strength of staff’s relationships with the child enables the child to be open about traumatic experiences. Staff help the child to understand their rights and the options available to them for support. Staff contact relevant agencies, and the child is supported to see external professionals in line with their views, wishes and feelings.
p.3
The effectiveness of leaders and managers: good
The manager has suitable skills and appropriate experience. She is working towards a relevant level 5 leadership diploma.
p.3
The effectiveness of leaders and managers: good
The manager has high aspirations for the staff. Members of the team are working towards a relevant level 4 diploma. The manager works to continuously upskill the team. Specific training is provided as the child’s needs change.
p.3
The effectiveness of leaders and managers: good
Staff speak highly of the manager. They say that she is approachable and a good listener. Staff feel well led and supported with their own development. Inspection report for children’s home: 2767797 4 Staff receive regular supervision and appraisals. However, the sessions do not always enable staff to be reflective and to understand their own attitudes and behaviour and how these could affect the quality of care for the child.
p.3
The effectiveness of leaders and managers: good
The regular team meetings are well structured, and the manager has a good understanding of the strengths and the challenges at the home. The child is the focus of the meetings, and staff discuss the child’s progress, wishes and feelings.
p.4
The effectiveness of leaders and managers: good
The manager models good relationship building with the child and makes time to have constructive and effective conversations with them. The child writes notes to the manager with their requests, which are responded to consistently.
p.4
The effectiveness of leaders and managers: good
The manager advocates for the child and ensures that their views are shared. Meetings are held, and the child’s wishes are communicated to decision-makers, whose responses are regularly fed back to the child.
p.4
The effectiveness of leaders and managers: good
Feedback received from external professionals has consistently been good. The child’s social worker and other professionals say that the manager is a good communicator and child focused. Inspection report for children’s home: 2767797 5
p.4
Recommendations
The registered person should ensure that all incidents of control, discipline and restraint are subject to systems of regular scrutiny to ensure that their use is fair. (‘Guide to the Children’s Homes Regulations, including the quality standards’, page 46, paragraph 9.36) The registered person should ensure that supervision enables staff to reflect and act on how their own feelings and behaviour may be affected by the behaviour of the children they care for. (‘Guide to the Children’s Homes Regulations, including the quality standards’, page 39, paragraph 3.20)
p.5
Information about this inspection
Inspectors have looked closely at the experiences and progress of children and young people, using the social care common inspection framework. This inspection was carried out under the Care Standards Act 2000 to assess the effectiveness of the service, how it meets the core functions of the service as set out in legislation, and to consider how well it complies with The Children’s Homes (England) Regulations 2015 and the ‘Guide to the Children’s Homes Regulations, including the quality standards’. Inspection report for children’s home: 2767797 6
p.5
Children’s home details
Registered provider address: Martineau Lane, Norwich, Norfolk NR1 2DH
p.6
Inspector
Dan Williams, Social Care Inspector Inspection report for children’s home: 2767797 7 achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for looked after children, safeguarding and child protection.
p.6
Inspector
If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk . You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .
p.7
Inspector
Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .
p.7
Inspector
T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted
p.7
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion