Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School inspection (EIF)

Holy Trinity CofE Primary School

Inspected 3 Jul 2024 · published 10 Sept 2024 · URN 105488

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

Requires improvement

Charlotte Oles (lead), Clare Lightbown, Patrick Rayner

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    3 Jul 2024

  • Inspectors verified

    Charlotte Oles, Clare Lightbown, Patrick Rayner

  • Behaviour and attitudes verified

    Good

  • Early years verified

    Good

  • Leadership and management verified

    Requires improvement

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Requires improvement

  • Personal development verified

    Good

  • Quality of education verified

    Requires improvement

  • Postcode verified

    M9 4DU

  • Name on report verified

    Holy Trinity CofE Primary School

  • URN verified

    105488

Page 1 of 7
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2019.

  • OverallRequires improvement
  • Behaviour and attitudesGood
  • Early yearsGood
  • Leadership and managementRequires improvement
  • Personal developmentGood
  • Quality of educationRequires improvement

15% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Requires improvement (5,043 inspections).

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+16Mostly positivemore positive than 43% of reports of this type graded Requires improvement
OutstandingGoodRIInadequate

In line with other reports of this type graded Requires improvement.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praiseambitiouswarmenjoypositivesuccessfullywell preparedeffectivehigh expectations
Criticismweaknessesgapsweakinconsistentlacksmisseslowerdo not know

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improveSafeguardingAbout the inspection positive critical
  • Findings1189w+14
  • Safeguarding6w+33
  • What needs to improve31w—

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
7
Words of findings
1,191
about usual (typical 1215)
Reading level
Fairly hard
Flesch 56, typical 56
Average sentence
16 words
Next steps
6
typical 5
Hedged sentences
21%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 65%Safeguarding 0%What needs to improve 2%About the inspection 33%

Full report text

Inspection of Holy Trinity CofE Primary School Capstan Street, Blackley, Greater Manchester M9 4DU

p.1

Overall effectiveness Requires improvement

The quality of education Requires improvement Behaviour and attitudes Good Personal development Good Leadership and management Requires improvement Early years provision Good Previous inspection grade Good 2 and 3 July 2024

p.1

What is it like to attend this school?

This school has a warm and nurturing environment and pupils are happy to attend. They enjoy their learning and time spent with their friends. Many pupils participate in clubs and activities that develop their talents and interests. Popular examples include sports clubs and competitions, coding club and book club.

p.2

What is it like to attend this school?

Pupils learn about the wide array of differences between people in the school community. They welcome new arrivals to the school. This includes the number of pupils that join the school at various points after the early years, many of whom speak English as an additional language.

p.2

What is it like to attend this school?

Most pupils behave well. They understand the importance of kindness and they show respect towards each other and to teachers. Pupils are well supported to recognise and regulate their own emotions. This particularly helps some pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND) to establish a positive mindset for learning.

p.2

What is it like to attend this school?

The school recognises that some pupils do not achieve as well as they should. To address this, it has taken steps to increase its expectations for pupils’ achievement by improving the curriculum. However, as many of these changes are recent, the impact cannot be measured. In the early years, where the curriculum is more established, children progress well from their starting points.

p.2

better?

The school is ambitious for pupils and wants them to do well. However, some aspects of this vision are not fully realised. The school, with the support of the governing body, has taken action to improve the quality of education that it provides. However, its analysis of the impact of this work is inconsistent and, in some cases, lacks urgency. This means that, at times, the school misses opportunities to swiftly address actions that are not having the intended impact.

p.2

better?

The school has recently revamped the curriculum in many subjects. It has defined what pupils should learn and when they should learn it. This helps teachers to design learning that builds on what pupils already know. In the main, teachers check on pupils’ developing knowledge well. They identify misconceptions quickly, before these become embedded in pupils’ memory.

p.2

better?

The school is taking action to address gaps in pupils’ knowledge due to the previous, less effective curriculum, as well as due to the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic. However, it has not acted swiftly enough to raise standards in writing. As a result, some pupils have weak handwriting, grammar, and spelling knowledge. This limits their progress across the curriculum and means that they are not as prepared as they should be for their next stages of learning. 2 and 3 July 2024

p.2

3

Staff are quick to recognise when pupils have SEND. The school aspires for these pupils to benefit from what the school has to offer. Nonetheless, sometimes staff have lower expectations of these pupils’ learning, which limits their progress across the curriculum. They do not make suitable adaptations to activities that would allow pupils with SEND to successfully access learning alongside their peers.

p.3

3

In the early years, the school places a heavy emphasis on developing children’s communication and language skills. This ensures that children are well prepared for a strong start when learning to read. The school has recently redesigned the phonics programme. Most staff deliver this new approach successfully. This is starting to improve the rate at which children develop their reading knowledge. However, there remains a number of older pupils who do not read as well as they should. The school has not acted with sufficient urgency to address weaknesses in their reading knowledge, fluency, and comprehension.

p.3

3

The school ensures that most pupils attend school regularly. It quickly recognises and intervenes when pupils’ rates of absence begin to rise.

p.3

3

Staff create warm and positive climates for learning in classrooms. This helps pupils to develop their confidence and to try their best. In the early years, staff support children to develop their independence and self-care skills through well-established routines. For example, children in the Nursery class learn how to put on waterproof clothing in readiness of outdoor learning. This prepares children well for key stage 1.

p.3

3

The school places particular emphasis on nurture. It fosters pupils’ and staff’s well- being highly effectively. The school is keen to extend pupils’ learning beyond the academic. For example, pupils learn about the importance of maintaining their mental and physical health. They understand how to manage the risks that they may face in the local community and while online.

p.3

3

Staff enjoy working at the school. They value the support of leaders and governors. Staff said that the school is mindful of their workload, including during the current period of rapid school development.

p.3

Safeguarding

The arrangements for safeguarding are effective.

p.3

(Information for the school and appropriate authority)

 Some of the school’s systems do not provide useful evaluations of the impact of its work. At times, staff do not know how well the school’s strategies to improve pupils’ progress and attainment are working. The school should strengthen its systems to monitor the quality of provision that pupils, including those with SEND, receive to ensure that it is as effective as it should be. 2 and 3 July 2024

p.3

4

 Some pupils do not write as well as they should. They are hampered by weaknesses in their handwriting, spelling and grammar knowledge. This limits their success in English, and across other curriculum subjects. The school should ensure that staff better support pupils to develop these fundamental skills, so that they are well prepared for their next steps in education.  At times, staff have lower expectations of what some pupils, including pupils with SEND, can achieve. Sometimes they do not support these pupils to access ambitious learning activities alongside their peers. This hampers their learning. The school should train staff to adapt their curriculum delivery, so that pupils with SEND benefit from high expectations of their learning.  The school’s approach to help older pupils who struggle with reading is not tailored well enough to swiftly address gaps in their reading knowledge and how fluently they read. For some pupils, these weaknesses persist over time, which

p.4

4

hinders their ability to read and therefore to access the curriculum. The school should sharpen its approach in developing pupils’ reading knowledge, so that pupils become fluent and confident readers.

p.4

How can I feed back my views?

or to find out what other parents and carers think. We use information from Ofsted Parent View when deciding which schools to inspect, when to inspect them and as part of their inspection.

p.4

How can I feed back my views?

The Department for Education has further guidance on how to complain about a school.

p.4

Further information

You can search for published performance information about the school.

p.4

Further information

In the report, 'disadvantaged pupils' is used to mean pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND); pupils who meet the definition of children in need of help and protection; pupils receiving statutory local authority support from a social worker; and pupils who otherwise meet the criteria used for deciding the school's pupil premium funding (this includes pupils claiming free school meals at any point in the last six years, looked after children (children in local authority care) and/or children who left care through adoption or another formal route). 2 and 3 July 2024

p.4

School details

Appropriate authority The governing body

p.5

School details

Website www.holytrinity.manchester.sch.uk

p.5

School details

Date of previous inspection 20 March 2019, under section 8 of the Education Act 2005

p.5

Information about this school

 This Church of England school is part of the Diocese of Manchester. The school’s last section 48 inspection, for schools of a religious character, took place in May 2017. The school’s next section 48 inspection is due to take place before the end of 2025.  The school provides a breakfast club for pupils.  The school makes use of two unregistered alternative providers for a small number of pupils.

p.5

Information about this inspection

The inspectors carried out this graded inspection under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.

p.5

Information about this inspection

 Inspections are a point-in-time judgement about the quality of a school’s education provision. 2 and 3 July 2024

p.5

6

 This was the first routine inspection the school received since the COVID-19 pandemic began. Inspectors discussed the impact of the pandemic with the school and have taken that into account in their evaluation of the school.  Inspectors met with the headteacher, other leaders and a range of staff. They also spoke with governors, including the chair of governors.  The lead inspector met with representatives of the local authority and of the diocese.  Inspectors reviewed a wide range of evidence, including the school’s self- evaluation documents, improvement plans and minutes of governing body meetings. Inspectors also scrutinised records of pupils’ behaviour and attendance.  To evaluate the effectiveness of safeguarding, inspectors: reviewed the single central record; took account of the views of leaders, staff, and pupils; and considered the extent to which the school has created an open and positive

p.6

6

culture around safeguarding that puts pupils’ interests first.  Inspectors spoke with pupils about their experiences of school and their views on behaviour and bullying. They observed pupils’ behaviour during lessons and at social times.  Inspectors carried out deep dives in early reading, mathematics, English, music, and geography. For each deep dive, they discussed the curriculum with subject leaders, visited a sample of lessons, spoke with some staff and with pupils about their learning, and looked at samples of pupils’ work.  Inspectors met with curriculum leaders and reviewed pupils’ work in some other subjects.  Inspectors observed pupils from Years 1 to 3 read to a familiar adult.  Inspectors considered the responses to Ofsted Parent View, including the free- text comments. They also considered the responses to Ofsted’s online surveys for staff and for pupils.

p.6

Inspection team

Charlotte Oles, lead inspector His Majesty's Inspector

p.6

Inspection team

Clare Lightbown Ofsted Inspector 2 and 3 July 2024

p.6

7

regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children's services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.

p.7

7

If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.7

7

You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .

p.7

7

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .

p.7

7

T : 0300 123 1231 Textphone : 0161 618 8524 E : enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.7

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion