Schools & FE · School inspection (EIF)
Langley Park Primary School
Summary
Lisa Ponter (lead), Gemma Jeynes
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection date verified
26 Jun 2024
- Inspectors verified
Gemma Jeynes, Lisa Ponter
- Behaviour and attitudes verified
Good
- Early years verified
Good
- Leadership and management verified
Requires improvement
- Overall effectiveness verified
Requires improvement
- Personal development verified
Good
- Quality of education verified
Requires improvement
- Postcode verified
DH7 9XN
- Name on report verified
Langley Park Primary School
- URN verified
148874
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Each judgement on its scale, weakest to strongest.
- OverallRequires improvement
- Behaviour and attitudesGood
- Early yearsGood
- Leadership and managementRequires improvement
- Personal developmentGood
- Quality of educationRequires improvement
15% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Requires improvement (5,043 inspections).
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type graded Requires improvement.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No strong criticism found.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Previous inspection grade Not previously inspected under section 5 of the Education Act 2005 p.1
- The headteacher of this school is Daniel Walton. p.1
- This school is part of the Stanley Learning Partnership, which means other people in the trust also have responsibility for running the school. p.1
- The trust is run by the chief executive officer (CEO), Mark Stewart, and overseen by a board of trustees, chaired by Tom Harpe. 25 and 26 June 2024 p.1
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Leadership & governance8
“Leaders have designed an ambitious curriculum.” p.2Progress & outcomes6
“Staff have high expectations for all pupils’ achievement.” p.2
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 7
- Words of findings
- 1,233
- about usual (typical 1215)
- Reading level
- Fairly hard
- Flesch 55, typical 56
- Average sentence
- 15 words
- Next steps
- 4
- typical 5
- Hedged sentences
- 14%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Inspection of Langley Park Primary School Langley Park, Durham, County Durham DH7 9XN
p.1
Overall effectiveness Requires improvement
The quality of education Requires improvement Behaviour and attitudes Good Personal development Good Leadership and management Requires improvement Early years provision Good
p.1
Overall effectiveness Requires improvement
Previous inspection grade Not previously inspected under section 5 of the Education Act 2005
p.1
Overall effectiveness Requires improvement
The headteacher of this school is Daniel Walton. This school is part of the Stanley Learning Partnership, which means other people in the trust also have responsibility for running the school. The trust is run by the chief executive officer (CEO), Mark Stewart, and overseen by a board of trustees, chaired by Tom Harpe. 25 and 26 June 2024
p.1
What is it like to attend this school?
Langley Park Primary School is a nurturing school that provides an inclusive place for pupils to learn. Pupils feel happy and safe. Staff care deeply for the pupils and help them to develop independence and resilience.
p.2
What is it like to attend this school?
Staff have high expectations for all pupils’ achievement. Leaders have designed an ambitious curriculum. However, these ambitions are not fully realised because some parts of the curriculum are not implemented as intended. As a result, pupils do not achieve as well as they should.
p.2
What is it like to attend this school?
Pupils behave well. They are tolerant and acknowledge that everyone is different. Pupils develop a deep understanding of equality and treat everyone as an equal. Bullying rarely happens. Staff swiftly deal with it if it does. Pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND) fully access all aspects of school life.
p.2
What is it like to attend this school?
The school enriches its curriculum with a range of trips and visits. Pupils recall these with enthusiasm and look forward to opportunities to visit other countries, such as a skiing trip to France. Staff ensure that everyone has equal access to opportunities that build confidence and resilience.
p.2
better?
The school benefits from comprehensive support from the trust. This has led to recent improvements in the support for pupils with SEND and in the provision in the early years. However, there is more that the school needs to do to ensure that all pupils benefit from a high-quality education across all subjects.
p.2
better?
Since the previous inspection, leaders have continued to develop the curriculum. The important knowledge that pupils should learn has been carefully identified. However, some of the key knowledge set out in the curriculum is not taught in sufficient depth. The reasons for this are varied. In some cases, the school has not ensured that staff have the subject knowledge that they need to deliver the curriculum as intended. For example, in mathematics, staff do not provide pupils with enough opportunities to apply their mathematical knowledge to solve problems. In other cases, some staff do not teach parts of the curriculum. Some subjects are not taught as regularly as they should be. Consequently, pupils develop gaps in their knowledge.
p.2
better?
The school has prioritised early reading. Teachers benefit from effective training in phonics and deliver the curriculum for early reading consistently. Pupils learn phonics as soon as they start school. In reading, teachers check what pupils know and remember. Those pupils who find it difficult to read benefit from extra support. Staff ensure that pupils routinely practise and embed effective reading techniques. As a result, pupils develop fluency and accuracy in reading. 25 and 26 June 2024
p.2
3
With the ongoing support of the trust, the school ensures that the needs of pupils with SEND are quickly identified. Staff work with outside agencies to advise on the most appropriate support for these pupils. Expectations for pupils with SEND are high. Staff successfully support pupils with SEND and help them to make progress.
p.3
3
Children make a great start to their education in the early years. Staff have a good understanding of children’s needs. There is a clear emphasis on improving children’s vocabulary. The carefully organised environment promotes language and communication. Adults support children effectively by asking them questions to promote their thinking and encouraging them to use the new words that they are learning. Children are eager to learn and share their learning with confidence and enthusiasm. When writing, many have secured the basic letter formation they need to write successfully.
p.3
3
Pupils enjoy coming to this school. They have positive attitudes to their learning. Pupils behave well in lessons and actively support each other in class. They greet visitors with smiles, ask how they are and hold open doors. There is a deeply respectful culture here. However, overall rates of absence are high and the number of pupils who are persistently absent is also high. While the school takes some steps to improve individual pupils’ attendance, the systems to monitor and improve overall attendance are not as robust as they could be. As a result, rates of absence and persistent absence remain higher than the national average. Too many pupils miss out on important learning.
p.3
3
The school’s personal development curriculum supports pupils to be well prepared for life in modern Britain. Pupils learn about healthy relationships and how to stay safe online. They contribute positively to school life; for example, the school council is involved in decisions to improve the school. Their peers vote on the suggestions it offers.
p.3
3
Leaders, including governors, have not monitored the impact of the curriculum carefully. The school has not recognised that some aspects of the curriculum are not implemented as intended. As a result, the school does not have an accurate view of the progress being made towards improving the quality of education. Staff work well together as a team and are proud to work at the school. They feel well supported by leaders, especially around workload. The school engages with parents and carers well and most say that they would recommend the school.
p.3
Safeguarding
The arrangements for safeguarding are effective. 25 and 26 June 2024
p.3
(Information for the school and appropriate authority)
In some subjects, some of the explanations of teachers or the activities they choose do not help pupils to learn and remember the content set out in the curriculum. As a result, pupils do not achieve as well as they should. Leaders should work with staff to develop their subject and pedagogical knowledge. In some subjects, the school does not check to ensure that the curriculum is implemented as intended. The school has not recognised that in some subjects, some aspects of the curriculum have not been taught and, therefore, pupils have gaps in their knowledge. The school, including those responsible for governance, should ensure that the intended curriculum is taught and that pupils learn and remember the content the school identifies as important for them to know. Rates of absence and persistent absence are high. Pupils are missing out on important learning. Leaders have achieved an improvement but must strengthen
p.4
(Information for the school and appropriate authority)
their approach to reducing absence, especially for disadvantaged pupils.
p.4
How can I feed back my views?
or to find out what other parents and carers think. We use information from Ofsted Parent View when deciding which schools to inspect, when to inspect them and as part of their inspection.
p.4
How can I feed back my views?
The Department for Education has further guidance on how to complain about a school.
p.4
Further information
You can search for published performance information about the school.
p.4
Further information
In the report, ‘disadvantaged pupils’ is used to mean pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND); pupils who meet the definition of children in need of help and protection ; pupils receiving statutory local authority support from a social worker; and pupils who otherwise meet the criteria used for deciding the school’s pupil premium funding (this includes pupils claiming free school meals at any point in the last six years, looked after children (children in local authority care) and/or children who left care through adoption or another formal route). 25 and 26 June 2024
p.4
School details
Website www.langleyparkprimaryschool.co.uk
p.5
School details
Date of previous inspection Not previously inspected
p.5
Information about this school
Langley Park Primary School is part of the Stanley Learning Partnership. There are nine other schools in the trust. The school converted to become an academy in April 2022. When its predecessor school, Langley Park Primary School, was last inspected by Ofsted, it was judged to be requires improvement overall. There is an on-site breakfast club and after-school club. The school uses no alternative providers.
p.5
Information about this inspection
The inspectors carried out this graded inspection under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.
p.5
Information about this inspection
Inspections are a point-in-time judgement about the quality of a school’s education provision. 25 and 26 June 2024
p.5
6
This was the first routine inspection the school received since the COVID-19 pandemic began. The inspectors discussed the impact of the pandemic with the school and have taken that into account in their evaluation of the school. The inspectors met with all senior leaders, a number of teaching and support staff, governors, the CEO, the trust director of education, trustees and governors. The inspectors carried out deep dives in these subjects: early reading, mathematics and geography. For each deep dive, inspectors held discussions about the curriculum, visited a sample of lessons, spoke to teachers, spoke to some pupils about their learning and looked at samples of pupils’ work. Inspectors considered a range of other subject documentation and spoke to leaders of these subjects. Inspector scrutinised a range of other documents, including leaders’ evaluation of the school and priorities for school improvement.
p.6
6
To evaluate the effectiveness of safeguarding, the inspectors: reviewed the single central record; took account of the views of leaders, staff and pupils; and considered the extent to which the school has created an open and positive culture around safeguarding that puts pupils’ interests first. The inspectors took account of the views of pupils, staff and parents, as gathered through discussions and Ofsted’s surveys.
p.6
Inspection team
Lisa Ponter, lead inspector His Majesty’s Inspector
p.6
Inspection team
Gemma Jeynes Ofsted Inspector 25 and 26 June 2024
p.6
7
regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.
p.7
7
If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .
p.7
7
You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .
p.7
7
Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .
p.7
7
T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted
p.7
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion