Schools & FE · School inspection (EIF)
William Penn School
Summary
Stephen Long (lead), Stephen Jackson
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection date verified
10 Jul 2024
- Inspectors verified
Stephen Jackson, Stephen Long
- Behaviour and attitudes verified
Requires improvement
- Early years verified
Good
- Leadership and management verified
Requires improvement
- Overall effectiveness verified
Requires improvement
- Personal development verified
Good
- Quality of education verified
Requires improvement
- Postcode verified
RH13 8GR
- Name on report verified
William Penn School
- URN verified
126002
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2019.
- OverallRequires improvement
- Behaviour and attitudesRequires improvement
- Early yearsGood
- Leadership and managementRequires improvement
- Personal developmentGood
- Quality of educationRequires improvement
15% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Requires improvement (5,043 inspections).
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type graded Requires improvement.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- these pupils, the lack of clarity about what pupils should learn in some subjects hinders this work. p.3
- The school should increase its work with families where attendance is a concern. p.4
- This should include ensuring parents are clear about the consequences of missed learning. p.4
- They do not make as much progress through the curriculum as they should and occasionally distract others. p.2
- The school has recognised that pupils’ behaviour in class is not as good as it needs to be. p.3
- The school should ensure that staff have the skills and support to keep pupils on task. p.4
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 7
- Words of findings
- 1,176
- about usual (typical 1215)
- Reading level
- Fairly hard
- Flesch 53, typical 56
- Average sentence
- 16 words
- Next steps
- 6
- typical 5
- Hedged sentences
- 26%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Inspection of William Penn School Brooks Green Road, Coolham, Horsham, West Sussex RH13 8GR
p.1
Overall effectiveness Requires improvement
p.1
The quality of education Requires improvement Behaviour and attitudes Requires improvement Personal development Good Leadership and management Requires improvement Early years provision Good Previous inspection grade Good 9 and 10 July 2024
p.1
What is it like to attend this school?
William Penn School provides a kind and caring environment in which pupils learn to get on well together. They feel safe at school and know that adults will support them if they have any worries. Pupils value the school’s small size and like the way that pupils of different ages mix. They appreciate the range of enrichment activities in addition to their lessons, such as the music workshops going on during the inspection.
p.2
What is it like to attend this school?
The school is ambitious for all pupils to do well in their learning. It succeeds in some areas of its work, for example enabling pupils to get off to a good start in the early years and in their reading. However, pupils do not achieve well enough in some subjects across the curriculum by the time that they leave.
p.2
What is it like to attend this school?
Pupils behave well around the school and get on well as a community. While many pupils work hard in lessons, some find it difficult to sustain their focus on learning. They do not make as much progress through the curriculum as they should and occasionally distract others. Any bullying is typically sorted out effectively by staff, showing the school’s Quaker ethos of reflecting on one’s behaviour in order to improve it.
p.2
better?
Early years staff plan children’s learning carefully to cover the required areas, building strong foundations in key areas like reading and number. The well- organised environment supports learning. Staff are adept at teaching new skills and setting out activities that encourage children to explore further the new aspects of learning.
p.2
better?
Older pupils receive a well-planned curriculum in the core areas of mathematics and English, but the curriculum in some other subjects is not effective enough. Pupils’ learning is not always sequenced well over time to build towards the ambition of the national curriculum. The school recognised the issue this year and has started to address it, but this is at the early stages. As a result, in some subjects, teachers are not routinely able to plan their teaching to ensure pupils learn the necessary skills or knowledge.
p.2
better?
Teachers work hard to prepare their teaching. There is some highly effective practice in explaining new learning to pupils, notably in mathematics and English. Teachers select interesting tasks for pupils, such as using counting blocks in mathematics to reinforce learning. In these subjects, teachers understand pupils’ achievement and often adapt their approaches to help pupils learn well. In some other subjects, teachers are not clear enough about the skills they want pupils to develop or the extent of pupils’ learning. As a result, they are not able to adjust the support provided. The school identifies pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND) effectively. While activities are sometimes adapted well to support 9 and 10 July 2024
p.2
3
these pupils, the lack of clarity about what pupils should learn in some subjects hinders this work.
p.3
3
The school ensures that pupils learn to read well. Phonics is taught consistently well, with training for all staff this year to develop their practice further. Support to help pupils to catch up is effective. Activities like ‘Drop Everything and Read’ and ‘Hooked on Books’, alongside a well-stocked library, mean pupils are keen readers.
p.3
3
Pupils receive good support for their wider personal development. Through the taught curriculum and enrichment activities, they develop respect for each other and understand right and wrong. They learn to reflect if they make mistakes. The school ensures all pupils benefit from trips and visits, supporting those from disadvantaged backgrounds where needed. Pupils like the opportunities to take on responsibilities, including the hotly contested but democratic way school councillors are elected.
p.3
3
The school has recognised that pupils’ behaviour in class is not as good as it needs to be. In lessons, many pupils engage well with tasks, but a few do not. Staff do not consistently support all pupils to concentrate well, so some start to fidget and distract others. The school is drawing up a revised approach to managing behaviour but has yet to put it into practice. Attendance is below the national average. The school has worked effectively with some families this year and reduced the number of persistently absent pupils. However, more is required to raise overall attendance, including explaining more explicitly to parents the impact on learning if holidays are taken in term time.
p.3
3
The school has worked diligently this year during a period of interim leadership. Areas of strong practice, such as reading and safeguarding, have been sustained. Work has started on other areas, like the curriculum and attendance, where there are some concerns. Nevertheless, there is more to do. Parents are positive about the school, noting communication with them is effective. Staff feel well supported. They have received useful training this year, including through working with nearby schools. Support from the local authority has helped develop leaders’ skills. The governors do a good job in supporting leaders and holding them to account.
p.3
Safeguarding
The arrangements for safeguarding are effective.
p.3
(Information for the school and appropriate authority)
The sequence of learning in some subjects is not planned clearly enough to build knowledge toward ambitious end points. This means teachers cannot provide activities that give pupils secure understanding and skills. The school should ensure that learning is sequenced well in all subjects. 9 and 10 July 2024
p.3
4
Teachers do not have comprehensive information in some subjects about pupils’ achievement so as to adapt activities to meet their varying needs. This hampers pupils’ learning, including for pupils with SEND. The school should make sure staff have accurate information about pupils’ achievement and needs to adapt subsequent teaching effectively. Some pupils are missing out on learning through poor attendance. The school should increase its work with families where attendance is a concern. This should include ensuring parents are clear about the consequences of missed learning. Some pupils are not supported and enabled to sustain their focus on learning well enough in lessons, becoming distracted and sometimes distracting others. This slows the progress that they make through the curriculum. The school should ensure that staff have the skills and support to keep pupils on task.
p.4
How can I feed back my views?
or to find out what other parents and carers think. We use information from Ofsted Parent View when deciding which schools to inspect, when to inspect them and as part of their inspection.
p.4
How can I feed back my views?
The Department for Education has further guidance on how to complain about a school.
p.4
Further information
You can search for published performance information about the school.
p.4
Further information
In the report, ‘disadvantaged pupils’ is used to mean pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND); pupils who meet the definition of children in need of help and protection ; pupils receiving statutory local authority support from a social worker; and pupils who otherwise meet the criteria used for deciding the school’s pupil premium funding (this includes pupils claiming free school meals at any point in the last six years, looked after children (children in local authority care) and/or children who left care through adoption or another formal route). 9 and 10 July 2024
p.4
School details
Appropriate authority The governing body
p.5
School details
Date of previous inspection 12 March 2019, under section 8 of the Education Act 2005
p.5
Information about this school
The headteacher has not been at work during this academic year and was not present during the inspection. The school has been led for the year by the deputy headteacher as acting headteacher. The chair of the governing body took up his role in March of this year. The school is much smaller than average. It is one of nine schools in England that has a Quaker foundation. Pupils are very largely of White British heritage, but there are increasing numbers of pupils from other ethnic backgrounds. Very few pupils are from disadvantaged backgrounds. The school makes use of one registered alternative provision.
p.5
Information about this inspection
The inspectors carried out this graded inspection under section 5 of the Education Act 2005. 9 and 10 July 2024
p.5
6
Inspections are a point-in-time judgement about the quality of the school’s education provision. This was the first routine inspection the school received since the COVID-19 pandemic began. Inspectors discussed the impact of the pandemic with the school and have taken that into account in their evaluation of the school. Inspectors had discussions with the acting headteacher, other senior staff, staff seen teaching, governors, including the chair of the governing body, and with an advisor working on behalf of the local authority. Other discussions were held with parents at the school gate. Inspectors visited lessons, met with pupils, observed the wider life of the school and reviewed the outcomes of surveys completed by parents, staff and pupils. To evaluate the effectiveness of safeguarding arrangements, the inspectors took account of the views of leaders, spoke with staff and pupils, reviewed the single
p.6
6
central record and considered how well the school has established an open and positive culture around safeguarding that puts children’s interests first. Inspectors carried out deep dives into these subjects: early reading, mathematics and art. In each subject, inspectors met with school leaders and teachers of the subject, had discussions with pupils about their work and visited a range of lessons. Inspectors visited classrooms to see other subjects being taught.
p.6
Inspection team
Stephen Long, lead inspector Ofsted Inspector
p.6
Inspection team
Stephen Jackson Ofsted Inspector 9 and 10 July 2024
p.6
7
and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.
p.7
7
If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .
p.7
7
You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .
p.7
7
Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .
p.7
7
T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted
p.7
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion