Early years · Early years complaint outcome
Seedlings Pre School
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection datesingle source
19 Sept 2024
- URN verified
2655479
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No standout praise found.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 2
- Words of findings
- 363
- longer than usual (typical 281)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 42, typical 42
- Average sentence
- 18 words
- Next steps
- 1
- typical 1
- Hedged sentences
- 5%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Summary of outcome
All early years providers must meet the legal requirements in the Statutory framework for the early years foundation stage, which you can find at www.gov.uk/government/publications/early-years-foundation-stage-framework--2. If we find that a provider is not meeting the requirements, we can take action to ensure they put matters right.
p.1
Summary of outcome
On 2 September 2024, we received concerns that the provider was not meeting requirements relating to staff:child ratios, information and record keeping, supporting and understanding children's behaviour and complaints.
p.1
Summary of outcome
On 9 September 2024, we carried out a regulatory visit. We found the provider was not meeting some of the requirements and had taken action to put this right. The provider had reviewed the support provided to the children who need extra help. Subsequently, they had updated the children's individual learning and care plans, requested support from outside agencies where required and held meetings with the children's parents.
p.1
Summary of outcome
We also found the provider was in breach of other requirements. We have issued actions for the provider to take. The provider will be able to give parents further information about this.
p.1
Summary of outcome
n improve staff deployment and the supervision of children, to meet children's individual needs and engage them in their play and learning
p.1
Summary of outcome
n support staff to help children understand the rules and boundaries to help them learn the consequences of their actions and be able to manage their feelings and emotions.
p.1
Summary of outcome
On 18 September 2024, the provider responded to the actions set. We found that staff had undertaken training and received support to develop their knowledge and skills with regard to staff deployment, the supervision of children and the effective management of children's behaviour. The information gathered suggests that the provider is now meeting the requirements of their registration. We are satisfied the provider has met the safeguarding and welfare actions raised. The provider is still registered with Ofsted.
p.1
Publication of complaints
We publish details of complaints made against childminders, home childcarers and childcare providers where we or the provider have taken action in order to meet legal requirements.
p.1
Publication of complaints
We publish details of complaints on our website for a period of five years.
p.2
Publication of complaints
For further information about the complaints process please view the Concerns and complaints about childminders and childcare providers leaflet .
p.2
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion