Schools & FE · School monitoring visit
Setting
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspectorssingle source
Frances Bywater
- Postcode verified
PL5 3AG
- Name on report verified
St Boniface’s RC College This letter sets out the findings from the monitoring inspection that took place on 4 July
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No standout praise found.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No strong criticism found.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- This letter sets out the findings from the monitoring inspection that took place on 4 July 2024, on behalf of His Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills. p.1
- The monitoring inspection was carried out under section 8(2) of the Education Act 2005 and took place because the school has received two successive judgements of requires improvement at its previous graded (section 5) inspections. p.1
- The purpose of a monitoring inspection is not to grade the school’s overall effectiveness, but to identify and report on the school’s progress. p.1
- It is to highlight to the school and parents any improvements that school leaders have made since the school’s previous graded inspection. p.1
- During the inspection, I discussed with you and other senior leaders, trust leaders, and governors and members of staff the actions that have been taken to improve the school since the most recent graded inspection. p.1
- We discussed the ongoing impact of the COVID- 19 pandemic. p.1
- I met with leaders to discuss suspensions and attendance. p.1
- I discussed with some pupils their experiences of what has changed at the school. p.1
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 3
- Words of findings
- 806
- shorter than usual (typical 1570)
- Reading level
- Fairly hard
- Flesch 56, typical 47
- Average sentence
- 16 words
- Next steps
- 8
- typical 8
- Hedged sentences
- 8%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Store Street Manchester M1 2WD T 0300 123 1231 www.gov.uk/ofsted
p.1
Michael Antram Executive Headteacher St Boniface’s RC College 21 Boniface Lane Crownhill Plymouth Devon PL5 3AG
p.1
Requires improvement monitoring inspection of St Boniface’s RC College
This letter sets out the findings from the monitoring inspection that took place on 4 July 2024, on behalf of His Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills. The monitoring inspection was carried out under section 8(2) of the Education Act 2005 and took place because the school has received two successive judgements of requires improvement at its previous graded (section 5) inspections.
p.1
Requires improvement monitoring inspection of St Boniface’s RC College
The purpose of a monitoring inspection is not to grade the school’s overall effectiveness, but to identify and report on the school’s progress. It is to highlight to the school and parents any improvements that school leaders have made since the school’s previous graded inspection.
p.1
Requires improvement monitoring inspection of St Boniface’s RC College
During the inspection, I discussed with you and other senior leaders, trust leaders, and governors and members of staff the actions that have been taken to improve the school since the most recent graded inspection. We discussed the ongoing impact of the COVID- 19 pandemic. I visited lessons and the ‘reset’ room. I met with leaders to discuss suspensions and attendance. I discussed with some pupils their experiences of what has changed at the school. I also reviewed school improvement documents, visited lessons and met with teachers. I have considered all this in coming to my judgement.
p.1
Leaders have made progress to improve the school, but more work is
necessary for the school to become good.
p.1
Main findings
Since the previous inspection, you have been appointed as executive headteacher and a new head of school is now in post. In addition, there have been significant changes to key policies, such as behaviour and attendance. The school is now working more closely with trust leaders. The school has started to make progress with the areas of improvement set out in the report. While some of the work needs time to embed, it is evident that the school is moving in the right direction.
p.2
Main findings
The school has worked to improve the curriculum and ensure that it is suitably broad and ambitious. Small steps have been accurately identified to ensure that pupils make progress through the curriculum. Mechanisms are in place to check pupils’ understanding. However, these are not yet used with consistent efficiency. As a result, misconceptions are not always tackled with the immediacy that they need to be. More work needs to be done to ensure that gaps in pupils’ understanding are identified and swiftly acted on.
p.2
Main findings
Since the recent changes in leadership, you have wasted no time in acting on the areas for improvement. Alongside the head of school, you have accelerated necessary changes to improve behaviour, attendance and the quality of education. You have an accurate understanding of the school’s strengths and where it needs to develop further. A robust improvement plan is used meaningfully to ensure the school is making progress at an appropriate pace. Governors and trust leaders use this plan to challenge leaders and hold them to account for the impact of their actions.
p.2
Main findings
You introduced a new behaviour policy with increased expectations at the start of the year and this saw an initial rise in suspensions. This has since decreased. However, single suspensions are higher than last year overall, so it is too soon to know if the new policy has had the desired impact. The number of repeat suspensions has steadily decreased over the last two years. Pupils and staff feel that behaviour has improved. Lesson visits demonstrate that low-level disruption is rare. Pupils understand the school’s expectations of them and think that these are fair. Staff and pupils appreciate the increased consistency with which the behaviour policy is applied. There is evidence of reasonable adjustments being made for pupils, where appropriate.
p.2
Main findings
The school has worked hard this year to improve attendance, and the overall rate of attendance has increased. However, persistent absenteeism has risen and is high. The school is trying to work alongside pupils and their families to ensure that barriers to attendance are overcome. The school is identifying pupils earlier on to ensure that their attendance does not worsen. The school should continue to focus its efforts in this area.
p.2
Main findings
The school has engaged with a wide range of external support, which has increased its capacity. The work of external partners is focused and has clear aims. You have also used external support to quality assure different areas of the school. Leaders at all levels speak positively about this experience and can point to specific examples of the impact that it has had. I am copying this letter to the chair of the board of trustees, and the CEO of Plymouth CAST, the director of education for the Diocese of Plymouth, the Department for Education’s regional director and the director of children’s services for Plymouth. This letter will be published on the Ofsted reports website.
p.2
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion