Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School inspection (EIF)

St Mary's Church of England (Aided) Primary School, Chipping Norton

Inspected 26 Jun 2024 · published 11 Sept 2024 · URN 123227

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    26 Jun 2024

  • Inspectors verified

    Ian Elkington, Shazia Akram

  • Behaviour and attitudes verified

    Good

  • Early years verified

    Good

  • Leadership and management verified

    Good

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Good

  • Personal development verified

    Good

  • Quality of education verified

    Good

  • Postcode verified

    OX7 5DH

  • Name on report verified

    St Mary’s Church of England (Aided) Primary School, Chipping Norton

  • URN verified

    123227

Page 1 of 7
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2018.

  • OverallGood
  • Behaviour and attitudesGood
  • Early yearsGood
  • Leadership and managementGood
  • Personal developmentGood
  • Quality of educationGood

66% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Good (5,043 inspections).

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+38Positivemore positive than 18% of reports of this type graded Good
OutstandingGoodRIInadequate

In line with other reports of this type graded Good.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praisestrongenjoyhigh expectationseffectiveambitioushappyfeel safepositive
Criticismpoorgapsnot effectivelyconcernsweakerinconsistencies

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsSafeguardingAbout the inspection positive critical
  • Findings1023w+37
  • Safeguarding6w+33

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
7
Words of findings
998
about usual (typical 1098)
Reading level
Fairly hard
Flesch 52, typical 55
Average sentence
15 words
Next steps
5
typical 4
Hedged sentences
13%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 65%Safeguarding 0%About the inspection 35%

Full report text

Inspection of St Mary’s Church of England (Aided) Primary School, Chipping Norton The Green, Chipping Norton, Oxfordshire OX7 5DH

p.1

Overall effectiveness Good

The quality of education Good Behaviour and attitudes Good Personal development Good Leadership and management Good Early years provision Good Previous inspection grade Good Norton 25 and 26 June 2024

p.1

What is it like to attend this school?

Pupils enjoy coming to this friendly and welcoming school. There is a strong ethos of mutual respect and support in all areas. Pupils know that adults will deal with any worries or concerns they have. They are happy and, they feel safe and well cared for. Pupils are keen to meet the high expectations that staff have for behaviour and achievement. They show positive attitudes to their work. Pupils behave kindly towards others and are thoughtful learners. In early years, children look forward to the interesting range of activities that help them develop their independence and self-confidence. Overall, most pupils, including those with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND), achieve well and are prepared for the next stage of their education.

p.2

What is it like to attend this school?

Pupils appreciate the wide range of opportunities available. They relish visiting the local secondary school to make a trebuchet, taking part in theatre performances and meeting international authors. Pupils are proud of their leadership responsibilities such as being foundation buddies, play pals, librarians and school counsellors. They enjoy learning new skills and enthusiastically attend the sewing, gardening, art and sports clubs. Pupils are especially delighted about the talent show they hosted for their families and the community.

p.2

better?

The school has a strong and compelling vision for pupils’ success and achievements. However, historically some pupils, including those with SEND, have not achieved well in published outcomes. Previous weaker achievement was linked to poor attendance for a high proportion of pupils and some key inconsistencies in curriculum thinking. The school has worked tirelessly to ensure that all pupils benefit from a good-quality education. The impact of this work is clearly evident. The number of pupils who do not attend school regularly has reduced significantly and all pupils, including those with SEND, are moving through the curriculum more successfully than before.

p.2

better?

The curriculum in all subjects is well constructed and ambitious. The school has set out precisely the essential knowledge that pupils need to learn and the order in which it should be taught. Pupils build a broader appreciation of different subjects through a range of experiences such as visiting art galleries and the theatre. They learn about their local history through trips to Chipping Norton museum, the church and the railway station nearby.

p.2

better?

Staff benefit from a well-thought-out programme of training and support. They provide pupils with SEND with the resources they need to help them access the same curriculum as their peers. Consequently, pupils with SEND make strong progress in their work. Staff use their effective training to explain new learning clearly. However, sometimes, they do not check what pupils know and understand carefully enough, including in phonics, before introducing new work. This means that any gaps and misconceptions are not addressed effectively. As a result, some Norton 25 and 26 June 2024

p.2

3

pupils do not learn as well as they could. One pupil said, ‘Sometimes I get confused about what I need to remember because adults don’t check what I don’t know.’

p.3

3

Reading is central to the school’s curriculum. Children are introduced to phonics from the moment they join Reception class. Pupils read books that are closely matched to the sounds they are taught. They enjoy reading a broad range of books, which provide insights into different cultures and diversity. This promotes pupils’ love of reading.

p.3

3

Lessons are calm and purposeful. This enables pupils to focus. Younger children take turns and collaborate with each other through play. They talk animatedly about the recycled ‘watering bottles’ they make to help keep their plants healthy. Most parents are full of praise about how ‘staff go over and above’ to help their children and families.

p.3

3

School leaders and governors know well what needs to improve further in the quality of education. Governors visit the school regularly. They provide challenge and support in equal measure. Staff morale is high. They feel greatly supported to manage their workload effectively.

p.3

3

The curriculum prepares pupils well for life in modern Britain. They have a well- rounded understanding of equality and diversity. Pupils have plentiful opportunities to discuss current affairs. For instance, they talk maturely and with consideration about the importance of mutual respect and individual liberty. Pupils have an age- appropriate understanding of different types of family and relationships. They understand and appreciate different cultures and communities. One Year 3 pupil echoed the views of her friends and said, ‘We treat everyone how we want to be treated, with kindness and without prejudice. We are all equal and important.’

p.3

Safeguarding

The arrangements for safeguarding are effective.

p.3

(Information for the school and appropriate authority)

 Sometimes, staff do not check what pupils know and understand carefully enough before moving them on to new learning. When this is the case, gaps and misconceptions, including in phonics, are not addressed effectively. As a result, some pupils do not learn as well as they could. The school should ensure that teachers assess pupils’ knowledge consistently and accurately to enable them to make informed decisions about what to teach next.

p.3

How can I feed back my views?

or to find out what other parents and carers think. We use information from Ofsted Norton 25 and 26 June 2024

p.3

4

Parent View when deciding which schools to inspect, when to inspect them and as part of their inspection.

p.4

4

The Department for Education has further guidance on how to complain about a school.

p.4

Further information

You can search for published performance information about the school.

p.4

Further information

In the report, ‘disadvantaged pupils’ is used to mean pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND); pupils who meet the definition of children in need of help and protection ; pupils receiving statutory local authority support from a social worker; and pupils who otherwise meet the criteria used for deciding the school’s pupil premium funding (this includes pupils claiming free school meals at any point in the last six years, looked after children (children in local authority care) and/or children who left care through adoption or another formal route). Norton 25 and 26 June 2024

p.4

School details

Appropriate authority The governing body

p.5

School details

Date of previous inspection 7 November 2018, under section 8 of the Education Act 2005.

p.5

Information about this school

 The school is designated as having a religious character. Its last Statutory Inspection of Anglican and Methodist Schools took place in May 2023, when it received a good judgement overall.  The headteacher took up her post in January 2023.  The school does not currently use alternative provision.

p.5

Information about this inspection

The inspectors carried out this graded inspection under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.

p.5

Information about this inspection

 Inspections are a point-in-time judgement about the quality of a school’s education provision.  This was the first routine inspection the school received since the COVID-19 pandemic began. Inspectors discussed the impact of the pandemic with the school and have taken that into account in their evaluation of the school.  Inspectors carried out deep dives in these subjects: early reading, mathematics, Norton 25 and 26 June 2024

p.5

6

history and geography. For each deep dive, inspectors held discussions about the curriculum, visited a sample of lessons, spoke to teachers, spoke to some pupils about their learning and looked at samples of pupils’ work.  The lead inspector met with the chair of governors and three other governors. She also spoke on the telephone with a representative of the local authority and a representative of the Diocese of Oxfordshire.  Inspectors held a wide range of meetings with the headteacher, senior leaders and staff.  Inspectors observed pupils’ behaviour during visits to classrooms, during breaktimes and as pupils moved around the school. They also considered the responses to the confidential pupil survey.  Inspectors considered the views of parents expressed in Ofsted Parent View, Ofsted’s online survey for parents. They also considered the views of staff during meetings with them and through the staff survey.

p.6

6

 To evaluate the effectiveness of safeguarding, the inspectors reviewed the single central record; took account of the views of leaders, staff and pupils; and considered the extent to which the school has created an open and positive culture around safeguarding that puts pupils’ interests first.

p.6

Inspection team

Shazia Akram, lead inspector His Majesty’s Inspector

p.6

Inspection team

Ian Elkington Ofsted Inspector Norton 25 and 26 June 2024

p.6

7

regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.

p.7

7

If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.7

7

You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .

p.7

7

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .

p.7

7

T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.7

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion