Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection date verified
4 Jul 2024
- Inspectors verified
Alex Reed
- Postcode verified
OL16 4UU
- Name on report verified
Lowerplace Primary School
- URN verified
105777
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- The school has provided these pupils, and any other pupils who find reading difficult, with highly effective support so that they are rapidly catching up with their peers. p.2
- Pupils said that their school is a happy, safe and kind place to learn. p.1
- With this support, pupils can meet the school’s high expectations of behaviour. p.1
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- It has carefully identified the important knowledge that pupils need to learn. p.1
- In most subjects, teachers deliver the curriculum well, which results in pupils remembering what they need to know. p.2
- The school should ensure that teachers deliver the curriculum as intended, so that pupils can deepen their knowledge and establish secure foundations on which to build new learning. p.3
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Teaching & assessment9
“High-quality interactions with staff deepen children’s learning.” p.2Parents & families3
“Staff know pupils and their families well.” p.1
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 7
- Words of findings
- 1,206
- about usual (typical 1153)
- Reading level
- Fairly hard
- Flesch 54, typical 55
- Average sentence
- 17 words
- Next steps
- 3
- typical 4
- Hedged sentences
- 10%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Inspection of a good school: Lowerplace Primary School Kingsway, Rochdale, Lancashire OL16 4UU
p.1
Outcome
Lowerplace Primary School continues to be a good school.
p.1
What is it like to attend this school?
Pupils said that their school is a happy, safe and kind place to learn. They benefit from the positive relationships that they have with staff and with each other. Staff know pupils and their families well.
p.1
What is it like to attend this school?
Pupils, including those with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND), know that they can share their worries with staff. They trust that staff will resolve any issues between them and their peers quickly and effectively.
p.1
What is it like to attend this school?
Pupils behave well in lessons, and they move around school calmly and purposefully. Staff support pupils to understand how to manage their own feelings and behaviour. For example, at playtimes, pupils can choose to access an inside space which is set up with activities to help them to be calm. With this support, pupils can meet the school’s high expectations of behaviour.
p.1
What is it like to attend this school?
Pupils have opportunities to take part in a range of clubs and leadership activities. They relish their appointments as librarians and school council members. Junior interpreters make a valuable contribution by helping pupils who speak English as an additional language to settle into the school well.
p.1
What is it like to attend this school?
The school expects pupils to do well academically. Pupils typically achieve well in most subjects, as they benefit from a high-quality curriculum.
p.1
What does the school do well and what does it need to do better?
The school has developed a broad and balanced curriculum, which is accessible to all pupils. It has carefully identified the important knowledge that pupils need to learn. This knowledge has been broken down and organised well so that pupils can build on what they know from the early years through to Year 6. 3 and 4 July 2024
p.1
2
In most subjects, teachers deliver the curriculum well, which results in pupils remembering what they need to know. Teachers use assessment strategies successfully to identify what pupils can and cannot remember. Teachers diligently revisit less secure knowledge, so that pupils have more opportunities to learn and remember it. In the early years, teachers design learning opportunities that prepare children well for the demands of key stage 1.
p.2
2
In a small number of subjects, some pupils cannot make links between new concepts and prior knowledge. This is because the school has not ensured that teachers deliver the curriculum in the most logical order.
p.2
2
The school’s published data in 2023 shows that the proportion of pupils who met the expected standard in the Year 1 phonics screening check was below the national average. This was partly due to high rates of pupil absence and the considerable number of pupils who left or joined the school partway through the year. However, weaknesses in the previous phonics curriculum and its delivery also hindered pupils’ learning. The school has taken swift and effective action to address these issues. It has refreshed the phonics curriculum and provided staff with high-quality training. As a result, current pupils’ learning of phonics is much more successful.
p.2
2
The school places reading at the heart of its culture. It has developed the school library and other reading areas into vibrant places where pupils read interesting books by a diverse range of authors. Pupils enjoy listening to a range of books and stories. The school’s early reading programme supports children in the early years, and pupils in key stage 1, to read with increasing confidence and fluency.
p.2
2
Many pupils are new to learning English as an additional language. The school has provided these pupils, and any other pupils who find reading difficult, with highly effective support so that they are rapidly catching up with their peers. Pupils enjoy reading widely and often. As a result, they develop into fluent and enthusiastic readers.
p.2
2
The school has effective systems for quickly identifying pupils with SEND and for providing the extra support that they need. As a result, pupils with SEND access the full curriculum and are supported to succeed.
p.2
2
Pupils benefit from a range of trips and visits, which are designed to broaden their horizons and expose them to a range of careers, role models and faiths. The school has carefully considered how this offer helps to give pupils varied experiences and opportunities. For example, Year 6 pupils spoke with enthusiasm about their residential activity trip.
p.2
2
Pupils are polite, well-mannered and welcoming. Pupils’ behaviour rarely disrupts learning. When this does occur, pupils are confident that teachers deal with it. In the early years, children are keen to share their learning with staff and their peers. High-quality interactions with staff deepen children’s learning.
p.2
2
The school is taking decisive action to improve pupils’ rates of attendance. The school works with families to identify the barriers to pupils attending school and provides support 3 and 4 July 2024
p.2
3
to overcome these challenges. However, this work is not making a big enough difference to some pupils. Absence levels remain high.
p.3
3
Staff workload is carefully considered. The school engages well with staff when considering any changes or improvements. Staff are proud to work at the school and to serve their community.
p.3
Safeguarding
The arrangements for safeguarding are effective.
p.3
(Information for the school and appropriate authority)
In some subjects, the school has not ensured that teachers deliver the curriculum in a logical order. This hinders some pupils from making secure connections between new concepts and what they know already. The school should ensure that teachers deliver the curriculum as intended, so that pupils can deepen their knowledge and establish secure foundations on which to build new learning.
p.3
Background
When we have judged a school to be good, we will then normally go into the school about once every four years to confirm that the school remains good. This is called an ungraded inspection, and it is carried out under section 8 of the Education Act 2005. We do not give graded judgements on an ungraded inspection. However, if we find evidence that a school would now receive a higher or lower grade, then the next inspection will be a graded inspection, which is carried out under section 5 of the Act. Usually this is within one to two years of the date of the ungraded inspection. If we have serious concerns about safeguarding, behaviour or the quality of education, we will deem the ungraded inspection a graded inspection immediately.
p.3
Background
This is the first ungraded inspection since we judged the school to be good on in May 2019.
p.3
How can I feed back my views?
find out what other parents and carers think. We use information from Ofsted Parent View when deciding which schools to inspect, when to inspect them and as part of their inspection.
p.3
How can I feed back my views?
The Department for Education has further guidance on how to complain about a school. 3 and 4 July 2024
p.3
Further information
You can search for published performance information about the school.
p.4
Further information
In the report, ‘ disadvantaged pupils ’ is used to mean pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND); pupils who meet the definition of children in need of help and protection ; pupils receiving statutory local authority support from a social worker; and pupils who otherwise meet the criteria used for deciding the school’s pupil premium funding (this includes pupils claiming free school meals at any point in the last six years, looked after children (children in local authority care) and/or children who left care through adoption or another formal route). 3 and 4 July 2024
p.4
School details
Appropriate authority The governing body
p.5
School details
Dates of previous inspection 8 and 9 May 2019, under section 5 of the Education Act 2005
p.5
Information about this school
The school offers a breakfast club for pupils. There have been changes to the leadership team, including the appointment of the headteacher, since the previous inspection. The school uses one unregistered alternative provision provider for a limited number of pupils.
p.5
Information about this inspection
Inspections are a point-in-time judgement about the quality of a school’s education provision. This was the first routine inspection the school received since the COVID-19 pandemic began. The inspector discussed the impact of the pandemic with the school and has taken that into account in their evaluation of the school. The inspector spoke with the headteacher, other leaders and staff. The inspector met with representatives of the local governing body, including the chair of governors. 3 and 4 July 2024
p.5
6
The inspector spoke with a representative of the local authority, the school improvement partner and an external consultant who works with the school. The inspector carried out deep dives in these subjects: mathematics, early reading and geography. For each deep dive, the inspector discussed the curriculum with subject leaders, visited a sample of lessons, spoke with teachers, spoke with some pupils about their learning and looked at samples of pupils’ work. The inspector also spoke with leaders about the curriculum in some other subjects. The inspector spoke with pupils about their experiences of school and their views on behaviour and bullying. They also observed pupils’ behaviour during lessons and at breaktimes. The inspector considered the responses to Ofsted Parent View, including the free-text comments. They also considered the responses to Ofsted’s online surveys for pupils and for staff.
p.6
6
The inspector spoke to a number of parents and carers as they collected their children from school. The inspector reviewed a wide range of evidence, including the school’s self-evaluation documents and records relating to pupils’ behaviour and attendance. To evaluate the effectiveness of safeguarding, the inspector: reviewed the single central record; took account of the views of leaders, staff and pupils; and considered the extent to which the school has created an open and positive culture around safeguarding that puts pupils’ interests first.
p.6
Inspection team
Alex Reed, lead inspector Ofsted Inspector 3 and 4 July 2024
p.6
7
regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.
p.7
7
If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .
p.7
7
You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .
p.7
7
Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .
p.7
7
T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted
p.7
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion