Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School inspection (EIF)

Great Park Academy

Inspected 10 Jul 2024 · published 25 Sept 2024 · URN 143923

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    10 Jul 2024

  • Inspectors verified

    Jonathan Ferstenberg, Steve Wren

  • Behaviour and attitudes verified

    Outstanding

  • Leadership and management verified

    Good

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Good

  • Personal development verified

    Outstanding

  • Quality of education verified

    Good

  • Postcode verified

    NE3 2JH

  • Name on report verified

    Great Park Academy

  • URN verified

    143923

Page 1 of 7
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Each judgement on its scale, weakest to strongest.

  • OverallGood
  • Behaviour and attitudesOutstanding
  • Leadership and managementGood
  • Personal developmentOutstanding
  • Quality of educationGood

66% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Good (5,043 inspections).

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+44Positivemore positive than 25% of reports of this type graded Good
OutstandingGoodRIInadequate

In line with other reports of this type graded Good.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praiseexceptionalvery highhighly effectiveexemplarythriveenjoysuccessfullyeffectively
Criticismgapsdisruptionnot alwaysseriouslynot stronglimiteddelayedabsence

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsSafeguardingAbout the inspection positive critical
  • Findings978w+42
  • Safeguarding6w+33

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
7
Words of findings
964
about usual (typical 1098)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 48, typical 55
Average sentence
15 words
Next steps
4
typical 4
Hedged sentences
5%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 60%Safeguarding 0%About the inspection 40%

Full report text

Inspection of Great Park Academy Knightsbridge, Great North Road, Gosforth, Newcastle-upon-Tyne NE3 2JH

p.1

Overall effectiveness Good

The quality of education Good Behaviour and attitudes Outstanding Personal development Outstanding Leadership and management Good

p.1

Overall effectiveness Good

Previous inspection grade Not previously inspected under section 5 of the Education Act 2005

p.1

Overall effectiveness Good

The principal of this school is Katherine Billingsley. This school is part of The Gosforth Federated Academies Limited, which means other people in the trust also have responsibility for running the school. The trust is run by the chief executive officer (CEO), Hugh Robinson, and overseen by a board of trustees, chaired by George Snaith. 9 and 10 July 2024

p.1

What is it like to attend this school?

Despite the challenges of operating from temporary accommodation for longer than expected, leaders have established a school where pupils thrive, personally and academically.

p.2

What is it like to attend this school?

Great Park is a calm and purposeful school. Pupils show high levels of respect for each other and adults. They behave well in lessons and act maturely around school, including at social times. They have pride in their school and are excited about how the school will develop as it grows in size and moves to its permanent home. Pupils value the many opportunities they have to develop their leadership, including the active school council. Pupils enjoy coming to school. Attendance is very high.

p.2

What is it like to attend this school?

Adults know how to get the best out of each individual pupil. Pupils who need it receive highly effective support. Pupils who find new learning easier are suitably challenged to deepen their understanding. Pupils achieve very highly, including in the end of Year 6 national curriculum tests.

p.2

better?

Leaders have worked successfully to initially develop, and then maintain, a clear school identity. They have successfully overcome the barriers presented from operating in temporary accommodation. Pupils benefit from practical science focus days by using laboratory facilities at a nearby school within the trust. The school plans these deeper learning days and educational visits carefully.

p.2

better?

Leaders, including members of the academy advisory group and trustees, plan strategically for how the school’s systems and structures will need to adapt as the school grows.

p.2

better?

Pupils enjoy coming to school. The school identifies barriers to pupils’ regular attendance quickly. Leaders work with pupils and their families well to overcome these barriers. Attendance is very high.

p.2

better?

Pupils benefit greatly from an exceptional personal development programme. Leaders have thought carefully about what they want pupils to learn, and when, in personal development lessons. Pupils have exceptional knowledge of issues including the role that religion plays in people’s lives, and the similarities between the moral codes of different faiths.

p.2

better?

Pupils are explicitly taught how to debate respectfully with others. The approaches taught are not reserved for ‘set piece’ debates. Pupils model these approaches in their interactions with each other throughout the school day.

p.2

better?

Behaviour in lessons and around school is exemplary. Lessons are free from disruption. Pupils get along well with each other. Bullying is rare. When bullying 9 and 10 July 2024

p.2

3

happens, it is dealt with very effectively. Pupils, who need it, receive additional behaviour support including through an enhanced ‘PD+’ programme.

p.3

3

Leaders have designed curriculums that build on pupils’ existing knowledge and understanding on entry to Year 5. Pupils who have special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND) receive the support they need to achieve well.

p.3

3

In mathematics and English, pupils, including those with SEND, achieve highly in their end of Year 6 national curriculum tests. As the school has grown in size, it has appointed staff to lead individual subjects. These leaders evaluate the effectiveness of provision effectively and make any adaptions necessary. Some subjects do not have a substantive leader. In these subjects, pupils’ learning of the more complicated ideas and concepts is not as strong. These gaps in pupils’ knowledge and understanding are not always identified and addressed. Leaders have identified this as a priority as new subject leaders take up post in September.

p.3

3

Reading is prioritised across school. The ‘50 book challenge’ ensures that pupils read a range of different texts. Adults listen to pupils read in registration time. Pupils who need extra help with reading benefit from carefully tailored support. Pupils’ reading quickly reaches the level required to be successful in their wider studies.

p.3

3

The pupil council meets frequently and plays an active part in the life of the school. Councillors identify where improvements can be made, for example the introduction of a ‘band club’. Currently, the councillors are planning how social spaces in the new school buildings should be arranged. Leaders take the views of the council seriously. When suggestions cannot be implemented, they explain why.

p.3

Safeguarding

The arrangements for safeguarding are effective.

p.3

(Information for the school and appropriate authority)

 In some subjects, the absence of a substantive subject leader has delayed the development of systems to check pupils’ knowledge and understanding. This limits the ability to identify gaps in pupils’ learning and make any necessary changes to the curriculum or its implementation. Leaders should ensure that there are effective systems in all subjects to check pupils’ knowledge and understanding of the curriculum.

p.3

How can I feed back my views?

or to find out what other parents and carers think. We use information from Ofsted Parent View when deciding which schools to inspect, when to inspect them and as part of their inspection. 9 and 10 July 2024

p.3

4

The Department for Education has further guidance on how to complain about a school.

p.4

Further information

You can search for published performance information about the school.

p.4

Further information

In the report, ‘ disadvantaged pupils ’ is used to mean pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND); pupils who meet the definition of children in need of help and protection ; pupils receiving statutory local authority support from a social worker; and pupils who otherwise meet the criteria used for deciding the school’s pupil premium funding (this includes pupils claiming free school meals at any point in the last six years, looked after children (children in local authority care) and/or children who left care through adoption or another formal route). 9 and 10 July 2024

p.4

School details

Date of previous inspection Not previously inspected

p.5

Information about this school

 The school is part of The Gosforth Federated Academies Limited, a multi-academy trust.  The school opened in September 2021 and will eventually educate pupils from Year 5 to Year 11.  At the time of inspection, the school only educated pupils in Years 5, 6 and 7.  The school has been operating on a temporary site, located at another school in the trust, since opening. It is planned for the school to move to its own premises, three miles from the current site, in September 2025.  The principal was appointed in April 2024. The principal was previously the assistant principal of the school.  The school uses one alternative and registered provider. The school does not use any unregistered alternative providers. 9 and 10 July 2024

p.5

Information about this inspection

The inspectors carried out this graded inspection under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.

p.6

Information about this inspection

 Inspections are a point-in-time judgement about the quality of a school’s education provision.  This was the first routine inspection the school received since the COVID-19 pandemic began. Inspectors discussed the impact of the pandemic with the school and have taken that into account in their evaluation of the school.  Inspectors held discussions with the principal, leaders responsible for behaviour and attendance, and leaders in charge of personal development and careers.  Inspectors met with the special educational needs coordinator and looked at samples of pupils’ support plans. Inspectors looked at the provision that pupils with SEND receive across all aspects of school life.  Inspectors carried out deep dives in mathematics, English, history and science. For each deep dive, inspectors met with leaders, visited a sample of lessons, spoke to teachers, spoke to some pupils about their learning and looked at

p.6

Information about this inspection

samples of pupils’ work.  Inspectors spoke to leaders about reading across school and observed some pupils reading to adults.  Inspectors met with members of the academy advisory group, trustees and the CEO of the trust.  To evaluate the effectiveness of safeguarding, the inspectors: reviewed the single central record; took account of the views of leaders, staff and pupils; and considered the extent to which the school has created an open and positive culture around safeguarding that puts pupils’ interests first.  Inspectors spoke to teachers and other staff over the course of the inspection.  Inspectors met with groups of pupils and spoke to others informally during the inspection.  Inspectors considered responses to the Ofsted Parent View survey and surveys of staff and pupils.  Inspectors took account of a wide range of documentary information, including the school’s policies, its self-evaluation, records of behaviour and documentation

p.6

Inspection team

Steve Wren, lead inspector His Majesty’s Inspector

p.6

Inspection team

Jonathan Ferstenberg Ofsted Inspector 9 and 10 July 2024

p.6

7

regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.

p.7

7

If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.7

7

You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .

p.7

7

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .

p.7

7

T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.7

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion