Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School inspection (EIF)

King James Academy Royston

Inspected 9 Jul 2024 · published 18 Sept 2024 · URN 137656

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection datesingle source

    9 Jul 2024

  • Inspectors verified

    Anne Maingay, Brenda Watson, Jason Carey, Linda Culling, Matthew Haynes, Sarah Fowler, Steve Woodley

  • Behaviour and attitudes verified

    Good

  • Leadership and management verified

    Good

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Good

  • Personal development verified

    Good

  • Quality of education verified

    Good

  • Postcode verified

    SG8 7JH

  • Name on report verified

    King James Academy Royston

  • URN verified

    137656

Page 1 of 8
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2018.

  • OverallGood
  • Behaviour and attitudesGood
  • Leadership and managementGood
  • Personal developmentGood
  • Quality of educationGood

66% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Good (5,043 inspections).

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+62Positivemore positive than 58% of reports of this type graded Good
OutstandingGoodRIInadequate

In line with other reports of this type graded Good.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praisestrongpositivehigh qualityambitioussuccessfullyeffectivehigh expectationsenjoy
Criticismnot effectivenot alwaystoo oftennot consistentlygapsnot yetlow

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsSafeguardingAbout the inspection positive critical
  • Findings1115w+61
  • Safeguarding6w+33

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
8
Words of findings
1,097
about usual (typical 1098)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 49, typical 55
Average sentence
17 words
Next steps
1
typical 4
Hedged sentences
15%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 60%Safeguarding 0%About the inspection 40%

Full report text

Inspection of King James Academy Royston Garden Walk, Royston, Hertfordshire SG8 7JH

p.1

Inspection dates: 23 and 24 April, and 9 July 2024

p.1

Overall effectiveness Good

The quality of education Good Behaviour and attitudes Good Personal development Good Leadership and management Good Sixth-form provision Good Previous inspection grade Good

p.1

Overall effectiveness Good

The headteacher of this school is Lisa Plowman. This school is part of the Diamond Learning Partnership Trust, which means other people in the trust also have responsibility for running the school. The trust is run by the chief executive officer, Susannah Connell, and overseen by a board of trustees, chaired by Alan Ball. 23 and 24 April, and 9 July 2024

p.1

What is it like to attend this school?

The school has high expectations for pupils’ achievement and behaviour. Staff work hard to make these ambitions a reality. Pupils respect each other and have a strong understanding of people with different backgrounds and beliefs. They know the school’s rules and how to behave well. Relationships between pupils and with staff are typically positive. Pupils are considerate of each other’s well-being. Most pupils enjoy school and attend regularly. They feel safe because of the care staff take to help them with any problems that they might have. The majority of pupils approach their learning enthusiastically and aim high.

p.2

What is it like to attend this school?

Pupils’ aspirations and wider development are supported through strong provision. A comprehensive programme of careers education and advice, including in the sixth form, ensures that pupils are well prepared for the future. Opportunities for pupils to develop leadership skills and positive character traits are of high quality, including through roles such as sports leaders, being members of the student council and participating in the Duke of Edinburgh’s Award scheme. In addition to a range of trips for pupils throughout the year, including residentials, trips abroad and visits to the theatre and museums, pupils have access to a breadth of extra-curricular activities. Some of these are organised and led by pupils with support from staff.

p.2

better?

Pupils experience a well-designed, ambitious curriculum which meets their needs. Teachers revisit what pupils have learned before, so that pupils learn new knowledge securely. Pupils’ progress through the curriculum is strong and they achieve well overall. Many pupils produce work of high quality in both primary and secondary phases. The proportion of pupils studying the full suite of subjects in the English Baccalaureate at key stage 4 has been low in the past. This has risen sharply, with almost half of pupils now taking these qualifications. In particular, the school has made sure that provision for modern foreign languages has developed further across key stages 2 to 4.

p.2

better?

Teachers have good subject knowledge. As a result of the school’s ongoing work to develop teaching, teachers possess a repertoire of proven strategies which many use successfully in lessons. At times, however, some teachers’ choices about which approaches to employ are not always as effective. Consequently, some pupils are not as fully engaged in their learning as they could be, which affects their depth of understanding. Teachers use their checks on pupils’ learning to adjust the curriculum in order to close gaps in pupils’ knowledge. Some staff do not yet do this as effectively as others. As a result, some pupils’ misconceptions are not identified and addressed in lessons as quickly as they might be.

p.2

better?

Teachers increasingly use information about disadvantaged pupils, including those who have special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND), to help them to access the curriculum successfully. Sometimes teachers’ adaptations could be matched to pupils’ needs more precisely, especially in key stages 3 and 4. The 23 and 24 April, and 9 July 2024

p.2

3

Bridge provision provides pupils with social, emotional and mental health needs with the right support to help them enjoy school and attend regularly. The school rightly places a high priority on supporting pupils with their reading. Pupils encounter a range of ambitious texts throughout the primary and secondary phases. The school quickly identifies any pupils that need additional help with reading. They receive effective support which improves their accuracy and fluency in reading so that they catch up with their peers.

p.3

3

Students in the sixth form follow a specialist performing arts curriculum. This is delivered very effectively by teachers who have extensive, up-to-date vocational expertise. As a result, students achieve well overall and some excel. Students benefit from a range of additional opportunities, including visits from industry professionals. Students gain hands-on experience of careers in the performing arts and are well prepared for their next steps.

p.3

3

The school supports pupils’ personal development well. They learn about important aspects, such as how to form and maintain positive relationships and lead healthy lives. While most pupils translate this into good attitudes and behaviour, staff work successfully to support a small minority of pupils who find this more challenging. This includes the school’s effective work to improve pupils’ attendance when they are absent too often.

p.3

3

The school has faced significant challenges caused by storm damage to the school’s buildings. Leaders and staff have managed this difficult period impressively. Staff, including early career teachers, are supported with their workload and well-being so that they can focus fully on making sure that pupils get a good education. Trustees and local governors have a clear oversight of the school’s effectiveness. They support and challenge the school really well.

p.3

Safeguarding

The arrangements for safeguarding are effective.

p.3

(Information for the school and appropriate authority)

 At times, teachers’ strategies to engage pupils in their learning are not as effective as they could be, including for pupils with SEND. When this happens, pupils do not consistently develop really deep understanding and achieve highly. The school should tighten up teaching approaches further, including how pupils’ learning is assessed, so that the standards pupils achieve continue to rise. 23 and 24 April, and 9 July 2024

p.3

How can I feed back my views?

or to find out what other parents and carers think. We use information from Ofsted Parent View when deciding which schools to inspect, when to inspect them and as part of their inspection.

p.4

How can I feed back my views?

The Department for Education has further guidance on how to complain about a school.

p.4

Further information

You can search for published performance information about the school.

p.4

Further information

In the report, ‘disadvantaged pupils’ is used to mean pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND); pupils who meet the definition of children in need of help and protection ; pupils receiving statutory local authority support from a social worker; and pupils who otherwise meet the criteria used for deciding the school’s pupil premium funding (this includes pupils claiming free school meals at any point in the last six years, looked after children (children in local authority care) and/or children who left care through adoption or another formal route). 23 and 24 April, and 9 July 2024

p.4

sixth form

Date of previous inspection 8 October 2020, under section 8 of the Education Act 2005

p.5

Information about this school

 King James Academy Royston operates across three sites: Years 5 and 6 are based on the junior school site, Years 7 to 11 are based on the adjacent senior school site, and the sixth-form provision is based on a separate site at Lumen Road.  Sixth-form students study the BTEC Level 3 Extended Diploma in Performing Arts Practice at the Stage Right Centre for the Performing Arts.  In January 2024, serious storm damage resulted in the closure of parts of both the senior and junior school sites. Pupils were educated off site and, at times, online in the spring term. Some lessons currently take place in temporary classrooms on the senior school site while repairs to the school’s buildings continue. 23 and 24 April, and 9 July 2024

p.5

6

 The school currently uses two registered and one unregistered alternative provision for pupils.  The school meets the requirements of the provider access legislation, which requires schools to provide pupils in Years 8 to 13 with information and engagement about approved technical education qualifications and apprenticeships.

p.6

Information about this inspection

The inspectors carried out this graded inspection under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.

p.6

Information about this inspection

 Inspections are a point-in-time judgement about the quality of a school’s education provision.  This was the first routine inspection the school received since the COVID-19 pandemic began. Inspectors discussed the impact of the pandemic with the school and have taken that into account in their evaluation of the school.  The inspection started on 23 April 2024. Inspectors returned on 9 July 2024 to gather additional evidence in line with Ofsted inspections and visits: Deferring, pausing and gathering additional evidence policy.  Inspectors carried out deep dives in these subjects: English, mathematics, science, geography and physical education. For each deep dive, inspectors discussed the curriculum with subject leaders, visited a sample of lessons, spoke with teachers, spoke with some pupils about their learning and looked at samples of pupils’ work.  Inspectors also discussed the curriculum in some other subjects and visited a

p.6

Information about this inspection

range of lessons.  Inspectors held meetings with a range of leaders, including the special educational needs and disabilities coordinator, to discuss all aspects of the school’s work.  Inspectors met with trustees and members of the local governing board, and the chief executive officer of the Diamond Learning Partnership Trust.  An inspector met with early career teachers and staff involved in their induction.  Inspectors observed pupils’ behaviour in lessons and at other times around school. They met with groups of pupils to discuss behaviour in the school and a range of other aspects of the school’s work.  To evaluate the effectiveness of safeguarding, the inspectors: reviewed the single central record; took account of the views of leaders, staff and pupils; and considered the extent to which the school has created an open and positive culture around safeguarding that puts pupils’ interests first.

p.6

Information about this inspection

 Inspectors scrutinised a range of records relating to behaviour and attendance. 23 and 24 April, and 9 July 2024

p.6

7

 Inspectors considered parents’ and carers’ responses to Ofsted’s surveys, and responses to Ofsted’s staff survey. The lead inspector in April also spoke to a parent.

p.7

Inspection team

Matthew Haynes, lead inspector His Majesty’s Inspector

p.7

Inspection team

Anne Maingay His Majesty’s Inspector 23 and 24 April, and 9 July 2024

p.7

8

regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.

p.8

8

If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.8

8

You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .

p.8

8

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .

p.8

8

T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.8

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion