Schools & FE · School inspection (EIF)
Norris Bank Primary School
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection date verified
24 Jul 2024
- Inspectors verified
Steve Bentham
- Postcode verified
SK4 2NF
- Name on report verified
Norris Bank Primary School
- URN verified
106065
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- They have excellent relationships with staff. p.1
- In most subjects, pupils meet the high expectations that the school sets for their learning. p.1
- That said, the vast majority of staff who responded to the inspection survey said that they feel proud to be part of the school and enjoy working here. p.2
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- This means that staff are unsure of the essential knowledge that pupils need to know to help them with their future learning. p.2
- Governors should ensure that they undertake meaningful engagement with all leaders and staff so that staff can continue to focus on the quality of education for pupils. p.3
- Staff are clear about what these pupils need to learn next. p.2
- The school should ensure that it more precisely defines the essential knowledge that it wants pupils to know so that teachers can help pupils to achieve well in all subjects. p.3
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 7
- Words of findings
- 1,262
- about usual (typical 1153)
- Reading level
- Fairly hard
- Flesch 58, typical 55
- Average sentence
- 17 words
- Next steps
- 4
- typical 4
- Hedged sentences
- 8%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Inspection of a good school: Norris Bank Primary School Green Lane, Heaton Norris, Stockport, Cheshire SK4 2NF
p.1
Outcome
Norris Bank Primary School continues to be a good school.
p.1
What is it like to attend this school?
Pupils at Norris Bank Primary happily attend this caring and welcoming school. They have excellent relationships with staff. Pupils are excited to learn because of the interesting way in which teachers deliver lessons. This ensures that pupils are curious about, and engaged in, the topics that they study.
p.1
What is it like to attend this school?
In most subjects, pupils meet the high expectations that the school sets for their learning. This is reflected in the strong outcomes that pupils achieve in national tests at the end of key stage 2.
p.1
What is it like to attend this school?
Pupils behave well in school. They put the school’s GROW values into practice by respecting others’ feelings and working well with one another. For example, in the early years, children talk to each other about their learning to achieve well together.
p.1
What is it like to attend this school?
Pupils have opportunities to attend a varied range of clubs that offer sporting opportunities as well as activities that develop their wider interests. For example, they use their entrepreneurial skills by making and selling carrot cake made with the produce they have grown in the school garden. There are also annual residential visits for pupils in key stage 2 that support their learning. Pupils also have opportunities to learn to play musical instruments.
p.1
What does the school do well and what does it need to do better?
The school has recently put in place a new programme for the teaching of phonics. Staff have received training to ensure that they deliver a highly consistent and effective curriculum. In the early years, no time is wasted in ensuring that children start to learn phonics. Teachers question children well to check on how well they know the sounds that have been taught. In key stage 1, staff support pupils to be precise in their pronunciation of different sounds.
p.1
What does the school do well and what does it need to do better?
Staff check carefully on pupils’ learning of reading to spot where pupils may need help to remember what has been taught. There is additional support to make sure that pupils 23 and 24 July 2024
p.1
2
keep up well with the intended curriculum where needed. The phonics scheme has started to pay dividends in terms of pupils’ achievement and in terms of their enjoyment of reading. Pupils progress well to become confident and fluent readers.
p.2
2
The school has set out an ambitious curriculum in most subjects. It has started to define the key aspects of learning that it wants pupils to remember. Teachers use this well to demonstrate the expectations that have been set for pupils’ learning. Staff assess pupils’ knowledge accurately to inform their teaching and to help to deepen pupils’ understanding. However, in a small number of subjects the school has not defined some key subject-specific knowledge clearly enough. This means that staff are unsure of the essential knowledge that pupils need to know to help them with their future learning. Consequently, pupils do not recall this key knowledge as well as they can in other subjects.
p.2
2
There are robust systems in place to identify where pupils may have special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND). The provision for these pupils is effective in enabling them to access the curriculum. Staff are clear about what these pupils need to learn next. The support that pupils with SEND receive enables them to achieve ambitious goals.
p.2
2
Disruption to learning is rare. When it does happen, pupils feel that it is handled swiftly by staff to help them to continue to focus on their learning.
p.2
2
The school has prioritised pupils’ regular attendance and has clear systems in place to tackle persistent absenteeism. The school understands the causes of pupils’ absence well. It has used this information to ensure that pupils typically have a high rate of attendance.
p.2
2
Pupils understand the importance of exercise and eating well as part of leading a healthy lifestyle. They also know how to maintain healthy relationships. Pupils get to sample a range of cultures through activities such as tasting different Spanish foods as part of their language lessons. The school has also put in place thoughtful opportunities for pupils to learn about different faiths. Pupils understand the main differences between religions as well as comparing their similarities. They have a strong understanding of equality.
p.2
2
The school has worked well to support staff with their well-being, including when the need arises. However, a significant minority of staff said that their workload can become unmanageable at peak times. Governors do not routinely assure themselves about the demands on leaders and staff and are not aware of the extent of this issue. As a result, there is a lack of meaningful engagement to understand some of the pressures on staff, including leaders. That said, the vast majority of staff who responded to the inspection survey said that they feel proud to be part of the school and enjoy working here.
p.2
Safeguarding
The arrangements for safeguarding are effective. 23 and 24 July 2024
p.2
(Information for the school and appropriate authority)
In a small number of subjects, the school has not sufficiently defined the key knowledge that it wants pupils to know. This means that teachers are not clear about the most important knowledge that pupils will need for their future learning. Pupils’ recall of key knowledge in these subjects is not as strong as it could be. The school should ensure that it more precisely defines the essential knowledge that it wants pupils to know so that teachers can help pupils to achieve well in all subjects. Governors do not assure themselves about the demands placed on staff, including leaders, at different points in the year. This means that they are unaware of how workload is affecting some staff. Governors should ensure that they undertake meaningful engagement with all leaders and staff so that staff can continue to focus on the quality of education for pupils.
p.3
Background
When we have judged a school to be good, we will then normally go into the school about once every four years to confirm that the school remains good. This is called an ungraded inspection, and it is carried out under section 8 of the Education Act 2005. We do not give graded judgements on an ungraded inspection. However, if we find evidence that a school would now receive a higher or lower grade, then the next inspection will be a graded inspection, which is carried out under section 5 of the Act. Usually this is within one to two years of the date of the ungraded inspection. If we have serious concerns about safeguarding, behaviour or the quality of education, we will deem the ungraded inspection a graded inspection immediately.
p.3
Background
This is the second ungraded inspection since we judged the school to be good in January 2015.
p.3
How can I feed back my views?
find out what other parents and carers think. We use information from Ofsted Parent View when deciding which schools to inspect, when to inspect them and as part of their inspection.
p.3
How can I feed back my views?
The Department for Education has further guidance on how to complain about a school.
p.3
Further information
You can search for published performance information about the school.
p.3
Further information
In the report, ‘disadvantaged pupils’ is used to mean pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND); pupils who meet the definition of children in need of help and protection ; pupils receiving statutory local authority support from a social worker; and 23 and 24 July 2024
p.3
4
pupils who otherwise meet the criteria used for deciding the school’s pupil premium funding (this includes pupils claiming free school meals at any point in the last six years, looked after children (children in local authority care) and/or children who left care through adoption or another formal route). 23 and 24 July 2024
p.4
School details
Number of pupils on the school roll 407 Appropriate authority The governing body
p.5
School details
Dates of previous inspection 2 and 3 October 2019, under section 8 of the Education Act 2005
p.5
Information about this school
Since the previous inspection, there have been several changes to the governing body. There is a new chair and a new vice-chair of governors. The school does not use any alternative provision. The school runs a before- and after-school provision.
p.5
Information about this inspection
Inspections are a point-in-time judgement about the quality of a school’s education provision. This was the first routine inspection the school received since the COVID-19 pandemic began. The inspector discussed the impact of the pandemic with the school and has taken that into account in his evaluation of the school. The inspector carried out deep dives in these subjects: early reading, history, and art and design. For each deep dive, the inspector visited a sample of lessons, spoke to teachers, spoke to some pupils about their learning and looked at samples of pupils’ work. 23 and 24 July 2024
p.5
6
The inspector also discussed the curriculum in other subjects, looked at a sample of work in these subjects and spoke with pupils about their work. The inspector heard pupils read individually and as part of classroom activities. The inspector took account of the responses to Ofsted Parent View as well as Ofsted’s online inspection surveys for staff and pupils. The inspector observed pupils’ behaviour during lessons, at breaktimes and around the school. He looked at records for behaviour and bullying and spoke with pupils and staff. The inspector discussed the provision in place for pupils’ personal development. To evaluate the effectiveness of safeguarding, the inspector reviewed the single central record; took account of the views of leaders, staff and pupils; and considered the extent to which the school has created an open and positive culture around safeguarding that puts pupils’ interests first.
p.6
Inspection team
Steve Bentham, lead inspector His Majesty’s Inspector 23 and 24 July 2024
p.6
7
regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.
p.7
7
If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .
p.7
7
You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .
p.7
7
Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .
p.7
7
T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted
p.7
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion