Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School monitoring visit

Setting

Inspected — · published 10 Sept 2024

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Sarah Fowler (lead), Dave Gibson

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Dave Gibson, Sarah Fowler

  • Postcode verified

    SS8 9QS

  • Name on report verified

    The Cornelius Vermuyden School This letter sets out the findings from the monitoring inspection that took place on 10 and

Page 1 of 4
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+18Mostly positivemore positive than 51% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praiseclearstrongpositiveimprovedambitiouswell plannedhigh-qualitysecure knowledge
Criticismweaknessespoornot high expectationslacksinconsistenciesconcernsmissedyet to

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings228w0
  • What needs to improve1173w+18

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
4
Words of findings
1,399
about usual (typical 1570)
Reading level
Fairly hard
Flesch 55, typical 47
Average sentence
14 words
Next steps
8
typical 8
Hedged sentences
9%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 16%What needs to improve 84%

Full report text

Store Street Manchester M1 2WD T 0300 123 1231 www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.1

Desi McKeown Executive Headteacher The Cornelius Vermuyden School Dinant Avenue Canvey Island Essex SS8 9QS

p.1

Special measures monitoring inspection of The Cornelius Vermuyden School

This letter sets out the findings from the monitoring inspection that took place on 10 and 11 July 2024, on behalf of His Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills. The monitoring inspection was carried out under section 8(2) of the Education Act 2005 and was the first monitoring inspection since the school was judged to require special measures following the graded (section 5) inspection that took place in November

p.1

Special measures monitoring inspection of The Cornelius Vermuyden School

The purpose of a monitoring inspection is not to grade the school’s overall effectiveness, but to identify and report on the school’s progress. It is to highlight to the school and parents any improvements that school leaders have made since the school’s previous graded inspection.

p.1

Special measures monitoring inspection of The Cornelius Vermuyden School

During the inspection, Sarah Fowler, Ofsted Inspector (OI), and I discussed with you and other senior leaders, chief executive officers (CEO) from your partner trusts, trustees and a representative from the local authority the actions that have been taken to improve the school since the most recent graded inspection. We discussed the ongoing impact of the COVID-19 pandemic. I also visited lessons, met with subject leaders, reviewed curriculum plans, and held discussions with pupils and staff. I have considered all this in coming to my judgement.

p.1

Leaders have made progress to improve the school, but more work is

necessary for the school to be no longer judged as requiring special measures.

p.1

The progress made towards the removal of special measures

Since the inspection, there have been significant changes in leadership and governance. You joined the school in April. The leadership team has been restructured. New leaders and governors, with significant experience of school improvement have been brought in. In the past, the school has found it difficult to recruit and been reliant on supply staff. However, you have been able to ensure you are fully staffed for the autumn term 2024.

p.2

The progress made towards the removal of special measures

As soon as you arrived, you quickly identified the underlying causes of the school’s weaknesses. A detailed plan for improvement was rapidly developed and implemented. While still in the early stages, the actions set out in this plan are already having a positive impact on pupils’ experiences. At the same time, you and leaders from the trust have had to deal with other significant structural issues, including finance and human resources matters. This has not hindered the rate of improvement.

p.2

The progress made towards the removal of special measures

The vision for the school’s curriculum has been made clear to all staff. Subject leaders have used this vision to set out what pupils should know in each subject. Some subjects have used the national curriculum and gone beyond its requirements. However, a small number of subjects remain constrained by external influences, such as exam specifications. Pupils are accessing an ambitious curriculum. However, opportunities are missed where teachers could deepen and enrich pupils’ knowledge. As a result, some pupils do not archive as well as the school intends.

p.2

The progress made towards the removal of special measures

The curriculum is now generally well planned. Working alongside subject communities, from the partner trusts, the school has set out what pupils should learn and when. This enables pupils to build on existing knowledge as they layer new, small component elements on top of each other. Teachers are generally teaching to these plans. However, teaching remains imprecise and lacks a sense of coherence. Many teachers have strong subject knowledge. They know the important principles that underpin high-quality teaching. However, they are yet to fully understand how to use them. Teachers teach to the written plans, not the pupils in front of them. They do not routinely check to see if pupils have the foundational knowledge they need to secure new learning. Teaching is not adapted to meet the needs of pupils. As a result, at times work is too easy. Too many learning activities are not appropriate to support pupils secure knowledge into their long-

p.2

The progress made towards the removal of special measures

term memory. Teaching approaches are often focused on task completion and behaviour management. The result of this is that pupils often experience lessons that are uninteresting and uninspiring. Consequently, pupils do not make the progress they are capable of.

p.2

The progress made towards the removal of special measures

The provision for pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND) is developing. Leaders have made sure that statutory processes, such as annual reviews, are now followed. All pupils with SEND have a pupil passport. Pupils value the input they have had to developing their individual plans. This provides teachers with important information about each individual pupil. These passports also provide strategies to help

p.2

OFFICIAL-SENSITIVE

teachers adapt their teaching. However, not all have had the training to implement these strategies effectively.

p.3

OFFICIAL-SENSITIVE

You have taken appropriate steps to improve the behaviour of pupils. The school has made expectations clear to staff and pupils. There are clear boundaries of what is and what is not acceptable. Pupils understand how they are expected to behave. The behaviour, SEND and safeguarding teams are now working closely together. They identify and address patterns and trends in behaviour before they become a problem. Most pupils have responded positively, and behaviour has improved. However, a significant number of lessons continue to be interrupted by the behaviour of some pupils. Pupils are often seen in corridors, sent from their lesson by teachers. This does not help as you try to reduce the level of internal truancy.

p.3

OFFICIAL-SENSITIVE

Your teams have made the school a warmer and more inclusive place. Pupils feel safe and now have confidence to report their worries to staff. Pupils and staff do not feel afraid as they move around the building. There remain some pupils who struggle to deal with issues without physical confrontation, but these incidents are becoming rare. There are emerging positive relationships between staff and pupils. However, many pupils are frustrated and angered. They feel they have been let down by the school in the past. The majority of pupils want to come to school and learn in a calm and purposeful environment. They find it difficult to understand why it is taking so long for it to improve.

p.3

OFFICIAL-SENSITIVE

The number of significant behavioural incidents has reduced. Consequently, the use of suspension has also fallen. You have made it clear to staff how they should respond to pupils when they do not meet your high expectations. There is more focus on tackling the root causes of behaviour. Training for staff to help them manage behaviour as you expect has begun. This has seen some benefits but not all staff have fully understood. This means there remains inconsistencies in how staff deal with poor behaviour.

p.3

OFFICIAL-SENSITIVE

Staff are now clear that the safeguarding of pupils is everyone’s responsibility. Increased training and regular communication means that all staff are fully aware of what to look for and how to report concerns. Input from local agencies, such as the police, complement the school’s personal social and health education programme. This helps pupils develop a deeper awareness of how to stay safe, on and offline. You have redefined how the behaviour, SEND, safeguarding and pastoral teams work together. This has begun to ensure that there is a greater understanding across the staff about the most vulnerable pupils. Staff now have all the expected checks in advance of taking up roles. Safeguarding is becoming fully embedded into the culture of the school. Consequently, safeguarding is more effective.

p.3

OFFICIAL-SENSITIVE

The changes to the trust board now mean that a group of highly experienced members are holding staff and leaders to account. The level of expertise on the board means that the questions they ask are incisive. Trustees expect detailed responses from your team that are supported by evidence. This means that there is a well-informed clear picture of where the school has improved and where actions have not had the desired impact.

p.3

OFFICIAL-SENSITIVE

The school is benefiting from the innovative partnership with The South East Essex, Basildon and Zenith Academies Trusts. Working together with a strong, shared moral purpose they are helping the school make the improvements needed. They have committed to providing additional capacity for as long as it is necessary. Your staff have access to their established subject communities. This is beginning to help teachers improve how they teach. Access to the trusts’ combined resources and expertise has undoubtedly contributed towards the improvements pupils are already benefitting from.

p.4

OFFICIAL-SENSITIVE

I am copying this letter to the chair of the board of trustees, the Department for Education’s regional director and the director of children’s services for Essex County Council. This letter will be published on the Ofsted reports website.

p.4

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion