Schools & FE · School inspection (EIF)
Hackness Church of England Voluntary Controlled Primary School
Summary
Matthew Harrington (lead), John Downs
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection date verified
10 Jul 2024
- Inspectors verified
John Downs, Matthew Harrington
- Behaviour and attitudes verified
Good
- Early years verified
Good
- Leadership and management verified
Good
- Overall effectiveness verified
Requires improvement
- Personal development verified
Good
- Quality of education verified
Requires improvement
- Postcode verified
YO13 0JN
- Name on report verified
Hackness Church of England Voluntary Controlled Primary School
- URN verified
121497
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2022.
- OverallRequires improvement
- Behaviour and attitudesGood
- Early yearsGood
- Leadership and managementGood
- Personal developmentGood
- Quality of educationRequires improvement
15% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Requires improvement (5,043 inspections).
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
Reads more warmly than most reports of this type graded Requires improvement.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- It has clearly identified the knowledge and skills that pupils must learn. p.2
- It has carefully considered what children need to know and experience by the time they move into Year 1. p.3
- The school should support teachers to develop strategies to enable pupils to understand and retain the most important subject knowledge. p.4
- The school should ensure that teachers systematically check what pupils know and understand, enabling teachers to respond to individual pupils’ needs appropriately. p.4
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Progress & outcomes4
“As pupils progress through the school, most develop a love of reading.” p.3Parents & families3
“Pupils, parents and carers value the school’s family friendly ethos.” p.2
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 7
- Words of findings
- 1,159
- about usual (typical 1215)
- Reading level
- Fairly hard
- Flesch 53, typical 56
- Average sentence
- 15 words
- Next steps
- 4
- typical 5
- Hedged sentences
- 14%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Inspection of Hackness Church of England Voluntary Controlled Primary School Hackness, Scarborough, North Yorkshire YO13 0JN
p.1
Overall effectiveness Requires improvement
The quality of education Requires improvement Behaviour and attitudes Good Personal development Good Leadership and management Good Early years provision Good Previous inspection grade Requires improvement School, 9 and 10 July 2024
p.1
What is it like to attend this school?
Pupils, parents and carers value the school’s family friendly ethos. New pupils to the school settle quickly. They are soon made to feel welcome. Older pupils are excellent role models to those in younger year groups. Year 6 pupils enjoy being buddies to children in Reception. They carry out these and other roles, such as worship ambassadors and librarians, responsibly.
p.2
What is it like to attend this school?
Pupils benefit from school visits that enable them to experience different cultures and faiths. Regular opportunities to work with local schools, including the partner school in the federation, build pupils’ confidence to meet and work with others.
p.2
What is it like to attend this school?
The school’s high expectations of pupils, including those with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND), are beginning to be realised. By the end of their time in school, most pupils achieve well in reading, writing and mathematics. While this is encouraging, there remains work to do to continue to embed the recently developed curriculum and achieve consistency across the school.
p.2
What is it like to attend this school?
Those associated with the school recognise the improvements that have been made. Pupils know what is expected of them in class and around school. They conduct themselves in a positive and friendly manner. Classrooms are calm and settled places that support pupils’ learning. Pupils told inspectors that they like the clarity they now have in the use of rewards and consequences. Most pupils attend school regularly and on time. They benefit from being in school. As a result of the school’s implementation of a consistent approach to monitoring absence, rates of attendance are high for most pupils.
p.2
better?
The school is working to improve the quality of the curriculum. It has clearly identified the knowledge and skills that pupils must learn. In some subjects, the school has introduced commercial schemes. It has made appropriate adaptations to these to meet the needs of pupils at the school, including for those pupils in mixed- aged classes.
p.2
better?
The school has focused on improving the curriculum in reading, writing and mathematics. This is having a positive impact on pupils’ learning. Consequently, most pupils, including those with SEND, achieve well in these subjects. The school recognises that there remain inconsistencies in the delivery of parts of the curriculum, particularly in foundation subjects. Where the curriculum is less developed, pupils do not build on what they have previously learned as effectively as they might.
p.2
better?
Teachers demonstrate confidence in their subject knowledge. However, in some subjects, teachers do not break learning down within lessons as much as they could. When this is the case, pupils do not understand the concepts that are being taught sufficiently well. School, 9 and 10 July 2024
p.2
3
Teachers check what pupils know and remember at the beginning and end of units of work. Within lessons, teachers do not routinely check pupils’ understanding of concepts they are being taught. This means that pupils are sometimes given work that is too difficult for them.
p.3
3
The school has ensured that there are clear processes to identify the needs of pupils with SEND. Strategies to support these pupils in their learning are shared with staff and parents, and reviewed regularly. Teachers make suitable adaptations to pupils’ learning, such as providing alternative ways for pupils to record their answers.
p.3
3
Pupils benefit from a consistent approach to the teaching of reading. They read books that are matched to their phonics knowledge. The school appropriately supports pupils who are at risk of falling behind in reading. Over time, pupils read with increasing fluency and accuracy. Pupils in Reception and key stage 1 are enthusiastic about learning to read. As pupils progress through the school, most develop a love of reading. The school’s new library is a stimulating environment to support and promote reading to pupils.
p.3
3
The school has significantly developed and improved the early years curriculum. It has carefully considered what children need to know and experience by the time they move into Year 1. Adults make effective use of opportunities to promote children’s communication and language knowledge. Adults ensure that the classroom and outside areas enable children to apply what they have learned in a practical context. Children develop high levels of independence and positive attitudes to their learning. They are curious about what they are doing and are eager to try new ideas. This prepares children well for key stage 1.
p.3
3
The personal, social and health education (PSHE) curriculum supports pupils to learn how to keep themselves safe, including online. Acts of worship, PSHE and other curriculum lessons provide times for pupils to reflect on what they have learned and how this impacts on their own life. During the inspection, pupils shared with an inspector what they had learned about the Windrush. They reflected on the meaning of racism and its impact on society.
p.3
3
Leaders, including those with responsibility for governance, have ensured that staff receive regular, high-quality training to support their practice. The school routinely checks that the actions taken to improve the school are having the intended impact. This way of working is now firmly established. Governors check that what leaders tell them aligns with what they observe in visits to the school and in reports by external advisers. Governors provide an appropriate level of challenge and support. Leaders are aware of the demands on staff within this small school. They have worked with staff to reduce additional and unnecessary workload.
p.3
Safeguarding
The arrangements for safeguarding are effective. School, 9 and 10 July 2024
p.3
(Information for the school and appropriate authority)
Teachers do not consistently break learning down sufficiently well to enable pupils to develop and remember important knowledge. In some subjects, pupils do not develop the knowledge they need for later learning. The school should support teachers to develop strategies to enable pupils to understand and retain the most important subject knowledge. Within lessons, teachers do not routinely check pupils’ understanding of what they have been taught. Some pupils are given work that does not accurately meet their needs. The school should ensure that teachers systematically check what pupils know and understand, enabling teachers to respond to individual pupils’ needs appropriately.
p.4
How can I feed back my views?
or to find out what other parents and carers think. We use information from Ofsted Parent View when deciding which schools to inspect, when to inspect them and as part of their inspection.
p.4
How can I feed back my views?
The Department for Education has further guidance on how to complain about a school.
p.4
Further information
You can search for published performance information about the school.
p.4
Further information
In the report, ‘disadvantaged pupils’ is used to mean pupils with SEND; pupils who meet the definition of children in need of help and protection ; pupils receiving statutory local authority support from a social worker; and pupils who otherwise meet the criteria used for deciding the school’s pupil premium funding (this includes pupils claiming free school meals at any point in the last six years, looked after children (children in local authority care) and/or children who left care through adoption or another formal route). School, 9 and 10 July 2024
p.4
School details
Appropriate authority The governing body
p.5
School details
Chair of governing body Tracy Shepherdson
p.5
School details
Headteacher Janet Spittal (executive headteacher)
p.5
School details
Website www.hacknesswykehamcefederation.co.uk
p.5
School details
Dates of previous inspection 14 and 15 June 2022, under section 5 of the Education Act 2005
p.5
Information about this school
The school is part of the Hackness and Wykeham Church of England Schools Federation. The headteacher is the executive headteacher for both schools in the federation. Since the school’s last inspection, there have been several changes to the staff team. The school is part of the Church of England Diocese of York. The school’s most recent section 48 inspection was in July 2024. The school is much smaller than the average-sized primary school. The proportion of pupils with SEND is well above the national average. The school runs a breakfast and after-school club. The school does not use any alternative provision.
p.5
Information about this inspection
The inspectors carried out this graded inspection under section 5 of the Education Act 2005. School, 9 and 10 July 2024
p.5
6
Inspections are a point-in-time judgement about the quality of a school’s education provision.
p.6
6
Inspectors discussed any continued impact of the pandemic with the school and have taken that into account in their evaluations of the school. Inspectors spoke to the headteacher and deputy headteacher. Inspectors carried out deep dives in these subjects: early reading, mathematics and computing. For each deep dive, inspectors held discussions about the curriculum, visited a sample of lessons, spoke to teachers, spoke to some pupils about their learning and looked at samples of pupils’ work. Inspectors also reviewed work in other subjects. To evaluate the effectiveness of safeguarding, the inspector: reviewed the single central record; took account of the views of leaders, staff and pupils; and considered the extent to which the school has created an open and positive culture around safeguarding that puts pupils’ interests first. An inspector visited the after-school club provision. Separate meetings were held with representatives from the school’s governing
p.6
6
body, the school’s improvement partner from the local authority and the deputy director of education from the Diocese of York. Inspectors spoke to parents and considered responses to Ofsted’s parent survey, Ofsted Parent View. Ofsted’s staff and pupil surveys were also reviewed.
p.6
Inspection team
Matthew Harrington, lead inspector His Majesty’s Inspector
p.6
Inspection team
John Downs Ofsted Inspector School, 9 and 10 July 2024
p.6
7
and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for looked after children, safeguarding and child protection.
p.7
7
If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .
p.7
7
You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .
p.7
7
Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .
p.7
7
T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted
p.7
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion