Schools & FE · School inspection (EIF)
Langley Fitzurse Church of England Primary School
Summary
Victoria Griffin (lead), Catherine Beeks
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection date verified
11 Jul 2024
- Inspectors verified
Catherine Beeks, Victoria Griffin
- Behaviour and attitudes verified
Good
- Early years verified
Good
- Leadership and management verified
Good
- Overall effectiveness verified
Good
- Personal development verified
Good
- Quality of education verified
Good
- Postcode verified
SN15 5NN
- Name on report verified
Langley Fitzurse Church of England Primary School
- URN verified
126334
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2018.
- OverallGood
- Behaviour and attitudesGood
- Early yearsGood
- Leadership and managementGood
- Personal developmentGood
- Quality of educationGood
66% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Good (5,043 inspections).
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type graded Good.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No strong criticism found.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Teaching & assessment3
“Assessment is not always used precisely and effectively.” p.3Behaviour3
“Bullying is extremely rare.” p.2
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 7
- Words of findings
- 989
- about usual (typical 1098)
- Reading level
- Fairly hard
- Flesch 53, typical 55
- Average sentence
- 13 words
- Next steps
- 1
- typical 4
- Hedged sentences
- 13%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Inspection of Langley Fitzurse Church of England Primary School Middle Common, Kington Langley, Chippenham, Wiltshire SN15 5NN
p.1
Overall effectiveness Good
The quality of education Good Behaviour and attitudes Good Personal development Good Leadership and management Good Early years provision Good Previous inspection grade Good 10 and 11 July 2024
p.1
What is it like to attend this school?
Pupils at the school are happy and well-cared for. They behave well. Strong foundations are laid when children join in Reception class. As a result, the school is calm and orderly. Pupils show high levels of respect for staff and their peers. They are kind and listen well to others’ views. Staff know every pupil well. Pupils, including children in Reception, learn how to recognise their feelings and ask for help when needed. They are confident and resilient. Bullying is extremely rare. Pupils know there are trusted adults to help them resolve their differences.
p.2
What is it like to attend this school?
The curriculum at the school is broad and ambitious. Most pupils achieve well. They are enthusiastic about the books they have read. Pupils read widely and often. They have a secure knowledge of mathematical concepts. Pupils know that they can learn from mistakes.
p.2
What is it like to attend this school?
Pupils’ broader development is embedded into school life. The school ensures that every pupil takes part in a range of extra-curricular activities. These include contributing to the wider community, learning first aid, participating in entrepreneurial endeavours, attending live performances and taking part in charity events.
p.2
better?
The school has planned its curriculum carefully, including for mixed-age classes. Most pupils achieve well in reading, writing and mathematics. This is because the most important knowledge pupils need has been broken down carefully. Pupils build on this over time. The school has ensured that staff have received appropriate training in these areas. The school’s wider curriculum is ambitious for all pupils. Most of the time, the work that pupils complete enables them to learn effectively. Pupils enjoy their learning and most retain what they have learned.
p.2
better?
There is a sharp focus on pupils who are at the early stages of reading. The school has successfully improved its phonics provision, which is now successful. This means pupils, including children in the early years, get off to a strong start in reading. Pupils who struggle to keep up are given additional support. Staff are well-trained in the school’s phonics programme.
p.2
better?
Children in Reception enjoy their learning. Their emotional and social development is prioritised. The school establishes strong routines, which support children’s well- being. Children learn particularly effectively during time that is directed by staff. They play with purpose and sustained attention. This is because activities are carefully designed.
p.2
better?
In some subjects, the school has not established how they will check that all pupils are learning what is intended. This means that the school cannot assure itself that all pupils are learning what has been planned. In Reception, the school does not systematically check all children’s learning. Nevertheless, the majority of children achieve a good level of development. 10 and 11 July 2024
p.2
3
The school has introduced a new system to improve the way pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND) are identified and supported. This work is in its early stages, and not used consistently effectively to monitor progression through the curriculum. However, pupils with SEND are mostly well-supported in lessons, including with additional adults, when needed.
p.3
3
Staffing challenges at the school mean that the oversight of some areas of its work has not been sufficiently robust. However, local governance is strong. Governors know the school well and have supported leaders to make sensible decisions around these challenges. They have maintained the quality of education for pupils. They have strong systems in place to drive improvements where they are needed.
p.3
3
Pupils behave well in lessons. Low-level disruption is extremely rare. Playtimes are well-supervised and pupils enjoy a plethora of activities and sports. Pupils have a secure knowledge of the British values, which they learn about in assemblies. They have time to reflect on what these values mean for them and the wider world. For example, older pupils talk meaningfully about democracy and the rule of law. They enjoy voting for their school council members. The school prepares pupils well for life in modern Britain. They describe their school as respectful and tolerant. The school’s personal, social and health education curriculum ensures that pupils learn how to keep themselves safe and healthy, including online.
p.3
3
Music is a strength of the school. All pupils have the opportunity to learn a musical instrument, and many choose to take additional lessons. The school ensures that pupils who are disadvantaged are also able to access these.
p.3
Safeguarding
The arrangements for safeguarding are effective.
p.3
(Information for the school and appropriate authority)
The school does not check the impact of the curriculum effectively. This means that the school does not always have an accurate picture of whether the curriculum is enacted as intended, including for some pupils with SEND. The school must support leaders to effectively monitor their areas of responsibility, so that curriculum implementation is consistently effective. Assessment is not always used precisely and effectively. Sometimes teaching does not routinely check that all pupils understand before introducing new content, or deepening pupils’ understanding. The school must sharpen its approach to assessment to ensure that all pupils learn the intended curriculum. 10 and 11 July 2024
p.3
How can I feed back my views?
or to find out what other parents and carers think. We use information from Ofsted Parent View when deciding which schools to inspect, when to inspect them and as part of their inspection.
p.4
How can I feed back my views?
The Department for Education has further guidance on how to complain about a school.
p.4
Further information
You can search for published performance information about the school.
p.4
Further information
In the report, 'disadvantaged pupils' is used to mean pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND); pupils who meet the definition of children in need of help and protection ; pupils receiving statutory local authority support from a social worker; and pupils who otherwise meet the criteria used for deciding the school's pupil premium funding (this includes pupils claiming free school meals at any point in the last six years, looked after children (children in local authority care) and/or children who left care through adoption or another formal route). 10 and 11 July 2024
p.4
School details
Appropriate authority The governing body
p.5
School details
Website www.langleyfitzurse.wilts.sch.uk
p.5
School details
Date(s) of previous inspection 5 December 2018, under section 8 of the Education Act 2005
p.5
Information about this school
The school is a smaller than average primary school. The school is one of two schools which form the Langley Fitzurse Stanton St Quintin Federation. The school is designated as having a religious character. The school is in the Dio- cese of Bristol. At the most recent section 48 inspection of the school, carried out in June 2023, the school was judged to be good. The school uses one alternative provision.
p.5
Information about this inspection
The inspector(s) carried out this graded inspection under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.
p.5
Information about this inspection
Inspections are a point-in-time judgement about the quality of a school’s educa- tion provision. This was the first routine inspection the school received since the COVID-19 pan- demic began. Inspectors discussed the impact of the pandemic with the school and have taken that into account in their evaluation of the school. 10 and 11 July 2024
p.5
6
Inspectors carried out deep dives in these subjects: early reading, mathematics and music. For each deep dive, inspectors held discussions about the curriculum, visited a sample of lessons, spoke to teachers, spoke to some pupils about their learning and looked at samples of pupils’ work. The lead inspector also looked at the wider curriculum in science and history. Inspectors analysed responses to Ofsted’s online survey, Ofsted Parent View. Inspectors also considered the responses of staff to Ofsted’s online survey. Inspectors spoke with groups of pupils during lessons and social times. To evaluate the effectiveness of safeguarding, the lead inspector: reviewed the single central record; took account of the views of leaders, staff and pupils; and considered the extent to which the school has created an open and positive cul- ture around safeguarding that puts pupils’ interests first. The lead met with the special educational needs and disabilities coordinator and
p.6
6
discussed how pupils with SEND are identified and supported. Inspectors met with staff who oversee the personal development and behaviour of pupils. The lead inspector met with members of the governing body and representatives from the local authority.
p.6
Inspection team
Victoria Griffin, lead inspector His Majesty's Inspector
p.6
Inspection team
Catherine Beeks Ofsted Inspector 10 and 11 July 2024
p.6
7
regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children's services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.
p.7
7
If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .
p.7
7
You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .
p.7
7
Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .
p.7
7
T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted
p.7
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion