Schools & FE · School inspection (EIF)
Oakwood Primary School
Summary
Sara Boyce (lead), Jason Howard, Peter Petrou
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection date verified
10 Jul 2024
- Inspectors verified
Jason Howard, Peter Petrou, Sara Boyce
- Behaviour and attitudes verified
Good
- Early years verified
Good
- Leadership and management verified
Good
- Overall effectiveness verified
Good
- Personal development verified
Good
- Quality of education verified
Good
- Postcode verified
AL4 0XA
- Name on report verified
Oakwood Primary School
- URN verified
117222
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2014.
- OverallGood
- Behaviour and attitudesGood
- Early yearsGood
- Leadership and managementGood
- Personal developmentGood
- Quality of educationGood
66% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Good (5,043 inspections).
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type graded Good.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- This limits how consistently well and in what depth pupils secure knowledge in a few foundation subjects and in writing. p.2
- This school was last inspected under section 5 of the Education Act 2005 10 years ago and judged ‘Outstanding’ under a previous inspection framework. p.1
- Pupils know that staff have high expectations of them and also that there is help when needed. p.2
- In reading and mathematics and grammar, pupils do very well in national assessments by the end of Year 6. p.2
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- However, in a few curriculum areas, there is not enough depth or detail about what pupils need to learn. p.2
- Subject leaders then need to check that all pupils are learning these parts of the curriculum in the depth intended and are making the connections to prior learning. 9 and 10 July 2024 p.3
- The school needs to ensure that all staff are clear on curriculum content and expectations in these areas. p.3
- The school needs to ensure that targets and support for these specific pupils are precisely matched to their needs. p.4
- The school needs to ensure these pupils are set work that is suitably ambitious, so they fully achieve what they are capable of. p.4
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 7
- Words of findings
- 1,229
- about usual (typical 1098)
- Reading level
- Fairly hard
- Flesch 55, typical 55
- Average sentence
- 15 words
- Next steps
- 5
- typical 4
- Hedged sentences
- 19%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Inspection of Oakwood Primary School Oakwood Drive, St Albans, Hertfordshire AL4 0XA
p.1
Overall effectiveness Good
The quality of education Good Behaviour and attitudes Good Personal development Good Leadership and management Good Early years provision Good Previous inspection grade Outstanding
p.1
Overall effectiveness Good
This school was last inspected under section 5 of the Education Act 2005 10 years ago and judged ‘Outstanding’ under a previous inspection framework. This reflected the school’s overall effectiveness under the inspection framework in use at the time.
p.1
Overall effectiveness Good
From then until November 2020, the school was exempted by law from routine inspection, so there has been a longer gap than usual between graded inspections under section 5 of the Act. Judgements in this report are based on the current inspection framework and also reflect changes that may have happened at any point since the last graded inspection. 9 and 10 July 2024
p.1
What is it like to attend this school?
Pupils are positive about their experiences at this school. They appreciate that leaders listen to their views. Pupils influence decisions through the school council and pupil surveys. This includes contributing to the behaviour policy, improving recycling facilities and selecting lunchtime activities. Adults empower pupils and, in return, there is mutual respect for everyone. Pupils like the many ‘golden’ rewards available and are clear on behaviour consequences. Pupils behave well, from early years upwards.
p.2
What is it like to attend this school?
Pupils are proud of their learning. Many pupils achieve highly here, especially in reading and mathematics. Pupils know that staff have high expectations of them and also that there is help when needed. They like the trips they go on to broaden their understanding of topics they are studying. However, pupils would benefit from learning in more depth in some wider curriculum areas and in writing.
p.2
What is it like to attend this school?
Pupils understand how to manage their own personal safety. They learn about first aid. Pupils take on leadership roles to keep the school tidy and organised. Older pupils act as ‘reading buddies’ to younger pupils. There are several clubs they can attend, such as clubs for football, art and coding. Pupils learn to play the violin and enjoy school performances. They develop into polite and well-rounded young people.
p.2
better?
The new leaders have quickly and accurately identified the school’s strengths and areas for improvement. Teachers know what to teach, and when, in each subject. They also have good subject knowledge. In reading and mathematics and grammar, pupils do very well in national assessments by the end of Year 6. However, in a few curriculum areas, there is not enough depth or detail about what pupils need to learn. Links to previous learning are not always explicit. This limits how consistently well and in what depth pupils secure knowledge in a few foundation subjects and in writing. Leaders have a clear plan to move this forward.
p.2
better?
Teachers do check pupils’ understanding and address any misconceptions. Pupils receive feedback on how to improve their work. In some instances, though, pupils are set work that is not ambitous enough. This means that pupils are not always able to extend their learning further, especially when working independently.
p.2
better?
Reading is a strength. Pupils are encouraged to read a wide range of texts that they may not normally choose for themselves. This broadens their literary understanding and appreciation. It also exposes them to rich vocabulary. Younger pupils follow a systematic phonics programme so that most pupils are fluent readers by the end of Year 2. Pupils who struggle with reading receive support. However, there are a few pupils, including those with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND), that are not catching up quickly enough in reading. This is because their interventions are not always precisely linked to the gaps in their phonics knowledge. 9 and 10 July 2024
p.2
3
Overall, pupils with SEND are provided for well. They have their needs identified swiftly and the school provides the appropriate support. Each pupil with SEND has targets set which are regularly reviewed and specialist advice sought. Where targets are precise and provision is closely matched to these targets, pupils with SEND make progress. There are a few pupils with SEND where this is not consistently the case and so they do not achieve as well as they could.
p.3
3
Recent changes in early years provision are having a positive impact on children. Children can turn take, sustain concentration and are articulate. They are skilfully supported in their learning in reading, writing and mathematics and so are ready for Year 1. However, sometimes staff miss opportunities to deepen children’s knowledge or fill gaps when they engage in more independent learning activities. This means they do not always achieve what they are fully capable of.
p.3
3
Pupils demonstrate positive attitudes to learning. They like coming to school and attendance is high. Through their personal development curriculum, pupils understand about respecting difference. This results in pupils who are understanding of the feelings of others. Pupils focus in lessons. Learning is not disrupted. If it is, this is swiftly dealt with. The behaviour policy is still new, but pupils, parents and staff recognise that rewards and consequences are more consistent and fair.
p.3
3
Pupils have a strong understanding of why discrimination is wrong and the importance of respecting cultures and religions. They have a developing sense of key British values, including democracy and the rule of law.
p.3
3
Governors know the school well. They have the necessary expertise to hold leaders to account and fulfil their statutory duties. The school is mindful of staff well-being and workload. Staff are positive about working here and the training and support they receive.
p.3
Safeguarding
The arrangements for safeguarding are effective.
p.3
(Information for the school and appropriate authority)
There are some inconsistencies in how well pupils are learning the curriculum across the school. This means pupils are not securing the level of detailed knowledge leaders intend in a few foundation subjects and in writing. The school needs to ensure that all staff are clear on curriculum content and expectations in these areas. Subject leaders then need to check that all pupils are learning these parts of the curriculum in the depth intended and are making the connections to prior learning. 9 and 10 July 2024
p.3
4
In some instances, pupils are not provided with meaningful learning opportunities, including in early years. This limits how well pupils deepen and extend their understanding. The school needs to ensure these pupils are set work that is suitably ambitious, so they fully achieve what they are capable of. For a few pupils with SEND, the provision in place is not sufficiently aligned to their specific needs. This limits how well these pupils can access and learn the curriculum. The school needs to ensure that targets and support for these specific pupils are precisely matched to their needs.
p.4
How can I feed back my views?
or to find out what other parents and carers think. We use information from Ofsted Parent View when deciding which schools to inspect, when to inspect them and as part of their inspection.
p.4
How can I feed back my views?
The Department for Education has further guidance on how to complain about a school.
p.4
Further information
You can search for published performance information about the school.
p.4
Further information
In the report, ‘disadvantaged pupils’ is used to mean pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND); pupils who meet the definition of children in need of help and protection ; pupils receiving statutory local authority support from a social worker; and pupils who otherwise meet the criteria used for deciding the school’s pupil premium funding (this includes pupils claiming free school meals at any point in the last six years, looked after children (children in local authority care) and/or children who left care through adoption or another formal route). 9 and 10 July 2024
p.4
School details
Dates of previous inspection 1 and 2 April 2014, under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.
p.5
Information about this school
The headteacher took up the role in April 2024. She was previously the deputy headteacher. The new deputy headteacher has been in post since June 2024, as has the early years leader. The school does not use any alternative provision.
p.5
Information about this inspection
The inspectors carried out this graded inspection under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.
p.5
Information about this inspection
Inspections are a point-in-time judgment about the quality of a school’s education provision. This was the first routine inspection the school received since the COVID-19 pandemic began. Inspectors discussed the impact of the pandemic with the school and have taken that into account in their evaluation of the school. The inspectors held meetings with the headteacher, deputy headteacher, the special educational needs coordinator, subject leaders and teaching staff. 9 and 10 July 2024
p.5
6
The inspectors carried out deep dives in these subjects: reading, mathematics, history, computing and design and technology. For each deep dive, the inspectors spoke to leaders, visited lessons, spoke with pupils, look at pupils’ work and spoke with teachers and support staff. The inspectors also looked at a range of curriculum documents from other subjects. The lead inspector met with four members of the governing body for the school, including the chair of the governing body. The inspectors scrutinised a range of documentation, including the school’s own self-evaluation, school improvement plan, governing body minutes and school improvement adviser visit notes. The lead inspector spoke with the school’s improvement adviser from the local authority. To evaluate the effectiveness of safeguarding, the inspectors reviewed the single central record, took account of the views of leaders, staff and pupils and
p.6
6
considered the extent to which the school has created an open and positive culture around safeguarding that puts pupils’ interests first. The inspectors considered the responses gathered through Ofsted’s online survey for parents, Ofsted Parent View, which included 138 free-text comments. There were 30 responses to the staff survey. No pupils answered the pupil survey. However, the inspector spoke to several pupils from different year groups during the inspection, along with a range of staff.
p.6
Inspection team
Sara Boyce, lead inspector His Majesty’s Inspector
p.6
Inspection team
Peter Petrou Ofsted Inspector 9 and 10 July 2024
p.6
7
regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.
p.7
7
If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .
p.7
7
You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .
p.7
7
Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .
p.7
7
T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted
p.7
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion