Schools & FE · School inspection (EIF)
Don Valley Academy
Summary
Carl Sugden (lead), Lisa Allen
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection date verified
3 Jul 2024
- Inspectors verified
Carl Sugden, Lisa Allen
- Postcode verified
DN5 9DD
- Name on report verified
Don Valley Academy
- URN verified
137472
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- The school has an exceptionally consistent approach to teaching. p.2
- The school has a highly effective system for identifying exactly what support pupils need to improve their reading. p.2
- This reading intervention is highly effective. p.2
- However, the evidence gathered suggests that the inspection grade might be outstanding if a graded (section 5) inspection were carried out now. p.1
- The rich and broad curriculum prepares them effectively for life beyond school. p.1
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- If we have serious concerns about safeguarding, behaviour or the quality of education, we will deem the ungraded inspection a graded inspection immediately. p.3
- On the occasions when some pupils fail to meet this standard, they are supported to reflect and improve. p.1
- A number of pupils join the school with weak reading skills. p.2
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Progress & outcomes5
“This sometimes results in suspensions.” p.2
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 7
- Words of findings
- 1,158
- about usual (typical 1153)
- Reading level
- Fairly hard
- Flesch 53, typical 55
- Average sentence
- 14 words
- Next steps
- 1
- typical 4
- Hedged sentences
- 4%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Inspection of a good school: Don Valley Academy Jossey Lane, Scawthorpe, Doncaster, South Yorkshire DN5 9DD
p.1
Outcome
There has been no change to this school’s overall judgement of good as a result of this ungraded (section 8) inspection. However, the evidence gathered suggests that the inspection grade might be outstanding if a graded (section 5) inspection were carried out now. The school’s next inspection will be a graded inspection.
p.1
Outcome
The principal of this school is Richard Brooke. This school is part of Delta Academies Trust, which means other people in the trust also have responsibility for running the school. The trust is run by the chief executive officer, Paul Tarn, and overseen by a board of trustees, chaired by Steve Hodsman.
p.1
What is it like to attend this school?
Pupils achieve well at this school. The rich and broad curriculum prepares them effectively for life beyond school. Success is celebrated. The inspection coincided with a very well- attended awards evening to celebrate pupils’ effort and hard work. School and trust leaders have an unwavering ambition for pupils and the local community. They are successful in unlocking the potential in pupils.
p.1
What is it like to attend this school?
Behaviour in the school is calm and purposeful. Pupils are friendly and welcoming. Pupils are safe and feel safe here. Lessons proceed with pace and purpose. The majority of pupils behave above and beyond the expectations of the school behaviour policy. On the occasions when some pupils fail to meet this standard, they are supported to reflect and improve.
p.1
What is it like to attend this school?
Pupils benefit from a carefully planned programme of wider experiences. This is called ‘the life of a student’. Enrichment opportunities range from a pantomime trip to alpaca walking and escape rooms. The careers education programme particularly stands out. The school plans this programme with care to ensure pupils get the right experience and advice at exactly the right time. Every opportunity is taken, whenever any visitors are in school, to showcase different jobs and careers. Mock interviews, money management and university visits all contribute to pupils’ understanding of their future potential. 2 and 3 July 2024
p.1
What does the school do well and what does it need to do better?
The ambitious curriculum ensures pupils can study a wide range of subjects. At key stage 3 pupils follow a broad and balanced curriculum. Many pupils at key stage 4 study a modern foreign language and triple science, along with a wide range of other options, such as engineering. The depth and breadth of the curriculum is just one reason why pupils are well prepared for future education, training and employment. The high achievement of pupils extends to those with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND). Pupils succeed, regardless of their background or starting point. This is particularly true in English and mathematics, however, this achievement extends to many other subjects at key stage 4.
p.2
What does the school do well and what does it need to do better?
The school has an exceptionally consistent approach to teaching. Pupils learn effectively because of careful teacher explanation followed by opportunities to practise and apply their knowledge. Teachers routinely check that pupils understand. Pupils value the consistency in lessons. They know that this is how they learn and remember. The clear way that subjects are taught particularly benefits those pupils with SEND.
p.2
What does the school do well and what does it need to do better?
A number of pupils join the school with weak reading skills. The school has a highly effective system for identifying exactly what support pupils need to improve their reading. Additional reading sessions are matched carefully to the needs of the pupils. This reading intervention is highly effective. Pupils improve their reading quickly. They are then able to make more progress in other subjects. The wider love of reading is promoted across the school. Pupils enjoy choosing books from the ‘reading routes’ programme. This programme encourages pupils to read across a range of genres. Pupils take advantage of the well-stocked library.
p.2
What does the school do well and what does it need to do better?
Behaviour in the academy is characterised by pupils’ good manners and good conduct. There are good relationships between staff and pupils. Pupils behave well and work hard in lessons. Some pupils contravene the school’s behaviour policy. This sometimes results in suspensions. Suspensions have been higher than the national average. Suspensions have considerably reduced during this academic year. This is a trend that leaders are determined to continue.
p.2
What does the school do well and what does it need to do better?
Pupils have a strong understanding of how to stay safe and be healthy. The school teaches this very effectively. Pupils are knowledgeable about a wide range of important topics. For example, online safety, healthy eating, drugs awareness and body image.
p.2
What does the school do well and what does it need to do better?
Trust and school leaders have a strong, shared understanding of the vision and values of the school. They ensure this vision is enacted. The trust provides important strategic support for staff training at all levels. The trust provides a framework for strong policies and routines. Staff are proud to work at the academy. They feel well supported to do so, especially in regard to managing their workload.
p.2
Safeguarding
The arrangements for safeguarding are effective. 2 and 3 July 2024
p.2
(Information for the school and appropriate authority)
Suspensions from school are falling rapidly as a result of leaders’ actions to improve standards of behaviour. Continuing this work is important, as historically the number of suspensions has been higher than the national average. Leaders should continue to reduce the number of suspensions, while maintaining overall standards of behaviour, so that all pupils benefit fully from the school’s curriculum.
p.3
Background
When we have judged a school to be good, we will then normally go into the school about once every four years to confirm that the school remains good. This is called an ungraded inspection, and it is carried out under section 8 of the Education Act 2005. We do not give graded judgements on an ungraded inspection. However, if we find evidence that a school would now receive a higher or lower grade, then the next inspection will be a graded inspection, which is carried out under section 5 of the Act. Usually this is within one to two years of the date of the ungraded inspection. If we have serious concerns about safeguarding, behaviour or the quality of education, we will deem the ungraded inspection a graded inspection immediately.
p.3
Background
This is the first ungraded inspection since we judged the school to be good in April 2019.
p.3
How can I feed back my views?
find out what other parents and carers think. We use information from Ofsted Parent View when deciding which schools to inspect, when to inspect them and as part of their inspection.
p.3
How can I feed back my views?
The Department for Education has further guidance on how to complain about a school.
p.3
Further information
You can search for published performance information about the school.
p.3
Further information
In the report, ‘disadvantaged pupils’ is used to mean pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND); pupils who meet the definition of children in need of help and protection; pupils receiving statutory local authority support from a social worker; and pupils who otherwise meet the criteria used for deciding the school’s pupil premium funding (this includes pupils claiming free school meals at any point in the last six years, 2 and 3 July 2024
p.3
4
looked after children (children in local authority care) and/or children who left care through adoption or another formal route). 2 and 3 July 2024
p.4
School details
Number of pupils on the school roll 1096
p.5
School details
Website http://www.donvalleyacademy.org.uk/
p.5
School details
Dates of previous inspection 2 and 3 April 2019, under section 5 of the Education Act 2005
p.5
Information about this school
The school uses three registered providers of alternative education, and four unregistered providers. The school meets the requirements of the provider access legislation, which requires schools to provide pupils in Years 8 to 13 with information and engagement about approved technical qualifications and apprenticeships.
p.5
Information about this inspection
Inspections are a point-in-time judgment about the quality of a school’s education provision.
p.5
Information about this inspection
This was the first routine inspection the school received since the COVID-19 pandemic began. Inspectors discussed the impact of the pandemic with the school and have taken that into account in their evaluation of the school. Inspectors met with the headteacher, other senior leaders and a range of middle leaders and staff. The lead inspector met with representatives of the trust and trustees. 2 and 3 July 2024
p.5
6
Inspectors carried out deep dives in English, science, modern foreign languages and geography. For each deep dive, inspectors held discussions about the curriculum, visited a sample of lessons, spoke to teachers, spoke to pupils about their learning and looked at samples of pupils’ work. To evaluate the effectiveness of safeguarding, inspectors; reviewed the single central record; took account of the views of leaders, staff and pupils; and considered the extent to which the school has created an open and positive culture around safeguarding that puts pupils’ interests first. Inspectors studied a range of documents. These included pupil attendance information, safeguarding records and support plans for pupils with SEND. The lead inspector considered the responses to Ofsted’s online surveys for staff and pupils. The views of parents and carers were considered through the Ofsted’s online survey, Ofsted Parent View.
p.6
Inspection team
Carl Sugden, lead inspector Ofsted Inspector
p.6
Inspection team
Lisa Allen Ofsted Inspector 2 and 3 July 2024
p.6
7
regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.
p.7
7
If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .
p.7
7
You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .
p.7
7
Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .
p.7
7
T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted
p.7
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion