Schools & FE · School inspection (EIF)
Platt Bridge Community School
Summary
Jackie Stillings (lead), Niamh Howlett, Nicky Parkinson
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection date verified
11 Jul 2024
- Inspectors verified
Jackie Stillings, Niamh Howlett, Nicky Parkinson
- Behaviour and attitudes verified
Outstanding
- Early years verified
Outstanding
- Leadership and management verified
Good
- Overall effectiveness verified
Good
- Personal development verified
Good
- Quality of education verified
Good
- Postcode verified
WN2 5NG
- Name on report verified
Platt Bridge Community School
- URN verified
139300
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2013.
- OverallGood
- Behaviour and attitudesOutstanding
- Early yearsOutstanding
- Leadership and managementGood
- Personal developmentGood
- Quality of educationGood
66% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Good (5,043 inspections).
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type graded Good.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- At each stage of the early years, children are exceptionally well prepared for their next steps in learning. p.3
- This is a warm and welcoming school where pupils are happy and safe. p.2
- Pupils demonstrate extremely positive attitudes to learning and to school. p.3
- This school was last inspected under section 5 of the Education Act 2005 11 years ago and judged ‘Outstanding’ under a previous inspection framework. p.1
- Pupils respond eagerly to the school’s high expectations and aspirations for their achievement. p.2
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- They ensure that staff have the resources that they need to provide pupils with the best start in life. p.2
- This means that it does not identify when teachers need further support to make sure that pupils learn all that they should. p.3
- The school should sharpen its insight into the delivery of the curriculum and the impact that it is having on pupils. 10 and 11 July 2024 p.3
- The school should ensure that these fundamental skills receive greater attention in key stage 1 and that they are sufficiently embedded in key stage 2. p.4
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Reading & phonics9
“The early reading curriculum is a strength of the school.” p.2Leadership & governance4
“Trust leaders provide confident, strategic leadership.” p.2
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 7
- Words of findings
- 1,266
- about usual (typical 1098)
- Reading level
- Fairly hard
- Flesch 54, typical 55
- Average sentence
- 16 words
- Next steps
- 4
- typical 4
- Hedged sentences
- 9%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Inspection of Platt Bridge Community School Rivington Avenue, Platt Bridge, Wigan, Lancashire WN2 5NG
p.1
Overall effectiveness Good
The quality of education Good Behaviour and attitudes Outstanding Personal development Good Leadership and management Good Early years provision Outstanding Previous inspection grade Outstanding
p.1
Overall effectiveness Good
The executive headteacher of this school is Sue Darbyshire. This school is part of Community First Academy Trust, which means other people in the trust also have responsibility for running the school. The trust is run by the chief executive officer, Sue Darbyshire, and overseen by a board of trustees, chaired by Ruth Rule-Mullen.
p.1
Overall effectiveness Good
This school was last inspected under section 5 of the Education Act 2005 11 years ago and judged ‘Outstanding’ under a previous inspection framework. This reflected the school’s overall effectiveness under the inspection framework in use at the time.
p.1
Overall effectiveness Good
From then until November 2020, the school was exempted by law from routine inspection, so there has been a longer gap than usual between graded inspections under section 5 of the Act. Judgements in this report are based on the current inspection framework and also reflect changes that may have happened at any point since the last graded inspection. 10 and 11 July 2024
p.1
What is it like to attend this school?
This is a warm and welcoming school where pupils are happy and safe. They are treated with kindness and respect. Staff provide high-quality emotional support for pupils who need it. Pupils show their appreciation for the care that they receive by behaving impeccably well. They rarely need reminding to do their best.
p.2
What is it like to attend this school?
Children in the early years settle quickly at school. They explore the engaging activities that staff design for them with zest. Older pupils are keen to make full use of their talents and interests. They embrace the wide range of experiences on offer to them, including the array of clubs. Pupils particularly enjoy taking part in residential trips which take them far beyond their local community.
p.2
What is it like to attend this school?
Pupils respond eagerly to the school’s high expectations and aspirations for their achievement. They typically achieve well across a broad range of subjects. When needed, the school provides additional support for pupils to enable them to take part in all aspects of school life. This includes pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND). Pupils who have a place in the specially resourced provision for pupils with SEND (specially resourced provision) are well supported to be ready to learn alongside their classmates.
p.2
better?
Leaders at all levels understand their roles and responsibilities, including those relating to school governance, well. Members of the local academy board carry out their roles earnestly. Trust leaders provide confident, strategic leadership. They ensure that staff have the resources that they need to provide pupils with the best start in life.
p.2
better?
The early reading curriculum is a strength of the school. From the start of the provision for two-year-olds, children are immersed in a world of much-loved songs, rhymes and stories. This develops children’s vocabulary by introducing them to words that they would seldom hear or use in everyday speech. Children are well prepared to access the school’s phonics programme.
p.2
better?
Expert staff ensure that children in the Reception Year and pupils in key stage 1 learn quickly how to read an increasing range of words using their phonics knowledge. Pupils practise their reading using books that match the sounds that they are learning. This helps them to develop their confidence.
p.2
better?
The school ensures that pupils keep pace with the phonics programme. Pupils who need extra help with their reading benefit from the support of well-trained staff. Most pupils become accurate readers by the end of key stage 1. Older pupils typically build well on this positive start. However, the school’s most recent published data does not reflect this. In 2023, a significant proportion of pupils left Year 6 having made below-average progress in reading. The school has acted decisively to improve its reading curriculum. Current pupils read with greater fluency. This eases their access to the whole curriculum. 10 and 11 July 2024
p.2
3
The early years curriculum is designed and delivered with great expertise. Staff check children’s learning carefully. They ensure that children build firmly on what they already know and can do. At each stage of the early years, children are exceptionally well prepared for their next steps in learning.
p.3
3
The curriculum in key stages 1 and 2 is also carefully organised to enable pupils to successfully develop their knowledge over time. Curriculum leaders are knowledgeable about the subjects that they lead. In most subjects they make sure that staff have the expertise to deliver curriculums well. Teachers use their strong subject knowledge to explain new learning clearly to pupils. They check that pupils have fully grasped what has been taught before they introduce something new. Pupils build their learning securely. They achieve well in these subjects.
p.3
3
In a small number of other subjects, including aspects of English, there have been insufficient opportunities to develop staff’s subject knowledge, and to check how well curriculums are delivered. The curriculum is not delivered as effectively in these subjects as in most others. Pupils’ knowledge is uneven as a result. This includes pupils’ knowledge of grammar and spelling as well as their ability to write in a legible handwriting style.
p.3
3
Pupils demonstrate extremely positive attitudes to learning and to school. They attend well. Staff support pupils who find it more challenging to manage their own behaviour with genuine sensitivity. Pupils with SEND, including those in the specially resourced provision, achieve well. They benefit from the expertise of staff in identifying and meeting their varying needs.
p.3
3
The school carefully considers pupils’ wider development. Pupils learn how to manage money. They relish opportunities to develop their entrepreneurial skills. Pupils develop a secure understanding of what is right and wrong. This includes when thinking about issues such as knife crime and about the dangers of drug and alcohol misuse. Pupils are well prepared to become active and responsible citizens.
p.3
Safeguarding
The arrangements for safeguarding are effective.
p.3
(Information for the school and appropriate authority)
In a few subjects, the school does not check effectively enough that the intended curriculum is being delivered consistently well. This means that it does not identify when teachers need further support to make sure that pupils learn all that they should. Some pupils’ knowledge is not as secure as it could be in these subjects as a result. The school should sharpen its insight into the delivery of the curriculum and the impact that it is having on pupils. 10 and 11 July 2024
p.3
4
The strong start that children in the early years make with their fundamental writing skills is not built upon consistently well as pupils move into key stage 1 and beyond. Some pupils’ written work is hampered by weaknesses in their spelling, handwriting and grammatical knowledge. The school should ensure that these fundamental skills receive greater attention in key stage 1 and that they are sufficiently embedded in key stage 2.
p.4
How can I feed back my views?
or to find out what other parents and carers think. We use information from Ofsted Parent View when deciding which schools to inspect, when to inspect them and as part of their inspection.
p.4
How can I feed back my views?
The Department for Education has further guidance on how to complain about a school.
p.4
Further information
You can search for published performance information about the school.
p.4
Further information
In the report, ‘disadvantaged pupils’ is used to mean pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND); pupils who meet the definition of children in need of help and protection ; pupils receiving statutory local authority support from a social worker; and pupils who otherwise meet the criteria used for deciding the school’s pupil premium funding (this includes pupils claiming free school meals at any point in the last six years, looked after children (children in local authority care) and/or children who left care through adoption or another formal route). 10 and 11 July 2024
p.4
School details
Headteacher Sue Darbyshire (Executive Headteacher) Carly Bozdoğan (Head of School) Website www.plattbridge.wigan.sch.uk
p.5
School details
Dates of previous inspection 25 and 26 June 2013, under section 5 of the Education Act 2005
p.5
Information about this school
The school is part of the Community First Academy Trust. The school has a specially resourced provision for five pupils with SEND aged between four and 11 years old. Places at this specially resourced provision are commissioned by the local authority. The specially resourced provision supports pupils with specific learning difficulties. At the time of the inspection, there were four pupils on roll in the specially resourced provision. Each of these pupils has an education, health and care (EHC) plan. The school operates a breakfast club and after-school provision for pupils. The school makes use of one unregistered provision for a small number of pupils.
p.5
Information about this inspection
The inspectors carried out this graded inspection under section 5 of the Education Act 2005. 10 and 11 July 2024
p.5
6
Inspections are a point-in-time judgement about the quality of a school’s educational provision. This was the first routine inspection that the school received since the COVID-19 pandemic began. Inspectors discussed the impact of the pandemic with the school and have taken that into account in their evaluation of the school. Inspectors spoke with the executive headteacher, head of school and other leaders in the school. The lead inspector spoke with members of the board of trustees, including the chair of the trust. She also met with representatives of the local academy board, including the chair of the board. The lead inspector spoke with a representative of the local authority and a headteacher representative of the local schools consortium. To evaluate the effectiveness of safeguarding, the inspectors: reviewed the single central record; took account of the views of leaders, staff, and pupils; and
p.6
6
considered the extent to which the school has created an open and positive culture around safeguarding that puts pupils’ interests first. The lead inspector observed pupils from Years 1 and 2 reading to a familiar adult. Inspectors carried out deep dives in early reading, mathematics, computing, history and art and design. They spoke with the leaders of these areas of the curriculum. Inspectors also visited lessons, looked at examples of pupils’ work, held discussions with teachers and talked with pupils. Inspectors also spoke to a sample of pupils about their learning in other areas of the curriculum. They spoke with leaders and reviewed a sample of pupils’ work in these subjects. Inspectors spoke with groups of pupils about their experiences of school. They observed pupils’ behaviour at breaktimes and in lessons. The lead inspector scrutinised leaders’ records of pupils’ behaviour and attendance. There were no
p.6
6
responses to Ofsted’s online survey for pupils for inspectors to consider. Inspectors spoke with parents and carers as they brought their children to school. Inspectors also considered the responses to Ofsted Parent View, including the free-text responses. Inspectors considered the responses to Ofsted’s online survey for staff.
p.6
Inspection team
Jackie Stillings, lead inspector His Majesty’s Inspector
p.6
Inspection team
Nicky Parkinson Ofsted Inspector 10 and 11 July 2024
p.6
7
regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.
p.7
7
If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .
p.7
7
You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .
p.7
7
Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .
p.7
7
T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted
p.7
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion