Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School inspection (EIF)

Priory School

Inspected 13 Jun 2024 · URN 137433

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Charlie Fordham (lead), Ashley Best-White

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    13 Jun 2024

  • Inspectors verified

    Ashley Best-White, Charlie Fordham

  • Postcode verified

    IP32 7BH

  • Name on report verified

    Priory School

  • URN verified

    137433

Page 1 of 8
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+46Positivemore positive than 44% of reports of this type
OutstandingGoodRIInadequate

In line with other reports of this type.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praiseoutstandinghigh-qualityenjoyflourishsuccessfullyeffectivevery welleffectively
Criticismdo not knowseriousnot alwaysconcernsnot well plannedstrugglenot effectivelynot effective

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsSafeguardingAbout the inspection positive critical
  • Findings1352w+45
  • Safeguarding6w+33

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
8
Words of findings
1,352
about usual (typical 1153)
Reading level
Fairly hard
Flesch 57, typical 55
Average sentence
13 words
Next steps
6
typical 4
Hedged sentences
15%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 63%Safeguarding 0%About the inspection 37%

Full report text

Inspection of an outstanding school: Priory School Mount Road, Bury St Edmunds, Suffolk IP32 7BH

p.1

Outcome

There has been no change to this school’s overall judgement of outstanding as a result of this ungraded (section 8) inspection. However, the evidence gathered suggests that the inspection grade might not be as high if a graded (section 5) inspection were carried out now. The school’s next inspection will be a graded inspection.

p.1

Outcome

The head of school is Sharron White. This school is part of the Special Educational Needs and Disabilities Academy Trust (SENDAT) multi-academy trust. This means other people in the trust also have responsibility for running the school. The trust is run by the chief executive officer, Lawrence Chapman, and overseen by a board of trustees, chaired by Sue Snowdon. There is also an executive headteacher, Graham Alcock, who is responsible for this school and several others.

p.1

What is it like to attend this school?

Priory School is a happy place. Pupils enjoy supportive friendships. Bullying and unkindness are rare. Pupils learn to understand and manage their emotional triggers. They flourish in the school’s safe culture, including in the sixth form.

p.1

What is it like to attend this school?

Pupils get the practical help they need. The school supports families with transport and pupils with hygiene. Pupils eat high-quality meals. Boarding teaches them independence. Pupils learn a lot of life skills, such as about money and the world of work. The school facilitates trips, ranging from nearby locations like local shops to distant places like Germany. Pupils benefit from the school’s ambition to prepare them for life beyond school. In recent years, all have gone on to positive next steps in education or training.

p.1

What is it like to attend this school?

Regular routines support purposeful behaviour. For instance, the daily ‘meet and greet’ readies pupils for school. They receive skilful support for their social and emotional needs. Consequently, pupils can focus on learning. They stay calm if a peer occasionally gets upset.

p.1

What is it like to attend this school?

Pupils do well with their learning and take pride in their work. They get strong support for their needs. However, the curriculum they learn is not always as effectively planned or taught as it could be. 11 to 13 June 2024

p.1

What does the school do well and what does it need to do better?

The school has put in place a curriculum that in most areas builds up pupils’ knowledge incrementally. Where it is successful, the curriculum identifies the key knowledge that pupils should learn and revisit. In food technology, for example, teachers use previous learning as the building blocks pupils need to understand new content. Students in the sixth form develop the mathematical calculation skills they know from key stage 4. Mostly, pupils develop detailed knowledge. They produce high-quality work. However, in some areas, the curriculum is less well planned. In these cases, teachers do not know exactly what was taught in previous years. They, therefore, do not make the connections with prior learning as precisely as they could. This leads to pupils on occasion being less able to recall prior knowledge. As a result, these pupils do not achieve as well as they could over time.

p.2

What does the school do well and what does it need to do better?

Overall, teachers deliver the curriculum well. They model and explain learning clearly. This includes confident use of technology. In most cases, staff skilfully support pupils’ special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND). The school gives teachers precise and user- friendly information from pupils’ education, health and care (EHC) plans. Staff apply and review this. For instance, teaching assistants work expertly with teachers to ensure each pupil gets bespoke support. This enables pupils to keep up with the learning. This includes those with complex needs. While this is the case, sometimes teachers use tasks that are not well pitched to pupils’ levels of understanding. In these instances, some pupils finish the work quickly and get bored while staff are busy helping their peers.

p.2

What does the school do well and what does it need to do better?

Subject leadership is not as effective as it could be. Some subject leaders do not have a secure enough oversight of how their subject is taught in all year groups. This lessens the school’s capacity to address any variability in teaching.

p.2

What does the school do well and what does it need to do better?

The reading curriculum is a strength. Pupils in the early stages of reading learn phonics successfully. Where they need extra support, this is regular and effective. Pupils read books they understand and enjoy. Teachers adeptly use texts to develop pupils’ vocabulary. Most pupils show considerable pleasure in reading. Even where they do not, they understand its importance and do their best with it.

p.2

What does the school do well and what does it need to do better?

The school has a behaviour policy that is carefully matched to pupils’ needs. This is based on understanding and pre-empting the causes of difficult behaviour and low attendance. The approach is thoroughly embedded in all aspects of provision, such as risk assessments. As a result, pupils’ ability to regulate themselves rapidly improves. Attendance is high.

p.2

What does the school do well and what does it need to do better?

The curriculum for personal development is coherent. The school aims to develop ‘the whole child’ holistically. It does this very well. Pupils receive a well-considered careers education. The sixth form prepares students successfully for their next steps. Pupils learn about important areas of risk, such as drugs and alcohol. They value this learning and explain their own views well.

p.2

What does the school do well and what does it need to do better?

Trustees keep a close oversight of key areas of provision, such as safeguarding and behaviour. They know some aspects of the quality of education need focus. The trust 11 to 13 June 2024

p.2

3

provides challenge, where needed, and supports the school well. Staff praise the collaborative ethos.

p.3

Safeguarding

The arrangements for safeguarding are effective.

p.3

(Information for the school and appropriate authority)

 The curriculum does not, in all areas, identify precisely enough the most important knowledge that pupils need to learn. This means that teachers sometimes do not know clearly which areas to emphasise and revisit so that pupils remember the key content. The school needs to make sure that all areas of the curriculum are comprehensively planned.  In a few cases, teaching is not well adapted to support pupils with different levels of prior knowledge and understanding. This means that some pupils finish tasks easily while others struggle. The school should make sure all teachers get the training and support they need to adapt the curriculum effectively for pupils’ varying levels of understanding.  In some areas, subject leadership is not embedded well enough. Where this is the case, subject leaders do not have the knowledge they need of their curriculum to ensure it is delivered as the school intends. The school needs to make sure subject

p.3

(Information for the school and appropriate authority)

leaders get the guidance and support they need to fulfil their roles effectively.

p.3

Background

When we have judged a school to be outstanding, we will then normally go into the school about once every four years to confirm that the school remains outstanding. This is called an ungraded inspection, and it is carried out under section 8 of the Education Act 2005. We do not give graded judgements on an ungraded inspection. However, if we find evidence that a school would now receive a higher or lower grade, then the next inspection will be a graded inspection, which is carried out under section 5 of the Act. Usually this is within one to two years of the date of the ungraded inspection. If we have serious concerns about safeguarding, behaviour or the quality of education, we will deem the ungraded inspection a graded inspection immediately.

p.3

Background

This is the second ungraded inspection since we judged the school to be outstanding in November 2014.

p.3

How can I feed back my views?

find out what other parents and carers think. We use information from Ofsted Parent View when deciding which schools to inspect, when to inspect them and as part of their inspection. 11 to 13 June 2024

p.3

4

The Department for Education has further guidance on how to complain about a school.

p.4

Further information

You can search for published performance information about the school.

p.4

Further information

In the report, ‘disadvantaged pupils’ is used to mean pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND); pupils who meet the definition of children in need of help and protection ; pupils receiving statutory local authority support from a social worker; and pupils who otherwise meet the criteria used for deciding the school’s pupil premium funding (this includes pupils claiming free school meals at any point in the last six years, looked after children (children in local authority care) and/or children who left care through adoption or another formal route). 11 to 13 June 2024

p.4

School details

Social care unique reference number SC024610

p.5

School details

School category Academy special converter

p.5

form

Date of previous inspection 16 October 2018, under section 8 of the Education Act 2005

p.5

Information about this school

 The school is an all-through school. This means it is registered to take pupils from the ages of five to 19. However, there are currently no pupils in key stage 1.  All pupils in the school have an EHC plan. The school caters for the following needs: specific learning difficulty; visual impairment; speech, language and communication; autism; social, emotional and mental health; multi-sensory impairment; physical disability; severe learning difficulty; profound and multiple learning difficulty.  Suffolk local authority mostly commissions places. However, several other local authorities also commission places. 11 to 13 June 2024

p.5

6

 The school is part of SENDAT. There are currently plans for SENDAT to merge with another local trust, the Eastern Education Group (EEG). SENDAT already works in partnership with schools and colleges in EEG. The aim is for the merger to be complete by September 2024.  The school has boarding facilities with 23 beds, Monday to Thursday. At the time of the inspection, there were 46 pupils accessing these facilities. In most cases this is for one or two nights.  The school operates on two other sites. A small number of pupils learn at Angel Hill College, which is at 24A Angel Hill, Bury St Edmunds, Suffolk, IP33 1UZ. There are two provisions for a small number of pupils at School Lane, Thurston, Bury St Edmunds, Suffolk, IP31 3RY. These are Priory Aspire, and Priory at Thurston. All pupils on the three sites are on the school roll.  The school currently uses three unregistered alternative providers.

p.6

6

 The school meets the requirements of the provider access legislation, which requires schools to provide pupils in Years 8 to 13 with information and engagement about approved technical education qualifications and apprenticeships.

p.6

Information about this inspection

 Inspections are a point-in-time judgement about the quality of a school’s education provision.  This was the first routine inspection the school received since the COVID-19 pandemic began. Inspectors discussed the impact of the pandemic with the school and have taken that into account in their evaluation of the school.  This school inspection was carried out at the same time as a social care inspection of the boarding provision.  Inspectors met with the headteacher, the executive headteacher, trust leaders, other school leaders, staff, and pupils. As part of evaluating governance and the support from the trust, the lead inspector met with the chair and the chief executive officer of the trust.  Inspectors carried out deep dives in these subjects: English, including early reading; mathematics; humanities; and food technology. For each deep dive, inspectors discussed the curriculum with the leaders, visited a sample of lessons, met with

p.6

Information about this inspection

teachers, met with pupils about their learning and looked at samples of pupils’ work.  As part of evaluating the effectiveness of safeguarding, inspectors met with leaders, governors, staff and pupils. Inspectors scrutinised the school’s single central record of recruitment and vetting checks. They considered the extent to which the school has created an open and positive culture around safeguarding that puts pupils’ interests first.  Inspectors scrutinised a range of policies and documents, including the school’s self- evaluation and development plan, and minutes of governor meetings.  Inspectors considered the responses to the online survey, Ofsted Parent View, and the free-text comments submitted. They considered the responses to Ofsted’s 11 to 13 June 2024

p.6

7

questionnaire for staff. Inspectors held multiple conversations with pupils to gauge their views.

p.7

Inspection team

Charlie Fordham, lead inspector His Majesty’s Inspector

p.7

Inspection team

Ashley Best-White Ofsted Inspector 11 to 13 June 2024

p.7

8

regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.

p.8

8

If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.8

8

You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .

p.8

8

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .

p.8

8

T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.8

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion