Schools & FE · School inspection (EIF)
Cherry Lane Primary School
Summary
Matea Marcinko (lead), Alison Cartlidge, Laurie O’Brien, Meena Walia
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection date verified
27 Jun 2024
- Inspectors verified
Alison Cartlidge, Laurie O’Brien, Matea Marcinko, Meena Walia
- Behaviour and attitudes verified
Requires improvement
- Early years verified
Requires improvement
- Leadership and management verified
Requires improvement
- Overall effectiveness verified
Requires improvement
- Personal development verified
Requires improvement
- Quality of education verified
Requires improvement
- Postcode verified
UB7 9DL
- Name on report verified
Cherry Lane Primary School
- URN verified
131638
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2018.
- OverallRequires improvement
- Behaviour and attitudesRequires improvement
- Early yearsRequires improvement
- Leadership and managementRequires improvement
- Personal developmentRequires improvement
- Quality of educationRequires improvement
15% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Requires improvement (5,043 inspections).
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
Reads more critically than most reports of this type graded Requires improvement.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No standout praise found.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Information regarding incidences of weaker behaviour, bullying and pupils’ attendance are not sufficiently reviewed or analysed. p.3
- However, it is not consistently well designed or implemented. p.2
- The provision for early reading and language development is not sufficiently robust. p.4
- However, the knowledge children secure in the Nursery is not sufficiently built on and opportunities to maximise language are missed. p.3
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- As a result, some pupils are asked to complete tasks that lack ambition and do not help them to develop independence or the knowledge they need to progress through the curriculum. p.4
- This means that teaching and assessment are not sufficiently focused on the most important subject knowledge pupils need to secure. p.4
- In several subjects, the curriculum does not set out precisely what pupils should learn. p.4
- These pupils do not routinely develop the independence and detailed knowledge they need to be fully prepared for the next stage of their learning. 26 and 27 June 2024 p.2
- The school should ensure the curriculum in each subject identifies and sequences the important concepts pupils need to learn. p.4
- The school should ensure that the early years curriculum and chosen phonics programme are implemented in a way that systematically develops pupils’ early spoken language and reading knowledge. p.4
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Communication & language6
“The provision for early reading and language development is not sufficiently robust.” p.4
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 8
- Words of findings
- 1,314
- about usual (typical 1215)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 38, typical 56
- Average sentence
- 18 words
- Next steps
- 6
- typical 5
- Hedged sentences
- 19%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Inspection of Cherry Lane Primary School Sipson Road, West Drayton UB7 9DL
p.1
Overall effectiveness Requires improvement
The quality of education Requires improvement Behaviour and attitudes Requires improvement Personal development Requires improvement Leadership and management Requires improvement Early years provision Requires improvement Previous inspection grade Good 26 and 27 June 2024
p.1
What is it like to attend this school?
Pupils at Cherry Lane are polite and welcoming to visitors. Pupils feel safe and are kept safe at school. This is because they have trusted adults to speak with and can report any concerns they may have by using the ‘worry box’. Typically, pupils behave well in lessons. At times, however, the behaviour of some pupils disrupts learning, and this is not always addressed swiftly.
p.2
What is it like to attend this school?
Pupils have opportunities to take on responsibilities within the school, such as through the school council, as ‘eco-warriors’ or as class monitors. There are a range of clubs on offer to pupils, for example, football, martial arts, gymnastics and netball. Pupils contribute positively to the wider community, such as by raising money for local and national charities.
p.2
What is it like to attend this school?
The curriculum pupils follow matches the scope of what is expected nationally. However, it is not consistently well designed or implemented. As a result, pupils, including those with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND), do not develop a sufficient depth of knowledge. This limits some pupils’ achievement, including in national assessments, and their readiness for the next stage of their education.
p.2
better?
Overall, the curriculum does not sufficiently support pupils to achieve well, including in national assessments. This is because, in several subjects, the precise knowledge that pupils need to secure has not been clearly identified. Consequently, teaching does not routinely focus on these important subject concepts and the tasks and activities pupils are asked to complete sometimes lack ambition. Assessment is not used effectively to check pupils learn and remember these important ideas before moving on. As a result, some pupils develop misconceptions that are not addressed, meaning they do not develop sufficient knowledge across the curriculum.
p.2
better?
There are subjects where the curriculum is stronger. In these instances, the key ideas pupils are expected to learn are more explicitly identified and logically sequenced. For example, in mathematics, children in early years are taught to add and subtract using different objects. This supports older pupils to solve increasingly complex problems involving capacity and volume using appropriate subject-specific vocabulary.
p.2
better?
There are suitable processes in place for identifying pupils with SEND. Leaders work closely with external agencies to secure appropriate advice and support for pupils, including when they transition between schools. Staff are not suitably trained, however, in making appropriate adaptations for these pupils. Often the tasks they complete lack ambition. This means that some pupils with SEND, including in the special resource provision, do not access a sufficiently broad curriculum. These pupils do not routinely develop the independence and detailed knowledge they need to be fully prepared for the next stage of their learning. 26 and 27 June 2024
p.2
3
The curriculum in the Nursery is designed to develop children’s curiosity and social awareness. For example, children listen attentively to stories such as ‘Pirate’s Treasure’ and then have opportunities to draw their playground as a treasure map. They take turns to design the space with familiar and new objects, such as seashells, which help prepare children for upcoming visits to the seaside. The early years curriculum is designed to ensure children have regular opportunities to rehearse and extend their spoken language. However, the knowledge children secure in the Nursery is not sufficiently built on and opportunities to maximise language are missed.
p.3
3
Some pupils, including those with SEND, do not develop sufficient reading accuracy and fluency. The agreed phonics programme is not implemented with consistent precision, and assessment is not used effectively to check for understanding and address misconceptions. This limits some pupils’ progress through the phonics curriculum and their readiness to read more complex texts.
p.3
3
The curriculum for personal development is designed to help pupils build awareness of some important issues. These include how to maintain a healthy lifestyle, including exercise and diet, and the importance of good mental well-being. However, the breadth of concepts in the curriculum is limited. For example, insufficient consideration is given to developing pupils’ understanding of tolerance and respect. Some pupils do not develop a sufficient understanding of these important values and are less well prepared for life in modern Britain.
p.3
3
Pupils typically behave positively in lessons and around the school. However, when pupils do not follow the rules, this is not always addressed swiftly. Information regarding incidences of weaker behaviour, bullying and pupils’ attendance are not sufficiently reviewed or analysed. This means opportunities to systematically identify or address any patterns or trends are missed.
p.3
3
Governors understand their role in maintaining effective oversight of statutory processes, including safeguarding. However, governors’ oversight of the quality of education and the systems for tracking and analysing patterns of behaviour and attendance have not been sufficiently robust. As a result, their understanding of the school’s strengths and priorities for improvement are not sufficiently detailed or accurate.
p.3
Safeguarding
The arrangements for safeguarding are effective. 26 and 27 June 2024
p.3
(Information for the school and appropriate authority)
In several subjects, the curriculum does not set out precisely what pupils should learn. This means that teaching and assessment are not sufficiently focused on the most important subject knowledge pupils need to secure. As a result, the tasks pupils complete sometimes lack ambition and pupils do not develop sufficient knowledge across the curriculum. The school should ensure the curriculum in each subject identifies and sequences the important concepts pupils need to learn. The school should also ensure that the activities provided match the ambition of the planned curriculum and that assessment is used well to identify and correct misconceptions. There has been insufficient training on how to support pupils with SEND to access the curriculum. As a result, some pupils are asked to complete tasks that lack ambition and do not help them to develop independence or the knowledge they need to progress through the curriculum. The school should ensure that training
p.4
(Information for the school and appropriate authority)
supports staff to make meaningful and appropriate adaptations for pupils with SEND. The provision for early reading and language development is not sufficiently robust. The planned opportunities to develop young children’s spoken language are not maximised. Similarly, the school’s chosen phonics programme is not implemented with consistent precision across the school. Consequently, pupils and children in early years are not fully supported to develop as accurate, confident and fluent readers. The school should ensure that the early years curriculum and chosen phonics programme are implemented in a way that systematically develops pupils’ early spoken language and reading knowledge. Leaders at all levels, including those responsible for governance, do not have sufficiently detailed oversight of the quality of education, behaviour and attendance. As a result, some of the priorities for improvement have not been
p.4
(Information for the school and appropriate authority)
timely nor consistently implemented. The school should ensure subject leaders have the appropriate training and opportunities to check the impact of the curriculum. The school should also ensure those responsible for governance receive sufficiently detailed information to support and hold leaders to account. This will help them to better identify specific areas for improvement and check the effectiveness with which they are implemented.
p.4
How can I feed back my views?
or to find out what other parents and carers think. We use information from Ofsted Parent View when deciding which schools to inspect, when to inspect them and as part of their inspection. 26 and 27 June 2024
p.4
5
The Department for Education has further guidance on how to complain about a school.
p.5
Further information
You can search for published performance information about the school.
p.5
Further information
In the report, ‘disadvantaged pupils’ is used to mean pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND); pupils who meet the definition of children in need of help and protection; pupils receiving statutory local authority support from a social worker; and pupils who otherwise meet the criteria used for deciding the school’s pupil premium funding (this includes pupils claiming free school meals at any point in the last six years, looked after children (children in local authority care) and/or children who left care through adoption or another formal route). 26 and 27 June 2024
p.5
School details
Appropriate authority The governing body
p.6
School details
Website www.cherrylane.hillingdon.sch.uk
p.6
School details
Dates of previous inspection 18 and 19 September 2019, under section 8 of the Education Act 2005
p.6
Information about this school
The school has a specially resourced provision for pupils with autistic spectrum disorder (ASD). Ten pupils currently attend the provision. The school currently use one registered alternative provision. The school runs a breakfast club.
p.6
Information about this inspection
The inspectors carried out this graded inspection under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.
p.6
Information about this inspection
Inspections are a point-in-time judgement about the quality of a school's education provision. 26 and 27 June 2024
p.6
7
This was the first routine inspection the school received since the Covid-19 pandemic began. Inspectors discussed the impact of the pandemic with the school and have taken that into account in their evaluation of the school. The inspectors held meetings with the headteacher, senior leaders, teachers and support staff. The lead inspector met with a group of governors, including the chair of the governing body. She also spoke with the local authority school improvement partner. The inspectors did deep dives in these subjects: reading, history, mathematics, and physical education. For each deep dive, inspectors discussed the curriculum with subject leaders, visited a sample of lessons, spoke with teachers, spoke with some pupils about their learning and looked at samples of their work. The inspectors also considered the curriculum in other subjects. To evaluate the effectiveness of safeguarding, the inspectors reviewed the single
p.7
7
central record of pre-employment checks; took account of the views of leaders, staff and pupils; and considered the extent to which the school has created an open and positive culture around safeguarding that puts pupils’ interests first. The inspectors scrutinised a range of documentation provided by leaders, including their priorities for improvement. The inspectors considered the views of parents, pupils and staff through discussions and their responses to Ofsted’s online surveys.
p.7
Inspection team
Matea Marcinko, lead inspector His Majesty’s Inspector
p.7
Inspection team
Alison Cartlidge Ofsted Inspector 26 and 27 June 2024
p.7
8
regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.
p.8
8
If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .
p.8
8
You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .
p.8
8
Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .
p.8
8
T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted
p.8
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion