Schools & FE · School monitoring visit
St Mary's Catholic Primary School
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspectorssingle source
Sue Keeling
- Postcode verified
PO33 1LJ
- Name on report verified
St Mary’s Catholic Primary School
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No standout praise found.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Leadership & governance7
“Governors know the school well.” p.3
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 3
- Words of findings
- 1,044
- shorter than usual (typical 1570)
- Reading level
- Fairly hard
- Flesch 52, typical 47
- Average sentence
- 16 words
- Next steps
- 1
- typical 8
- Hedged sentences
- 9%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Store Street Manchester M1 2WD T 0300 123 1231 www.gov.uk/ofsted
p.1
Margaret Sanderson Executive Headteacher St Mary’s Catholic Primary School Ampthill Road Ryde Isle of Wight PO33 1LJ
p.1
School
This letter sets out the findings from the monitoring inspection that took place on 22 July 2024, on behalf of His Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills. The monitoring inspection was carried out under section 8(2) of the Education Act 2005 and took place because the school has received two successive judgements of requires improvement at its previous graded (section 5) inspections.
p.1
School
The purpose of a monitoring inspection is not to grade the school’s overall effectiveness, but to identify and report on the school’s progress. It is to highlight to the school and parents any improvements that school leaders have made since the school’s previous graded inspection.
p.1
School
During the inspection, I discussed with you and other senior leaders, governors and the local authority the actions that have been taken to improve the school since the most recent graded inspection. We discussed the ongoing impact of the COVID-19 pandemic. I also held meetings with staff and pupils, visited lessons and considered curriculum planning, school improvement and safeguarding documentation. I have considered all this in coming to my judgement.
p.1
Leaders have made progress to improve the school, but more work is
necessary for the school to become good.
p.1
Main findings
You and the head of school joined this school shortly before the previous inspection. Since then, you have acted quickly and robustly to improve its provision. You have rightly identified the actions needed to address the next steps from the previous inspection report. You have ensured that all staff understand the rationale for these actions and have built a team around you that fully supports the school’s improvement journey. There is a real sense of everyone working together to achieve the same goal.
p.1
Main findings
You have prioritised designing and implementing well-sequenced curriculums for English and mathematics. You recognise that, first and foremost, pupils must have every opportunity to achieve well in these subjects. You have worked hard to improve teachers’ knowledge of how to teach these subjects effectively. You are confident that this work is already having an impact on pupils’ success.
p.2
Main findings
Furthermore, you have made strides in embedding the teaching of phonics and early reading. The school is clear that all pupils need to develop secure phonics knowledge as swiftly as possible. Phonics is taught using a consistent and well-structured approach. Generally, this is delivered securely, although there are still some inconsistencies in phonics teaching. When learning to read, pupils now read books that match their phonics knowledge. This means that they can practise reading with confidence and fluency. You have ensured that the weakest readers are identified quickly. Generally, weaker readers are supported well to catch up quickly. However, sometimes, staff do not completely understand the purpose of one-to-one reading support. When this is the case, pupils are not given sufficient time to apply their phonics knowledge and to practise reading. You are aware that all staff will benefit from additional, high-quality training to ensure that the
p.2
Main findings
teaching of reading is consistent across the school.
p.2
Main findings
The school has high ambition for all pupils to learn a broad and balanced curriculum and achieve well. To help achieve this ambition, you have designed a carefully considered curriculum. This is at varying stages of development. For most subjects, the curriculum content is sequenced in a sensible order from Reception to Year 6. You have also given thought to how the Nursery curriculum feeds into this sequence. However, what children must learn in Nursery so that they develop the required prior knowledge and skills for their future learning is not yet completely clear. You have rightly recognised that this is something that the school needs to clarify.
p.2
Main findings
You have made a strong start in identifying the important knowledge that pupils must learn in each subject. This work is well on its way. However, you are aware that further work is needed to refine the curriculum content in subjects other than English and mathematics. In many subjects, the curriculum content often lacks sufficient precision. Statements identifying what pupils must know are often very broad and, therefore, it is not always clear exactly what pupils must learn to be ready for their next steps. This can lead to pupils developing gaps in their understanding that make future learning more difficult. The school now needs to refine the curriculum so that it clarifies the precise knowledge and skills pupils must know and remember. This will ensure that pupils can make connections in their learning and deepen their understanding over time.
p.2
Main findings
The school’s work to develop staff’s subject knowledge is well underway. You have made sensible and appropriate use of local subject networks and local authority support to build staff’s expertise. You have also taken steps to develop leadership capacity across the school, prioritising the development of the leaders for English and mathematics. However, you are committed to developing subject leaders’ and staff’s knowledge for all aspects of the curriculum. You have a clear and carefully considered plan of action to achieve this over the coming year.
p.2
Main findings
Governors know the school well. They have a clear understanding of the school’s strengths and weaknesses and are working effectively with you to continue to improve the school. Systems for checking the impact of the school’s work help to assure governors that the actions taken to improve provision are the right actions.
p.3
Main findings
The school clearly recognises that the pace of improvement needs to be swift. However, you have also been mindful of staff’s workload. You have introduced developments in a sensible order at a rate that does not overload staff. This has given them the chance to build their practice securely. This approach is already showing some impact on the quality of curriculum implementation across the school. You are very mindful of staff’s workload and well-being. Staff appreciate the measures that have been put in place to support them to do their job well without unrealistic demands on their time or energy.
p.3
Main findings
I am copying this letter to the chair of governors, the director of education for the Roman Catholic Diocese of Portsmouth, the Department for Education’s regional director and the director of children’s services for the Isle of Wight. This letter will be published on the Ofsted reports website.
p.3
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion