Schools & FE · School inspection (EIF)
Kea Community Primary School
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection date verified
10 Jul 2024
- Inspectors verified
Matthew Barnes
- Postcode verified
TR3 6AY
- Name on report verified
Kea Community Primary School
- URN verified
111861
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- However, leaders are rightly keen to ensure that pupils’ learning is consistently strong across all subjects. p.1
- They are working collaboratively to secure leaders’ clear vision to ensure that pupils’ learning is robust and consistent. p.1
- Consequently, pupils make very strong progress in their reading and learn to love stories and books. p.2
- Staff follow leaders’ high expectations for pupils. p.1
- Leaders use assessment very well to ensure pupils stay on track. p.2
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Teachers ensure that pupils focus on the sounds they need to learn. p.2
- The school should improve the use of assessment to ensure that pupils embed new knowledge and fix misconceptions before moving on to new concepts. p.3
- As a result, when asked to apply their knowledge in more complex tasks, pupils do not have the security they need to do this as well as they should. p.2
- The school should continue its work on ensuring pupils’ learning is robust and consistent across all subjects so that more pupils reach their full potential. p.3
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Teaching & assessment9
“Leaders use assessment very well to ensure pupils stay on track.” p.2
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 6
- Words of findings
- 1,178
- about usual (typical 1153)
- Reading level
- Fairly hard
- Flesch 52, typical 55
- Average sentence
- 16 words
- Next steps
- 4
- typical 4
- Hedged sentences
- 5%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Inspection of a good school: Kea Community Primary School Kea, Truro, Cornwall TR3 6AY
p.1
Outcome
Kea Community Primary School continues to be a good school.
p.1
What is it like to attend this school?
Pupils learn happily and with increasing success at this friendly community school. They benefit from a carefully designed, improving curriculum. Provision for pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND) is carefully tailored to meet their needs. Pupils of all abilities and backgrounds are included in all elements of school life. Collectively, this all means pupils learn well and harmoniously together. They are well prepared for the transition to secondary school by the end of key stage 2.
p.1
What is it like to attend this school?
Staff follow leaders’ high expectations for pupils. They secure positive relationships with and between pupils. As a result, pupils behave well and are respectful. Occasionally, more could be expected of pupils in lessons. Bullying is very rare and, when it does happen, is dealt with effectively. Sensible adjustments are made for those with SEND. Low-level disruption is very rare.
p.1
What is it like to attend this school?
Pupils recognise how staff help them to love to learn, be good citizens and consider the world of work. For example, pupils are positive about the increased opportunities to learn outside in the school’s extensive grounds. They like the way they can shine in school productions, undertake leadership opportunities and develop independence when on residential visits.
p.1
What does the school do well and what does it need to do better?
The school has been in a period of transition lately, with the appointment of a new headteacher and deputy headteacher. They have worked together determinedly to build on the strengths and improve the school systematically and with high ambition. This ambition is being increasingly realised in the improving curriculum. An historic fall in standards has already been addressed. However, leaders are rightly keen to ensure that pupils’ learning is consistently strong across all subjects.
p.1
What does the school do well and what does it need to do better?
Leaders have secured the commitment of staff. They are working collaboratively to secure leaders’ clear vision to ensure that pupils’ learning is robust and consistent. Together, they 9 and 10 July 2024
p.1
2
are developing a more effective curriculum. Leaders develop staff to be skilled, whatever their role. Staff benefit from considered opportunities to improve their practice. This has helped ensure that the implementation of the curriculum is strengthening considerably, including in Reception. For example, teachers use planning to promote pupils’ learning across subjects in increasingly meaningful ways. As a result, pupils, including those with SEND, secure knowledge with increasing accuracy.
p.2
2
Nevertheless, the school rightly acknowledges there is more to do. For example, in history, pupils’ understanding of how to use evidence to make judgements about the past could be better. Pupils enjoy learning history. They know when events happened and how periods of time relate to each other. However, they do not learn to question the evidence they look at to understand its reliability.
p.2
2
Similarly, the use of assessment has improved, but could still be more impactful. Teachers use assessment well during key points across the academic year, including in Reception. They use this information to identify pupils who are on track and those who need extra support to catch up. However, teachers are less adept at checking pupils’ learning systematically in lessons. This means, occasionally, pupils have gaps in their knowledge or misconceptions that are not addressed before they move on to new learning. As a result, when asked to apply their knowledge in more complex tasks, pupils do not have the security they need to do this as well as they should.
p.2
2
Leaders give reading the highest priority. They have established a curriculum that ensures all pupils can learn and enjoy reading. From the moment they start in Reception, children learn the routines that are used in the robust programme for learning phonics that is securely in place. Consequently, children learn their sounds rapidly in Reception and as they move into key stage 1. Leaders use assessment very well to ensure pupils stay on track. Teachers ensure that pupils focus on the sounds they need to learn. Books taken home match very well the sounds pupils know. Consequently, pupils make very strong progress in their reading and learn to love stories and books.
p.2
2
Opportunities in the curriculum to promote pupils’ personal development are plentiful. Staff do this very effectively. For example, assemblies and trips are used to promote an understanding of life in modern Britain. Trips and visits help pupils to appreciate their locality and their contribution to it. All pupils, including those with SEND, are included in all parts of school life. This helps them to feel valued members of this increasingly aspirational school community.
p.2
Safeguarding
The arrangements for safeguarding are effective.
p.2
3
The school’s work to improve the impact of the curriculum is more secure in some subjects than others. This means that, although improving, pupils do not retain key knowledge as well as they could, particularly by the end of key stage 2. The school should continue its work on ensuring pupils’ learning is robust and consistent across all subjects so that more pupils reach their full potential. The use of assessment does not consistently help teachers check that pupils have secured new knowledge in their long-term memory. This means that sometimes pupils move on to new learning before they are ready. The school should improve the use of assessment to ensure that pupils embed new knowledge and fix misconceptions before moving on to new concepts.
p.3
Background
When we have judged a school to be good, we will then normally go into the school about once every four years to confirm that the school remains good. This is called an ungraded inspection, and it is carried out under section 8 of the Education Act 2005. We do not give graded judgements on an ungraded inspection. However, if we find evidence that a school would now receive a higher or lower grade, then the next inspection will be a graded inspection, which is carried out under section 5 of the Act. Usually this is within one to two years of the date of the ungraded inspection. If we have serious concerns about safeguarding, behaviour or the quality of education, we will deem the ungraded inspection a graded inspection immediately.
p.3
Background
This is the first ungraded inspection since we judged the school to be good in February 2019.
p.3
How can I feed back my views?
find out what other parents and carers think. We use information from Ofsted Parent View when deciding which schools to inspect, when to inspect them and as part of their inspection.
p.3
How can I feed back my views?
The Department for Education has further guidance on how to complain about a school.
p.3
Further information
You can search for published performance information about the school.
p.3
Further information
In the report, ‘disadvantaged pupils’ is used to mean pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND); pupils who meet the definition of children in need of help and protection ; pupils receiving statutory local authority support from a social worker; and pupils who otherwise meet the criteria used for deciding the school’s pupil premium funding (this includes pupils claiming free school meals at any point in the last six years, looked after children (children in local authority care) and/or children who left care through adoption or another formal route). 9 and 10 July 2024
p.3
School details
Appropriate authority The governing body
p.4
School details
Dates of previous inspection 12 and 13 February 2019, under section 5 of the Education Act 2005
p.4
Information about this school
Since the last inspection, a new headteacher and deputy headteacher have been appointed. The school does not use alternative provision.
p.4
Information about this inspection
The inspector carried out this ungraded inspection under section 8 of the Education Act 2005.
p.4
Information about this inspection
Inspections are a point-in-time judgement about the quality of a school’s education provision. This was the first routine inspection the school received since the COVID-19 pandemic began. The inspector discussed the impact of the pandemic with the school and has taken that into account in their evaluation of the school. The inspector met with leaders, including the headteacher, deputy headteacher and well-being lead. 9 and 10 July 2024
p.4
5
The inspector spoke to an independent consultant who acts as a school improvement advisor to the school. They also met with three members of the governing body, including the chair. The inspector carried out deep dives in these subjects: early reading, mathematics and history. For each deep dive, inspectors met with subject leaders, looked at curriculum plans, visited a sample of lessons, spoke to teachers, spoke to some pupils about their learning and looked at a sample of pupils’ work. Inspectors also listened to some pupils read. To evaluate the effectiveness of safeguarding, the inspector: reviewed the single central record; took account of the views of leaders, staff and pupils; and considered the extent to which the school has created an open and positive culture around safeguarding that puts pupils’ interests first. The inspector took account of the responses to Ofsted’s online survey, Parent View, and
p.5
5
free-text responses. The inspector reviewed a range of documentation, including documents relating to governance, leaders’ evaluations, plans for school improvement and information about the school’s curriculum.
p.5
Inspection team
Matthew Barnes His Majesty’s Inspector 9 and 10 July 2024
p.5
6
regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.
p.6
6
If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .
p.6
6
You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .
p.6
6
Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .
p.6
6
T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted
p.6
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion